參 考 文 獻
一、 中文部分
王靜儀 (2004)。交互教學法增進國中生英語閱讀能力及後設認知之效應。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。林佳蓉 (2008)。合作學習融入國小英語教學對五年級學童閱讀能力之影響。國立臺北市教育大學兒童英語教育學系英語教學碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。林思燕 (2006) 。交互教學法對台灣國中生英語閱讀能力與後設認知之效益。國立政治大學英語教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。林進財 (2008)。教學原理。臺北:五南。
周筱婷 (2008)。交互教學法在閱讀理解及策略使用成效之研究:以台灣國中生為例。國立彰化師範大學英語學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。柯華葳 (2008)。教出閱讀力。臺北:天下。
柯華葳、幸曼玲、陸怡琮、辜玉旻 (2010)。閱讀策略教學手冊。臺北:教育部。
胡美娥 (2008)。運用交互教學法對於提升國小五年級學生英語閱讀理解策略學習及英語閱讀態度之行動研究。國立臺北教育大學兒童英語教育學系英語教學碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。陳美靜、朱淑芬 (2005)。為孩子開啟學習之窗-以教科書課文內容為介入方案之閱讀理解策略教學研究。教育部九十四年度行動研究成果報告,未出版,臺北市。
教育部 (2008)。九年一貫英語課程綱要。臺北:作者。
張春興 (1989)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北:東華。
黃政傑 (1996)。創思與合作的教學法。臺北:師大書苑。
黃政傑、林佩璇 (1996)。合作學習。臺北:五南
曾鈺惠 (2009) 。後設認知閱讀策略訓練對國中生英語閱讀理解及態度的效益研究。國立政治大學英語教學碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。劉瑾珊 (2008)。後設認知策略於學習障礙學生閱讀理解教學上之應用。雲嘉特教,7,66-74。
戴維揚 (2007)。就典範轉移論辯認知與後設認知的教學策略與評量機制。中等教育,58(6),86-115。
蘇宜芬、林清山 (1992)。後設認知訓練課程對國小低閱讀能力學生的閱讀理解能力與後設認知能力之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系教育心理學報,25,245-267。二、英文部分
Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. Modern Language Journal, 75, 460-472.
Beard, R. (2003 ). Uncovering the key skills of reading. In N. Hall, J. Larson, & J. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy (pp.199-208). London, UK: SAGE.
Block, E. (1986). The comprehensive strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26(3), 463-494.
Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carrell, L. G., & Wise, T. (1998). Metacognition and EFL/ESL reading. Instructional Science, 26, 97–112.
Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA Handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Choo, T., Eng, T., & Ahmad, N. (2011). Effects of reciprocal teaching strategies on reading comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 11(2), 140-149.
Cohen, A. D. (1990). Language learning: Insights for learner, teachers, and researcher. New York:Newbury House
Dole, J. A., Nokes, J. D., & Drits, D. (2009). Cognitive strategy instruction, In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp.347-372). New York:Routledge.
Duke, N. K., & Pearson, D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. Farstrup & S. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: IRA.
Fan, Y. (2010). The effect of comprehension strategy instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Asia Social Science, 6(8), 19-29.
Farivar, S. H. (1985). Developing and implementing a cooperative learning program in a middle elementary classroom. Disseration Abstracts Internation, 46, no.1823, 6-10.
Gagn’e, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Company.
Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of Reading Specialist, 6, 126-35.
Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. F. Kavanaugh & J. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye (pp. 331–358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gough, P. B. (1991). The complexity of reading. In R. R. Hoffman & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes: Applied and ecological perspectives (pp.141-152). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc.
Guthrie, J. T. (2003). Concept-oriented reading instruction: Practices of teaching reading for understanding. In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp.115-140). New York: The Guilford Press.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., Scafiddi, N. T., & Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403-423.
Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(3/4), 255-278.
Jason, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone (2nd Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Becon.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity, Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1998). Using collaborative strategic reading. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(6), 32-37.
Koda, K. (2004). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.
Lai, Y., Tung, Y., & Luo, S.(2008) Theory of Reading Strategies and its Application by EFL Learners: Reflections on Two Case Studies. Journal of Lunghwa University of Science and Technology, 26, 153-167
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259.
Nassaji, H. (2003). Higher-level and lower-level text processing skills in advanced ESL reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 261-276.
National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and it’s implication for reading instruction. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, I (2), 117-175.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1987, April). Collaborating for collaborative learning of text comprehension. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
Palincsar, A. S., & Klenk, L. (1992). Fostering literacy learning in supportivecontexts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(4), 211-225.
Palincsar, A. S. (2003). Collaborative approaches. In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp.99-114). New York: The Guilford Press.
Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 239-316.
Pars, S., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulations for learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89-101.
Person, P. D. (2009). The roots of reading comprehension instruction. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp.3-31). New York: Routledge.
Pressley, M., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J. L., & Brown, R. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. The Elementary School Journal, 92(5), 513-555.
Raphale, T. E., George, M., Weber, C. M., & Nies, A. (2009). Approaches to Teaching Reading Comprehension. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 449-469). New York: Routledge.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479-530.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Toward an interactive model of reading. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed.)(pp. 722-750). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
Salataci, R., & Akyel, A. (2002). Possible effects of strategy instruction on L1 and L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(1), 1-17.
Shiraki, S. (1995). The role of local reading strategies in EFL reading comprehension. Memoirs of Osaka Kyoiku University Ser.V, 44(1), 157-166.
Snow, C. E., & Sweet, A. P. (2003). Reading for comprehension. In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp.1-11). New York: The Guilford Press.
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.
Stoodt, B. D. (1989). Reading Instruction (2nd ed). New York: Harper & Row.
Taraban, R., Rynearson, K., & Kerr, M. S. (2000). Metacognition and freshman academic performance. Journal of Developmental Education, 24(1), 12-20.
Verdugo, D. R. (2004). Cognitive reading instruction for FL learners of technical English. In M. Singhal & Liontas, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Online Conference on Second and Foreign Language Teaching and Research - September 25-26, 2004- Beyond Borders (pp. 91-106). Retrieved December 21, 2012, from
http://www.readingmatrix.com/onlineconference/proceedings2004.h tml.
Wichadee, S. (2011).The effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on EFL Thai students’ reading comprehension ability. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 8(5), 31-40.
Yuko, I. (2011). The effects of metacognitive reading strategies: Pedagogical implications for EFL/ESL teachers. The Reading Matrix, 11(2), 150-159.
Zhang, L. J., & Wu, A. (2009). Chinese senior high school EFL students’ metacognitive awareness and reading-strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 37-59.