跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.201.94.236) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/03/25 01:19
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:廖凰伊
研究生(外文):Valencia chandra
論文名稱:可比性、應計數之持續性與市場評價
論文名稱(外文):Comparability, Persistence of accruals and Market Evaluation
指導教授:李貴富李貴富引用關係
指導教授(外文):Kuei Fu-Li
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:銘傳大學
系所名稱:會計學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:38
中文關鍵詞:可比性持續性應計數錯誤定價
外文關鍵詞:comparabilitymispricing of accrualspersistence
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:298
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究係探討財務報表可比性對於應計數持續性與市場評價之影響。本文主張當公司之可比性較高時,其盈餘持續性較高,且應計數錯誤定價的現象較為減緩。本研究以2003年至2007年間台灣上市上櫃公司進行實證研究,結果顯示可比性較高之公司應計數持續性也比較高。其次,本文採用Mishkin-tests測試投資人是否能正確評估應計數之持續性,發現可比性較高之公司發生錯誤定價現象較低。此外,基於應計項目&;#63842;常現象所發展的投資組合策&;#63862;,相較於可比性較低,可比性較高之公司可獲的超額報酬較小。整體而言,較高之可比性可促使投資人正確評估應計數之持續性。
This study investigate the impact of the comparability of the financial statements for the accrual persistence and stock price reaction. This paper claim when the comparability of company high occurs higher earnings persistence and mitigate accrual mispricing phenomenon. In this study, empirical research data of Taiwan''s listed companies from 2003 to 2007 and the results provide higher comparability of company the accruals persistence is relatively high. Furthermore, we use Mishkin-tests to test whether the investor can correctly assess accrual persistence, the results show that higher comparable company occurs lower mispricing phenomenon. In addition, the development portfolio of abnormal accrual-based compared to the lower comparable company, higher comparable company may obtain smaller excess returns. Overall, higher comparability prompted investors to correctly assess the persistence of accruals.
目錄
目錄 I
第一章緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究架構 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 可比較性 4
第二節 市場效率性 7
第三節. 市場的影響 9
第四節 市場的異常現象 10
第五節 假說建立與發展 17
第三章 研究設計 20
第一節 可比性之衡量 20
第二節 實證模型:假說1a與假說1b 21
第三節 實證模型:測試假說2a與2b 23
第四節 資料來源與樣本期間 24
第四章 實證結果 25
第一節 敘述性統計 25
第二節 持續性實證結果 25
第三節 Mishkin test 實證結果 26
第四節 套利投資組合策略實證結果(Hedge Portfolio Test) 27
第五章 結論 28
參考文獻 29



表目錄
表1:變數之敘述性統量 …………………………………………………………………. 33
表2:相關係數鉅陳 ……………………………………………………………………….. 34
表3:持續性迴歸結果 ……………………………………………………………………. 35
表4:Mishkin test之實證結果 ………………………………………………………. 36
表5:投資組合報酬之迴歸結果 ……………………………………………………. 37

圖目錄
圖1-1:研究流程圖 …………………………………………………………………………. 3
參考文獻
中文文獻
1.周賓凰、張宇志、&;#63988;美珍,2007,「投資人情緒與股票報酬互動關係」,《證券市場發展季刊》,19 卷 2 期,頁 153-190
2.劉秉龍,「成長型與價值型投資策略之實證分析-以台灣股票市場為例」,《靜宜大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文》,民國九十一年六月。
3.戴國強、陸蓉,1999,「中國股票市場的週末效應檢驗」,《金融研究》,頁48-54。
4.&;#24352;仁良、胡斌,1997,「香港股市中的小&;#30424;股效&;#24212;及季&;#33410;效&;#24212;分析」,《系&;#32479;工程理&;#35770;方法&;#24212;用》第3 期,頁 44-9 。
英文文獻
1.A .Ali, X. Chen, T. Yao and T. Yu. 2008.:Do mutual fund profit from the accruals anomaly?Journal of accounting research Vol.46 No.1
2.Ball, R., &; Brown, P. 1968. An Empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 159-178
3.Bauman, W.S., C.M. Conover, and R.E. Miller. 1998. Growth versus value and large-cap versus small-cap stocks in international market, Financial Analysts Journal, 54, 75-89.
4.Bernard, V.,J. Thomas. 1989..Post earnings announcement drift: Delayed price response or risk premium?.Journal of Accounting Research,27,1-36.
5.Bradshaw, M., S. Richardson and R. Sloan . 2001. Do analysts and auditors use information in accruals? Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), 45-74.
6.Bushee, B. 1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&;D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 73(3), 305-333.
7.Capaul, C., I. Rowley, and W. F. Sharpe. 1993. International Value and Growth Stock Returns. Financial Analysts Journal 49(1): 27-36.
8.Chan, L.K.C.,J. Karceski,J. Lakonishok. 1998.The Risk and Return from Factors. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,33,159-188.
9.Chan, W. 2003. Stock price reaction to news and no-news: Drift and reversal after headlines, journal of financial economics, Journal of Financial Economics 70, 223-260.
10.Chan,K., L.K.C. Chan, N. Jagadeesh, and J. Lakonishok. 2006. Earnings quality and stock returns, Journal of Business Vol. 79, No.3, pp. 1041-1082
11.Chordia, T., L. Shivakumar. 2006. Earnings and price momentum. Journal of Financial Economics 80, 627-656
12.Collins, D., G. Gong, and P. Hribar. 2003. Investor sophistication and the mispricing of accruals. Review of Accounting Studies 8 (June): 251-276.
13.Cross, Frank. 1973. The behavior of stock prices on Fridays and Mondays﹐Financial Analysts Journal﹐Nov.-Dec.,67-69.
14.De Franco, G., S.P. Kothari, and R.S. Verdi. 2011. The benefits of financial statement comparability. Journal of Accounting Research 49: 895–931.
15.De Franco, Gus, Kothari, S.P. and Verdi, Rodrigo S. 2011. The Benefits of Financial Statement Comparability. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1266659 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1266659.
16.DeBondt, W. F. W. and Thaler, R. H. 1987. Further Evidence on Investor Overreaction and Stock Market Seasonality, Journal of Finance, 42, 557-582.
17.DeFond M., X. Hu, M. Hung, and S. Li. 2011. The impact of IFRS adoption on US mutual fund ownership: The role of comparability. Journal of Accounting and Economics 51: 240-258.
18.Fama, E. 1976. Foundations of Finance. New York: Basic Books.
19.Fama, E. F. 1970. Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work, Journal of Finance, 25, 383-417.
20.Fama, E. F. 1991. Efficient Capital Markets II, Journal of Finance, 46, 1575-1618.
21.FASB. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2: Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information. Available at http://www.fasb.org/pdf/con2.pdf (1980).
22.Frazzini, A., &; Lamont, O. 2007. The earnings announcement premium and trading volume. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w13090
23.French, K.R. 1980. Stock Returns and The Weekend Effect, The Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.8,1980,pp.55-69.
24.Gultekin, M. N. and N. B. Gultekin. 1983. Stock Market Seasonality: International Evidence, Journal of Financial Economics 12, 469-482.
25.Hong, H., T. Lim, and J.C. Stein. 2000. Bad news travels slowly size, analyst , coverage, and the profitability of momentum strategies, Journal ofFinancial Economics 55, 265-295.
26.Jaffe,J and Westerfield,R. 1985. The Weekend Effect in Common Stock Returns: The International Evidence, Journal of Finance, July 1985,pp.433-454.
27.James P. O’Shaughnessy. 1996. What Works on Wall Street: A Guide to the Best-Performing Investment Strategies of All Time, McGraw-Hill: New York,
28.Jegadeesh, N., 1990, Evidence of Predictable Behavior of Security Returns, Journal of Finance, 45, 881-898.
29.Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263-291.
30.Krisement V. 1997. An approach form measuring the degree of comparability of financial accounting information. The European Accounting Review, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 465-485.
31.Laderman, J. 1992. Growth vs. Value: Tips for the intrepid investor. Business Week, June 15, 136-137
32.Lakonishok, J., A. Shleifer and R. Vishny. 1994. Contrarian Investment Extrapolation and Risk. Journal of Finance 44:1541-1578
33.Leo G. Van der Tas. 1988. Measuring Harmonization of Financial Reporting Practice, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 18. No. 70, pp. 157-169.
34.Li, F. 2008. Annual Report Readability, Current Earnings, and Earnings Persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 45: 221-247.
35.Miller, B.P. 2010. The Effects of Reporting Complexity on Small and Large Investor Trading. The Accounting Review 85(6): 2107-2143.
36.Mishkin, F. 1983. A Rational Expectations Approach to Macroeconomics. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
37.Nofsinger J. R., and R. W. Sias. 1999. Herding and Feedback Trading by institutional and Individual Investors, The Journal of Finance, 2263-2295
38.Poterba, J., and Summers, L. 1988. Mean Reversion in Stock Prices: Evidence and Implications, Journal of Financial Economics, 22, 27-59
39.Ramaswami,M. 1994. Return Enhancement Through Size and Style Management, Blending Quantiative and Traditional Equity Analysis
40.Rogalski, R. J., and S.M. Tonic. 1984. The January Size Effect: Anomaly or Risk Mismeasurement? Financial Analysts Journal﹐Nov.-Dec.,1984, pp. 63-70.
41.Rozeff, M. S. and W. R. Kinney. 1976. Capital Market Seasonality: The Case of Stock Returns, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 379-402.
42.S. Grossman,J. Stiglitz. 1976. Information and Competitive Price Systems American Economic Review,246-253.
43.Schipper, K. and L. Vincent. 2003. Earnings Quality, Accounting Horizons, Vol.17, Supplement.
44.Shiller ,R. J. 2000 .Irrational Exuberance, Princeton University Press.
45.Shiller, R. J. 1984 . Stock prices and social dynamics, Brookings Papers on 35 Economic Activity 2, 457-498.
46.Sloan, R. G. 1996. Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings?The Accounting Review71(July):289-316.
47.Subramanyam, K. R. 1996. The Pricing of Discretionary Accruals,’ Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.22, No.1-3, Aug. - Dec.
48.Thomas, J., and H. Zhang. 2002. Inventory changes and future returns. Review of Accounting Studies 7 (June): 163-187.
49.Van der Tas, L. G. 1988. Measuring harmonisation of financial reporting practice. Accounting and Business Research, 18 (Spring), 157-169.
50.Wachtel, F. 1942. Certain Observations on Seasonal Movements in Stock Prices, Journal of Business 15, 184-193.
51.Xie, H. 2001. The mispricing of abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 76 (July): 357-373.
52.Yip, Rita W. Y. and Young, Danqing Xu. 2012. Does Mandatory IFRS Adoption Improve Information Comparability? Accounting Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2044295.
&;#8195;
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top