創業的議題向來深為學術界所重視，更是近年研究的重要領域。其最主要的原因在於，創業不僅對於一國的經濟成長有莫大的影響力，對個人而言，更是實現夢想，快速累積財富的最佳途徑。然而，雖然有許多人對創業趨之若鶩，但受到內、外在諸多因素之影響，最後投入創業活動，並能獲得成功者，卻僅有少數人。因此，本研究將過去研究所引述有關成功創業之變數，整合形成概念性架構，探討創業者自我效能、主觀規範、創業技能與創業行為間之關係，並加入環境變動因素為干擾變數。
本研究使用質性之深度訪談法，並依研究目的設定受訪者條件，再採用滾雪球抽樣方式尋找適當的受訪對象，總計進行了十個質性深度訪談。研究結果得出下列命題：(一) 自我效能對創業者之創業行為具有正向影響；(二) 主觀規範對創業者之創業行為具有正向影響；(三) 創業技能對創業者之創業行為具有正向影響；(四) 環境變動因素對創業者之創業行為具有負向影響；(五) 環境變動因素在自我效能、主觀規範、創業技能等三個變數對創業行為影響上具有干擾作用。

As a constant focus of academia, enterprise has become an important area of research particularly in the recent years. The first and foremost reason is that enterprise not only has great influence on the economic growth of a country, but also the best way for an individual to rapidly accumulate wealth and realize its own dream. However, while so many people scramble for starting up their own business, but due to the impact of both internal and external factors, only few of them succeeded in their venture. Therefore, this study tried to explore the interrelation between entrepreneur's self-efficacy, subjective norm, entrepreneurial skills and entrepreneurial behaviors through integrating the variables of successful enterprise into conceptual framework quoted in previous studies and adding environmental turbulence factor as intervening variable.
In this study, we use the method of qualitative in-depth interview. We set up the conditions for interviewees in accordance with the objective of our study, and then select suitable interviewees by snowball sampling. Totally ten qualitative in-depth interviews have been made. Following propositions are obtained from study results: (1)self-efficacy has impact on entrepreneurial behaviors; (2)subjective norm has impact on entrepreneurial behaviors; (3)entrepreneurial skills have impact on the choosing of industry by entrepreneur; (4)environmental turbulence factor has impact on entrepreneurial behaviors; (5)environmental turbulence factor can moderate the impact of self-efficacy, subjective norm, entrepreneurial skills on entrepreneurial behaviors.

目錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 4
第四節 論文架構 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 自我效能 7
第二節 主觀規範 15
第三節 創業技能 19
第四節 環境變動因素 23
第五節 創業行為 27
第三章 研究方法 35
第一節 質性研究探討 35
第二節 觀念性架構 39
第三節 研究對象與抽樣方法 41
第四節 訪談大綱設計 42
第五節 資料分析法 44
第四章 研究結果 46
第一節 樣本結構分析 46
第二節 信效度分析 47
第三節 資料分析 48
第五章 結論與建議 63
第一節 研究發現 63
第二節 研究貢獻與管理意涵 67
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 69
參考文獻 71
一、 中文 71
二、 英文 77
附錄 88
附錄A：訪談問卷 88


表目錄
表2-1 自我效能定義 8
表 2-2 創業技能概念性定義 21
表3-1 研究構面與衡量之次構面 40
表3-2 訪談大綱 42
表3-3 逐字稿編碼範例說明 45
表4 1 研究對象基本資料 46
表4-2 相互衡量信度表 48


圖目錄
圖1-1 研究流程 5
圖2-1 人類行為三元交互模式 10
圖2-2 理性行為理論 16
圖2-3 計劃行為理論架構 17
圖2-4 創業行為的觀念性架構 28
圖2-5 創業過程四階段 31
圖2-6 台灣創業者形成的理論架構 32
圖3 1 觀念性架構 39
圖5 1 觀念性架構修正 64

參考文獻
一、中文
1.王淑君 (2007)，中高齡女性創業行為及其影響因素之研究，環球技術學院中小企業經營策略管理研究所碩士論文。
2.王翔姿 (2006)，臺灣中小企業主創業導向對創業意圖與企業績效影響之研究—以環境不確定為干擾變項，國立體育學院休閒產業經營學系碩士論文。
3.尤杏暖(2006)，體育預算編列與執行之研究--以行政院體育委員會為例，國立臺灣師範大學運動與休閒管理研究所碩士論文。
4.池勝源(1998)，社會學習論在教育上的啟示與應用，竹縣文教，第 17 期，頁 14-16。
5.呂孟育、黃財蔚(2006)，國小高年級學生在網路遊戲與學習上的自我效能研究，科學教育研究與發展季刊，第 43 期，頁 43-61。
6.汪青河(1991)，創業家創業行為與環境、個人特微關係之研究，台灣大學商學研究所未出版碩士論文。
7.李章琪 (2008)，創業家人格特質、創業能力與創業績效關係之研究，實踐大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
8.李慶順 (2001)，影響研發機構技術人員創業行為相關因素之研究—以中科院為例，中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
9.李儒宜 (1998)，創業家之個人特徵、創業動機與人格特質於創業行為影響之探討，國立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
10.何麗君(2005)，國中學生自我效能、集體效能與學業成就之相關研究，國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
11.林玉卿(2010)，以自我效能為中介變數探討創業機會辨識與其影響因素之研究，國立高雄應用科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
12.林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)，質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析，身心障礙研究，第 3 卷，第 2 期，頁 122-136。
13.林培鈞 (2008)，專業能力、創業行為與創業成功關係之研究—以高雄市地區外帶式飲料店創業者為例，國立高雄餐旅學院餐旅管理研究所碩士論文。
14.林韶君 (2013)，“歹路”不可行：創業警世錄，國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
15.林寶生(2005)，組織氣候、工作特性、內外控人格、自我效能與工作績效之關係研究－以陸軍某基地進訓基層單位為例，大葉大學國際企業管理學系碩士論文。
16.吳柏緯 (2012)，應用計劃行為理論探討創業意圖─以創業技能為調節變項，國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
17.席汝楫(1997)，社會與行為科學研究方法，臺北：五南圖書公司。
18.洪菁穗 (1999)，探討國中生在理化科的學術地位、自我效能與學業成敗歸因之關係，國立台灣大學物理研究所碩士論文。
19.范麗娟(2004)，深度訪談。謝臥龍（編），質性研究（頁81-125），台北：心理。
20.郁義鴻、李志能、Robert D. H. (2002)，創業管理，台北市：五南圖書公司。
21.夏佳妤 (2011)，民宿業者創業精神、創業自我效能對創業績效影響之研究，澎湖科技大學服務業經營管理研究所碩士論文。
22.孫志麟(1999)，教師自我效能:有效教學的關鍵，教育研究資訊，第 7 卷，第 6 期，頁 170-187。
23.孫義雄(2007)，深度訪談法與犯罪成因之探索，警學叢刊，第 38 卷，第 3 期 ，頁 37-55。
24.袁方編(2002)，社會研究方法，臺北市：五南圖書公司。
25.高宜君 (2002)，高科技創業行為研究，國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
26.陳向明(2002)，社會科學質的研究，台北市：五南圖書公司。
27.陳育全 (2013)，影響消費者網路購買冷凍水產品意願之因素，實踐大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
28.陳彥廷 (2010)，創業家特質、跨界活動對創業績效之實證分析—以創業自我效能為干擾變項，臺南大學行政管理學系碩士論文。
29.陳瑜芬、賴銘娟 (2007)，「台灣創業課程現況之探究」，創業管理研究，第 2 卷，第 3 期，頁117-147。
30.許士軍 (1990)，管理學，台北：東華書局。
31.許東讚(2007)，人格特質、創業精神與創業績效之關連性探討，國立成功大學高階管理碩士論文。
32.許鈺慧(2012)，認知風格、創業熱情、知覺行為控制對創業意圖之影響—創業警覺性為中介變數，國立高雄應用科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
33.麥涵媜(2009)，女性自我效能與機會吸引力對創業意圖之關係─以一位女性創業家的創業歷程為例，義守大學管理學院碩士論文。
34.黃英忠、黃毓華、劉錦雲、陳錦輝等人(2008)，工作需求─控制模式與工作倦怠關係之研究：以自我效能為干擾變數，管理實務與理論研究， 第 2 卷，第 1 期，頁 37-51。
35.黃芳銘(2003)，結構方程模式：理論與應用，台北市：五南圖書公司。
36.黃怡仁(2004)，南部地區科技大學應屆畢業女學生創業意圖及其相關影響因素之研究—以計畫行為理論為基礎，南台科技大學技職教育與人力資源發展研究所碩士論文。
37.黃炳滄(1992)，創業行為、個人特質、人際網路及社會傾向間之關聯性研究以管理顧問業為例，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
38.黃郁文(1994)，自我效能概念及其與學業成就表現之關係，諮商與輔導，第 1066 期，頁 39-41。
39.黃瑞琴(1991)，質的教育研究方法，台北：心理出版社。
40.黃義俊、楊敏里、劉德芳(2010)，以計畫性行為理論實證研究女性創業意向，創業管理研究，第5卷，第1期，頁33-68。
41.陳玉玲(1995)，目標設定、目標投入與自我效能對國小學生數學表現的影響，國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
42.陳家聲、吳奕慧(2007)，華人創業家心理與行為特質之初探，創業管理研究，第2卷，第1期，頁1-30。
43.畢恆達(1996)，詮釋學與質性研究，輯於胡幼慧主編，質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，台北：巨流。
44.郭明智(2011)，人格特質、創業環境與社會資本對創業績效之關係研究—以台灣之中小企業及海外台商企業負責人為例，國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
45.張文龍、黃文谷、陳思婷(2010)，創業家人力資本、創業環境與創業績效關係之研究，創業管理研究，第5卷，第1期，頁1-32。
46.張文龍、蘇睿鈞(2009)，創業家職能與創業績效關係之研究：以技術型創業家為例，創業管理研究，第4卷，第1期，頁33-58。
47.張春興(1991)，現代心理學，台北：東華書局。
48.張恩齊(2009)，創業行為與創業意願之認知比較研究，國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
49.張惠真、蔡翼擎、何文松(2014)，西進中國之台灣汽車零組件廠商動態能耐對其競爭優勢之影響─以環境變動為調節，商管科技季刊，第15卷，第1期，頁27-54。
50.萬文隆(2004)，深度訪談在質性研究中的應用，生活科技教育月刊，第 37 卷，第 4 期，頁 17-23。
51.趙亦珍(2000)，女性創業家性別角色與創業行為之研究，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
52.趙柏原(2000)，國中學生自我效能、求助態度與課業求助行為之相關研究，彰化師大教育學報，第 1 期，頁 163-200。
53.楊孝濚(1996)，傳播研究方法總論，台北市：三民書局。
54.楊敏里，葉千禎(2009)，影響女性創業意圖因素之研究，2009管理創新與行銷專案研討會，頁 53-67。
55.楊煥卿(2002)，自雇型電傳勞動者創業行為模式之研究，中國文化大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
56.廖家萱(2007)，台灣中小企業主創業導向與創業績效關聯之研究─以創業家人格特質為干擾變項，國立體育學院休閒產業經營學系碩士論文。
57.廖懿萱(2012)，自我效能、情緒、知覺環境不確定對創業意圖的影響-以風險偏好為中介變數，高雄應用科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
58.蔣美惠(2003)，探討保全人員生涯管理、人格特質及組織氣候對工作滿足、自我效能與工作績效之關聯性研究，南華大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
59.鄭時宜(2003)，影響環保團體成員三種環境行為意向之因素的比較，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所博士論文。
60.鄭蕙萍(1999)，創業家的個人背景、心理特質、創業驅動力對創業行為的影響，大同工學院事業經營研究所碩士論文。
61.潘淑滿(2003)，質性研究：理論與應用，台北市: 心理出版社。
62.蔡明田、謝煒頻、李國瑋、許東讚(2008)，創業精神與創業績效之關連性探討：創業動機、能力與人格特質的整合性觀點，創業管理研究，第 3 卷，第 3 期，頁 29-65。
63.蔡繡容(2001)，創業家之認知與行為意向之研究：計畫行為理論與社會認知理論之應用，國立高雄第一科技大學金融營運研究所碩士論文。
64.賴銘娟(2004)，技職校院商管群學生創業態度及其影響因素之研究，雲林科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。
65.歐予媗(2012)，創業績效驅動因子研究與模式建構—兼論創業能力的干擾效果，南華大學企業管理系碩士論文。
66.歐建益(2001)，創業家特質、動機與創業問題之研究，國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
67.歐蓁瑛(2006)，態度與主觀規範對行為意圖之影響研究—以壽險業為例，國立成功大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
68.劉仲冬(1996)，量與質社會研究的爭議及社會研究未來的走向及出路，收錄於胡幼慧編：質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，台北：巨流圖書公司。
69.鍾倫納(1993)，應用社會科學研究法，臺北：臺灣商務。
70.簡茂發(2002)，信度與效度。載於楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園 (編著)：社會及行為科學研究法，台北：東華書局。
71.2013年10月上班族創業調查。2013年10月，取自yes123求職網http://www.yes123.com.tw/admin/white_paper/index_detail.asp?id=20131021175723。




二、英文
1.Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, pp. 84.
2.Ajzen, I. (1985), From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior, Action-Control: From Cognition to Behavior, Heidelberg: Springer.
3.Ajzen, I. (1987), Attitude, traits and actions:Dispositional predictions of behavior In personality and social psychology. Academy in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, pp. 1-63.
4.Ajzen, I. (1991), The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 50, pp. 179-211.
5.Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003), A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development, Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), pp. 105-123.
6.Assael, H. (1992), Consumer Behaviour and Marketing Action, (Fourth Edition). PWS-KENT Publishing Company, Boston.
7.Babbie, E. (1998), The practice of social research(8th ed.), London: Wadsworth.
8.Bainbridge, W. S. (1989), Survey Research：A computer-Assistant Introduction, Belmont, CA：Wadsworth.
9.Balje, S. H. & Waasdorp, P. M. (2001), Entrepreneurship in the 21st Century: The role of public policy. In Entrepreneurship in the Netherlands. New Economy: new entrepreneurs!, Zoetermeer: EIM Business & Policy Research and the Ministry of Economic Affairs.
10.Bandura, A. (1977), Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), pp. 191-215.
11.Bandura, A. (1977a), Social learning theory. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12.Bandura, A. & Schunk, D. H. (1981), Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, pp. 586-598.
13.Bandura, A. (1982), Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), pp. 122-147.
14.Bandura, A. (1986), Social foundations of thought and action: a social Cognitive theory. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15.Bandura, A. (1991), “Social cognitive theory of selfregulation,”Organizational Behaviorand Human Decision Process, 50, pp. 248-287.
16.Bandura, A. (1997), Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. NY: Freeman.
17.Baron, R. A. (2006), Opportunity Recognition as Pattern Recognition: How Entrepreneurs Connect the Dots to identify New BusinessOpportunities, Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), pp.104-119.
18.Baumol, W. J. (1993), Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: Existence and bounds. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), pp. 197-210.
19.Bhattacherjee, A. (2000), Acceptance of E-Commerce Services: The Case of Electronic Brokerages, IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics-Part A: systems and humans, 30(4), pp. 411-420.
20.Bird, B. (1988), Implementing Entrepreneurial ideas: The case of intention. Academy of Management Review, 13, pp. 442-453.
21.Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2005), “Model of Adoption of Technology in the Household: A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle,” MIS Quarterly 29(4), pp. 399-426.
22.Busch, T. (1995), Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computation Research, 12(2), pp. 147-158.
23.Chaganti, R. (1986), Management in Women-owned entrepreneurs in profile.Journal of Small Business Management. 24(October) , pp. 18-29.
24.Chandler, G. N. & Hanks, S. H. (1994), ‘Market attractiveness, Resource-Based Capabilities, Venture Strategy, and Venture Performance’, Journal of Business Venturing, 9(4), pp. 331-349.
25.Chen C.C., Greene G. P. & Crick A.,(1998), “Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?, ”Journal of Business Venturing, 13, pp. 295-316.
26.Claycomb, C., Germain, R., Dröge, C. (2000), The effects of formal strategic marketing planning on the industrial firm’s configuration, structure, exchange patterns, and performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(3), pp. 219-234.
27.Cole, A. H. (1967), “An Approach to the Study of Entrepreneurship：A Tribute to Edwin”, F. Gay. In H. G. J. Aitken, ed. Explorations in Entreprise, Cambridge, Mass：Harvard University Press：pp. 30-34.
28.Compeau, D. R. & Higgins C. A. “Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skill,” Information Systems Research 6(2), June 1995a, pp. 118-143.
29.Compeau, D. R. & Higgins C. A. “Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test,” MIS Quarterly 19(2), June 1995b, pp. 189-211.
30.Covin, J. G. & Slevin, D. P. (1989), “Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments”. Strategic Management Journal. 10, pp. 75-87.
31.Day, G. S. & Nedungadi, P. (1994), Managerial representations of competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), pp. 31-44.
32.Day, G. S. & Wensley, R. (1988), Assessing advantage: a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. Journal of Marketing, 52(2), pp. 1-20.
33.Dean, T. J. & Meyer, G. D. (1996), “Industry Environments and New Venture Formations in U.S. Manufacturing: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis of Demand Determinants.” Journal of Business Venturing, 11(2), pp. 107-132.
34.Dean, T. J., Brown, R. L. & Bamford C. E. (1998), “Differences in large and small firm responses to environmental context: Strategic implications form a comparativean alysis of business formations”. Strategic Management Journal,19, pp. 709-728.
35.Deng, S. Hassan, L., & Jivan, S. (1995), Journal of Small Business Management. 12(2), pp. 60-80.
36.De Noble, A. F., Jung, D., & Ehrlich, S. B. (1999), Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: The development of a measure and its relationship to entrepreneurial action. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, Retrieved from http://fusionmx.babson.edu/entrep/fer/papers99/I/I_C/IC.html Global Entrepreneurship Monitor-DATA, Retrieved from http://www.gemconsortium.org/key-indicators
37.Drnovsek, M. & Glas, M. (2006), Women Entrepreneurs in Slovenia: by fits and starts, in Welter, F., Smallbone, D., N. Isakova (eds.), Enterprising Women in Transition Economies, Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 143-170.
38.Drucker, P. F. ( 1985), Innovation and Entrepreneurship ,Harper & Row, New York .
39.Ehrlich, S. B., De Noble, A. F., Moore, T., & Weaver, R. R. (1994), After the cash arrives: a comparative study of venture capital and private investor involvement in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(1), pp. 67-82.
40.Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
41.Flexman, N. A. & Scanlan, T. J. (1982), Running your own business: how to evaluate and develop your entrepreneurial skills, Argus communications.
42.Forbes, D. P. (2005), The effects of strategic decision making onentrepreneurial self-efficacy. Entrepreneurship Theory And Practice,19(5), pp. 599-626.
43.Gartner, W. B. ( 1985), “A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of Venture Creation”, Academy of Management Review, vol.10, no.4 , pp696-706 .
44.Gartner, W. B., Mitchell, T. R., & Vesper, K. H. (1989), “A Taxonomy of New Business Ventures”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.4,No.3, pp.169-186 .
45.Gartner, W. B. (1990), What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship. Journal of Business venturing, 5, pp. 15-28
46.Gima, K. A. & Murray, J. Y. (2004), Antecedents and outcomes of marketing strategy comprehensiveness. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), pp. 33-46.
47.Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. ( 1989), “Effects of Alternative Training Methods on Self-Efficacy and Performance in Computer Software Training,” Journal of Applied Psychology 74(6) , pp. 884-891.
48.Gist, M. E. & Mitchell, T. R. (2003), Self-efficacy: a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), pp. 183-211.
49.Glazer, R. & Weiss, A. M. (1993), Marketing in turbulent environments: decision processes and the time-sensitivity of information. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4), pp. 509–521.
50.Gordon, R. M. (1986), Folk Psychology as Simulation, Mind and Language, 1(2), pp. 158-171.
51.Grewal, R. & Tansuhaj, P. (2001), Building organizational capabilities for managing economic crisis: the role of market orientation and strategic flexibility. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), pp. 67-80.
52.Grieco,V. A. (1975), Management of small business: Text, Incidents and Cases, Charles
E. Merrill Publishing Company
53.Harper, D. A. (1996), Entrepreneurship and The Market Process: An Enquiry into The Growth of Knowledge, Routledge.
54.Hisrich, R. D. & Brush, C. G. (1984), The woman entrepreneur: Management skills and business problems. Journal of Small Business Management, 22(1), pp. 30-38.
55.Hisrich, R. D. & Brush, C. G. (1985), Women and minority entrepreneurs: A comparative analysis. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellsley, MA : Babsom College.
56.Holsti, O. R. (1969), Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
57.Holt, D. H. (1992), Entrepreneurship“ NewVentureCreation, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall” .
58.Hung, S. Y., Ku, C. Y., & Chang, C. M. (2003), "Critical Factors of WAP Services Adoption: An Empirical Study", Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2(1), pp. 42-60.
59.Hsu, M. H. & Chiu, C. M. (2004), Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems, 38 (3), pp. 369-381.
60.Jaworski, B. J. & Kohli, A. K. (1993), Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), pp. 53-70.
61.Johnson, J. M. (2002), In-depth Interviewing. In Jaber F. G. & James A. H.（eds）: Handbook of InterviewResearch: Context and Method, 103-119. London, Sage Publication.
62.Kanfer, R. (1987), Task-specific Motivation:An Integrative Approach to Issues of Measurement, Mechanisms, Processes, and Determinants , Journal of Social and clinical Psychology, 5, pp. 237-264.
63.Kassarjian, H. H. (1977), Content Analysis in Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), pp. 8-18.
64.Kazanjian, R. K. (1988), Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new venures, Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), pp. 257-279.
65.Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago：University of Chicago Press .
66.Kohli, A. K. & Jaworski, B. J. (1990), Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), pp. 1-18.
67.Kolvereid, L. (1996), Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(1), pp. 47-57.
68.Krueger, N. F. & Dickson, P. R. (1994), “How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: self-efficacy and perceptions of opportunity and threats”, Decision Sciences, 25, pp. 103–123.
69.Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D. & Carsrud, A. L. (2000), “Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions”, Journal of Business Venturing, 15, pp. 411–432.
70.Krueger, Jr. N. F. (2003), The Cognitive Psychology of Entrepreneurship, In Acs, Z. J.
& Audretsch, D. B. (Eds.), Handbook of EntrepreneurshipResearch: An Interdiaciplinary Survey and Introduction, Boston: KluwerAcademic, pp.105-40.
71.Lazear, E. P. (2005), Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(4), pp. 649-680.
72.Lee, C. (1983), Self-efficacy and behavior as predicators of subsequent behavior in an assertiveness training program. Behavior Research and therapy, 21, pp. 225-232.
73.Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D. & Hackett, G. (1994), Toward a unified social cognitive theory of career/academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior [Monograph], 45, pp .79-122.
74.Li, H., Zhang, Y., & Chan, T. S. (2005), “Entrepreneurial Strategy Making and Performance in China’s new Technology Ventures- the Contingency Effect of Environments and Firm Competences”. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 16, pp. 37-57.
75.Liñán, F. (2008), Skill and value perceptions: How do they affect entrepreneurial intentions? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(3), pp. 257-272.
76.Liñán, F. & Chen, Y. W.(2009), “Development and Cross-Cultural Application of Specific Instrument to Measure Entrepreneurial Intentions”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), pp. 593-617.
77.Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (1990), A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
78.Lumpkin, G. T. & Dess, G. G. (1996), Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), pp. 135−172.
79.Lussier, R. N. (1995), ”Startup Business Advice from Business Owners to Would -be Entrepreneurs”, S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, pp. 10-15.
80.Madden, T. J., Ellen, P.S., & Ajzen, I. (1992), “A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, pp. 3- 9.
81.Malhotra, N. K. (1993), Marketing research: An applied orientation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
82.Miller, W. L. & Crabtree, B. F. ( 1992 ), “ Primary Care Research: Amultimethod Typology ND Qualitative Road Map”, In Crabtree & Miller (Eds.), Doing Qualitative Research, Newbury Park CA: Sge, pp.3-28.
83.Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1995), In-depthInterviewing，Second Edition.South Melbourne：Longman.
84.Morris, (1994), Toward a user-centered information service, Journal of theAmerican Society for Information Science, 45 (1), pp. 11-30.
85.Narayanan, V. K. (2001), “Managing Technology and Innovation for CompetitiveAdvantage.” Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
86.Neuman, S. B. & Dickinson, D. K. (2002), Handbook of early literacy Research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
87.Patton, M. Q. (1990), Qualitative evaluation and research methods，London:Sage Publication Inc.
88.Paul, S. C. Hsu (1990), ”Entrepreneurship and the Motivational Effect of Family in Taiwan” .
89.Powell, D. James & Bimmerle, F. Cahrles (1980), ”A Model of Entrepreneurship: Moving Toward Precision and Complexity”, Journal of Small Business Management, 8(1), pp.33-37.
90.Renko, M., Shrader, R. C., & Simon, M. (2012), Perception of entrepreneurial opportunity: a general framework. Management Decision, 50(7), pp. 1233–1251.
91.Roth, W. G. (1985), Treatment implications derived from self-efficacy research with 50 children . Doctor of Psychology Research Paper, Biola University , California.
92.Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., Velamuri, S. R. & Venkataraman, S. (2003), Three Views of Entrepreneurial Opportunity in Acs, Z. J. & Audretsch, D.B. (Eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, 23, pp. 141-160.
93.Scholten, V., Kemp, R & Omta, O. (2004), Entrepreneurship For Life: The entrepreneurial Intention Among Academic in the Life Sciences, Paper prepared for European Summer University 2004, Twente. Wageningen University.
94.Schumpeter J. A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
95.Scott, C. (1986), Why more women are becoming entrepreneurs. Journal Small Business Management. 24(4), pp. 37-44.
96.Shabbir, A. & Gregorio, S. D. (1996),An examination of the relationship between women’s personal goals and structural factors in influencing their decision to star a business: The case of Pakisan. Journal of Business Venturing. 11, pp. 507-529.
97.Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000), The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), pp. 217-226 .
98.Shane, S. (2003), A General Theory of Entrepreneurship. The Individual–Opportunity Nexus, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003.
99.Stevenson, L. (1989), Some methodological problems associate with researching women entrepreneurs. Journal of business Ethics, 9, pp. 439-446.
100.Taylor, S. & Todd, P. A. (1995), Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 145-176.
101.Timmons, J. A., Muzyka, D. F., Stevenson, H. H., & Bygrave, W .D. (1987), Opportunity Recognition: The Core of Entrepreneurship, in: Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Edited by, Churchill et. al Wellesley, MA: Babson College, pp. 109-123.
102.Timmons, J. A. (1995), “New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century.” Boston, MA: Irwin. U.S. Department of Commerce. 1994. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S.
103.Vermond, K. (2000), Making the Jump, CMA Management, 74（3）, pp. 18-24 .
104.Weiss, A. M. & Heide, J. B. (1993), The nature of information search in high-technology markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(2), pp. 220–33.
105.Wood, R. & Bandura, A. (1983), Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 56(3), pp. 407-415.
106.Wood, R. & Bandura, A. (1989), Social cognitive theory of organizationalmanagement. The Academy of Management Review, 14(3), pp. 361-384.
107.Wu, S. Y. (1989), Production, Entrepreneurship, and Profits. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
108.Yin, R. K. (1994), “Case Study Research : Design and Method. ”Applied Social Research Methods Series, 5, 2nd Edition, Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications, Inc.
109.Zahra, S. A. (1993a), “Environment, Corporate Entrepreneurship and Company Performance: A Taxonomic Approach.” Journal of Business Venturing, 8, pp. 319-340.
110.Zahra, S. A. (1993b), “A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior: A Critique and Extension.” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 14 (4), pp. 5-21.
111.Zahra, S. A. & Covin, J. (1995), “Contextual Influences on the Corporate Entrepreneurship-Company Performance Relationship in Established Firms: A Longitudinal Analysis.” Journal of Business Venturing, 10 (1), pp. 43-58.
112.Zahra, S. A., and Neubaum, D. O. (1998), “Environmental Adversity and the Entrepreneurial Activities of New ventures.” Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 3, pp. 123-140.
113.Zahra, S. A., and Bogner, W.C. (2000), “Technology Strategy and Software New Ventures' Performance: Exploring the Moderating Effect of the Competitive Environment.” Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), pp. 135-173.
114.Zapalsika, A. (1997), A profile of women entrepreneurs and enterprises in Poland. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(4) , pp. 76-82.