跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(3.236.50.201) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/08/05 19:36
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:江文心
研究生(外文):Chiang Wen-Hsin
論文名稱:聯盟多樣性對廠商績效影響之研究
論文名稱(外文):A study of Alliance Portfolio Diversity Impact on Firm Performance
指導教授:王俊賢王俊賢引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wang Chun-Hsien
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立嘉義大學
系所名稱:生物事業管理學系研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
畢業學年度:102
語文別:英文
論文頁數:59
中文關鍵詞:聯盟夥伴多樣性區域多樣性產品新穎開放性組合
外文關鍵詞:alliance partner diversityalliance geographic diversityproduct noveltyopennessportfolio
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:83
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
探索外部有效的資源為創新過程關鍵的特性。為了獲得外部知識來源,企業需要透過外部夥伴與自身創新基礎來獲取外部資源與擴展合作區域。本研究為實證調查聯盟夥伴多樣性與區域多樣性對產品與創新新穎程度的影響。本研究目的為基於外部多樣化連結的開放性策略下,分析了解開放式創新對企業產品發展的價值,其中的關鍵在於探索多樣性策略如何在高科技產業影響產品發展的成功。基於知識基礎理論的觀點,本研究提出多樣化組合,即夥伴多樣化與區域多樣化,會如何影響企業產品新穎性,其特色在於反映企業是否將外部資源內化,以強化創新的效果。本研究樣本取自2012年台灣行政院國家科學委員會所調查之區域創新調查(Community Innovation Survey; CIS),並以228家台灣高科技廠商作為調查對象。經實證研究結果發現聯盟夥伴多樣性與區域多樣性與新穎程度之間的關係呈現倒U曲線。
Searching for externally available resources had been characterized as a crucial part of the innovation process. To acquire external knowledge sources, firms must connect their in-house innovative based activities with external partner to access external resources and expand their cooperative region. This study examine the empirically that the alliance partner diversity and alliance geographic diversity affects the levels of product and innovative novelty. The purpose of this study is to analyze openness strategy based on external multiple linkages in order to understand the value of open innovation in firm’s product development. One of the key aims of the study is to explore how diversity strategic affects product development success in the high tech context. Building on the knowledge-based theory view of the firms, this study proposes that how these diversity portfolio including partners diversity and alliance geographic diversity, influence firm product novelty because this feature reflects whether the firms are likely to internalize external resources to enhance their innovation outcomes. This study tests hypotheses with a sample of 228 Taiwan high tech firms, drawn from the Community Innovation Survey (CIS) for 2012, survey by the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology. The empirically results finding that alliance partner diversity and alliance geographic diversity shows an inverted U-shaped effect on novelty.
Table of contents
Chinese abstract i
Abstract ii
Table of contents iii
List of Figures iv
List of Tables v
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research background and motivation 1
1.2 Research purposes 5
1.3 Research process 6
Chapter 2 Literature review 7
2.1 Open Innovation 7
2.2 External sources and alliance partner diversification 11
2.3 Alliance geographic diversity and performance 15
Chapter 3 Methodologies 18
3.1 Theoretical development and hypotheses 18
3.2 Data collection 26
3.3 Variable measures 28
Chapter 4 Empirical Results 32
4.1. Sample structure analysis 32
4.2. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analysis 35
4.3. Test of hypotheses 36
Chapter 5 Discussion and Conclusion 40
5.1 Discussion 40
5.2 Conclusion 44
5.3 Limitation of the study 46
Reference 47

Ahlstrom, D. (2010). Innovation and Growth: How Business Contributes to Society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 11-24. doi: 10.2307/29764971
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455. doi: 10.2307/2667105
Ahuja, G., and Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197-220.
Aitken, B. J., and Harrison, A. E. (1999). Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89(3), 605-618.
Almirall, E., and Casadesus-Masanell, R. (2010). Open versus closed innovation: A model of discovery and divergence. Academy of management review, 35(1), 27-47.
Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., and Gambardella, A. (2004). Markets for technology: The economics of innovation and corporate strategy: MIT press.
Baum, J. A., Calabrese, T., and Silverman, B. S. (2000). Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267-294.
Becker, W., and Dietz, J. (2004). RandD cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 209-223.
Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., and Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in RandD Cooperation Strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(8-9 ), 1237-1263.
Bianchi, M., Cavaliere, A., Chiaroni, D., Frattini, F., and Chiesa, V. (2011). Organisational modes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis. Technovation, 31(1), 22-33.
Bierly, P., and Chakrabarti, A. (1996). Generic knowledge strategies in the US pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(WINTER), 123-135.
Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure (Vol. 7): Free Press New York.
Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170-1182.
Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard.
Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., and Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation, 24(1), 29-39.
Carayannopoulos, S., and Auster, E. R. (2010). External knowledge sourcing in biotechnology through acquisition versus alliance: A KBV approach. Research Policy, 39(2), 254-267.
Cassiman, B., and Veugelers, R. (2002). RandD Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169-1184.
Chesbrough, H. (2003a). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating And Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Chesbrough, H. (2003b). Open platform innovation: Creating value from internal and external innovation. Intel Technology Journal, 7(3), 5-9.
Chesbrough, H., and Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&;D Management, 36(3), 229-236.
Christensen, J. F., Olesen, M. H., and Kjær, J. S. (2005). The industrial dynamics of Open Innovation—Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics. Research Policy, 34(10), 1533-1549.
Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128.
Dahlander, L., and Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699-709.
Dikova, D., Rao Sahib, P., and Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2010). Cross-border acquisitionabandonment and competition: The effect of institutional and organizationallearning in the international business service industry 1981–2001. Journal ofInternational Business Studies, 41: 223–245.
de Faria, P., Lima, F., and Santos, R. (2010). Cooperation in innovation activities: The importance of partners. Research Policy, 39(8), 1082-1092.
de Leeuw, T., Lokshin, B., and Duysters, G. (2014). Returns to alliance portfolio diversity: The relative effects of partner diversity on firm's innovative performance and productivity. Journal of Business Research, Available online 9 January 2014.
Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of economic literature, 1120-1171.
Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., and Tribó, J. A. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 38(1), 96-105.
Faems, D., Van Looy, B., and Debackere, K. (2005). Interorganizational Collaboration and Innovation: Toward a Portfolio Approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(3), 238-250.
Feldman, M.P., and Kogler, D.F., (2010). Stylized facts in the geography of innovation. In:Hall, R., Rosenberg, N. (Eds.), Handbook of The Economics of Innovation, Volume1. Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 381–410..
Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M. (1999). A mechanism of creativity. Poetics Today, 20(3), 397-418.
Fosfuri, A. (2006). The licensing dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing. Strategic Management Journal, 27(12), 1141-1158.
Garcia-Vega, M. (2006). Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firms. Research Policy, 35(2), 230-246.
Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. RandD Management, 36(3), 223-228.
Gay, B., and Dousset, B. (2005). Innovation and network structural dynamics: Study of the alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry. Research Policy, 34(10), 1457-1475.
Goerzen, A., and Beamish, P. W. (2003). Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1289-1306.
Goerzen, A., and Beamish, P. W. (2005). The effect of alliance network diversity on multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4), 333-354.
Granstrand, O., Bohlin, E., Oskarsson, C., and Sjöberg, N. (1992). External technology acquisition in large multi-technology corporations. RandD Management, 22(2), 111-134.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122.
Greene,William H. (2003), Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Prentice Hall: UpperSaddle River, NJ.
Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397-420.
Gulati, R., and Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? The American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439.
Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Inter-firm RandD partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960.
Hagedoorn, J., and Cloodt, M., (2003). Measuring innovative performance: is there anadvantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy 32, 1365–1379.
Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., and Chen, M.-J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659-684.
Harrison, D. A., and Klein, K. J., (2007). What’s the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. The Academy of Management Review 32 (4), 1199–1228.
Hejazi, W. (2007). Reconsidering the concentration of US MNE activity: Is it global, regional or national? Management International Review, 47(1), 5-27.
Hemmert, M. (2004). The influence of institutional factors on the technology acquisition performance of high-tech firms: survey results from Germany and Japan. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 1019-1039.
Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., and Ireland, R. D. (1994). A mid-range theory of the interactive effects of international and product diversification on innovation and performance. Journal of Management, 20(2), 297-326.
Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., and Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management journal, 40(4), 767-798.
Huutoniemi, K., Klein, J. T., Bruun, H., and Hukkinen, J. (2010). Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators. Research Policy, 39(1), 79-88.
Hwang, J., Kim, E., and Kim, S. (2009). Factors affecting open technological innovation in open source software companies in Korea. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 11(3), 279-290.
Inkpen, A. (1998). Learning, knowledge acquisition, and strategic alliances. European Management Journal, 16(2), 223-229.
Jiang, R. J., Tao, Q. T., and Santoro, M. D. (2010). Alliance portfolio diversity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31(10), 1136-1144.
Keil, T., Maula, M., Schildt, H., and Zahra, S. A. (2008). The effect of governance modes and relatedness of external business development activities on innovative performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(8), 895-907.
Kim, C.-S., and Inkpen, A. C. (2005). Cross-border RandD alliances, absorptive capacity and technology learning. Journal of International Management, 11(3), 313-329.
Kogut, B. (1986). Designing global strategies: profiting from operation flexibility. The International Executive, 28(1), 15-17.
Koput, K. W. (1997). A Chaotic Model of Innovative Search: Some Answers, Many Questions. Organization Science, 8(5), 528-542.
Köhler, C., Sofka, W., and Grimpe, C., (2012), Selective search, sectoral patterns, and the impact on product innovation performance, Research Policy 41 (2012) 1344–1356.
Lane, P. J., and Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461-477.
Laursen, K., and Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150.
Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., and Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), 290-300.
Lichtenthaler, U. (2008). Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 55(1), 148-157.
Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Outbound open innovation and its effect on firm performance: examining environmental influences. RandD Management, 39(4), 317-330.
Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). Open Innovation: Past Research, Current Debates, and Future Directions. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 75-93.
Love, J. H., Roper, S., and Bryson, J. R. (2011). Openness, knowledge, innovation and growth in UK business services. Research Policy, 40(10), 1438-1452.
Lubatkin, M., Florin, J., and Lane, P. (2001). Learning together and apart : A model of reciprocal interfirm learning (Vol. 54). London, ROYAUME-UNI: Sage Publications.
Miller, D. J., Fern, M. J., and Cardinal, L. B. (2007). The Use of Knowledge for Technological Innovation within Diversified Firms. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 308-326.
Milliken, F.J., and Martins, L.L., (1996). Searching for common threads: understanding themultiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. The Academy of ManagementReview 21 (2), 402–433.
Nadler, D., and Tushman, M. (1997). Competing by design: The power of organizational architecture: Oxford University Press.
Nohria, N., and Eccles, R. G. (1992). Networks and organizations: Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
Nooteboom, B. (1999). Innovation and inter-firm linkages: new implications for policy. Research Policy, 28(8), 793-805.
Noseleit, F., and de Faria, P. (2013). Complementarities of internal RandD and alliances with different partner types. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2000-2006.
Østergaard, C. R., Timmermans, B., and Kristinsson, K. (2011). Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy, 40(3), 500-509.
Parkhe, A. (1993). Partner Nationality and the Structure-Performance Relationship in Strategic Alliances. Organization Science, 4(2), 301-324.
Phelps, C. C. (2010). A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Academy of Management journal, 53(4), 890-913.
Powell, W., Koput, K., and Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145.
Qian, G., Khoury, T. A., Peng, M. W., and Qian, Z. (2010). The performance implications of intra- and inter-regional geographic diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9), 1018-1030.
Quintana-García, C., and Benavides-Velasco, C. A. (2008). Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification. Research Policy, 37(3), 492-507.
Raasch, C., Lee, V., Spaeth, S., and Herstatt, C. (2013). The rise and fall of interdisciplinary research: The case of open source innovation. Research Policy, 42(5), 1138-1151.
Sammarra, A., and Biggiero, L. (2008). Heterogeneity and Specificity of Inter-Firm Knowledge Flows in Innovation Networks. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 800-829.
Spithoven, A., Clarysse, B., and Knockaert, M. (2011). Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation, 31(1), 10-21.
Srivastava, M. K., and Gnyawali, D. R. (2011). When do relational resources matter? Leveraging portfolio technological resources for breakthrough innovation. Academy of Management journal, 54(4), 797-810.
Stuart, T. E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 791-811.
Subramaniam, M., and Youndt, M. A. (2005). The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450-463.
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305.
Teirlinck, P., and Spithoven, A. (2008). The spatial organization of innovation: open innovation, external knowledge relations and urban structure. Regional Studies, 42(5), 689-704.
Terjesen, S., Patel, P. C., and Covin, J. G. (2011). Alliance diversity, environmental context and the value of manufacturing capabilities among new high technology ventures. Journal of Operations Management, 29(1-2), 105-115.
Tsai, K.-H. (2009). Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy, 38(5), 765-778.
Tsai, K.-H., and Wang, J.-C. (2009). External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey. Research Policy, 38(3), 518-526.
Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance. Academy of Management journal, 44(5), 996-1004.
Valvano, S., and Vannoni, D. (2003). Diversification strategies and corporate coherence evidence from Italian leading firms. Review of Industrial Organization, 23(1), 25-41.
van Rijnsoever, F. J., and Hessels, L. K. (2011). Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Policy, 40(3), 463-472.
Vanhaverbeke, W., Van de Vrande, V., and Cloodt, M. (2008). Connecting Absorptive Capacity and Open Innovation SSRN eLibrary.
Van de Vrande, V., Lemmens, C., and Vanhaverbeke, W. (2006). Choosing governance modes for external technology sourcing. R&;D Management, 36(3), 347-363.
Very, P., Lubatkin, M., Calori, R., and Veiga, J. (1997). Relative standing and performance of recently acquired European firms. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 593–614.
Voelker, R., and Stead, R. (1999). New Technologies and International Locational Choice for Research and Development Units: Evidence from Europe. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 11(2), 199-209.
Von Hippel, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation: New York: OxfordUniversity Press.
Wagner, S. M. (2013). Partners for Business-to-Business Service Innovation. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 60(1), 113-123.
Wan, W.P., Hoskisson, R. E., Short, J. C., and Yiu, D.W., (2011). Resource-based theory and corporate diversification : accommplishmens and opportunities. Journal of Management 37 (5), 1335-1368.
Wang, C.-H., and Chien, P.-Y. (2013). Exploring the Nanotechnology Alliances of Nanotechnology Firms: The Roles of Network Position and Technological Uncertainty. Science Technology and Society, 18(2), 139-164.
Wu, J., and Wu, Z. (2014). ocal and international knowledge search and product innovation: The moderating role of technology boundary spanning. Interational Business Review, 23, 542-551.
Zahra, S. A., and George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
Zhou, K. Z., and Li, C. B. (2012). How Knowledge Affects Radical Innovation: Knowledge Base, Market Knowledge Acquisition, And Internal Knowledge Sharing. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1090-1102.


連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top