臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

Table of Contents
指導教授推薦書
口試委員審定書
中文摘要 ..........................................................- iii -
Abstract ...........................................................- v -
Table of Contents...........................................................- vi -
List of figures .............................................................- xi-
List of tables ...............................................................- xii -
Chapter I Introduction - 1 -
1.1 Background and motivation - 1 -
1.2 Study purposes - 3 -
1.3 Hypotheses - 3 -
Chapter II Literature review - 4 -
2.1 Lumbar decompression surgery - 4 -
2.2 Rehabilitation for lumbar decompression surgery - 5 -
2.2.1 Early rehabilitation - 5 -
2.2.2 Rehabilitation begin one to three months after surgery - 6 -
2.2.3 Rehabilitation begins three months after surgery - 6 -
2.3 Effects of rehabilitation after lumbar decompression surgery - 7 -
2.3.1 Early rehabilitation - 7 -
2.3.2 Rehabilitation beginning one month postoperatively - 8 -
2.3.3 Rehabilitation beginning in the three month following surgery - 9 -
2.4 The timed "Up &; Go" - 10 -
Chapter III Methods - 12 -
3.1 Research Design - 12 -
3.2 Participants - 12 -
3.3 Interventions - 13 -
3.3.1 Early rehabilitation - 13 -
3.3.2 Education - 15 -
3.4 Outcome measurements - 15 -
3.4.1 Basic information - 16 -
3.4.2 Recording from chart - 16 -
3.4.3 Physical examination - 16 -
3.4.4 Functional performance - 22 -
3.4.5 Visual analogue scale - 26 -
3.4.6 Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire - 27 -
3.5 Statistical analysis - 27 -
Chapter IV Results - 29 -
4.1 Demographics data - 29 -
4.2 Surgery related data - 30 -
4.3 Pain characteristics - 30 -
4.4 Physical examinations - 31 -
4.5 Functional performance - 32 -
4.6 Compliance - 33 -
4.7 Correlation - 33 -
Chapter V Discussion - 34 -
Chapter VI Conclusion - 38 -
Reference - 39 -
Appendix - 60 -
Appendix A. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (Chinese Version) - 60 -


 
List of figures
Figure 1. Flow chart - 59 -
 
List of tables
Table 1. Demographic data comparison between elderly and younger participants - 45 -
Table 2. Demographic data comparison between rehabilitation and control groups - 46 -
Table 3. Surgery related data comparison between elderly and younger participants - 47 -
Table 4. Surgery related data comparison between rehabilitation and control groups - 48 -
Table 5. Pain history comparison between elderly and younger participants - 49 -
Table 6. Pain history comparison between rehabilitation and control groups - 50 -
Table 7. Pain characteristics comparison between elderly and younger participants - 51 -
Table 8. Pain characteristics comparison between rehabilitation and control groups - 52 -
Table 9. Pain intensity comparison between elderly and younger participants -53 -
Table 10. Pain intensity comparison between rehabilitation and control groups - 54 -
Table 11. Physical examination comparison between elderly and younger participants - 55 -
Table 12. Physical examination comparison between rehabilitation and control groups - 56 -
Table 13. Functional outcomes comparison between elderly and younger participants - 57 -
Table 14. Functional outcomes comparison between rehabilitation and control groups - 58 -

Reference
1. Issack PS, Cunningham ME, Pumberger M, Hughes AP, Cammisa FP. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: evaluation and management. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2012;20(8):527-35.
2. Hart LG, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC. Physician office visits for low back pain. Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a U.S. national survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(1):11-9.
3. Hertling D, Kessler RM. Management of common musculoskeletal disorders physical therapy principles and methods. 4th ed: Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &; Wilkins; 2006.
4. Kisner C, Colby LA. Therapeutic exercise foundations and techniques. 5th ed.: Philadelphia：F.A. Davis; 2007.
5. Nielsen P, Jorgensen L, Dahl B, Pedersen T, Tonnesen H. Prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after spinal surgery: randomized clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(2):137-48.
6. O'Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ, Fulk GD. Physical rehabilitation. 6th ed. Philadelphia : F.A. Davis Co.; 2014.
7. McFeely JA, Gracey J. Postoperative exercise programmes for lumbar spine decompression surgery: a systematic review of the evidence. Physical Therapy Reviews. 2006;11(4):248-62.
8. Ostelo RW, Costa LO, Maher CG, de Vet HC, van Tulder MW. Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery: an update Cochrane review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(17):1839-48.
9. Rushton A, Wright C, Goodwin P, Calvert M, Freemantle N. Physiotherapy rehabilitation post first lumbar discectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(14):E961-72.
10. McGregor AH, Dore CJ, Morris TP, Morris S, Jamrozik K. ISSLS prize winner: Function After Spinal Treatment, Exercise, and Rehabilitation (FASTER): a factorial randomized trial to determine whether the functional outcome of spinal surgery can be improved. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(21):1711-20.
11. Kjellby-Wendt G, Styf J C, SG. Early active rehabilitation after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72(5):518-24.
12. Imagama S, Kawakami N, Tsuji T, Ohara T, Matsubara Y, Kanemura T, et al. Perioperative complications and adverse events after lumbar spinal surgery: evaluation of 1012 operations at a single center. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16(5):510-5.
13. Mannion AF, Denzler R, Dvorak J, Muntener M, Grob D. A randomised controlled trial of post-operative rehabilitation after surgical decompression of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(8):1101-17.
14. Sanderson PL, Wood PL. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in old people. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75(3):393-7.
15. Vieweg U, Grochulla F, SpringerLink. Manual of spine surgery. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012.
16. Choi G, Raiturker PP, Kim MJ, Chung DJ, Chae YS, Lee SH. The effect of early isolated lumbar extension exercise program for patients with herniated disc undergoing lumbar discectomy. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(4):764-72; discussion -72.
17. Aalto TJ, Leinonen V, Herno A, Alen M, Kroger H, Turunen V, et al. Postoperative rehabilitation does not improve functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(8):1331-40.
18. Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L. Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up &; Go Test, and gait speeds. Physical therapy. 2002;82(2):128-37.
19. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up &; Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1991;39(2):142-8.
20. Simmonds MJ, Olson SL, Jones S, Hussein T, Lee CE, Novy D, et al. Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(22):2412-21.
21. Botolfsen P, Helbostad JL, Moe-Nilssen R, Wall JC. Reliability and concurrent validity of the Expanded Timed Up-and-Go test in older people with impaired mobility. Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy. 2008;13(2):94-106.
22. Faria CD, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Silva EB, Nadeau S. Expanded timed up and go test with subjects with stroke: reliability and comparisons with matched healthy controls. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2012;93(6):1034-8.
23. Wall JC, Bell C, Campbell S, Davis J. The Timed Get-up-and-Go test revisited: measurement of the component tasks. Journal of rehabilitation research and development. 2000;37(1):109-13.
24. Hislop HJ, Avers D, Brown M, Daniels L. Daniels and Worthingham's muscle testing techniques of manual examination and performance testing. 9th ed. St. Louis, Mo.: Elsevier/Saunders; 2014.
25. Magee DJ. Orthopedic physical assessment. 5th ed.St. Louis, Mo. : Saunders Elsevier; 2008.
26. Dobkin BH. Short-distance walking speed and timed walking distance: redundant measures for clinical trials? Neurology. 2006;66(4):584-6.
27. Bohannon RW. Five-repetition sit-to-stand test: usefulness for older patients in a home-care setting. Perceptual and motor skills. 2011;112(3):803-6.
28. Bohannon RW. Test-retest reliability of the five-repetition sit-to-stand test: a systematic review of the literature involving adults. Journal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength &; Conditioning Association. 2011;25(11):3205-7.
29. Schaubert KL, Bohannon RW. Reliability and validity of three strength measures obtained from community-dwelling elderly persons. Journal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength &; Conditioning Association. 2005;19(3):717-20.
30. Bohannon RW. Reference values for the five-repetition sit-to-stand test: a descriptive meta-analysis of data from elders. Perceptual and motor skills. 2006;103(1):215-22.
31. Chapman JR, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, Bransford RJ, DeVine J, McGirt MJ, et al. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(21 Suppl):S54-68.
32. 陳淑媚, 劉玫舫, 王博民, 黃茂雄. 羅蘭－摩理斯下背痛生活障礙問卷之中文翻譯及改編. 物理治療. 2003;28(6):324-32.
33. DeVine J, Norvell DC, Ecker E, Fourney DR, Vaccaro A, Wang J, et al. Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(21 Suppl):S69-74.
34. Aalto T, Sinikallio S, Kroger H, Viinamaki H, Herno A, Leinonen V, et al. Preoperative predictors for good postoperative satisfaction and functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery - a prospective observational study with a two-year follow-up. Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. 2012;101(4):255-60.
35. Sanden B, Forsth P, Michaelsson K. Smokers show less improvement than nonsmokers two years after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a study of 4555 patients from the Swedish spine register. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(13):1059-64.
36. Sinikallio S, Aalto T, Lehto SM, Airaksinen O, Herno A, Kroger H, et al. Depressive symptoms predict postoperative disability among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a two-year prospective study comparing two age groups. Disability and rehabilitation. 2010;32(6):462-8.
37. Abbott AD, Tyni-Lenne R, Hedlund R. Early rehabilitation targeting cognition, behavior, and motor function after lumbar fusion: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(8):848-57.
38. Keorochana G, Laohacharoensombat W, Wajanavisit W, Chanplakorn P, Woratanarat P, Chatchaipun P. Functional outcome after decompression and instrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: factors influencing unsuccessful outcome change. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. 2011;94(12):1487-94.
39. Sinikallio S, Aalto T, Airaksinen O, Lehto SM, Kroger H, Viinamaki H. Depression is associated with a poorer outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: a two-year prospective follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(8):677-82.
40. Sinikallio S, Lehto SM, Aalto T, Airaksinen O, Kroger H, Viinamaki H. Depressive symptoms during rehabilitation period predict poor outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: a two-year perspective. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2010;11:152.
41. Mannion AF, Balague F, Pellise F, Cedraschi C. Pain measurement in patients with low back pain. Nature clinical practice Rheumatology. 2007;3(11):610-8.
42. Bohannon RW, Glenney SS. Minimal clinically important difference for change in comfortable gait speed of adults with pathology: a systematic review. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. 2014;20(4):295-300.
43. Meretta BM, Whitney SL, Marchetti GF, Sparto PJ, Muirhead RJ. The five times sit to stand test: responsiveness to change and concurrent validity in adults undergoing vestibular rehabilitation. Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium &; orientation. 2006;16(4-5):233-43.
44. Maughan EF, Lewis JS. Outcome measures in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(9):1484-94.
45. Henry KD, Rosemond C, Eckert LB. Effect of number of home exercises on compliance and performance in adults over 65 years of age. Physical therapy. 1999;79(3):270-7.
46. Williamson E, White L, Rushton A. A survey of post-operative management for patients following first time lumbar discectomy. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(6):795-802.