中文部分
李壬癸,2010,《珍惜台灣南島語言》。臺北:前衛。
李壬癸,2011,《台灣南島民族的族群與遷徙》。臺北:前衛。
李戰子,2007,《語氣‧情態》導讀。北京:世界圖書。
林健豪,2008,《泰雅語L’olu方言刪略結構》。國立高雄師範大學台灣文化及語言研究所碩士論文。吳新生,2008,《尖石泰雅語詞綴研究》,國立新竹師範學院台灣語言與語文教育研究所碩士論文。徐晶凝,2008,《現代漢語話語情態研究》。北京:昆侖。
陳傑惠,1996,《賽德克語中原地區方言否定詞初探》。國立清華大學語言學研究所碩士論文。張仲良,1996,《賽德克語疑問詞的研究》。國立清華大學語言學研究所碩士論文。黃郁純,1999,《漢語能願動詞之語義研究》。國立臺灣師範大學華語文教學系研究所碩士論文。湯廷池,2000,〈漢語的情態副詞:語意內涵與句法功能〉,《中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊》,第71本,第1分,頁199-219。湯廷池、湯志真,1997,〈華語情態詞序論〉,世界華文教育協進會編《第五屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集:語文分析組》,頁 175-197,台北:世界華文出版社。
黃美金,2000,《泰雅語參考語法》。臺北:遠流。
鄭縈,2001,<從語料庫看漢語情態動詞的語序>,靜宜人文學報14:42-69。蔡維天,1997,<台灣南島語疑問詞的無定用法>,清華學報:383-422。
蔡維天,2010,<談漢語模態詞的分佈與詮釋之對應關係>,《中國語文》第3期(總第336期)。
錢玉章,2001,《從音韻學的角度看泰雅的標音系統-以桃山方言為例》,國立新竹師範學院台灣語言與語文教育研究所碩士論文。謝佳玲,2002,《漢語的情態動詞》。國立清華大學語言學研究所博士論文。謝佳玲,2006,<華語廣義與狹義情態詞的分析>,華語文教學研究:3.1:1-25。蘇美娟,2004,《泰雅語桃山方言否定詞研究》,國立新竹師範學院台灣語言與語文教育研究所碩士論文。外文部分
Butle, Jonny. 2003. A minimalist treatment of modality. Lingua. 113. 967-996.
Chang, Henry Yungli. 2006. The guest playing host: Modifiers as matrix verbs in Kavalan. Clause Structure and Adjuncts in Austronesian Languages, ed. by Hans-Martin Gaertner et al., Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Chang, Henry Yungli. 2010. On the syntax of adverbial verbs in Formosan languages. Austronesian Contribution to Theoretical Linguistics. by Lisa Travis et al., Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chen, Sih-wei. 2007. Applicative Constructions in Atayal. MA Thesis. National Tsing Hua University.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Egerod, Sφren. 1965. “Verb Inflexion in Atayal.” Lingua, 15: 251-282.
Egerod, Sφren. 1966. “Word Order and Word Classes in Atayal.” Language, 42:346-369.
Egerod, Sφren. 1999. Atayal-English Dictionary. (=Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies, Monograph Series No. 35). London: Curzon Press.
Egerod, Sφren. 1999. Atayal-English Dictionary, Second Edition.
Heiko Narrog. 2009. Modality in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hsiao, Stella I-ling. 2004. Adverbials in Squliq Atayal. MA Thesis. National Tsing Hua University.
Hsin, Aili. 1999. Modality in Taiwan Southern Min. Ph.D. Dissertation. National Tsing Hua University.
Huang, Lillian M. 1993. A Study of Atayal Syntax. Taipei: Crane.
Huang, Lillian M. 1995. A study of Mayrinax Syntax. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.
Huang, Lillian M. 2001. Focus System of Mayrinax Atayal: a syntactic, semantic and pragmatic perspective. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Humanities &; Social Science 2001, 46(1,2): 51-69.
Huang, Lillian M. 2008a. Grammaticalization in Squliq Atayal. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics. 34.2: 1-46.
Huang, Lillian M, Tali’ Hayung. 2008. Syntax and Semantics of p- in Squliq Atayal. Language and Linguistics. 9.3: 491-521.
Huang, Xiao-you Kevin. 2009. Multiple-Modal Constructions in Mandarin Chinese: A View from Cartogrphy and MP. MA Thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
Holmer, Arthur. 1993. “Atayal clitics and sentence structure”. Working Papers, 40: 71- 94. Lund University: Dept of Linguistics.
Holmer, Arthur. 2006. Seediq—adverbial heads in a Formosan language. In clause structure and adjunct in Austronesian languages, H.-M. Gaertner, P. Law &; J. Sabel (eds), 83-124. Berlin: Mount de Gruyter.
Li, Chao-lin. 2007. Adverbial verbs and argument structure. Nanzan Linguistic 3:165-202.
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1980. The phonological rules of Atayal dialects. BIHP 51.2:349-405.
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1981. Reconstruction of proto-Atayalic phonology. BIHP 52.2:235-301.
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1985. Linguistic criteria for classifying Atayalic dialect groups. BIHP 56.4:699-718.
Lin, Chiao-chun. Beryl. 2005. Interrogatives in Squliq Atayal. MA Thesis. National Tsing Hua University.
Lin, Jo-wang and Jane Tang. 1995. Modals as verbs in Chinese: a GB perspective. The Bulletin of Institute of History and Philology 66.53-105. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Liu, Adlay Kun-lung. 2004. On Relativization in Squliq Atayal. MA Thesis. National Tsing Hua University.
Lyons, J.. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, F. R. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, F. R. 2001. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parkinson, Michael R. 1983. Modal expression in English. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
Pei, Tsai-li, Chia-hao Tai and Chun-ming Wu. 2010. On Modal Constructions in Mayrinax Atayal. Paper presented at the 17 Annual Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Society (AFLA 17), Stony Brook University.
Pei, Tsai-li. 2012. On the Modal Constructions in Squliq Atayal. Paper presented at NCL-13, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan.
Rau, Der-hwa. V. 1992. A Grammar of Atayal. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.
Rizzi, L. 1997 “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery”, in L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Ross, Malcolm. 1995. Reconstructing Proto-Austronesian verbal morphology: Evidence from Taiwan in Austronesian studies relating to Taiwan, ed. by Paul Jenkuei Li et al, 727-792. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.
Shih, Chao-kai. 2011. Deriving a VOS Language: A Case Study of Squliq Atayal. Paper presented at the 19 Annual Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Society (AFLA 19), Academia Sinica, Taipei.
Tang, Chih-chen. 1999. On Clausal Complements in Paiwan. Selected Papers from the 8ICAL: 529-578. Academia Sinica.
Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan. 2003. "Lexical Courtesy Revisited: Evidence from Tsouand Seediq Wh-Constructions," Gengo Kenkyu [Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan] 123, 331-361.
Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan. 2007. Conjunctive Reduction and its Origin: A Comparative Study of Tsou, Amis, and Squliq Atayal Oceanic Linguistics - Volume 46, Number 2, pp.585-602.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2008. Left Periphery and How-Why Alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17: 83-115.
Yu, Hsin-hsien. 2013. Modals and Final Particles in Mayrinax Atayal. Paper presented at NCL-14, National Dong Hwa University.
Zeitoun, Elizabeth, Lillian M. Huang, Marie M. Yeh, Anna H. Chang, and Joy J. Wu. 1996. “The Temporal, Aspectual, and Modal Systems of Some Formosan Languages: A Typological Perspective.” Oceanic Linguistics, 35.1: 22-56.