跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.86.95) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/05/20 08:51
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:方馨甯
研究生(外文):Hsin-Ning Fang
論文名稱:審計委員會與盈餘品質之關聯性研究
論文名稱(外文):Audit Committee and Earnings Quality
指導教授:廖秀梅廖秀梅引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hsiu-Mei Liao
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:銘傳大學
系所名稱:會計學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
語文別:中文
論文頁數:49
中文關鍵詞:盈餘品質審計委員會設置審計委員會品質
外文關鍵詞:Quality of an Audit CommitteesEarnings QualityFormation of an Audit Committees
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:456
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究以 2007 年至2013 年台灣非金融業上市、櫃公司為樣本,探討設置審計委員會及其品質,對於公司盈餘品質是否有影響,其中審計委員會的品質指標包含審計委員會規模、成員會計或財務專長、召集人是否具備會計或財務專長、開會次數、成員實際出席率及成員兼任獨立董事數。實證結果顯示,設置審計委員會與否對於提升公司盈餘品質的影響並不是很明顯。其次,針對有設置審計委員會的樣本,探討審計委員會個別品質指標與盈餘品質的關聯性,結果發現僅審計委員會中會計或財務專家之係數與預期方向一致,顯示當審計委員會中會計或財務專家比例越高時越能抑制盈餘管理幅度,並提升盈餘品質。此外,當審計委員會裡的成員越多時,每個委員對盈餘品質的意見反而不一致,不但會造成相關議題無法充分的討論及溝通,讓審計委員會運作的效率變差,因此無法達到監督財務報導的效果。
In this study, we use non-financial Taiwanese public firms from 2007 to 2013. This research investigates whether formation of an audit committees and the quality of an audit committees are associated with improved earnings quality. The quality indicators contains the size of the audit committee, members of the accounting or financial expertise, chairman having accounting or financial expertise, frequency of meetings, members’ attendance and number of members serving the independent directors. The empirical results show that there is no relationship between formation of an audit committees and earnings quality. However, for those companies with established audit committees, our results indicate that firms with more accounting experts in audit committees have the effects on constraining accrual earnings management and improving earnings quality. In addition, larger audit committees may cause the operation inefficient and couldn’t achieve the effect of supervision of financial reporting. Because each member have their own thought, so the issues can’t be fully discussed and communication.
目錄...................................................................... I
表目錄.................................................................... II
第一章 緒論.................................................................1
第一節 研究背景及動機........................................................1
第二節 研究目的及問題........................................................2
第三節 研究架構.............................................................2
第二章 文獻回顧.............................................................3
第一節 審計委員會制度........................................................3
第二節 設置審計委員會與盈餘品質...............................................7
第三節 審計委員會品質與盈餘品質..............................................10
第三章 研究方法............................................................14
第一節 變數衡量............................................................14
第二節 實證模型............................................................19
第三節 樣本選取與資料來源...................................................22
第四章 實證結果............................................................23
第一節 敘述性統計資料.......................................................23
第二節 差異性檢定與迴歸結果..................................................28
第三節 敏感性分析.......................................................... 34
第五章 研究結論與建議.......................................................38
第一節 研究結論............................................................38
第二節 研究建議............................................................38
第三節 研究限制............................................................39
參考文獻..................................................................40
王元章與張椿柏,2012,核心代理問題對盈餘管理之影響,會計審計論叢,第2卷第2 期:69-113。
吳旻璁,2013,審計委員會專家與盈餘管理之關聯性,中興大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
李奕萱,2011,審計委員會與財務報表品質之關聯性,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
李建然與林秀鳳,2013,大型會計師事務所之審計品質真的比非大型會計師事務所好嗎?從抑制盈餘管理的角度探討-控制自我選擇偏誤的重要性,中華會計學刊,第9 卷第1 期:77-110。
沈欣儀,2012,審計委員會品質與盈餘管理之關聯性研究,國立臺北大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
易瑞敏,2013,審計委員會開會次數與盈餘管理之關聯性,國立臺北大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
林玲蘭,2009,獨立董事之專業性、獨立性及勤勉度與盈餘管理關聯性,輔仁大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
柯承恩、陳耀宗與吳珊穎,2010,董監事治理與盈餘管理之關聯性研究,會計學報,第2 卷第2 期:25-60。
洪愛苓,2012,審計委員會多樣性對財報品質之影響,國立成功大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
張晉源,2011,審計委員會之設置及其結構對盈餘管理行為之影響,雲林科技大學管理研究所博士班未出版博士論文。
許文馨,2014,審計委員會是否較監察人更能提升盈餘品質,台大管理論叢,第24 卷第S1 期:203-232。
陳逸仲,2009,審計委員會與資訊透明度、財務報導品質與股價反應之探討,國立成功大學會計學系碩士班未出版碩士論文。
湯麗芬,2010,家族企業特質與盈餘品質之關聯性,當代會計,第11 卷專刊:271-410。
黃佩萱,2014,審計委員會設置前後盈餘管理之比較,中興大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃俐蓁,2008,審計委員會與盈餘品質-東亞實證,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
楊朝旭、吳幸蓁,2003,總經理薪酬績效敏感性、績效門檻與盈餘管理關聯性之研究,會計評論,第36 期:55-87。
葉銀華與林志豪,2014,上市櫃公司是否強制設置審計委員會?審計委員會與財務報表品質之研究,輔仁管理評論,第21 卷第3 期:1-22。
廖益興與陳昭蓉,2014,銀行進入公司董事會、代理問題與資訊不對稱之關聯性研究,人文及社會科學集刊,第26 卷第4 期:583-619。
劉正義,2013,審計委員會之設立及其品質對於公司盈餘管理的影響,國立臺北大學會計學系未出版博士論文。
蔡昀蓉,2009,審計委員會特性與盈餘管理,中國文化大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
謝秀蘭,2007,審計委員會與盈餘管理之關聯性研究,國立台北大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, and G. F. Peters. 2004. Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23(1): 69-87.
Baxter, P., and J. Cotter. 2009. Audit Committees and Earnings Quality. Accounting & Finance 49(2): 267-290.
Becker, C. L., M. L. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K.R. Subramanyam. 1998. The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15(1): 1-24.
Bedard, J., S. M. Chtourou, and L. Courteau. 2004. The Effect of Audit Committee Expertise, Independence, and Activity on Aggressive Earnings Management. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23(2): 13-35.
Chen, C. Y., C. J. Lin, and Y. C. Lin. 2008. Audit Partner Tenure, Audit Firm Tenure, and Discretionary Accruals: Does Long Auditor Tenure Impair Earnings Quality? Contemporary Accounting Research 25(2): 415-445.
Chi, W., H. Huang, Y. Liao and H. Xie. 2009. Mandatory Audit Partner Rotation, Audit Quality, and Market Perception: Evidence from Taiwan. Contemporary Accounting Research 26(2): 359-391.
Choi, J. H., K. A. Jeon, and J. I. Park. 2004. The role of audit committees in decreasing earnings management: Korean evidence. International Journal of Accounting Auditing and Performance Evaluation 1(1): 37-60.
Cohen, J. R., U. Hoistash, G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. Wright. 2014. The effect of audit committee industry expertise on monitoring the financial reporting process. The Accounting Review 89 (1): 243-273.
Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, J. L. Johnson, and A. E. Ellsrtand. 1999. Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Journal 42 (6): 674-686.
DeAngelo, H., L. E. DeAngelo, and D. Skinner. 1994. Accounting choices in troubled companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (1-2): 113-143.
Dechow, P., W. Ge, and C. Schrand. 2010. Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50: 344-401.
Dechow, R., G. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70 (2): 193-225.
DeFond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant violations and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 23 (2): 115-139.
DeFond, M. L., R. N. Hann, and X. Hu. 2005. Does the Market Value Financial Expertise on Audit Committees of Boards of Directors? Journal of Accounting Research 43(2): 153-193.
Dhaliwal, D., V. Naiker, and F. Navissi. 2010. The Association Between Accruals Quality and the Characteristics of Accounting Experts and Mix of Expertise on Audit Committees. Contemporary Accounting Research 27(3): 787-827.
Fich, E. M., and A. Shivdasani. 2006. Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors? The Journal of Finance 61(2): 689-723.
Francis, J. R., E. L. Maydew, and H. C. Sparks. 1999. The Role of Big 6 Auditors in the Credible Reporting of Accruals. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 18(2): 17-34.
Ghosh, A., A. Marra, and D. Moon. 2010 Corporate boards, audit committees, and earnings management: Pre- and post-SOX evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 37(9-10): 1145–1176.
Ghosh, A., and D. Moon. 2005. Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. The Accounting Review 80 (2): 585-612.
Klein, A. 2002. Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics, and Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33: 375-400.
Kothari, S. P., A. J. Leone, and C. E. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39(1): 163-197.
McMullen, D. A. 1996. Audit Committee Performance: An Investigation of the Consequences Associated with Audit Committees. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 15(1): 87-103.
Myers, J. N., L. A. Myers, and T. C. Omer. 2003. Exploring the Term of Auditor-Client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings: A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation. The Accounting Review 78(3): 779-799.
Raghunandan1, K., D.V. Rama, and D. P. Scarbrough. 1998. Accounting and auditing knowledge level of Canadian audit committees: Some empirical evidence. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 7(2): 181-194.
Vefeas, N. 2005. Audit Committees, Boards, and the Quality of Reported Earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research 22(4): 1093-1122.
Warfield, T. D., J. J. Wilda, and K. L. Wild. 1995. Managerial ownership, accounting choices, and informativeness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20(1): 61-91.
Wild, J. J. 1996. The Audit Committee and Earnings Quality. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 11(2): 247-276.
Xie, B., W. N. Davidson, and P. J. DaDalt. 2003. Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance 9: 295-316.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top