跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.168.16) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/04/02 02:40
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳氏秋簪
研究生(外文):Tran Thi Thu Tram
論文名稱:IFRS接軌後之市場流動性與資訊透明度
論文名稱(外文):Market Liquidity and Transparency under IFRS Convergence
指導教授:林淑瑛,陳禮潭陳禮潭引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shu-Ying, LinLii-Tarn, Chen
口試委員:謝佩芳,陳大仁林淑瑛陳禮潭
口試委員(外文):Pei-Fang, HsiehDa-Ren, ChenShu-Ying, LinLii-Tarn, Chen
口試日期:2014-06-16
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:明新科技大學
系所名稱:管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:英文
論文頁數:34
中文關鍵詞:市場流動性資訊透明度IFRS
外文關鍵詞:Market liquidityTransparencyIFRS
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:252
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:15
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is becoming a dominating accounting standards system all over the world. Taiwan’s financial accounting regulatory amendment directions shift the framework from the U.S. GAAP-based to IFRS to accelerate the pace of progress toward convergence with IFRS. This research aims to examine whether or not the stock market liquidity can be improved due to the transparency of information in the period of convergence. In the study, liquidity is proxied by 2 variables including zero return days and Amihud. Transparency is measured by 3 different variables which are earnings management, Information Disclosure and Transparency Ranking System from Securities and Futures Institute, and foreign investor proportion. Using the regression model on the 496 sample firms listed on Taiwan stock exchange for the period of 8 years from 2005 to 2012, the empirical analysis indicates that there is a significant positive relationship between transparency and liquidity, meaning that higher transparency, higher liquidity. The outcomes also presents that the sensitivity of liquidity level to transparency is enhanced when it is approaching to the IFRS adoption time.
Table of content
Abstract i
Acknowledgement ii
Table of content iii
List of tables iv
List of figures v
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW AND HYPOTHESES 4
2.1. IFRS: Background all over the world and in Taiwan 4
2.2. Liquidity and transparency 8
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY 13
3.1 Sample 13
3.2 Variables definition 13
3.2.1. Proxy for liquidity level 13
3.2.2. Proxy for transparency of information. 14
3.2.3 Control variables 15
3.3. T-test. 15
3.4. Regression models. 16
CHAPTER 4: EMPIRICAL RESULTS 18
4.1. Descriptive statistics 18
4.2. T-test 20
4.3. Regression models 21
4.3.1. Liquidity and transparency 21
4.3.2. Liquidity and ownership concentration. 29
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS 31
REFERENCES 32

1.Armstrong, C., Barth, M.E., Jagolizer, A., & Riedl, E.J (2010). Market Reaction to the Adoption of IFRS in Europe. The Accounting Review, 85(1), 31-61.
2. Barth, M., Landsman, W., & Lang, M. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467-498.
3. Chua, Y. L., Cheong, C. S., & Gould, G. (2012). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on accounting quality: Evidence from Australia. Journal of International Accounting Research, 11(1), 119-146.
4. Chung, H., Sheu, H. J., & Wang, J. L. (2009). Do firms’ earnings management pratices affect their equity liquidity. Finance Research Letters, 6, 152-158.
5. Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Verdi, R. (2008). Mandatory IFRS reporting around the world: Early evidence on the economic consequences. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(5), 1085-1142.
6. Dechow, P. M., & Skinner, D. J. (2000). Earnings management: Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators. Accounting Horizons, 14(2), 235-250.
7. DeFond, M., Hu, X., Hung, M., & Li, S. (2011). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on foreign mutual fund ownership: The role of comparability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 240-258.
8. Francis, J., Lafond, R., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2004). Cost of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review, 79, 967-1010.
9. Gordon, L. A., Loeb, M. P., & Zhu, W. (2012). The impact of IFRS adoption on foreign direct investment. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(4), 374-398.
10. Healy, P. M. (1985). The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, 85–107.
11. Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings managemnt literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365-383.
12. Horton, J., Serafeim, G., & Serafeim, I. (2013). Does mandatory IFRS adoption improve the information environment. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1), 388-423.
13. Hsu, C, H., & Lai, S, C. (2013). How does mandatory IFRS adoption impact on foreign investment? Evidence from Taiwan. Proceedings of 23rd International Business Research Conference.
14. http://www.sfi.org.tw
15. Iatridis, G., & Kadorinis, G. (2009). Earnings management and firm financial motives: A financial listed firms. International Review of Financial Analysis, 18(4), 164-173.
16. Jeanjean, T., & Stolowy, H. (2008). Do accounting standards matters? An explanatory analysis of earnings management before and after IFRS adoption. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(6), 480-494.
17. Landsman, W. R., Maydew, E. L., & Thornock, J. R. (2012). The information content of annual earnings announcements and mandatory of adoption of IFRS. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 53(1-2), 34-54.
18. Lang, M. H., & Maffett, M. G. (2011). Transparency and liquidity uncertainty in crisis periods. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 52(2-3), 101-125.
19. Lang, M., Lins, K. V., & Maffett, M. (2012). Transparency, liquidity and valuation: International on when transparency matters most. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 729-774.
20. Lang, M., Raedy, J, S., & Wilson, W. (2006). Earnings management and cross listing: Are reconciled earnings comparable to U.S. earnings? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1-2), 255-283.
21. Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P, D. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69, 505-527.
22. Lin, C. C., Hua, C. Y., Lin, W. H., & Lee, W. C. (2012). IFRS adoption and financial reporting quality: Taiwan experience. International Journal of Academic Research, 2(4), 285-294.
23. Ng, J. (2011). The efect of information quality on liquidity risk. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52(2-3), 126-143.
24. Nielsen, J. D., Feldhutter. P., & Lando, D. (2012). Corporate bond liquidity before and after the onset of the subprime crisis. Journal of Finance Economics, 103(3), 471-492.
25. Sadka, R. (2011). Liquidity risk and accounting information. Journal of Accounting and Economic, 52(2-3), 144-152.
26. Taiwan Economic Journal.
27. Tendeloo, V. B., & Vanstraelen, A. (2005). Earnings management under German GAAP versus IFRS. European Accounting Review, 14, 155-180.
28. Zéghal, D., Chtourou, S., & Sellami, Y, M. (2011). An analysis of the effect of mandatory adoption of IAS/IFRS on earnings management. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 20(2), 61-72.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top