臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

In recent years, the rapid development of IT has brought many changes in all fields of Economic and Social Affairs. In the field of education, the learning environment has had many changes in the digital age. Along with the development of Internet, e-learning have been learned, built and deployed by many universities in Vietnam. The purpose of this research is to identify the factors and the extent of their impacts on the acceptance of using e-learning at the university of Phan Thiet. We used the quantitative method and proposed the research model based on the use of theory of TAM as a research foundation. The research was conducted through the distribution of the questionnaires to the system’s users; the objects of this research are teachers and students. There was a total of 346 satisfied responds and included in the analysis. The results showed that the theories in the research model were all supported.

Abstract I
Acknowledgments II
Table of Contents III
List of Tables V
List of Figures VI
Illustration of Symbols VII
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.2 Research Motive 5
1.3 Research Purpose 6
1.4 Research Procedure 8
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 9
2.1 E-learning System 9
2.1.1 What is e-learning? 9
2.1.2 Types of e-learning training 14
2.1.3 Presentation and e-learning lesson 16
2.1.4 The situation of e-learning in the university of Phan Thiet 18
2.2 Technology Acceptance Model 22
2.2.1 Introducion 22
2.2.2 The role of TAM 26
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH DESIGN 29
3.1 Research Model 29
3.2 Research Hypotheses 31
3.3 Measurement of Variables 33
3.4 Data Collection 36



CHAPTER 4 RESEARCH RESULTS 39
4.1 Sample Description 39
4.2 Reliability of Variables 40
4.3 Factor Analysis 41
4.4 Hypothesis Test 43
4.5 Descriptive Statistics of Variables 48
4.6 T-Test 49
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION 51
5.1. Findings and Contributions 51
5.2. Implication 54
5.3. Limitation 54
REFERENCES 56

[1]Allen M. W. (2003), Michael Allen''s Guide to E-Learning: Building Interactive, Fun and Effective Learning Program for any Company, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
[2]Calhoun, B. D. (2004), Web­Based Training Knowledge Guide.
[3]Chau, P.Y.K. & Hu, P.J.-H. (2001). Information technology acceptance by professionals: A model comparison approach, Decision Sciences, 32(4), 699-719.
[4]Chuttur M. Y. (2009), Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions, Information Systems, 9(37).
[5]Clark, R. C. & Mayer, R. E. (2003), E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning, Pfeiffer, San Francisco.
[6]Compeau, D. R. & Higgins, C. A. (1995), Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test, MIS Quarterly, 19, 189–211.
[7]Davis, F. D. (1986), A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts.
[8]Davis, F. D. (1989), Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339.
[9]Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1989), User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
[10]Davis, F. D. (1993), User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts, International Journal of Man–Machine Studies, 38, 475–487.
[11]Dean, C. (2002). Technology Based Training & On-line Learning: An overview of Authoring Systems and Learning Management Systems available in the UK, PeakDean Interactive.
[12]Dishaw, M.T., & Strong, D.M. (1999) “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task-Technology Fit Constructs,” Information and Management 36 (1), 9–21.
[13]Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts.
[14]Hall, B. (1997), Web-Based Training Cookbook: Everything you need to know about online training, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
[15]Keller, C. & Cernerud, L. (2002). Students’ perception of e-learning in university education, Learning, Media and Technology, 27(1), 55-67.
[16]LaRose, R., Gregg, J., & Eastin, M. (1998). Audio graphic tele-courses for the Web: An experiment. Journal of Computer Mediated Communications, 4(2).
[17]Masrom, M. (2007), Technology Acceptance Model and E-learning 12th International Conference on Education.
[18]McDermott, R. (2001), Are you ready for computer-based training? What CBT can (and can''t) do for your company, Quality Digest, 21(8).
[19]Tavangarian, D., Leypold, M. E., Nölting, K., Röser, M., & Voigt, D. (2004). Is e-Learning the solution for individual learning? Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2(2), 273−280.
[20]The Politburo (2000), Directive No 58-CT/TW on 10/17/2000 regarding to the information technology application promotion and development in the national industrialization and modernization.
[21]The Ministry of Education and Training (2008), Directive No 55/2008/CT-BGDĐT on 09/30/2008 regarding to the information technology application enhancement in education in the period 2008 – 2012.
[22]Trombley, K. B. & Lee, D. (2002), Web-based learning in corporations: Who is using it and why, who is not and why not?, Journal of Educational Media, 27(3), 137-146.
[23]Venkatesh, V. (1999), Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: The Role of Intrinsic Motivation, MIS Quarterly, 23, 239-260.
[24]Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996), A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test, Decision Sciences, 27, 451–481.
[25]Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal filed studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204.
[26]Viet nam ICT White Book, 2011.