跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.201.92.114) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/03/31 08:42
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:賴定忠
研究生(外文):Lai, Ting-Chung
論文名稱:績效與薪酬管理之探討與反思─I公司為例
論文名稱(外文):The Linkage between Performance and Compensation - Review and Reflection for Company I
指導教授:林財丁林財丁引用關係
指導教授(外文):Lin, Tsai-Ding
口試委員:李明煌楊坤鋒
口試委員(外文):Li, Ming-HuangYang, Kun-Feng
口試日期:2014-06-17
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:高階經營管理碩士在職專班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:54
中文關鍵詞:績效考核薪酬制度關鍵性績效指標(KPI)
外文關鍵詞:Performance EvaluationCompensationKPI
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:476
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:53
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
為提升企業經營效率,有效的激勵制度是提升績效的重要工具。然一般企業在實施績效獎金制度時,其應如何訂定績效目標、評量績效指標?尤其是關鍵性績效指標(Key Performance Indicator簡稱KPI)。在訂定KPI後,相關作業程序如溝通、執行以至於在達成公司更高營運目標後,應如何公正、合理、客觀的據以發放績效獎金,才能達到真正的激勵效果,則值得去設計。本文透過相關文獻探討,期以瞭解推行「績效獎金」制度並作分配管理,對激勵與績效成果的關聯性,並檢討個案公司(I公司)之實施現況與改進之道。
Effective incentive system is an important tool to enhance business performance. However, most companies fail to set effective performance target, nor acceptable KPIs (Key Performance Indicators). Once KPIs are set and agreed upon, the challenge of implementation phase just begins. It involves process of people communication, as well as the objectiveness and perceived fairness of incentive distribution. In this research, the author intends to investigate the performance evaluation and compensation management through literature review and the study of real companies. Among those, Company I is the focal case the author intends to propose ways to improve its performance and compensation management system.
第一章 緒論......................................1
第一節 研究目的.............................1
第二節 績效與薪酬管理........................1
第二章 文獻探討 .................................4
第一節 績效管理學說探討......................4
第二節 績效制度建立的程序....................12
第三章 薪酬管理...................................15
第一節 薪酬的設計...........................15
第二節 變動薪酬.............................16
第三節 績效考核表單實例檢討──T、Y、H公司為例....20
第四章 對I公司獎金制度的檢討與建議....................33
第一節 獎金制度的檢討........................33
第二節 新評核與獎金制度之建構..................34
第三節 研究建議.............................42
參考文獻..........................................43
附錄:I公司外派人員薪酬制度說明.......................47

一、中文部份
吳秉恩(1992)。策略性人力資源管理:理念、運作與實務。台北:中國經濟企業研究所。
吳萬益(1996)。台美日企業在台灣及大陸企業經營環境及競爭策略之研究。台大管理論叢,7(1),49~84。
林財丁、陳子良(2007)。人力資源管理。台中:滄海。
林財丁、林瑞發編譯(2012)。組織行為《Stephen Robbins原著》。台中:滄海。
邱琬亭(2009)。高績效工作系統組成因子互動性之探索。第十五屆企業人力資源管理專題實務研究成果發表,中央大學人力資源管理研究所。
張明輝(2012)。企業運用激勵員工方法比較。工商時報,記者陳懷瑜訪問稿,2012.2.21。
簡博浩(2009)。任務性、脈絡性、適應性績效表現對主管獎酬決策影響效果之研究。國立政治大學企業管理學系博士論文。
羅耀宗譯(2012)。致勝《Jack Welch with Suzy Welch原著》。天下文化。
工作特徵模型。MBA智庫百科。http://wiki.mbalib.com/wiki/%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C%E7%89%B9%E5%BE%81%E6%A8%A1%E5%9E%8B
目標管理模型。MBA智庫百科。
http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%e7%9b%ae%e6%a0%87%e7%ae%a1%e7%90%86
馬斯洛人類需求五層次理論。MBA智庫百科。
http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E9%A9%AC%E6%96%AF%E6%B4%9B%E4%BA%BA%E7%B1%BB%E9%9C%80%E6%B1%82%E4%BA%94%E5%B1%82%E6%AC%A1%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA
企業人力資源管理手冊_績效管理。行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局中華民國全國工業總會。

二、英文部份
Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N.Schmitt W. C. Borman & Associates, (Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organization, San Francisco: Joseey-Bass: 71-98.
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organization psychology. In M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds). Handbook of Industrial and Organization Psychology (2nd Ed), Palo Alto, CA: Consulting
Cascio, W. F. (1998). Applied Psychology in Personnel Management (5th Ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Choi, F. D. S., & Mueller (1992). What is Coefficient Alpha? An examination of theory and application. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 98-104.
Chakravarthy, B. (1986). Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(5), pp.437~458.
Cumming, C. M. (1989). Total compensation: An approach to pay structure design. Compensation & Benefits Review, 21(1), 37-42.
Delaney, J. R., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practice on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 949-969.
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347
Hunt, S. (1996). Generic work behavior: An investigation into the dimensions of entry-level, hourly job performance. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 51-83.
Mahoney, Thomas A. (1991). Job evaluation: Endangered species or anachronism? Human Resource Management, 1(2), 155-162.
Motowidlo, S. J. , & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475-480.
Murphy, K. R. (1989). Dimensions of job performance. In R. Dillon, & J. Pellingrino. (Eds.), Testing: Applied and theoretical perspectives (pp.218-247). New York, NY: Pareger.
Murphy, K. R., & Jackson, S. E. (1999). Managing workrole performance: Challenges for twenty-first century organizations and their employees. In D. R. Illgen, & D. E. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing, motivation, and development (pp.325-365). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Nkomo, S. M. (1987). Human Resource Planning and Organization Performance: An Exploratory Analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 387-392.
Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85-97.
Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global rating of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 66-80.
Smith, P. C. (1976). Behaviors, results, and organizational effectiveness: The problem of criteria. In M. D. Dunnette (Eds), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp.745-775). Chicago, Illinois: Rand McNally College Publishing Co.
Szilagyi, A. D. Jr. (1981). Management and Performance, California: Goodyear Publishing Company.
Tosi, Henry L., Jeffrey P. Katz and Luis R. Gomez-Mejia (1997). Disaggregating The
Agency Contract: The Effects of Monitoring, Incentive Alignment, and Term In
Office on Agent Decision Making. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (3), 584-602.
Van de ven, Andrew H. & Diane L. Ferry. (1980). Measuring and Assessing Organization. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5) 540-555.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top