跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.168.16) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/03/21 16:10
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:白又如
研究生(外文):Pai, You-Jui
論文名稱:總經理特質與企業績效
論文名稱(外文):CEO Characteristics and Firm Performance
指導教授:陳家偉陳家偉引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chen, Jia-Wei
口試委員:陳麗君王有惟
口試委員(外文):Chen, Li-JunWang, Yu-Wei
口試日期:2014-06-19
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:財務金融學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:32
中文關鍵詞:總經理特質企業績效
外文關鍵詞:CEO CharacteristicsFirm Performance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:306
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:36
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
  本研究以2006年至2012年台灣上市企業為樣本,透過分析總經理過去的學習經驗與工作經歷,瞭解其對於當前企業管理績效的影響。本研究以總經理是否取得商管研究所的文憑、總經理過去曾經任職的企業數、總經理過去曾經任職的產業數、以及過去是否擔任過其他企業的總經理等四個變數,作為總經理個人學經歷的代理變數,並以會計績效衡量企業的營運績效。
  整體而言,總經理是否取得商管研究所的文憑對於企業績效並無顯著影響,此處呼應了華爾街日報的報導,指出總經理就讀商管研究所對於其人脈發展的助益可能大於專業知識的培養。總經理曾經任職過的企業數則顯著受到產業數的影響,顯示總經理應在不同的企業間多方學習不同企業文化下的管理技能,但是這些企業應在同一產業中加強同一產業專業技能的培養。最後,總經理過去曾經擔任過其他企業的總經理對於當前的企業績效有顯著的助益,顯示過去的管理技能與親身經歷確實有助於當前職務的推行。

  The purpose of this paper is to empirically examine whether the resumes of Taiwan listed firms’ CEOs’ lifetime experience affect the firm’s performance from 2006 through 2012. With the conditions of whether the CEO got the MBA degree, number of firms where the CEO worked, number of industries where the CEO worked, and whether the CEO held a CEO position at another firm. My study shows that the MBA degree doesn’t matter for CEOs’ ability to manage the firm. The numbers of firms that the CEO worked positively affect the CEOs’ ability to manage but the numbers of industries CEOs worked negatively affect, which means that CEOs should transfer in different firms but in the same industries. And the experience that CEOs held the CEO position positively affect the firms’ performance.
前言.....................................1
文獻探討...............................3
樣本選擇與研究方法...............7
結論...................................19
參考文獻.............................21


1.李佳玲、葉穎蓉與何晉滄(2012),「績效、公司治理與高階管理者離職關係之實證研究」,中山管理評論,第13卷第1期,頁75-106。
2.林秀鳳與李建然(2008),「管理特質對企業績效之影響」,中山管理評論,第16卷第4期,頁703-742。
3.劉韻僖與林玟廷(2010),「CEO權力與薪酬關係之實證研究-代理和資源依賴觀點」,中山企管評論,第8卷第1期,頁35-60。
4.Agrawal A., and C. Knoeber (2001). “Do Some Outside Directors Play a Political Role?” Journal of Law and Economics 44: 179-198.
5.Bantel, K. A. and S. E. Jackson (1989). “Top Management and Innovation in Banking: Does the Composition of the Team Make a Difference?” Strategic Management Journal 10: 802-836.
6.Barker, V. L. and O. C. Mueller (2002). “CEO Characteristics and Firm R&D Spending." Management Science, Vol. 48, No.6, 782-801.
7.Bertrand, M. and A. Schoar (2003). “Managing with Style: The Effect of Managers on Firm Policies. “ Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 1169-1208.
8.Bushman, R. M., R. J. Indjejikian and A. Smith (1996). “CEO Compensation: The Role of Individual Performance Evaluation.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 21: 161-193.
9.Chemmanur, T. J. and I. Paeglis (2005). “Management Quality, Certification, and Initial Public Offerings.” Journal of Financial Economics 76: 331-368.
10.Cheng, S. (2008) “Board Size and the Variability of Corporate Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics 87: 157-176.
11.Claessens, S., S. Djankov and H. P. Lang (2000). “The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporation.” Journal of Financial Economics 58: 81-112.
12.Cohen B. D. and T. J. Dean (2005). “Information Asymmetry and Investor Valuation of IPOs: Top Management Team Legitimacy as a Capital Market Signal.” Strategic Management Journal 26: 683-690.
13.Cremers, K. J. M. and V. B. Nair (2005). “Governance Mechanisms and Equity Prices.” Journal of Finance 60: 2859-2894.
14.Custodio, C., M. A. Ferreira and P. Matos (2013). “Generalists versus Specialist: Lifetime Experience and Chief Executive Officer Pay.” Journal of Financial Economics 108: 471-492.
15.Dahya, J., A. A. Lonie and D. M. Power (1998). “Ownership Structure, Firm Performance and Top Executive Change: an Analysis of UK Firms.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 25: 1089-1118.
16.Demsetz, H. and B. Villalonga. (2001). “Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance” Journal of Corporate Finance 7: 209-233.
17.Denis, D. J., D. K. Denis and A. Sarin (1997). “Ownership Structure and Top Executive Turnover. ” Journal of Financial Economics 45: 193-221.
18.Denis, D. K. and J. J. McConnell (2003). “International Corporate Governance.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38: 1-36.
19.Dyer, W. G. (2006). “Examining the “Family Effect” on Firm Performance.” Family Business Review 19: 253-273.
20.Fahlenbrach R., A. Low and R. M. Stulz (2010). “Why do Firms Appoint CEOs as Outside Directors?” Journal of Financial Economics 97: 12-32.
21.Fama, E. F. (1980). “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy 88: 288-307.
22.Fayol, H. (1916). Administration industrielle et générale. Paris: Dunod.
23.Fosberg, R. H. and M. R. Nelson (1999). “Leadership Structure and Firm Performance.” International Review of Financial Analysis 8: 83-96.
24.Gabaix, X. and A. Landier (2008). “Why has CEO Pay Increased So Much?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123: 49–100.
25.Goyal, V. K. and C. W. Park (2002). “Board Leadership Structure and CEO Turnover.” Journal of Corporate Finance 8: 49-66.
26.Hambrick, D. C. and R. A. D’Aveni (1992). “Top Team Deterioration as Part of the Downward Spiral of Large Corporate Bankruptcies.” Management Science 38: 1445-1466.
27.Hambrick, D. C. and S. Finkelstein (1987). “Managerial Discretion: A Bridge Between Polar Views of Organizational Outcomes.” Research in Organizational Behavior 9: 369-406.
28.Hambrick, D. C. and P. A. Mason (1984). “Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of its Top Managers.” Academy of Management Review 9: 193-206.
29.Hansen, J. A. (1992). “Innovation, Firm Size, and Firm Age.” Small Business Economics 4:37-44.
30.Hermalin, B. and M. Weisbach (1998). “Endogenously Chosen Boards of Directors and Their Monitoring of the CEO.” American Economic Review 88: 96–118.
31.Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling (1976). “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.
32.Kesner, I. F. and D. R. Dalton. (1987). “Composition and CEO Duality in Boards of Directors: an International Perspective.” Journal of International Business Studies 18: 33-42.
33.Murphy, K. J., and J. Zabojnik (2004). “CEO Pay and Turnover: A Market-Based Explanation for Recent Trends.” American Economic Review 94: 192–196.
34.Rechner, P. L. (1989.) “Corporate Governance: Fact or Fiction?” Business Horizons 4: 11-15.
35.Rosen, S. (1981). “The Economics of Superstars.” American Economic Review 71: 845–858.
36.Weisbach, M. S. (1988). “Outsider Directors and CEO Turnover.” Journal of Financial Economics 20: 431-460.
37.Williamson, O. E. (1983). “Organization Form, Residual Claimants and Corporate Control.” Journal of Law and Economics 26: 351-366.
38.Wolfensohn, James. (1999). “Learning a Brutal Lesson.” The Banker, Feb., 14.
39.Yermack, D. (1996). “Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors.” Journal of Financial Economics 40: 185-211.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top