臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

台灣將光電產業視為兩兆雙星的重點發展產業之一，由於台灣的經濟環境是以出口貿易及代工為主，其光電產業總產值由1996年的1,154億元成長至2010年的2兆1,557億新台幣，但由於2012年面臨歐洲債信危機，產值僅維持在2010年的水準，由此得知台灣光電產業在面臨全球經濟環境快速變遷及全球化時代的來臨時，其產業將遭遇更廣泛、多元、跨國際的競爭。對台灣國內企業來說，為了維持獲利與成長，單憑國內市場規模並不足以支撐企業持續經營，同時受到國家以出口貿易為主的經濟環境以及外國競爭者的影響，企業走向國際化成為重點目標之一。知識基礎理論認為，知識資產為企業最重要的資源，因此企業需具備吸收外部知識且有效學習的能力，以發展獨特的資源、能力是企業走向國際化的必要條件，唯有如此才能在競爭激烈的全球環境下保有企業的競爭優勢。
因此，本研究主要目的針對台灣光電產業來探討知識吸收能力、組織學習對於企業國際化程度之間的關係，並且探討組織學習是否對知識吸收能力與國際化程度間產生中介的效果。研究樣本為121家台灣光電產業企業、研究期間為2007年至2011年，其財務及專利資料分別來自TEJ資料庫及USPTO專利資料庫，利用SPSS進行迴歸等統計分析。實證結果顯示：知識吸收能力對企業國際化有顯著正向影響；知識吸收能力對於組織學習具有顯著正向影響；組織學習對知識吸收能力與企業國際化程度之間的影響，具有正向完全中介效果。

Optical industry is a key development industry in Taiwan. The industry’s output value had grown from NT.115.4 to NT. 2 billions from 1996 to 2010 year. But 2012 Europe debt crisis resulted that the output value of 2012 only kept the same in 2010. Therefore, Taiwan's optical industry is under wide and cross-national challenge of the global competition. Because Taiwan is an export-oriented country, focusing on domestic market is not enough to compete with other multinational firms. Internationalization becomes a key factor for Taiwan enterprises to build competitive advantage.
According to knowledge-based theory(KBT), knowledge asset is a very important resource for a firm. Nevertheless, knowledge assets can't keep the competence forever, firms need knowledge absorptive capacity and organizational learning to create competitive advantage. The study will explore the relationship of knowledge absorptive capacity, organizational learning and firm's internationalization in Taiwan optical industry, and demonstrate the mediating effects of organizational learning. The research samples are the 121 optical companies in Taiwan, and the research period is from 2007 to 2011.The financial data are from TEJ database and patent data are from USPTO database. This study will use regression analysis to demonstrate the relationship between those variables. Empirical results findings are as follows: First, knowledge absorptive capacity has positive effect on firm's internationalization. Second, knowledge absorptive capacity has positive effect on organizational earning. Finally, organizational learning has positive and the mediating effect between knowledge absorptive capacity and firm's internationalization.

目錄...................................................................iv
表目錄...................................................................vi
圖目錄...................................................................vii
第一章 緒論...............................................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機.......................................................1
第二節 研究目的............................................................3
第三節 研究範圍與限制.......................................................4
第四節 研究流程............................................................5
第二章 文獻探討............................................................6
第一節 光電產業............................................................6
壹、光電產業分類及範疇.......................................................6
貳、全球光電產業的現況及發展..................................................7
參、台灣光電產業的現況與發展..................................................9
第二節 知識吸收能力 ........................................................13
壹、知識吸收能力之定義......................................................13
貳、知識吸收能力之衡量......................................................16
第一節 組織學習................................................ ........17
壹、組織學習之定義.........................................................17
貳、組織學習方式...........................................................21
參、組織學習方式之衡量......................................................23
第四節 國際化.............................................................24
壹、國際化之定義...........................................................24
貳、國際化程度的衡量........................................................25
第三章 研究設計............................................................29
第一節 研究架構............................................................29
第二節 研究假說............................................................30
壹、知識吸收能力對於企業國際化程度的影響........................................30
貳、知識吸收能力對組織學習的影響...............................................31
參、組織學習是知識吸收能力對企業國際化程度影響的中介效果...........................32
第三節 樣本設計與研究資料來源.................................................34
第四節 研究模式與變數定義....................................................35
壹、 國際化程度.........................................................36
貳、 知識吸收能力.......................................................37
參、 組織學習..........................................................37
第五節 統計方法............................................................40
第四章 實證分析與結果.......................................................42
第一節 基本敘述統計分析......................................................42
第二節 知識吸收能力、組織學習對企業國際化程度影響.................................47
壹、Pearson相關分析........................................................47
貳、共線性檢定..............................................................48
參、知識吸收能力對企業國際化之影響結果..........................................48
肆、知識吸收能力對組織學習之影響結果............................................49
伍、組織學習是否為知識吸收能力與企業國際化之間的中介效果.............................50
第五章 結論與建議............................................................52
第一節 研究結論..............................................................52
壹、研究貢獻................................................................56
貳、管理實務意涵..............................................................57
第三節 未來研究建議 ...........................................................58
參考文獻.....................................................................60

中文部分
1.于卓民(2005)。國際企業-環境與管理。臺北市：華泰。
2.江正信(2000)。高階經營團隊與企業策略決策模式、組織學習傾向、創新能力及經營績效之關係研究。國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
3.李雅靖(2009)。吸收能力對企業績效之影響：產業環境觀點。東海大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
4.邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析-SPSS資料分析範例解析。台北：五男圖書出版。
5.吳青松(2002)。國際企業管理-理論與實務。台北：智勝。
6.吳啟絹、廖述賢、胡大謙、楊旻儒(2010)。吸收能力、知識移轉、組織學習與競爭優勢之關聯性研究。商略學報，第2卷 ，第4期 ，269-292。
7.邱昱群(2010)。海外中小企業之國際化程度與行銷活動對聯盟滿意度與品牌價值之影響：以產業密集度為干擾。國際企業學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
8.洪綺霞(2008)。知識投入、知識擴散效果與知識吸收能力對知識密集服務業的創新績效之影響-以台灣IC設計產業為例。東海大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
9.柯瀞雯(2012)。以網絡中心性與合作密切度探討吸收能力對創新績效之影響。逢甲大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
10.野中郁次郎、竹內弘高(2004)。胡瑋珊譯，企業創新的螺旋：全球競爭下的知識創新機制。台北：中國生產力出版。
11.張皓雲(2008)。組織吸收能力之實現－探討知識創造機制的角色。國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
12.許維呈(2004)。 吸收能力對創新績效與技術獲取模式影響之研究--以台灣資訊、電子產業為例。銘傳大學資訊管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
13.曾河嶸(2006)。供應鏈卓越之關鍵影響因素-參與決策、資訊科技的運用，組織學習能力，技術創新能力，製造彈性能力，新產品開法能力之探索研究。國立成功大學工業與資訊管理研究所博士學位論文。
14.楊嘉雯(2003)。吸收能力、整合能力對知識創新及持久性競爭優勢影響之研究。屏東科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
15.廖述賢、畢吳琛、劉志堂(2004)。知識慣性、組織學習、組織創新之關聯性研究。2004科技整合管理國際研討會， 289-314。
16.楊國安、大衛‧歐瑞奇、史蒂芬‧納森、瑪莉安‧范格林娜著。組織學習能力。劉復苓譯(2001)。台北：聯經。
17.劉韻僖、林玟廷(2008)。台灣資訊產業上市企業國際化程度與企業治理關係之探討。中山管理評論，第16卷，第1期，51-82。
18.韓文軒(2011)。企業國際化程度對企業治理之影響。銘傳大學國際企業學系碩士論文。
19.簡俊才 ( 1997 )。互動機制、吸收能力與訓練對技術移轉績效之影響－以工研院主導之共同研發聯盟為例。暨南大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
20.羅國俊(2011)。兩岸員工組織學習過程差異之探討-以 A 企業為例。國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
21.PIDA光電科技工業協進會(2010、2011)。全球光電市場與台灣產業，民102年6月10日，取自http://www.pida.org.tw/welcome.asp。
22.PIDA光電科技工業協進會(2012)。光電產品界定範圍。民102年6月10日，取自http://www.pida.org.tw/welcome.asp。
23.經濟部技術智慧財產局(2003)。專利資訊查詢。民102年8月25日，取自http://www.tipo.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1。

英文部分
1.Ahuja, G. & Katila, R. (2001). Technological Acquisitions and the Innovation Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Longitudinal Study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197-220.
2.Blomstermo, A. & Sharm, D. D. (2003). Learning in the Internationalisation Process of Firms. UK: Edward Elgar Pub.
3.Annavarjula, M. & Beldona, S. (2000). Multinationality Performance Relationship: A Review and Reconceptualization. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 8(1),48-67.
4.Aragón-Correa, J. A., García-Morales, V. J. & Cordón-Pozo, E. (2007). Leadership and organizational learning's role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(3), 349-359.
5.Argyris, C. & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. MA: Addison Wesley.
6.Atuahene-Gima, K. (1992). Inward Technology Licensing as an Alternative to Internal R&D in New Product Development：A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Production Innovation Management, 9(2), 156-167.
7.Aulakh, P. S., Kotabe, M. & Teegen, H. (2000).Export Strategies and Performance of Firms From Emerging Economies: Evidence From Brazil, Chile, and Mexico. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3), 342-361.
8.Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J. & Almedia, J. G. (2000). Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability On International Growth. Academy of Management Journal , 43(5),909-924.
9.Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
10.Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
11.Beer, M., Voelpel, S. C., Leibold, M. & Tekie E.B. (2005).Strategic management as organizational learning: Developing fit and alignment through a disciplined process. Long Range planning, 38(5), 445-465.
12.Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B. & Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(8/9),1237-1263.
13.Benvignati, A.M. (1987). Domestic profit advantage of multinational firms. Journal of business, 60, 449-461.
14.Brewer, H. L. (1981). Investor Benefits from Corporation International Diversification. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 16(1), 113-126.
15.Buckley, P. J. & Casson. M. (1976). The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. New York: The McMillan Company.
16.Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T. & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6),515-524.
17.Calof, J. L. & Beamish, P. W. (1995). Adapting to foreign markets: Explaining internationalization. International Business Review,4(2), 115-131.
18.Cantner, U. & Graf, H. (2005). The Network of Innovators in Jena: An Application of Social Network Analysis. Prepared for the Fourth European Meeting on Applied Evolutionary Economics (EMAEE), 19-21.
19.Cantwell, J. A. & Sanna-Randaccio, F. (1992). Multinationality and firm growth. Welt-wirtschaftliches Archiv, 129, 275-729.
20.Capar, N.& Kotabe, M. (2003). The relationship between international diversification and performance in service firms . Journal of International Business Studies, 34( 4),345-355.
21.Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-52.
22.Cyert, R. M. & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23.Daniels, J. D. & Bracker J. (1989). Profit Performance: Do Foreign Operations Make a Difference? Management International Review, 29(1), 46-57.
24.Delios, A. & Beamish, P. W. (1999). Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 915-933.
25.Duncan, R. & Weiss, A. (1979). Organizational Learning: Implications for Organizational Design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 75.
26.Dunning, J. H. (1993). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
27.Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams.Administrative Science Quarterly, Ithaca,44(2), 350-383.
28.Eppink, D. J. & Van, R. (1988). The internationalization of dutch industry. Long Range Planning, 21(5), 54-60.
29.Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgård, A. & Sharma, D. D. (2000). Effect of variation on knowledge accumulation in the internationalization process. International Studies of Management & Organization, 30(1), 26-44.
30.Eriksson, K., Majkgård, A. & Sharma, D. D. (2000). Path dependence and knowledge development in the internationalization process. Management International Review, 40(4), 307-28.
31.Eriksson, K. & Chetty, S. (2003). The effect of experience and absorptive capacity on foreign market knowledge. International Business Review, 12(6), 673-95.
32.Errunza, V. R. & Senbet, L. W. (1984).International Corporate Diversification, Market Valuation, and Size-Adjusted Evidence. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 727-743.
33.Fabrizio, K. R. (2006). Absorptive Capacity and Innovation: Evidence from Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Firms. Goizueta School of Business Emory University.
34.Fang E., Wang Q. & Lilien G. (2009). Developing Knowledge-Based Innovation Advantage through Organizational Learning Strategies. Institute for the Study of Business Markets The Pennsylvania State University.
35.Fayerweather, J. (1969).Canadian Foreign Investment Policy. California Management Review ,17(3), 74-83.
36.Filatotchev, I. & Piesse, J. (2009). R&D, internationalization and growth of newly listed firms: European evidence, Journal of International Business Studies, 40(8), 1260-1276.
37.Fiol, C. M. & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning, Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803-813.
38.Fosfuri, A. & Tribó, J. (2008). Exploring the Determinants of Potential Absorptive Capacity and its Impact on Innovation Performance. Omega 36 (2), 173-187.
39.Franko, L. G. (1989). Global corporate competition: Who's winning, who's losing, and the R&D factor as one reason why. Strategic Management Journal, 449-474.
40.Fulmer, R. M. (1994). A model for changing the way organizations learn. Planning Review, 22(3), 20-24.
41.Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78 -91.
42.Geringer, J. M., Tallman, S. & Olsen, D. M. (2000). Product and International Diversification Among Japanese Multina tional Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 51-80.
43.Gherardi, S. & Nicolini, D. (2000). The organizational learning of safety in communities of practice. Journal of Management, 9(1),7-18.
44.Giget, M. (1988). The Bonsai trees of Japan industry. Futures, 147-153.
45.Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implication for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
46.Gray, C. (2006). Absorptive Capacity, Knowledge Management and Innovation in Entrepreneurial Small Firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviors and Research, 12(6), 345-60.
47.Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E. & Kim H. (1997). International Diversification: Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Product-Diversified Firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767-798.
48.Zhao, H. & Li, H. (1997).R&D and export: An empirical analysis of Chinese manufacturing firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 8(1), 89-105.
49.Horst, T. (1972). Firm and industry determinants of the decision to invest abroad: An empirical study. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 54(3), 258--266.
50.Hsu, C. C. & Pereira, A. (2008).Internationalization and performance: The moderating effects of organizational learning. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 36(2),188-205.
51.Hu, M. Y., Chen, H. & Shieh, J. C. (1992). Impact of U. S. 2 China Joint Ventures on Stockholders’ Wealth by Degree of International Involvement. Management International Review, 32, 135-148.
52.Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational Learning: The Contributing Process and the Literatures. Organizational Science, 2, 88-115.
53.Hughes, K. S. (1986). Exports and innovation. European Economic Review, 30, 383-399.
54.Iansiti, M. & Clark, K. B. (1994). Integration and Dynamic Capability: Evidence from Product Development in Automobiles and Mainframe Computers. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(2), 557-605.
55.Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J. E. (1977).The internationalization process of the firm-A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 23-32.
56.Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J. E. (1990). The mechanisms of internationalization. International Marketing Review, 7(4), 11-24.
57.Kim, D. H. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, Fall, 37-50.
58.Kim, L. (1998). Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science, 9(4), 506-521.
59.Kostopoulosa, K., Papalexandrisb, A., Papachronic, M. & Ioannoud G. (2011). Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1335-1343.
60.Kuo, H. C. & Wang, L. H. (2005). The Effect of the Degree of Internationalization on Capital Structure for Listed Multinational Corporations in Taiwan during the Asian Financial Crisis. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 8(3), 47-466.
61.Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R. & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833-836.
62.Lee, H. H. & Stone, J. A. (1994). Product and process innovation in the product life cycles: estimates for U.S. manufacturing industries. Southern Economic Journal, 60(3), 754-763.
63.Levitt, B. & March J. G. (1988). Organizational Learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.
64.Liao, L. F. (2006). A Learning Organization Perspective on Knowledge-sharing Behavior and Firm Innovation. Human Systems Management, 25(4), 227- 236.
65.Liao, S. H., Chen F. W. & Chen C. C. (2007) .Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: an empirical study of Taiwan's knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Information Science, (33)3, 340-359.
66.Lieberman, M. B. (1987). The learning curve, diffusion, and competitive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 8 (5), 441-452.
67.Lim, K. (2004).The Many Faces of Absorptive Capacity: Spillovers of Copper Interconnect Technology for Semiconductor Chips. Melbourne Business School.
68.Liu, X. & White, R. (1997). The relative contributions of foreign technology and domestic inputs to innovation in Chinese manufacturing industries. Technovation, 17(3), 119-125.
69.Lloréns Montes, F. J., Ruiz Moreno, A. & García Morales, V. (2005). Influence of support leadership and teamwork cohesion on organizational learning, innovation and performance: an empirical examination. Technovation, 25 (10), 1159-1172.
70.Lord, R. G. & Maher, K. J. (1990). Alternative Information-Processing Models and Their Implications for Theory Research and Practice. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 9-28.
71.Lu, J. W. & Beamish, P.W. (2001).The International Diversification and Firm Performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 565-586.
72.Lyles, M. A. (1988). Learning among Joint Venture Sophisticated Firms. Management International Review, 28, 85-98.
73.Maisonrouge, J. G. (1974). The mythology of multinationalism. Columbia Journal of World Business, 9(1), 7-12.
74.March, J. G. & Olsen J. P. (1975). The Uncertainty of the Past: Organizational Learning Under Ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research, 3, 147-171.
75.Mariano, N. & Pilar, Q.(2005). Absorptive Capacity, Technological Opportunity, Knowledge Spillovers, and Innovative Effort. Technovation, 25(10), 1141-1157.
76.Mavondo, F. T., Chimhanzi, J. & Stewart, J. (2005).Learning orientation and market orientation: Relationship with innovation, human resource practices and performance.European Journal of Marketing, 39 (11/12), 1235-1392.
77.Michel, A. & Shaked, I. (1986). Multinational corporations vs. domestic corporations: Financial performance and characteristics. Journal of International Business Studies, 18, 89-100.
78.Miller, J. C. & Pras, B. (1980). The effects of multinational and export diversification on the profit stability of U.S corporations. Southern Economic Journal, 46, 792-805.
79.Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
80.Mowery, D. C. & Oxley, J. E. (1995). Inward technology transfer and competitiveness：The role of national innovation systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 67-93.
81.Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E. & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter), 77-91.
82.Nevis, E., DiBella, A. & Gould, J. (1995). Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems. Sloan Management Review Winter, 73-84.
83.Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company, New York： Oxford University Press, Inc.
84.Kuivalainen, O., Puumalainen K., Sintonen S. & Kyläheiko K. (2010). Organizational capabilities and internationalisation of the small and medium-sized information and communications technology firms. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 135-155.
85.Oltra, M. & Flor, M. (2003). The impact of technological opportunities and innovative capabilities on firms’ output innovation. Creativity & Innovation Management, 12(3), 137-145.
86.Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the Growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.
87.Perlmutter, H. V. (1969). The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation. Columbia Journal of Worm Business, 4, 9-18.
88.Pierce, N. (1981). Company Internationalization: Active and Reactive Exporting. European Journal of Marketing, 15(3), 40-59.
89.Jerez-Góomez,P. Céspedes-Lorente, J. & Valle-Cabrera R. (2005). Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement. Journal of Business Research, 58, 715-725.
90.Prashantham, S. (2005). Toward a knowledge-based conceptualization of internationalization. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 37-53.
91.Punnett, B. J. (1989). Experiencing International Management. Boston. MA: PWS-KENT.
92.Quinn, J. B. (1992). Intelligent Enterprise. A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry. NY: The Free Press.
93.Ramaswamy, K., Kroeck K. G. & Renforth, W. M. (1996). Measuring the Degree of Internationalization of a Firm : A Comment. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(1), 167-177.
94.Raymond, L. & Blili, S. (2001). Organizational learning as a foundation of electronic commerce in the network organization. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(2), 29-45.
95.Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (1998). The effects of the degree of internationalization on firm performance. International Business Review, 7(3), 315-321.
96.Richter, F. J. & Vetted, K. (1995).Successful Joint Ventures in Japan: Transferring Knowledge through Organizational Learning. Long Range Planning, 28(3), 37-46.
97.Rothaermel, F. (2012). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. New York :
McGraw-Hill.
98.Ruigrok, W. & Wagner H. (2003).Internationalization and Performance: An Organizational Learning Perspective. Management International Review, 43(1), 63-83.
99.Sanders, W. G. & Carpenter, M. A. (1998). Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure. Academy of Management journal, 158-178.
100.Schnaars, S. (1994), Managing Imitation Strategies. New York, NY: The Free Press.
101.Schulz, M. (2001). The Uncertain Relevance of Newness: Organizational Learning and Knowledge Flows. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 661-681.
102.Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. NY: Doubleday.
103.Shaw, R. B. & Perkins. D. (1992). Teaching Organizations to Learn. Organizational Development Journal, winter, 1-12.
104.Shrivastava, P. (1983). A typology of organizational learning systems. Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 7-28.
105.Simon, H. A. (1953). Birth of an organization：the economic cooperation
administration. Public Administration Review, 13(4), 227-236.
106.Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E. & Noordewier, T. A. (1997).A Framework for Market-based Organizational Learning: Linking Values, Knowledge, and Behavior. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 25(4), 305-318.
107.Sinkula, J. M. (1994). Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning. Journal of Marketing, 58, 35-45.
108.Slater, S.F. & Narver, J.C. (1994). Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship. Journal of Marketing, 58, 46-55.
109.Smith, R. P. & Eppinger, S. D. (1997). A Predictive Model of Sequential Iteration in Engineering Design. Management Science, 43 (8), 1104-1120.
110.Spender, J.C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 45-62.
111.Spender, J. C. & Grant, R. M. (1996). Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 5-9.
112.Stata, R. (1989). Organizational learning: the key to management innovation. Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 64-73.
113.Stock, G., Greis, N. & Fischer, W. (2001). Absorptive capacity and new product development. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(1), 77.
114.Stopford, J. & Wells, L. (1972). Managing the Multinational Enterprise, Organization of the firm and Ownership of the Subsidiaries. New York: Basics Books.
115.Roper, S. & Love, J. H. ( 2002). Innovation and export performance: evidence from the UK and German manufacturing plants. Research Policy, 31, 1087-1102..
116.Sullivan, D. (1994). Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 325-342.
117.Tallman, S. & Li J. (1996). Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firm. Academy of management Journal, 39(1), 179-196.
118.Thomas, A. & Williams, G. R. (1991). A Strategy to Provide Retirement Benefits for International Transferees in a Global Company. Benefits & Compensation International ,October, 2-7.
119.Todorova, G. & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity : valuing a
reconceptualization . Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 774-786.
120.Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in interorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004.
121.Tsang, E. (1997). Organizational learning and the learning organization：dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research .Human Relations, 50(1), 73-89.
122.UNCTAD (1995). World Investment Report. New York: United Nation Publication.
123.UNCTAD (2004). World Investment Report. New York: United Nation Publication.
124.Van Den Bosch, F. Volberda, H. & De Boer, M. (1999). Convolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities.Organization Science, 10(5), 551-568.
125.Vernon, M R. (1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190-207.
126.Wernerfelt, B. (1984).The Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
127.Yelle, L. E. (1979). The learning curve: historical review and comprehensive survey. Decision Sciences, 10(2), 302-328.
128.Yeung, A. K., Ulrich, D. O., Nason, S. W. & Glinow, M. A. (1999). Organizational Learning Capability. New York：Oxford University Press Inc.
129.Zahra, A. S. & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
130.Zahra, S. A. & Hayton, J. C. (2008). The Effect of International Venturing on Firm Performance: The Moderating Influence of Absorptive Capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(2), 195-220.