( 您好!臺灣時間:2024/02/26 22:35
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::


研究生(外文):Pin-tse Chen
論文名稱(外文):The Development Application and Learning Performance Analysis of Collaborative Kinesthetic English Learning System in a Vocational High School
外文關鍵詞:Total Physical ResponseCollaborative learningEnglish learningKinesthetic LearningKinect
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:314
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:40
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
本研究主要目的以全肢體反應教學法(Total Physical Response, TPR)理論為基礎,結合體感辨識科技與合作學習活動,探討Collaborative Total Physical Response(CTPR)對高職生英文學習之影響。本研究採用Kinect科技並開發出Collaborative Kinesthetic English Learning (CKEL)系統,結合兩人一組合作學習活動的實驗設計,並從系統使用過程、前測、後測、問卷與訪談活動中收集資料加以分析。

The main purpose of this study is to combine kinesthetic recognition technology and collaborative learning activities based on Total Physical Response (TPR) for investigating the effect of Collaborative Total Physical Response (CTPR) in English learning of vocational high school students. This study applies Kinect technology to develop a Collaborative Kinesthetic English Learning (CKEL) System which allow and two students to have collaborative learning activities in pairs. Besides, the experiment evaluation consists of using CKEL system record, pre-test, post-test, questionnaire and interview.
The analysis of technology acceptance model questionnaires and interviews show that the almost participants accepted CKEL system and learning activities of the experiment. According to the analysis of Keller’s Learning Motivation ARCS Questionnaire and interviews, the participants of experimental group had more confidence in this learning activities and the experimental design could enable them to improve learning motivation.
The learning outcomes of the experimental group was significantly better than the control groups in the post-test and the vocabulary part of posttest ,and the average mean of sentence part of posttest of the experimental group was higher than the control groups. In addition, the study analyzed the learning outcomes of using gestures, posture to learn different parts of speech based on TPR theory, and the results showed the verbs, nouns, adjectives learning were no significant difference. So, if the vocabulary can be combined with appropriate related action, it can be applied TPR theory to learn.
Finally, this learning style can enhance learning attention of participants, also give more active learning, promoting interaction and collaboration among members of the group. Therefore, CTPR is more suitable English language learning than the traditional personal TPR, this is due to the including of interaction and dialogue can enhance participants to have more confident and active.

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
致 謝 iv
目 錄 v
圖 目 錄 vii
表 目 錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機與目的 3
1.3 研究問題 5
1.4 研究範圍與限制 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
2.1 認知與語言學習相關理論 7
2.2 TPR應用體感科技於語言學習之研究 11
2.3 合作學習與TPR相結合 13
2.4 語言詞類與TPR的應用探討 16
第三章 系統設計與實作 17
3.1 系統設計 17
3.2 動覺的互動機制 19
3.3 學習活動模組 22
3.4 單人模式使用的系統 32
第四章 研究方法 33
4.1 研究對象 33
4.2 研究設計 34
4.3 研究流程 36
4.4 研究工具 37
4.5 活動設計 41
4.6 資料蒐集 44
4.7 資料處理與分析 45
第五章 結果分析與討論 47
5.1 問卷分析 47
5.1.1 科技接受模型(TAM) 47
5.1.2 凱勒學習動機(ARCS) 55
5.2 學習成效分析 61
5.2.1 前測差異檢驗 61
5.2.2 後測學習成效檢驗 61
5.3 基於肢體動作姿勢方式學習的不同詞類之學習成效分析 65
5.4 學習者的學習行為與學習成效間相關性之分析 67
5.4.1 學習階段活動與學習成效相關性之分析 67
5.4.2 遊戲活動和學習成效相關性之分析 70
5.5 學習者的學習行為與學習成效間迴歸分析 73
5.6 實驗組雙人的合作學習方式 75
5.7 意含與建議 79
第六章 結論與建議 81
6.1 結論 81
6.2 未來工作與建議 83
參考文獻 85
附錄一 字彙 89
附錄二 前測考卷 90
附錄三 後測句子測驗考卷 96
附錄四 開放性問卷 101
附錄五 訪談題目 102

Alexiadis, D. S., Kelly, P., Daras, P., O'Connor, N. E., Boubekeur, T., &; Moussa, M. B. (2011). Evaluating a dancer's performance using kinect-based skeleton tracking. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia.
Asher, J. J. (1966). The learning strategy of the total physical response: A review: ERIC Clearinghouse.
Asher, J. J. (1968). The total physical response method for second language learning: DTIC Document.
Asher, J. J. (1969). The Total Physical Response Approach to Second Language Learning*. The Modern Language Journal, 53(1), 3-17.
Blakemore, S.-J., &; Frith, U. (2005). The learning brain: Lessons for education: Blackwell publishing.
Cantoni, G. P. (1999). Using TPR-Storytelling To Develop Fluency and Literacy in Native American Languages. 53.
Carels, P. E. (1981). Pantomime in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 14(5), 407-411.
Carruthers, S. W. (2010). The Total Physical Response Method and Its Compatibility with Adult ESL Learners.
Chang, C. Y., Chien, Y. T., Chiang, C. Y., Lin, M. C., &; Lai, H. C. (2013). Embodying gesture‐based multimedia to improve learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), E5-E9.
Chang, C. Y., Lange, B., Zhang, M., Koenig, S., Requejo, P., Somboon, N., . . . Rizzo, A. A. (2012). Towards pervasive physical rehabilitation using Microsoft Kinect. Paper presented at the Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), 2012 6th International Conference on.
Chang, Y. J., Chen, S. F., &; Huang, J. D. (2011). A Kinect-based system for physical rehabilitation: A pilot study for young adults with motor disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2566-2570. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.002
Chang, Y. J., Chou, L. D., Wang, F. T. Y., &; Chen, S. F. (2013). A kinect-based vocational task prompting system for individuals with cognitive impairments. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17(2), 351-358. doi: 10.1007/s00779-011-0498-6
Chao, K. J., Huang, H. W., Fang, W. C., &; Chen, N. S. (2013). Embodied play to learn: Exploring Kinect-facilitated memory performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), E151-E155. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12018
Davis Jr, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 33456.
Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 27-50.
Garcia, R., Asher, J. J., &; Asher, J. (1988). Instructor's Notebook: How to Apply TPR for Best Results: Sky Oaks.
Gardner, H., &; Hatch, T. (1989). Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 4-10.
Guilherme, M. (2007). English as a global language and education for cosmopolitan citizenship. Language and Intercultural Communication, 7(1), 72-90.
Jorczak, R. L. (2011). An information processing perspective on divergence and convergence in collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 207-221. doi: 10.1007/s11412-010-9104-6
Kashiwagi, H., Xue, Y., Sun, Y., Kang, M., &; Ohtsuki, K. (2009). A Language Learning System Utilizing RFID Technology for Total Physical Response Activities. In J. Jacko (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction. Interacting in Various Application Domains (Vol. 5613, pp. 119-128): Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of instructional development, 10(3), 2-10.
Kelly, S. D., McDevitt, T., &; Esch, M. (2009). Brief training with co-speech gesture lends a hand to word learning in a foreign language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 313-334.
Kuhl, P. K. (2010). Brain mechanisms in early language acquisition. Neuron, 67(5), 713-727.
Kuo, F.-R., Hsu, C.-C., Fang, W.-C., &; Chen, N.-S. (2014). The effects of Embodiment-based TPR approach on student English vocabulary learning achievement, retention and acceptance. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1, Supplement), 63-70. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.10.003
Lange, B., Koenig, S., McConnell, E., Chang, C., Juang, R., Suma, E., . . . Rizzo, A. (2012). Interactive game-based rehabilitation using the Microsoft Kinect. Paper presented at the Virtual Reality Workshops (VR), 2012 IEEE.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching: Oxford university press.
Lindstromberg, S., &; Boers, F. (2005). From movement to metaphor with manner-of-movement verbs. Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 241-261. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami002
Liu, T.-Y., &; Chu, Y.-L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers &; Education, 55(2), 630-643.
Macedonia, M., &; von Kriegstein, K. (2012). Gestures Enhance Foreign Language Learning. BIOLINGUISTICS, 6(3-4), 393-416.
Nguyen, K., Stanley, N., &; Stanley, L. (2014). Storytelling in Teaching Chinese as a Second/Foreign Language.
Nijhof, W., &; Kommers, P. (1985). An analysis of cooperation in relation to cognitive controversy. Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn, 125-145.
Nikolaidou, G. N. (2012). ComPLuS model: A new insight in pupils’ collaborative talk, actions and balance during a computer-mediated music task. Computers &; Education, 58(2), 740-765. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.027
Pishkar, K., &; Ketabi, S. (2013). Effects of teaching of Modern American Drama As a Method for Speaking Fluency in BA EFL students. American Open Modern Language Journal, 1(1).
Pontual Falcão, T., &; Price, S. (2010). Interfering and resolving: How tabletop interaction facilitates co-construction of argumentative knowledge. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 539-559. doi: 10.1007/s11412-010-9101-9
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences.
Su, M.-C., &; Lin, H.-Y. (2013). A Simple Approach to a Human Action Recognition System and Its Application in an Interactive TPR-based English Learning System. Journal of Advanced Technology and Management, 3(2), 15-27.
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 97, 114.
Tellier, M. (2008). The effect of gestures on second language memorisation by young children. Gesture, 8(2), 219-235.
Tomasello, M., &; Tomasello, M. (2009). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition: Harvard University Press.
Vygotskiĭ, L. L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes: Harvard university press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wolfe, D. E., &; Jones, G. (1982). Integrating total physical response strategy in a level I Spanish class. Foreign Language Annals, 15(4), 273-280.
Wortzel, R. (1979). Multivariate analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Zack, M.(1999),” Developing a Knowledge Strategy.” California Management Review, 41(3), 125-143.
Yeo, T. M., &; Quek, C. L. (2011). Investigating design and technology students' peer interactions in a technology-mediated learning environment: A case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 751-764.
Zimmer, H. D. (2001). Why do actions speak louder than words? Action memory as a variant of encoding manipulations or the result of a specific memory system. Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory, 151-198.
周克謙. (2013). 體感科技支持全肢體反應教學法應用於高中英語教學之成效. (碩士論文).
游婷雅. (2007). 樂在學習的腦-神經科學可以解答的教育問題 (2007/05/16 ed.). 台北市: 遠流出版公司.

註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top