臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

河道遷急點附近動輒出現數十至數百公尺的劇烈倒退沖刷(算是岩體尺度之大規模破壞)，甚可能與岩體之構造破壞（導因於弱面發達）之遷急點岩盤邊坡破壞有極大關連，其破壞極可能受到水流導致之額外作用力的影響。本研究導出水流作用力與重力合併作用下遷急點岩盤邊坡之抵抗上舉、滑動、與翻覆之穩定安全係數。若水流作用力(拖曳力與上舉力)可知，則可計算遷急點岩盤邊坡之各種破壞機制對應之安全係數。本研究以計算流體力學(computational fluid dynamics ，CFD)數值模擬估算河道遷急點坡面上所受之水流作用力，配合穩定分析，探討遷急點岩盤邊坡之穩定性，進而瞭解遷急點驚人沖刷速率之原因與破壞機制。本研究以大安溪案址現地資料模擬河道遷急點沖刷，得知下游順向段之遷急點附近之急速沖刷的主控機制有二：(a)在坡頂處是以塊體抽離為主、(b)在坡趾處則是以平面滑動為主，中游水平段之遷急點沖刷則是以坡頂塊體抽離形成河階狀地形為主。上游逆向段之遷急點附近之急速沖刷的主控機制制為：(a)在坡頂處是以塊體抽離為主、(b)在坡趾處則是以傾倒翻覆為主。以上主控機制皆符合現地觀察之現象。透過塊體穩定分析之結果，可證實一旦考慮水流作用力，即使岩塊尺寸巨大至數公尺以上，亦有機會發生構造破壞而沖蝕流失。可解釋遷急點附近為何可有驚人之倒退沖刷速率。 影響塊體穩定之主要相關因素為塊體尺寸、流量及岩層位態，而含沙濃度影響並不大。

Intense knickpoint retreat up to tens or hundreds meters annually likely involves structural failure of jointed rock masses which has a lot to do with the slope instability adjacent to the knickpoint. In addition to the gravitational load, the slope instability is likely affected by the induced forces exerted by the strong current in the flow channel.
In this thesis, the factors of safety for a rock block subjected to these loading against various failure modes, including uplift, sliding, and overturning, were formulated and calculated for a variety of conditions. The study made use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to simulate and to estimate the forces acting on a potential unstable rock block from the water current on a knickpoint. These forces from water flow, combined with the gravitational load, were then used to examine the factor of safety for different failure modes. The examination of the factor safety for the dominant failure mode can help to understand the true reason and failure mechanism for cases with an extremely high knickpoint retreat rate.
This study examined the erosion rate of a reach in the Daan River related to knickpoint retreat. Major mechanisms of knickpoint retreat in different section along this reach were identified. For knickpoint in dip rock, the major failure mechanisms may include plucking of the rock blocks near the head of the knickpoint slope and plane sliding of the rock blocks at the toe of the knickpoint slope. For knickpoint in horizontal rock, the major failure mechanism is solely the plucking of rock blocks near the head of the knickpoint slope. For knickpoint in reverse rock, the major failure mechanisms may include plucking of the rock blocks near the head of the knickpoint slope and overturning of the rock blocks at the toe of the knickpoint slope. All the control mechanisms are in compliance with the actual phenomenon observable in field.
Through the stability analysis, it appears even a rock block with its size a few meters large can become unstable when it is subjected to the forces from a strong current. This can explain the high erosion rate near a knickpoint in jointed rock masses. The major factors affecting the stability of the rock block may include block size, discharge, and the orientation of discontinuities.

目錄
中文摘要 I
Abstract III
誌謝 V
目錄 VI
圖目錄 VIII
表目錄 XI
第一章 緒論 1
1-1研究動機 1
1-2 研究目的與流程 6
第二章 文獻回顧 8
2-1岩質河床之沖刷機制 8
2.1.1剪力磨蝕作用(abrasion) 8
2.1.2顆粒彈跳撞擊作用(saltation) 9
2.1.3岩塊抽離作用（plucking） 10
2.1.4穴蝕作用(cavitation) 13
2-2 遷急點形成之概述 13
2-3 遷急點倒退速率與形式 17
2-3-1遷急點倒退速率 17
2-3-2.遷急點倒退機制與形式 26
2-4 遷急點岩體構造破壞機制 41
2-5 前人之岩質河床沖刷模擬 45
2-6 小結 47
第三章 研究方法與規劃 49
3-1 Comsol軟體跟所需模組之控制方程式 49
3-1-1　Comsol軟體介紹 49
3-2　模擬規劃 54
3-2-1 案例建模驗證水流作用力 54
3-2-2　2D模擬與3D模擬之差異 58
3-2-3.實際沖刷河段之模擬規劃 60
第四章 模擬結果及討論 88
4-1案例建模驗證水流作用力成果 88
4-2 二維與三維模擬之差異 92
4-3 大安溪實際沖刷案例成果 94
4-3-1 順向河段(zone 1，水流方向與岩層傾向相同) 95
4-3-3 逆向河段(zone3，水流方向與岩層傾向相反) 109
第五章 結論及建議 118
5-1 結論 118
5-2 建議 120
參考文獻 122
參考資料 126

1.馮正一、李俊男，2005，「邊坡穩定處理工程規劃設計準則及施工注意事項」，國立中興大學水土保持學系，期刊
2.吳麗娟 、鄧國雄，2000，「遷急點的地形意義及其研究」，中國地理學會會刊 第28期。
3.經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所，2011，「軟弱岩床劇烈沖蝕河段沖蝕行為之探討─以大安溪為例（1/3）」
4.林文凱，2008，「軟弱岩床河道的沖蝕機制與抗沖蝕力評估─以八掌溪為例」，國立交通大學土木工程系，碩士論文
5.盧泓佑，2012，「1999集集地震引致的河道遷急點倒退速率與倒退機制」，國立交通大學土木工程學系，碩士論文
6.翁翊桓，2013，「含砂水流磨蝕試驗」，國立交通大學土木工程學系，碩士論文
7.彭俊文，2009，「軟弱岩床河道沖蝕率模式建立-以大安溪及八掌溪為例」，國立交通大學土木工程學系，碩士論文
8.徐婉容、黃明萬、潘以文、廖志中，2013，「軟岩河床之河道變遷與遷急點倒退速率」，國立交通大學土木工程學系，國科會研究發表成果
9.黃明萬、潘以文、廖志中，2013，「大安溪軟岩河道的沖刷機制與演繹」，國立交通大學土木工程學系，國科會研究發表成果
10.皮托科技 Pitotech，2013，「COMSOL Multiphysics Reference Guide 4.4」
11.李佩錞，2009，“軟岩沖蝕之微觀數值模擬”，國立交通大學土木工程學系，碩士論文。
12.羅若瑜，2011，“床面剪應力及顆粒彈跳引致岩石磨蝕之微觀數值模擬”，國立交通大學土木工程學系，碩士論文。
13.鍾里泉(2011)，“塊體抽離沖蝕行為數值模擬”，國立交通大學土木工程研究學系，碩士論文。
14.江前昱，2012，“岩質河床塊體抽離沖刷之微觀數值模擬與簡化分析”，國立交通大學土木工程學系，碩士論文。
15.江秀旭，2003，“互層軟岩隧道破壞模式探討”，國立朝陽科技大學營建工程學系，碩士論文。
16.李國維, 江前昱, 羅若瑜, 鍾里泉, 潘以文, 廖志中, 2012. “ 軟岩沖刷力學機制之微觀數值模擬”, 2012岩盤工程研討會, 苗栗。
17.吳佳諺，2011，“軟弱岩石水平磨蝕率及磨蝕行為 ”， 國立交通大學土木工程學系，碩士論文。
18.郭炳宏,，2010，“多功能軟岩沖蝕試驗儀之建立”，國立交通大學土木工程學系，碩士論文。
19.Annandale, G.W., 1995, “ERODIBILITY.” Journal of Hydraulic Research, 33(4): pp. 471-494.
20.Annandale, G. W., 2006, “Scour technology.” McGraw Hill, New York.
21.Bollaert, E., 2010 “Rock Scour at Hydraulic Structures: A Practical Engineering Approach“, Geo-Strata, July/August, 2010, pp.26-33.
22.Crosby, B. T., and Whipple K. X. , 2006, “Knickpoint initiation and distribution within fluvial networks: 236 waterfalls in the Waipaoa River.” North Island, New Zealand, Geomorphology, 82: 16-38.
23.D. I. H. Barr,and Thomas Telford, 1993 , “Additional Tables for the Hydraulic Design of Pipes.” Sewers and Channels.
24.Gilbert, G. K., 1896, “Niagara Falls and their history:National Geographic Monograph.” v. 1, p. 203-236.
25.Gardner,T.W., 1983,“Experimental study of knickpoint and longnitudinal profile evolution in cohesive, homogeneous material.”Geological Society of America Bulletin, 94: 664-672.
26.Goodman,R.E., 1989,“Introduction to Rock Mechanics.” 2nd Edtion, John Wiley & Sons.
27.Huang, M.-W., Pan, Y.-W., Liao, J.-J., Cheng, M.-H. , 2012, “Knickpoint evolution across anticline structure: A case of uplifted reach in the Taan River, Taiwan.” Sixth International Conference on Scour and Erosion, Paris, France. p. 32-36
28.Hayakawa, Y., and Matsukura Y., 2003, “Recession rates of waterfalls in Boso Peninsula, Japan, and a predictive equation.” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 28: 675-684.
29.Hayakawa, 2009, “Rapid Recession of Fault-scarp Waterfalls Six-year Changes Following the 921 Chi-Chi Earthquake in Taiwan.”.Japanese Geomorphological Union,30-1,p.1-13.
30.Holland, W. N., and Pickup G. , 1976, “Flume study of knickpoint development in stratified sediment.” Geological Society of America Bulletin, 87: 76-82.
31.Hoek, E , 1987, “General Two-dimensional Slope Stability Analysis.” E.T. Brown, ed. , Analytical and Computational Methods in Engrg. Rock Mechanics, pp. 95-128
32.Ian M. Dubinski , Ellen Wohl , 2013, “Relationships between block quarrying, bed shear stress, and stream power:A physical model of block quarrying of a jointed bedrock channel.” Geomorphology,180-181,p66-81.
33.Nikuradse’s , 1933, “Laws of flow in rough pipes. Technical report. ” NACA Technical Memorandum 1292.
34.Pan, Y., Liao, J., Li, P., Li, G., 2010. “A Microscopic Study on Soft Rock Erosion by Using Particle Flow Simulation”, ICSE5. ASCE, Tokyo.
35.Turner, A. K., and Schuster, R. L., editors, 1996, “Landslides Investigation and Mitigation, Transportation Research Board”, TRB Special Report 247, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 673 pp.
36.Whipple, K. X, 2004 ,“Bedrock rivers and the geomorphology of active orogens.” Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 32: 151-185.