跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.210.77.106) 您好!臺灣時間:2022/12/06 13:18
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林萩定
研究生(外文):Lin, Chiu-Ting
論文名稱:金融機構企業社會責任、財務績效與氣候金融推動策略之研究
論文名稱(外文):The Study of Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Performance and Climate Finance Promoting Strategy on Financial Institutes
指導教授:李堅明李堅明引用關係
指導教授(外文):Lee, Chien Ming
口試委員:李堅明張四立蘇漢邦
口試委員(外文):Lee, Chien MingChang, Ssu-liSu, Han-Pang
口試日期:2014-05-30
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:自然資源與環境管理研究所在職專班
學門:環境保護學門
學類:環境資源學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:255
中文關鍵詞:金融機構綠色金融氣候金融CSR赤道原則
外文關鍵詞:Financial InstitutesGreen FinanceClimate FinanceCSREquator Principles
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:1102
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:331
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
綠色金融已成為全球因應氣候變遷的重要政策與措施。聯合國環境規劃署 (United Nations Environment Program, UNEP) 在2011年「邁向綠色經濟:實現永續發展及消彌貧窮方案」中指出,為達成綠色經濟轉型的目標,私營部門之綠色金融扮演舉足輕重的角色,並呼籲全球政府應至少提撥2% GDP發展綠色金融,以促進國家邁向綠色經濟。
過去文獻主要著重製造業之企業環境績效與財務績效是否具有正向關係,卻較少談及金融服務業。因此,這種正相關,是否也存在金融機構?是一個值得探討與分析的課題。本研究首開評估金融機構環境績效與財務績效之關聯性,嘗試瞭解金融機構之財務績效是否與環境績效存在正相關,以作為推動金融機構環境績效之依據。
本研究將建立適當的評估模型,釐清企業社會責任績效與經營績效展望之關聯性,擬以金融機構的CSR作為環境績效的代理變數,並與其財務績效進行實證分析,確認金融機構之CSR與財務績效之關係,據此提供予政府或金融機構推動赤道原則之可行性參考。

Green finance is a key policy and measure to tackle climate change around the world. In 2011, United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) have addressed the decisive role of private sectors for the goal of transforming green economy in the report of “Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication”. It urges global public sectors on allocating at least 2% of GDP for the development of green finance, promoting the green economy in the country.
The past essays have focused more on any positive correlation between the environmental performance and the financial performance in manufacturing industry than in financial services industry. Whether the positive correlation inhibits in financial institutes become an issue worth studying and analyzing. This study pioneers to evaluate the correlation between the environmental performance and the financial performance in financial services industry. By attempting to explore the existence of positive correlation, the results can be the basis of promoting the environmental performance in financial institutes.
This study will build a suitable evaluation model for clarify the correlation between the performance of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and business outlook. By adopting CSR of financial institutes as proxy variables, processing empirical analysis with its financial performance, assuring their correlation, the results can be provided for the feasible reference in promoting the Equator Principles among government or financial institutes.

目 錄
第一章 緒論....................................................................1-1
第一節 研究緣起..............................................................1-1
第二節 研究動機與目的.........................................................1-6
第三節 研究內容與方法.........................................................1-8
第四節 預期成果.............................................................1-11

第二章 國際綠色經濟與綠色成長分析...................................................2-1
第一節 UNEP綠色經濟政策概況....................................................2-2
第二節 經濟合作發展組織綠色成長策略及架構........................................2-19
第三節 韓國的綠色成長策略.....................................................2-22
第四節 本章小結.............................................................2-28

第三章 國際綠色金融與碳金融發展現況與趨勢分析.........................................3-1
第一節 UNFCCC氣候金融發展沿革..................................................3-3
第二節 全球氣候金融發展現況.....................................................3-8
第三節 歐洲投資銀行的綠色投資分析...............................................3-24
第四節 碳金融對永續發展的影響..................................................3-44
第五節 國際赤道原則發展現況分析................................................3-54
第六節 國際金融機構綠色融資障礙分析.............................................3-62
第七節 本章小結.............................................................3-68

第四章 國內金融機構經營與企業社會責任分析............................................4-1
第一節 國內赤道原則發展現況分析.................................................4-3
第二節 國內金融機構推動CSR現況分析..............................................4-6
第三節 探討本國金融機構營運現況分析.............................................4-54
第四節 本章小結.............................................................4-64

第五章 金融機構CSR、財務績效與GDP實證分析............................................5-1
第一節企業環境績效與財務績效之關聯性..............................................5-2
第二節 金融機構財務與環境績效之實證分析...........................................5-5
第三節 金融機構放款融資與國家經濟發展實證分析.....................................5-18
第四節 本章小結..............................................................5-27

第六章 結論與建議...............................................................6-1
第一節 結論.................................................................6-3
第二節 綠色金融政策與建議......................................................6-8
第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向..................................................6-10

參考文獻..................................................................... R-1
中文文獻..................................................................R-1
英文文獻..................................................................R-2
相關網站..................................................................R-5
附錄.........................................................................A-1

一、中文文獻
李堅明 (2014),《資源、環境與經濟成長:為何兩種永續性典範均正確》,國立臺北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所永續發展專題上課簡報。
李堅明 (2013),《開啟台灣氣候政策動能…因應COP18-CMP8會議》,國立臺北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所排放交易制度專題上課簡報。
李堅明、林書吟 (2013),《綠 色貼水補、融資決策與綠 色貼水補、融資決策與綠 色貼水補、融資決策與綠 色貼水補、融資決策與綠 色貼水補、融資決策與綠 色貼水補、融資決策與色產業發展 色產業發展 》,發表於國立雲林科技大學學術研討會。臺灣雲林:雲林科技大學。
李堅明、江振興 (2011),《綠色信用評等機制與融資決策模式建立與評估》,發表於兩岸金融暨國立政治大學金融學系第二屆金融發展學術研討會。臺灣臺北:政治大學。
李堅明、江佳蓁 (2010),《歐盟排放交易制度、氣候政策和產業競爭力分析》,碳經濟,第18期。行政院經濟建設委員會。臺灣臺北。
陳召宜 (2013),《臺灣綠色成長指標建置之研究 綠色成長指標建置之研究 綠色成長指標建置之研究 綠色成長指標建置之研究 綠色成長指標建置之研究 》,國立臺北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所碩士論文。
顧洋 (2013),《UNFCCC氣候變化綱要公約與京都議定書沿革與發展現況》,國立臺北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所企業環境管理專題上課簡報。

二、英文文獻
Annandale, D., J. Bailey, E. Ouano, W. Evans and P. King (2001), The potential role of strategic environmental assessment in the activities of multilateral development banks, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21, 407-429.
Bloomberg New Energy Finance (2011), Clean energy investment storms to new record in 2010, Press Release, January 11.
Barbara Buchner et al. (2013), The Global Landscape of Climate Finance 2013, Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) .
Dasgupta, S., B. Laplante, H. Wang and D. Wheeler (2002), Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16:1, 147-168 .
Dowell, G., S. Hart and B. Yeung (2000), Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059-1074 .
European Investment Bank Group (EIB) (2011), 2011 Activity Report, EIB.
Iwata H., and K. Okada (2011), “How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from
Japanese manufacturing firms”, Journal of Ecological Economics.70 : 1691-1700.
John A. Mathews (2012), Green Growth Strategies - Korean Initiatives, Futures 44 (2012) 761-769.
Jones, R. S. and B. Yoo (2011), Korea's Green Growth Strategy: Mitigating Climate Change and Developing New Growth Engines, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 798, Paris France:OECD.
Jane Ellis, Randy Caruso and Stephanie Ockenden (OECD 2013) , Exploring Climate Finance Effectiveness, Climate Change Expert Group Paper No. 2013, Paris France:OECD.
Klassen, R. D. and C. P. McLaughlin (1996), The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance, Management Science, 42(8), 1199-1214.
M.D. Lo’pez-Gamero et al. (2008), The whole relationship between environmental variables and firm performance: Competitive advantage and firm resources as mediator variables, Journal of Environmental Management (2009) , 1–12.
Nakao, Y. , A. Amano , K. Matsumara , K. Genba , and M. Nakano (2007), Relationship between environmental performance and financial performance : an empirical analysis of Japanese corporations , Business Strategy and Environment, 16(2), 106-118.
OECD (2011), Towards Green Growth -Monitoring Progress :OECD Indicators, Paris France:OECD.
OECD (2008), Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide, Paris France:OECD.
P. Thompson, C.J. Cowton (2004), Bringing the environment into bank lending:implications for environmental reporting, The British Accounting Review 36 (2004) 197–218.
Randy Caruso and Jane Ellis (OECD 2013), Comparing Definitions and Methods to Estimate Mobilised Climate Finance, Climate Change Expert Group Paper No. 2013, Paris France:OECD﹒
Statistics Korea (2012), Korea's Green Growth based on OECD, Korea:Statistics Korea﹒
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2011), Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication, Geneva : UNEP.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2011), Energy Efficiency And The Finance Sector - A survey on lending activities and policy issues, Geneva : UNEP.
World Bank (2012), Carbon Finance For Sustainable Development, Carbon Finance At The World Bank 2012, Washington DC:World Bank.
World Bank (2013), Mapping Carbon Pricing Initiatives Developments and Prospects, Carbon Finance At The World Bank 2013, Washington DC:World Bank.
Ziegler, A., T. Busch and V. H. Hoffmann (2009), Corporate Responses to Climate Change and Financial Performance: The Impact of Climate Policy, Working Paper 09/105, Center of Economic Research at ETH Zurich.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top