臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

雲端運算是一種架構於網際網路上的應用服務，其特點是使用者不需要複雜的安裝與定時的維護，只需透過網路就可以使用，不管是在企業或是個人日常生活中都已被廣泛應用。而雲端的服務模式分為三種，分別為架構即服務(IaaS)、平台即服務(PaaS)及軟體即服務(SaaS)，根據市調機構IDC預測，SaaS若能在雲端運算中扮演關鍵角色的話，屆時SaaS服務將占雲端產業75%產值，並且於2015年雲端服務市場將達729億美元，足以見到SaaS模式在全球受歡迎的程度，而SaaS模式也將會是未來軟體產業的新趨勢。
軟體即服務(Software-as-a-Service; SaaS)是近年來發展熱門的資訊服務，提供更多的便利性，以協助日常及工作上的使用者，然而可能會因為SaaS提供者提供服務之便利性不佳，以及與使用者互動關係薄弱，以至於使用者無法信任提供者。本研究主要以社會資本理論作為核心，藉此分析SaaS提供者提供的科技便利性如何影響與使用者的關係，並深入了解使用者對於SaaS提供者所提供服務之信任。利用問卷調查法收集相關使用SaaS來協助日常及工作的個人使用者，從而收集到的有效問卷共216份，研究結果發現，(1) SaaS提供者所提供的科技便利性會影響與使用者的社會資本，有正向的影響(2) SaaS提供者與使用者的社會資本對於使用者使用SaaS產生的信任，有正向的影響。

Cloud computing is an architecture in application services on the Internet that does not require complex installation and regular maintenance. It can be easily accessed through the Internet and it has already been widely used in business as well as in daily personal lives. The cloud service has three models, namely: Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS) and Software as a Service (SaaS). According to a forecast made by the market research firm, IDC, if SaaS can play a key role in cloud computing, then SaaS cloud services will account for 75% of industrial output, and the market for cloud services will reach $ 72.9 billion in 2015; enough to see the SaaS model gaining worldwide popularity and inevitably becoming the new trend in software industry in the future.

Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) has evolved to become a popular information service, providing greater convenience and assistance to end-users both at work and in their daily routines. This research focuses on Social Capital Theory (Relational capital & Cognitive capital) and Technology Facilitating conditions to analyze how SaaS Providers relates and interacts with end-users. A more detailed examination of how end-users determine the trustworthiness of SaaS Providers will also be discussed. Questionnaires are used to gather and investigate the impact SaaS has on end-users at work and in their daily routines. The results of the questionnaires gathered from 216 samples SaaS end-users found that (1) The Technology Facilitating conditions made possible by the technological innovation of SaaS Providers will positively affect the relational and cognitive capital of end-users, and (2) SaaS Providers and end-users’ relational and cognitive capital will positively affect the trustworthiness that end-users have on SaaS Provider.

中文摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌　謝 IV
目　錄 V
表目錄 VII
圖目錄 VIII
壹、緒論 1
一、研究背景 1
二、研究動機 4
三、研究目的 5
四、研究範圍 5
五、論文結構與研究流程 6
六、研究程序 6
貳、文獻探討 9
一、雲端運算(Cloud Computing) 9
(一)基礎設施即服務(Infrastructure as a Service; IaaS) 10
(二)平台即服務(Platform as a Service; PaaS) 11
(三)軟體即服務(Software as a Service; SaaS) 11
二、軟體即服務(Software-as-a-Service; SaaS) 12
三、社會資本理論(Social Capital Theory，SCT) 13
(一) 關係資產(Relational Capital) 14
(二) 認知資產(Cognitive capital) 16
四、信任(Trust) 17
五、科技便利性(Technology-Facilitating Conditions) 18
參、研究方法與設計 20
一、研究假說與模式推導 20
(一) 「關係資產」與「信任」之關係 20
(二) 「認知資產」與「信任」之關係 21
(三) 「科技便利性」對「關係資產」與「認知資產」之關係 22
二、研究模型與各變項說明 22
(一) 自變項 24
(二) 中介變項 24
(三) 依變項 24
(四) 控制變數 25
三、研究變數的操作型定義與衡量 25
(一) 科技便利性(Technology-Facilitating conditions) 25
(二) 關係資產(Relational Capital) 26
(三) 認知資產(Cognitive Capital) 27
(四) 信任(Trust) 27
四、問卷設計 29
五、研究樣本 31
肆、資料收集與分析 32
一、資料收集 32
二、資料分析 34
(一)測量模式分析 34
(二)結構模式分析 39
伍、結論與未來發展 45
一、研究發現 45
二、研究結果 46
(一) 「科技便利性」對「關係資產」和「認知資產」之驗證性分析 46
(二) 「關係資產」和「認知資產」對「信任」之驗證性分析 47
三、研究貢獻 47
四、研究限制 48
(一) 研究類別之限制 48
(二) 發放問卷之限制 48
(三) 研究變數之限制 49
五、未來研究方向 49
(一) 增加雲端應用服務的延伸 50
(二) 增加軟體即服務延伸於不同產業 50
參考文獻 51
一、中文文獻 51
二、英文文獻 51

一、中文文獻
1.邱皓政 (2002). 量化研究與統計分析. 台北市, 五南.
2.張紹勳 (2001). 研究方法, 滄海書局.
3.資策會FIND. (2013). "2013消費者五大雲端網路應用行為調查."
二、英文文獻
1.Adler, P. S. and S.-W. Kwon (2002). "Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept." The Academy of Management Review 27(1): 17-40.
2.Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny (1986). "The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6): 1173.
3.Benlian, A. and T. Hess (2011). "Opportunities and risks of software-as-a-service: Findings from a survey of IT executives." Decision Support Systems 52(1): 232-246.
4.Benlian, A., T. Hess and P. Buxmann (2009). "Drivers of SaaS-Adoption - An Empirical Study of Different Application Types." Business & Information Systems Engineering 1(5): 357-369.
5.Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. New York, Greenwood.
6.Bourdieu, P. and R. Nice (1977). Outline of A Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press.
7.Brown, S. A., A. R. Dennis and V. Venkatesh (2010). "Predicting Collaboration Technology Use: Integrating Technology Adoption and Collaboration Research." Journal of Management Information Systems 27(2): 9.
8.Brownlie, J. and A. Howson (2005). "''Leaps of Faith'' and MMR: An Empirical Study of Trust." Sociology : the Journal of the British Sociological Association 39(2): 221-239.
9.Buyya, R., C. S. Yeo and S. Venugopal (2008). Market-Oriented Cloud Computing: Vision, Hype, and Reality for Delivering IT Services as Computing Utilities IEEE Computer Society Washington.
10.Cannon, J. P., R. S. Achrol and G. T. Gundlach (2000). "Contracts, norms, and plural form governance." Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28(2): 180-194.
11.Carini, R., J. Hayek, G. Kuh, J. Kennedy and J. Ouimet (2003). "College Student Responses to Web and Paper Surveys: Does Mode Matter?" Research in Higher Education 44(1): 1-19.
12.Chin, W. W. (1998). "Issues And Opinion On Structural Equation Modeling." MIS Quarterly 22(1): VII-XVI.
13.Chiu, C.-M., M.-H. Hsu and E. T. G. Wang (2006). "Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities: An Integration of Social Capital And Social Cognitive Theories." Decision Support Systems 42(3): 1872-1888.
14.Chou, S.-W. and Y.-C. Chang (2008). An Empirical Investigation of Knowledge Creation in Electronic Networks of Practice: Social Capital and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual.
15.Chou, S.-W., Y.-C. Chang and P.-H. Hsieh (2014). "Understanding the performance of software-as-a-service based on servicedominant logic." The Service Industries Journal: 645-658.
16.Chou, S.-W. and C.-H. Chiang (2013). "Understanding the formation of software-as-a-service (SaaS) satisfaction from the perspective of service quality." Decision Support Systems 56: 148.
17.Choudhary and Vidyanand (2007). "Comparison of Software Quality Under Perpetual Licensing and Software as a Service." Journal of Management Information Systems 24(2): 141.
18.Chunlan, L. (2011). Value of Cloud Computing by the View of Information Resources.
19.Coleman, J. (1988). "Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital." American Journal of Sociology 94: S95-S120.
20.Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard University Press.
21.Colquitt, J. A., B. A. Scott and J. A. LePine (2007). "Trust, Trustworthiness, And Trust Propensity: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Unique Relationships with Risk Taking and Job Performance." Journal of Applied Psychology 92(4): 909.
22.Cusumano, M. (2010). "Cloud computing and SaaS as new computing platforms." Commun. ACM 53(4): 27-29.
23.Davis, J. M., W. J. Kettinger and D. G. Kunev (2009). "When users are IT experts too: the effects of joint IT competence and partnership on satisfaction with enterprise-level systems implementation." European Journal of Information Systems 18(1): 26-37.
24.Dommeyer, C. J. and E. Moriarty (2000). "Comparing two forms of an e-mail survey: Embedded vs. attached." Market Research Society. Journal of the Market Research Society 42(1): 39-50.
25.Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker (1981). "Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics." Journal of Marketing Research 18(3): 382.
26.Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity The Globe and Mail (Index-only). Toronto, Ont.: 0.
27.Ganesan, S. (1994). "Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships." Journal of Marketing 58(2): 1.
28.Grootaert, C. and T. V. Bastelaer (2002). The Role of Social Capital in Development: An Empirical Assessment, Cambridge University Press.
29.Hair, J. F. and R. E. Anderson (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall.
30.Heart, T. and N. Pliskin (2002). "Business-to-business eCommerce of Information Systems: Two cases of ASP-to-SME eRental." Infor 40(1): 23-34.
31.Ibrahim, M. and P. M. Ribbers (2009). "The Impacts of Competence-Trust and Openness-Trust on Interorganizational Systems." European Journal of Information Systems 18(3): 223-234.
32.Lane, P. J. and M. Lubatkin (1998). "Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning." Strategic Management Journal (1986-1998) 19(5): 461.
33.Li, J. J., L. Poppo and K. Z. Zhou (2010). "Relational mechanisms, formal contracts, and local knowledge acquisition by international subsidiaries." Strategic Management Journal 31(4): 349.
34.Macneil, I. R. (1980). The New Social Contract: An Inquiry Into Modern Contractual Relations, Yale University Press.
35.Mather, T., S. Kumaraswamy and S. Latif (2009). Cloud Security and Privacy: An Enterprise Perspective on Risks and Compliance, O''Reilly Media, Inc.
36.Mayer, J. D. and P. Salovey (1993). "The Intelligence of Emotional Intelligence." Intelligence 17: 433-442.
37.McCabe, S. E. (2004). "Comparison of web and mail surveys in collecting illicit drug use data: a randomized experiment." Journal of drug education 34(1): 61-72.
38.McKnight, D. H., L. L. Cummings and N. L. Chervany (1998). "Initial Trust Formation In New Organizational Relationships." Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review 23(3): 473-490.
39.Mell, P. M. and T. Grance (2011). SP 800-145. The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing, National Institute of Standards \& Technology.
40.Mertz, S. A., C. Eschinger, T. Eid, H. H. Huang, C. Pang and B. Pring. (2009). "Market trends: Software as a service, worldwide, 2008-2013, update.".
41.Mishra, A. K. (1996). Organizational Responses to Crisis: The Centrality of Trust.
42.Moorman, C., R. Deshpande and G. Zaltman (1993). "Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships." Journal of Marketing 57(1): 81.
43.Mulligan, P. and S. R. Gordon (2002). "The impact of information technology on customer and supplier relationships in the financial services." International Journal of Service Industry Management 13(1): 29-46.
44.Nahapiet, J. and S. Ghoshal (1998). "Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage." The Academy of Management Review 23(2): 242-266.
45.Nooteboom, B. (2002). Trust: Forms, Foundations, Functions, Failures and Figures, Edward Elgar.
46.Pavlou, P. A. and M. Fygenson (2006). "Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior." MIS Quarterly 30(1): 115-143.
47.Pealer, L. N., R. M. Weiler, R. M. Pigg, D. Miller and S. M. Dorman (2001). "The feasibility of a web-based surveillance system to collect health risk behavior data from college students." Health Education Behavior 28(5): 547-559.
48.Shiau, W.-L. and M. M. Luo (2013). "Continuance intention of blog users: the impact of perceived enjoyment, habit, user involvement and blogging time." Behaviour and Information Technology 32(6): 570-583.
49.Sirdeshmukh, D., J. Singh and B. Sabol (2002). "Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges." Journal of Marketing 66(1): 15-37.
50.Sobel, M. (1982). "Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models." Sociological Methodology 13: 290-312.
51.Sun, Y., Y. Fang, K. H. Lim and D. Straub (2012). "User Satisfaction with Information Technology Service Delivery: A Social Capital Perspective." Information Systems Research 23(4): 1195-1211,1379,1381-1382.
52.Susarla, A., A. Barua and A. Whinston (2009). "A Transaction Cost Perspective of the "Software as a Service" Business Model." J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 26(2): 205-240.
53.Susarla, A., A. Barua and A. B. Whinston (2010). "Multitask Agency, Modular Architecture, and Task Disaggregation in SaaS." Journal of Management Information Systems 26(4): 87.
54.Tabachnick, B. G. and L. S. Fidell (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.), Allyn & Bacon.
55.Taylor, S. and P. A. Todd (1995). "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models." Information Systems Research 6(2): 144.
56.Tsai, W. and S. Ghoshal (1998). "Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks." Academy of Management Journal 41(4): 464-476.
57.Venkatesh, V., S. A. Brown, L. M. Maruping and H. Bala (2008). "Predicting Different Conceptualizations of System Use: The Competing Roles of Behavioral Intention, Facilitating Conditions, and Behavioral Expectation." MIS Quarterly 32(3): 483.
58.Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis and F. D. Davis (2003). "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1." MIS Quarterly 27(3): 425-478.
59.Viswanath, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis and F. D. Davis (2003). "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1." MIS Quarterly 27(3): 425-478.
60.Wasko, M. M. and S. Faraj (2005). "Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice1." MIS Quarterly 29(1): 35-57.
61.Watson, G. W. and S. D. Papamarcos (2002). "Social Capital and Organizational Commitment." Journal of Business and Psychology 16(4): 537.
62.Wiertz, C. and R. Ko de (2007). "Beyond the Call of Duty: Why Customers Contribute to Firm-hosted Commercial Online Communities." Organization Studies 28(3): 347-376.
63.Willemyns, M., C. Gallois and V. Callan (2003). "Trust me, I''m your boss: Trust and power in supervisor–supervisee communication." The International Journal of Human Resource Management 14(1): 117-127.
64.Witte, J. C., L. M. Amoroso and P. E. N. Howard (2000). "Research methodology: method and representation in Internet-based survey tools\—mobility, community, and cultural identity in Survey2000." Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 18(2): 179-195.
65.Wixom, B. H. and H. J. Watson (2001). "An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success." MIS Q. 25(1): 17-32.
66.Zaheer, A., B. McEvily and V. Perrone (1998). "Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance." Organization Science 9(2): 141-159.