臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

Total of 25 external-morphological quantitative characters from specimens, included 16 metric characters and 9 morphometric characters were used in this study to investigate the existence of similarities in morphological characters between individuals of the genus Teleogryllus, including Teleogryllus occipitalis, Teleogryllus mitratus and Teleogryllus spp. All of the 25 evaluated by the
coefficient of variation, and all accepted as the good character or useful characters. Analysis was demonstrated in Euclidean matrix, Canberra matrix and Minkowski matric, clustering with UPGMA. Collections in this study were distributed from Amu-Darja to Celebes, from Java to China. Results of genus Teleogryllus showed that there was no trend towards geographic relationship, and unfound to identify
between species in genus Teleogryllus when Euclidean matrix was applied as A coefficient; while Canberra matrix was applied as A coefficient, a small group of T. occipitalis was clustered with individuals were collected from locations close to the equator; when the Minkowski matrix was applied, T. occipitalis was also clustered but geographic distribution still very irregular in the latitude and
biogeographic subdivision. Same analysis method was used on specimens of Brachytrupes portentosus to explorer further application on chosen characters. However, there were no clustering as group and the geographic trend or pattern
was still very irregular in the latitude and biogeographic subdivision in all tested coefficient. Result of body growth and geographic trend analysis showed that there was medium to low relationship between body part growths and low-to-high latitude.

ABSTRACT .............................................. i

TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………......…………………………...ii

LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES…………………….……………………….…iii

INTRODUCTION ..........................................1

HISTORICAL REVIEW .....................................2

MATERIALS AND METHODS........................7

RESULTS ............................................... 9

DISCUSSION.............................. 14

REFERENCES .............................................16

TABLES ..........................................21

FIGURES ........................................... 29

Bateson, W. 1894. Materials for the Study of Variation: Treated with Especial Regard to Discontinuity in the Origin of Species: Kessinger Publishing, LLC.

Brady, R. H. 1994. Explanation, description and the meaning of ‘transformation’ in taxonomic evidence. In Scotland, R. W., Siebert, D. J. and Williams, D. M. (eds.), Models in Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 11-29
pp.

Bergmann, C. 1848. Über die Verhältnisse der Wärmeökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Göttinger Studien 3 (1): 595–708.

Boulidam, S. 2008. Edible insects in a Lao market economy. In Durst, P. B., Johnson, D. V., Leslie, R. N. and Shono, K. (eds.), Forest Insects as Food: Humans Bite Bac., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,
134 pp.

Gorochov, A. V. 1985. On the Orthoptera subfamily of Gryllidae (Orthopterea, Gryllidae) from eastern Indochina. In Medvedev, L. N. (ed.), Insect of Vietnam. 9-17 pp.

Brower, A. V. Z. and Schawaroch, V. 1996. Three steps of homology assessment. Cladistics 12: 265-275.

Carroll, S. B. 2006. Endless forms most beautiful: The new science of Evo Devo. W. W. Norton & Company.

Chopard, L. 1961. Les divisions du genre Gryllus basées sur l''étude de l''appareil copulateur (Orth. Gryllidae). Eos, Revista española de Entomología (Eos) 37(3):272.

Chopard, L. 1969. The fauna of India and adjacent countries (R. B. S. Sewell ed.). Orthoptera, Vol. 2, Gryllidea. Baptist Mission Press, Calcutta. 421 pp.

Colless, D. 1985. On “character” and related terms. Systematic Zoology 34: 229-233.

De Pinna, M.C.C. 1991. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistics paradigm. Cladistics 7: 367-394.

Donoghue, M. J. 1992. Homology. In Keller, E. F. and Lloyd, E. A. (eds.),
Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press, 170-179 pp.

Eades, D.C.; D. Otte; M.M. Cigliano & H. Braun. Orthoptera Species File. Version 5.0/5.0. [23-12-2013]. <http://Orthoptera.SpeciesFile.org>

Gift, N. and Stevens, P. F. 1997. Vagaries in the delimitation of character states in quantitative variation – an experimental study. Systematic Biology 46: 112-
125.

Jardine, N. 1969. The observational and theoretical components of homology: a study on the morphology of dermal skull-roofs of riphidistrian fishes. Biological Journal of Linnean Society. 18: 125-139.

Lai, C. F. 2000. Study on the Geographic Distribution, Morphology and Acoustics of Teleogryllus mitratus (Burmeister) and T. occipitalis (Serville)(Orthoptera:
Gryllidae) of the Oriental Region. Thesis of National Chung Hsing University.

Liu, S. H., J. T. Yang, H. K. Mok and C. T. Yang 1998. Acoustics and Taxonomy of Nemobiidae (Orthoptera) from Taiwan. Journal of Taiwan Museum 51(1):55-124.

Myers, A. A and Giller, P. S. 1988. Analytical Biology, an Intergrated Approach to the Study of Animal and Plant Distributions. Chapman and Hall. London, New York. 587 pp.

Nelson, G. J. and Platnick, N. I. 1981. Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance. New York: Columbia University Press.

Patterson, C. 1982. Morphological characters and homology. In Joysey, K. A. and Friday, A. E. (eds.), Problem of Phylogeny, Reconstruction. London: Academic Press, 21–74 pp.

Otte, D. and Alexander, R. D. 1983. The Australian crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Academic Natural Science Philadelphia, Monograph 22.

Otte, E. 1994. Orthoptera species file 1. Crickets (Grylloidea). The Orthopterists’ Society and the Academy of Natural Science of Philadelphia. Philadelphia, USA. 120 pp.

Patterson, C. 1983. Aims and methods in biogeography. In Sims, R. W., Price, J. H. and Whalley, P. E. S. (eds.), Evolution, Time and Space: The Emergence of the Biosphere, Systematics Association Special Volume 23. New York:
Academic Press.

Platnick, N. Ti. 1979. Philsophy and the transformation of cladistics. Systematic Zoology 28: 537-546.

Rapoport, E. H. 1983. Gloger’s rule and pigmentation of Collembola. Evolution 23: 622-626.

Razak, T. A., Ahmad, Y. H. and Ahmed, E. A. E. 2012. Nutritional evaluation of house cricket (Brachytrupes portentosus) meal for poultry. 7th Proceedings of
the Seminar in Veterinary Science 14-18.

Remane, A. 1952. Die Grundlagen des Natürlichen Systems, der Vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetick. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesllschaft.

Riedl, R. 1976. Die Strategie der Genesis. Zürich: R. Piper.
Rieppel, O. C. 1988. Fundamentals of Comparative Biology. Basel: Birkhäuser.

Sanderson, M. J. and Donoghue, M. J. 1996. The relationship between homoplasy and confidence in a phylogenetic tree. In Sanderson, M. J. and Hufford, L. (eds.) Homoplasy: the Recurrence of Similarity in Evolution. San Diego, CA:
Academic Press, 67-89 pp.

Shiraki, T. 1911. Monographie der Grylliden von Formosa, mit der öbersicht der Japanischen Arten 7. General Government von Formosa: Taipei, Taiwan. 1-129pp.

Stevens, P. F. 1984. Homology and phylogency: morphology and systematics. Systematic Botany 9: 395-409.
Stevens, P. F. 1991. Character states, morphological variation, and phylogenetic analysis: a review. Systematic Botany 16: 553-583.

Stevens, P. F. 1996. On phylogenies and data bases – where are the data, or are there any? Taxon 45: 95-98.

Stevens, P. F. 2000. On characters and character states: do overlapping and non-overlapping variation, morphology and molecules all yield data of the same value? In Scotland, R. and Pennington R. T. (eds.), Homology and Systematics.
London: Taylor and Francis Group, 81-105 pp.

Strait, D. S., Moniz, M. A. and Strait, P. T. 1996. Finite mixture coding: A new approach to coding continuous characters. Systematic Biology 45: 67-78.

Swiderski, D. L., Zelditch, M. L. and Fink, W. L. 1998. Why morphometrics isn’t special: coding quantitative data for phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 47: 508-519.

Tantrawatpan, C., Saijuntha, W., Pilab, W., Sakdakham, K., Pasorn, P. Thanonkeo, S., Thiha, Satrawaha, R. and Petney, T. 2011. Genetic differentiation among populations of Brachytrupes portentosus (Lichtenstein 1796) (Orthoptera:
Gryllidae) in Thailand and the Lao PDR: the Mekong River as a biogeographic barrier. Bulletin of Entomological Research 101: 687-696.

Thiele, K. 1994. The holy grail of the perfect character: The cladistics treatment of morphometric data. Cladistics 9: 275-304.
Townsend, B. C. 1980. A taxonomy study of two similar species of Teleogryllus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Journal of Natural History 14: 153-162.

Tsai, M. Y., and J. T. Yang 2005. A new species of the genus Alulatettix (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae) from Taiwan. Journal of Orthoptera Research 14(1):53-56.

Watt, C., Mitchell, S., and Salewski, V. 2010. Bergmann’s rule; a concept cluster? Oikos 119: 89-100.

Williams, D. M. and Siebert D. J. 2000. Characters, homology and three-item analysis. In Scotland, R. and Pennington R. T. (eds.), Homology and Systematics. London: Taylor and Francis Group, 183-208 pp.

Yang, J. T. and Y. L. Chang 1996. A new genus Taiwanemobius (Orthoptrna: Grylloidea: Grylidae: Nemobiinae) of ground crickets from Taiwan. Journal of Orthoptera Research 5: 61-64.

Yang, J. T. and C. T. Yang 1994. A new species of the genus Melanogryllus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Chinese Journal of Entomology 14(3):379-386.

Yang, J., T. and C. T. Yang 1995. Morphology and male calling sounds of Brachytrupes portentosus (Licht.) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Journal of Taiwan Museum 48(2):1-9.

Yang, J. T. and F. S. Yen 2001. Morphology and characters evaluation of scales in scaly crickets (Orthoptera:Grylloidea: Mogoplistidae). Zoological Studies 40 (3): 247-253.

Yeh, W. B., Y. L. Chang, J. S. Lin, F. S. Wu, and J. T. Yang. 2004. Genetic differentiation of Loxoblemmus appendicularis complex (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): speciation through vicariant and glaciation events. Annals of the
Entomological Society of America 97(4): 613-623.