跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.84) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/20 20:05
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林宜如
研究生(外文):Yi-Ju Lin
論文名稱:應用二階段資料包絡分析模型評估美國S&P500企業與環境績效
論文名稱(外文):Evaluate Business and Environmental Performance of American S&P 500 with Two-Stage DEA Model
指導教授:郭怡君郭怡君引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yi-Chun Kuo
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中原大學
系所名稱:國際商學碩士學位學程
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:貿易學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
語文別:英文
論文頁數:121
中文關鍵詞:企業績效;環境績效;二階段資料包絡分析法;麥氏生產力指數
外文關鍵詞:Business performance;Environmental performance;Two-stage DEA;Malmquist Productivity Index
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:188
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
全球氣候變遷的影響,迫使企業經營本質不再只是以創造最高價值為優先,也將環保行動納入其營運考量。本研究以美國S&P500企業為對象,探討企業賺取收益的同時對環境保護的努力與表現。本研究以二階段資料包絡分析法評估美國S&P500企業績效與環境績效。第一階段為企業績效評估,以總資產、員工數和股東權益作為投入的衡量指標;收益和利潤作為產出的衡量指標。第二階段為環境績效之評估,以第一階段的產出作為投入項;並以美國商業週刊公佈的S&P500企業之綠色分數(綠色衝擊、環境管理與環境揭露)作為產出的衡量指標。最後再以麥氏生產力指數衡量跨期(2009-2012)的效率變遷。研究結果顯示,以產業分類層級而言,2012年企業績效表現最佳的產業為民生必需品,環境績效表現最佳的產業為資訊科技產業,整體(同時考慮企業績效與環境績效)績效表現最佳者為非必需消費品產業。2011-2012年跨期效率進步最多的產業是民生必需品;退步最多的產業為醫療保健。以上發現,除了可以提供政府環境政策制定的參考外,亦可作為投資者或社會大眾對於綠色企業的投資或採購的決策依據。

The impact of global climate change has forced enterprises to look beyond the maximization of profits, and take environmental protection into consideration. This paper treats the U.S. S&P 500 as the target, and discusses the efforts made by for-profit enterprises and their environmental performance. The two-stage DEA (Data Development Analysis) model is used to evaluate the business performance and environmental performance of U.S. S&P 500. The first stage evaluates the business performance, with total assets, employee and equity as the measurement indicators of input, and revenue and profit as the measurement indicator of output. The second stage evaluates the environmental performance, with the output in the first stage as the input indicator, and the green score (environmental impact, environmental management and environmental disclosure) of S&P 500 published in the Newsweek as the measurement indicators of output. Finally, Malmquist Productivity Index is used to measure the intertemporal (2009-2012) efficiency changes. The results suggest that in terms of industry classification, in 2012, the industry with the best business performance is consumer staples, the industry with the best environmental performance is the information technology, and the industry with the best overall performance (both business performance and environmental performance are considered) is consumer discretionary industry. In 2011-2012, the consumer staples industry has the greatest improvement in intertemporal efficiency, while the health care industry has the least improvement. The findings can serve as reference for the governments in environmental policy making, and the decision-making basis for investors in investing green enterprises or the public in purchasing green products.

摘要 I
Abstract II
致謝 III
Table of Contents IV
List of Tables VI
List of Figures VII

Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Purpose of Research 7

Chapter 2 Literature Review 8
2.1 Environmental Performance 8
2.1.1 Environmental Impact 8
2.1.2 Environmental Management 11
2.1.3 Environmental Disclosure 13
2.1.4 Corporate Reputation 16
2.1.5 Green Policy 17
2.2 Business Performance 19
2.3 DEA Related Applications 22
2.4 Two-Stage DEA Related Applications 24

Chapter 3 Methodology 25
3.1 CCR Model 25
3.2 BCC Model 27
3.3 Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) 29
3.3.1 Business Performance Variables 30
3.3.2 Environmental Performance Variables in 2009-2010 31
3.3.3 Environmental Performance Variables 2011-2012 32
3.4 Malmquist Productivity Index 35

Chapter 4 Results 38
4.1 2009 ~ 2010 Industrial and Business Environment Performance 38
4.2 2011 ~ 2012 Industrial and Business Environment Performance 44
4.3 2009 ~ 2010 Industrial Environment Performance Change 49
4.4 2011 ~ 2012 Industrial Environment Performance Change 50

Chapter 5 Conclusion 57
5.1 Research Conclusion 57
5.2 Management Implications 58
5.3 Management Contribution 59
5.4 Research Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research 60

References 61

Appendix 72



List of Tables
Table 1 Business Performance Indicators 31
Table 2 Assessment factors and weights for different scores 33
Table 3 Name of industry and number of companies 34
Table 4 Benchmark enterprises in 2009 and 2010 43
Table 5 Benchmark enterprises in 2011 and 2012 47
Table 6 Business green implementations from 2009 to 2010 54
Table 7 Business green implementations from 2011 to 2012 56

List of Figures
Figure 1 Analysis model of two-stage DEA 29
Figure 2 Front-edge moving of intertemporal efficiency 35
Figure 3 Matrix diagram of business and environmental performance in 2009 42
Figure 4 Matrix diagram of business and environmental performance in 2010 42
Figure 5 Matrix diagram of business and environmental performance in 2011 46
Figure 6 Matrix diagram of business and environmental performance in 2012 46
Figure 7 Matrix diagram of environmental performance in 2009 and 2010 49
Figure 8 Matrix diagram of environmental performance in 2011 and 2012 51



1.Advanced Micro Devices. (2015). Environmental Sustainability

2.Alonso-Paulı, E. Andre, J. F. (2015). Standardized environmental management systems as an internal management tool. Resource and Energy Economics, 40, 85–106.

3.Al-Qattan A., Halabi M. Absi, Al-Otaibi A. (2015). Application of solar energy in the oil industry—Current status and future prospects, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 296–314.

4.American Eagle Outfitters. (2015). ENVIRONMENT

5.Amores-Salvadó, J., Martin-de C. G., Navas-López J. E. (2015). The importance of the complementarity between environmental management systems and environmental innovation capabilities: A firm level approach to environmental and business performance benefits, Technological Forecasting & Social Chang, 96, 288-297

6.André, J. F., Sokri, A., Zaccour, G. (2011). Public Disclosure Programs vs. traditional approaches for environmental regulation: Green goodwill and the policies of the firm. European Journal of Operational Research, 212, 199-212.

7.Arjomandi, A., Seufert, H.J. (2014). An evaluation of the world''s major airlines'' technical and environmental performance. Economic Modelling, 41, 133-144.

8.Ashcroft A. P. (2012). Extent of environmental disclosure of U.S. and Canadian firms by annual report location. Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 28, 279-292.

9.Azadi M., Shabani A., Khodakarami M., Saen R.F. (2015). Developing distinctive two-stage data envelopment analysis models: An application in evaluating the sustainability of supply chain management. Measurement, 70, 62–74.

10.Azadi, M., Shabani, A., Khodakarami, M., Saen R.F. (2015). Reprint of ‘‘Planning in feasible region by two-stage target setting DEA methods: An application in green supply chain management of public transportation service providers. Transportation Research Part E, 74, 22-36

11.Baird, K., Tung, A., Schoch, H. (2014) The relationship between organizational factors and the effectiveness of environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 144, 186-196

12.Balfors, B., Lundberg, K. , Folkeson, L. (2007). Identification of environmental aspects in an EMS context: a methodological framework for the Swedish National Rail Administration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 385-394.

13.Barros, C., Wanke, P. (2014). Two-Stage DEA: An application to major Brazilian banks. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 2337–2344.

14.Beukeboom, J. Camiel, K.P., Dijkmans, C. (2015). A stage to engage: Social media use and corporate reputation. Tourism Management, 47, 58-67.

15.Bhattacharya, C.B., Sen, S., Janssen, C. (2015). Corporate crises in the age of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 58, 183-192.

16.Broin Ó, E., Mata, Érika., Göransson, A., Johnsson, F. (2013). The effect of improved efficiency on energy savings in EU-27 buildings. Energy, 57, 134-148.

17.BNY Mellon. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility

18.Caves, D., L. Christensen., and W. E., Diewert. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica, 50, 1393-1414.

19.Caves, D., L. Christensen., and W. E. Diewert. (1982). Multilateral comparisons of output, input, and productivity using superlative index numbers. Economic Journal, 92, 73-86.

20.Chan, K.H., Wang, X.J., Raffoni, A. (2014). An integrated approach for green design: Life-cycle, fuzzy AHP and environmental management accounting. The British Accounting Review, 46, 344-360.

21.Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.

22.Chen, C., Zhu, J., Yu, J.Y., Noori, H. (2012). A new methodology for evaluating sustainable product design performance with two-stage network data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 221, 348-359.


23.Chen, S.H., Kuo, T.C., Hsu, C.W., Hu, H.A. (2013). Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 164-172.

24.Cheng, T.C.E., Yeung, C.L. A., Lo, K.Y. C. (2012) The Impact of environmental management systems on financial performance in fashion and textiles industries. Int. J. Production Economics, 135, 561-567.

25.Cho, H.C., Guidry, P.R., Hageman, M. A., Patten, M. D. (2012). Do actions speak louder than words? An empirical investigation of corporate environmental reputation. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 37, 14-25.

26.Chuang, C.M., Hsiao, T.Y., Kuo, N.W., Yu, M.F. (2014). Establishing attributes of an environmental management system for green hotel evaluation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36, 197-208.

27.CME Group. (2015). Commodity Exchanges

28.Coca-Cola Enterprises. (2015). SUSTAINABILITY

29.Cohen, A.S., Higham, J., Cavaliere, T. C., Reis, A., Finkler, W. (2014). Climate change, tourist air travel and radical emissions reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1-12.

30.Cordeiro, J., Zhu, Q.H., Sarkis, J. (2013). Institutional pressures, dynamic capabilities and environmental management systems: Investigating the ISO 9000 Environmental management system implementation linkage. Journal of Environmental Management, 114, 232-242.

31.Clorox. (2015). Corporate Responsibility

32.C.R. Bard. (2015). Social Responsibility

33.Crown Holdings. (2015). SUSTAINABILITY

34.Day, J., Jang, S.C., Jeong. E.H., Ha, S. (2014). The impact of eco-friendly practices on green image and customer attitudes: An investigation in a café setting. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 41, 10–20.

35.De Snoo, G.R., Heijungs, R., Fang, K. (2014). Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: Overview of a footprint family. Ecological Indicators, 36, 508–518.

36.Deif, M. A. (2011). A system model for green manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 1553-1559.

37.Deville, A. (2009). Branch banking network assessment using DEA: A benchmarking analysis—A note. Management Accounting Research, 20, 252–261.

38.Diabat, A., Olfat, L., Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., Shen, L. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier’s performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 74, 170–179.

39.Eagan, P.D., Joeres, E. (2002). The utility of environmental impact information: a manufacturing case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10 (No. 1), 75-83.

40.Eversource Energy. (2015). SUSTAINABILITY

41.Farrell, M.J. (1957) The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120, 253-290.

42.Färe, R. (1992).Measuring Farrell efficiency for a firm with intermediate inputs. Acdamic Economic Papers, 19, 329–340.

43.Fastenal. (2015). Green Statement

44.Faucheux, S., Nicolaï, I. (2011). IT for green and green IT: A proposed typology of eco-innovation. Ecological Economics, 70, 2020-2027.

45.Freedman, M., Yu, C., Park, D. J. (2014). Tone at the top: CEO environmental rhetoric and environmental performance. Advances in Accounting, incorporating, 30, 322–327.

46.Fujita, T., Shinozaki, M., Nogata, D., Hori, S. (2014). The role of CSR in promoting companies’ energy-saving actions in two Asian cities. Energy Policy, 69, 116-121.

47.Gillingwater, D., Ryley, T., Mayer, R. (2012). Passenger perceptions of the green image associated with airlines. Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 179–186.

48.Golgeli, K. (2014). Corporate Reputation Management: The Sample of Erciyes University. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 312 – 318.

49.Goto, M., Sueyoshi, T. (2013). DEA environmental assessment in a time horizon: Malmquist index on fuel mix, electricity and CO2 of industrial nations. Energy Economics, 40, 370-382.

50.Gotschol, A., De Pietro, G., Vinzi, E. V. (2014). Is environmental management an economically sustainable business? Journal of Environmental Management, 144, 73-82.

51.Hadji, A., Zaini, M., Habidin, F. N., Roslan, H. M., Norazlan, N.I.A., Zainudin , S. (2014). Green Supply Chain Management and Environment Performance in Malaysian Healthcare Industry. European Journal of Academic Essays, 1(6), 22-27.

52.Hagmann, C., Semeijn, J., Vellenga, B. D. (2015). Exploring the green image of airlines: Passenger perceptions and airline choice. Journal of Air Transport Management, 43, 37-45.

53.Halkos, E. G., Salamouris, S. D. (2004). Efficiency measurement of the Greek commercial banks with these of financial ratios: a data envelopment analysis approach. Management Accounting Research, 15, 201-224.

54.Halkos, E G., Tzeremes, G. N. (2012) Industry performance evaluation with the use of financial ratios: An application of bootstrapped DEA. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 5872–5880

55.Hartmann, J., Uhlenbruck, K. (2015). National institutional antecedents to corporate environmental performance. Journal of World Business.

56.He, P.L., Jian, J.H., Yu, Z.F. (2011). The Study on the Correlation between Environmental Information Disclosure and Economic Performance-With empirical data from the manufacturing industries at Shanghai Stock Exchange in China. Energy Procedia, 5, 1218–1224

57.Hewlett-Packard. (2015). Environmental

58.Hildebrandt, L., Tischer, S. (2014). Linking corporate reputation and shareholder value using the publication of reputation rankings. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1007-1067.

59.H.J. Heinz. (2015). Sustainability

60.Hong, P., Yang, M.G., Modi, B.S. (2011). Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance: An empirical study of manufacturing firms. Int. J. Production Economics, 129, 251-261.

61.Horng, J.S., Hu, M.L., Teng, C.C., Hsiao H.L., Liu C.H. (2013). Development and validation of the low-carbon literacy scale among practitioners in the Taiwanese tourism industry. Tourism Management, 35, 255-262.

62.Horváthová, E. (2012). The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Short-term costs and long-term benefits? Ecological Economics, 84, 91–97.

63.Hourneaux, Jr. F., Hrdlicka, A.H., Gomes, M.C., Kruglianskas, I. (2014). The use of environmental performance indicators and size effect: A study of industrial companies. Ecological Indicators, 36, 205– 212.

64.Hsua, C.W., Kuob, T.C., Chenc, S. H., Hudusing, H.A. (2013). DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 164-172.

65.Hung, S.W., Wang, A.P. (2012). Entrepreneurs with glamour? DEA performance characterization high-tech and older-established industries. Economic Modelling, 29, 1146–1153.

66.Iatridis, E.G. (2013). Environmental disclosure quality: Evidence on environmental performance, corporate governance and value relevance. Emerging Markets Review, 14, 55-75.

67.ISO14001, 2004. Environmental Management Systems - Requierements with Guidance for Use. International Organization for Standardization.

68.ISO 14001. (2015). ISO DIS 2015 14001Plain English Definitions

69.Jabbour, Lopes de Sousa ,A.B., Jabbour, Chiappetta, C.J., Latan H., Teixeira ,Adriano, A., Caldeira, de Oliveira, J.H. (2015). Reprint of ‘‘Quality management, environmental management maturity, green supply chain practices and green performance of Brazilian companies with ISO 14001 certification: Direct and indirect effects’’. Transportation Research Part E, 74, 139–151.

70.Jackson, A. L., Singh, D. (2015). Environmental rankings and financial performance: An analysis of firms in the US food and beverage supply chain. Tourism Management Perspectives, 14, 25–33.

71.Jasch, C. (2000). Environmental performance evaluation and indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 8 (No. 1), 79-88.

72.J.B. Hunt Transport Services. (2015). Corporate Sustainability

73.Jenkins, H., Yakovleva, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in mining industry: exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production 14, 271-284.

74.Kane, G. (2011). The Three Secrets of Green Business

75.Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D. P.(1992). The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.

76.Kim, C., Lee, H., Park, J. (2014). Corporate social responsibilities, consumer trust and corporate reputation: South Korean consumers'' perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 67, 295–302.

77.Komarek, M. Timothy, L.F., Kaplowitz, D., Michael, T.L. (2013). Influence of energy alternatives and carbon emissions on an institution’s green reputation. Journal of Environmental Management, 128, 335-344.

78.Lee, Y.K., Kim, S.H., Seo, M.K., Hight, S. K. (2015). Market orientation and business performance: Evidence from franchising industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 44, 28-37.

79.Li, S., Sueyoshi, T., Wang, D. (2014). DEA environmental assessment on U.S. Industrial sectors: Investment for improvement in operational and environmental performance to attain corporate sustainability. Energy Economics, 45, 254-267.

80.Lin. H., Zeng. S.X., Shi. J. J., Meng, X.H., Qi, G.Y., Yang, Q.X. (2014). Revisiting the relationship between environmental and financial performance in Chinese industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 349-356.

81.Lu, W.M., Wang, W.K., Wang. S.W. (2014). The impact of environmental expenditures on performance in the U.S. chemical industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 447-456.

82.Meng, X.H., Zeng, S.X., Shi, J. J., Qi, G.Y., Zhang, Z.B. (2014). The relationship between corporate environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical study in China, Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 357-367.

83.Middleton, A. (2015). Value relevance of firms’ integral environmental performance: Evidence from Russia. J. Account. Public Policy, 34, 204–211.

84.Ministry of Economic Affairs, R.O.C. (2015)

85.Mohamed, M. H. (2015). Green, environment-friendly, analytical tools give insights in pharmaceuticals and cosmetics analysis. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 66, 176-192.

86.Navistar International. (2015). SUSTAINABILITY

87.Newsweek. (2012). Newsweek Green Rankings

88.Noble Energy. (2015). Sustainability report

89.Nulkar, G. (2014). SMEs and environmental performance – A framework for green business strategies. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 130-140.

90.Office Depot. (2015). Corporate sustainability

91.Owens Corning. (2015). ENVIRONMENT & SAFETY

92.Pattena, M.D., Zhao, Na. (2014). Standalone CSR reporting by U.S. retail companies. Accounting Forum, 38, 132-144.

93.Philip Morris International. (2015). Sustainability

94.Przychodzen, J., Przychodzen, W. (2015). Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance ―evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary. Journal of Cleaner Production, 90, 253-263.

95.Robert Half International. (2015). Corporate Citizenship Report

96.Seiffert, M.E.B. (2008). Environmental impact evaluation using a cooperative model for implementing EMS (ISO 14001) in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (14), 1447-1461.

97.Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks. Management Science, 45, 1270-1288.

98.Sprint Nextel. (2015). Sustainability

99.Song, H, Zhao, C.G. (2015). Does environmental management improve enterprise’s value? – An empirical research based on Chinese listed companies. Ecological Indicators, 51 , 191–196

100.Sueyoshi, T.i, Wang, Derek. (2014). Sustainability development for supply chain management in U.S. petroleum industry by DEA environmental assessment. Energy Economics, 46, 360-374.

101.Vulcan Materials. (2015). Social Responsibility

102.Weight Watchers. (2015). Corporate Responsibility

103.Wills. (2015). ENVIRONMENTAL

104.Zhu, J. (2000). Multi-Factor Performance Measure Model with an Application to Fortune 500 Companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 123, 105-124.


中文部分:

1.徐光威 (2011)。《融入碳排放量的企業績效評估—以全球五百大企業為例》。碩士論文,中央大學企業管理研究所。

2.黃惠君 (2010)。《台灣壽險公司經營績效之評估―兩階段資料包絡分析法的應用》。碩士論文,國立高雄大學經營管理研究所。

3.薄喬萍 (2008)。D.B.A在績效評估之綜合應用,五南文化。

4.孫遜 (2004)。「資料包絡分析-理論與應用」,楊志文化,台北。

5.蔣本基、顧洋、談駿、申永順、胡憲倫(2014)。《清潔生產》,國家教育研究院。

6.黃宗煌,將本基、陳奕宏、郭華仁、陳遵賢、張育森、蘇忠貞、張添晉 (2014)。 《綠色產業》,國家教育研究院。P.115

7.詹火生,黃源協,陳小紅,薛承泰,古允文 (2014)。《社會正義與社區參與》,國家教育研究院。P.80

8.張子超、駱尚廉、馬鴻文、李永展、蔡慧敏 (2014)。《環境與資源管理》,國家教育研究院。P.13





QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top