跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.206.76.226) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/30 21:34
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:李妙珍
研究生(外文):Daranrat Jaitiang
論文名稱:農業創新平台之利益關係者優先順序與目標設定-以泰國楠省為例
論文名稱(外文):Stakeholder Priorities and Goals during initiation of an Agricultural Innovation Platform in Nan Province, Thailand
指導教授:高木知芙美
指導教授(外文):Dr. Chifumi Tagaki
口試委員:董時叡
口試委員(外文):Dr. Shin-Jui Tung
口試日期:2015-08-17
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:國際農學研究所
學門:農業科學學門
學類:一般農業學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
語文別:英文
論文頁數:139
中文關鍵詞:創新平台農業泰國北部地區
外文關鍵詞:Innovation PlatformAgricultureNorthern region of Thailand
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:128
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
泰國北部高原的農民因在坡地密集單一種植玉米,而面臨低產量,土壤酸化之問題,尤其在楠省地區又遇長期乾旱,因此此地區需要研究及相關單位協助農民發展並評估可能之解決方法。其中研究發展平台(R4D platform) 即為方法之一,研究發版平台是一個由利益相關者所組成的網路,在這之中的利益相關者包括了定期參與協調解決方案之農民、政府機構人員、研究人員及私人機構。但這些利益相關者所關照的重點和利益皆不同,這也在協調的過程中造成困難,因此此研究分析了源自Humitropics計畫中之楠省研究發展平台內不同利益相關者所關注之優先考量、利益及需要。此研究之目標為:(1) 指出楠省農民的需求及優先考量,及楠省農業創新發展平台其他利益相關者之利益及優先考量重點;(2)辨認不同利益相關者共同及衝突的利益及優先考量。此研究之研究方法包括了深入訪談、焦點討論(FDG) 及Q 方法,56位參與者分別被派以參與此三種方法所構成的活動之中,第一個活動自R4D平台中挑選出29名參與者參與Q分類,其餘參與者則參與小組焦點討論及深入訪談。參與者的需求及考量重點以小組焦點討論及深入訪談中探知,其結果顯示出楠省相關農業共同之問題。其中包括了市場、天災、自給、玉米種植系統、環境狀況、相關知識、邏輯運輸、機構宣傳、產量等。而農民關注較多的為農地資金來源、農業專業知識、播種、政府支持及水資源管理。其餘利益關係者所關心的為農林業、現代科技、行銷管道、農業知識的支持、有益之研究、可在市場販售之產品、水資源管理、及依據泰皇理論足夠之經濟基礎。Q分析的結果中指出二顯著的關注點,分別為研發及環境議題,除此之外Q分析之結果可得知參與者之同意或反對之意見。參與者同意於多樣化農業、推廣畜牧產業、種植蔬菜、政府提供之協助、橡膠栽種、化學農藥破壞、毀林、自給自足及其他等議題;另一方面,參與者則不同意於種植玉米所造成的食品安全議題、負債及在山坡上種植果樹。除此之外此研究也對於如何使楠省創新平台的運作更有效率作出建議;例如達成適當的機構性協議、定期會議、防止個人濫用及剝削平台、給予所有利益相關者平等發聲的機會、及確保此創新平台直接對當地社群產生利益。此研究的參與者最終期待能狗提升此地區的永續性,農業多元化也能在未來發揮其價值。

Farmers in the upland of northern part of Thailand face problems with low yields, soil erosion due to intensive maize mono-cropping on sloping lands especially in Nan Province and prolonged drought. Research and development efforts are needed to identify possible solutions, evaluate them and scale them out to farmers. One approach to doing this is the use of Research for Development (R4D) platform, which is a network of stakeholders, including farmers, government officers, researchers and private sector, who meet on a regular basis to try and coordinate the development of long-term solutions. Yet stakeholders have diverse priorities and interests, which makes such coordination difficult. This study therefore analyzed the priorities, interests, and needs of various stakeholders who are involved in the Nan R4D platform, which was initiated as part of Humidtropics. The objective of this research is to: (1) describe needs and priorities of farmers in Nan, and interests and priorities of other stakeholders in the Nan agricultural innovation platform; and (2) identify which interests and goals are shared, and which are conflicting, among the various stakeholders. The research methods include in-depth interview, focus group discussion (FGD) and Q methodology. Fifty-six participants were divided into three activities. The first activity had 29 participants selected from the R4D platform to conduct a Q-sort, and the remaining participants were involved in focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. Participants’ needs and priorities were revealed by using focus group discussion and in-depth interview. The results showed common issues in Nan Province relating the current agriculture. There are markets, natural disaster, self-sufficient, maize system, environmental conditions, knowledge, logistics and transportation, institutional advocacy, and productivities, while the needs and priorities of farmers are funding for farmland, knowledge from agricultural experts, seedling and seeds, supports from government, and water management. Furthermore, stakeholder’s interests and priorities are Agroforestry, modern technologies, marketing channels, support about agricultural knowledge, beneficial research, marketable products, water management, and sufficiency economy based on Thailand King’s theory. And also, the two distinctive framings elucidated from the Q analysis were research and development (R&D) and environmental issues. Additionally, results from Q methodology gives both the agreement and disagreement site. Participants are agreed in diversifying agriculture, livestock promotion, growing vegetable, helping from government, rubber plantation, pesticide damage, deforestation, growing own food, and other. On the other hand, participants have made disagreement site in leading food insecurity from maize growing, high debt from maize growing, and planting fruit trees on a sloping area. Besides, this study also gives recommendations to make innovation platform even more effective in Nan; likewise; find the appropriate institutional arrangement; regular meeting, preventing corrupt individuals from abusing and exploiting the platform; giving all stakeholders an equal voice; and ensuring that the platform directly benefits the local community. Eventually, participants expected to increase sustainability in the area and prioritize diversified agriculture that has potential value in the future.

Acknowledgement i
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
Table of Contents vi
List of Tables viii
List of Figures ix
Acronyms and Abbreviations x
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Problem statement 2
1.3 Research objectives 3
1.4 Significance of the study 3
1.5 Definition of key terms 3
2. Literature Review 5
2.1 Thailand agriculture and its current issues 5
2.2 Project information 11
2.2.1 Detailed information about the Humidtropics Program 11
2.2.2 Detailed information about the project in Nan Province, Thailand 13
2.3 Innovation Platform 16
2.3.1 Innovation platform background and definitions 16
2.3.2 Successful cases of Innovation platforms 19
2.3.3 Challenges of Innovation platforms 22
3. Methodology 27
3.1 Research design 27
3.2 Research area 27
3.3 Data collection procedures and research participants 30
3.3.1 In-depth Interview (IDI) 32
3.3.2 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) 35
3.3.3 Q methodology 38
4. Results and Discussion 44
4.1 Results from In-depth Interviews 44
4.2 Results from Focus Group Discussions 50
4.3 Results from Q Methodology 60
5. Conclusions, Recommendations, and Limitations 67
5.1 Conclusions 67
5.2 Recommendations 70
5.3 Limitations 72
References 74
Appendices 85
Appendix A. The definition of Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy 86
Appendix B. Definition of Innovation Platform 89
Appendix C. Q Method Analysis 90
Appendix D. Table of detailed information about the research participants 112
Appendix E. Background of each Focus group discussion (FGD) 115
Appendix F. Pictures 124


Adapting Humidtropics Research Methods to Fit Local Stakeholder Interests in Thailand. (2014). Retrieved April 11, 2015, from http://humidtropics.cgiar.org/adapting-humidtropics-research-methods-fit-local-stakeholder-interests/
Adekunle, A. A., & Fatunbi, A. O. (2012). Approaches for setting-up multi-stakeholder platforms for agricultural research and development. World Applied Sciences Journal, 16(7), 981-988.
Adekunle, A. A., Ellis-Jones, J., Ajibefun, I., Nyikal, R. A., Bangali, S., Fatunbi, O., & Ange, A. (2012). Agricultural innovation in sub-Saharan Africa: experiences from multiple-stakeholder approaches. In Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA), Accra, Ghana.
Adewale, A. A., Pluwole, F. A., Buruchara, R., & Nyamwaro, S. (2013). Integrated agricultural research for development... from concept to practice. Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA).
Archawanuntakul, S, Yamla-au, P., Tanangsanakul, K., Senpan, P., Klongarkara, S. (2013). Maize Supply Chain Management Analysis to Support Sustainable Watershed Management in Nan Province. Bangkok: Pasara.
Asbury, J.E. (1995). Overview of focus group research. Qualitative Health Research, 5 (4):414-420.
Bamberger, M. (2012). Introduction to mixed methods in impact evaluation. Impact Evaluation Notes, 3, 1-38.
Bank of Thailand. (2014). Economy in Thailand 2013. Retrieved May 22, 2014, from http://www.bot.or.th/Thai/EconomicConditions/Thai/genecon/Pages/index.aspx
Belton, B., & Little, D. (2008). The Development of Aquaculture in Central Thailand: Domestic Demand versus Export‐Led Production. Journal of Agrarian Change, 8(1), 123-143.
Bernard H. (1988). Research Methods in Cultural Anthropology. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.
Boogaard, B. K., Schut, M., Klerkx, L., Leeuwis, C., Duncan, A. J., & Cullen, B. (2013). Critical issues for reflection when designing and implementing Research for Development in innovation platforms (Report). Wageningen University and Research Centre. Retrieved from https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/35028
Borisutdhi, Y., Wansri, N., Kaewmanee, S., Mikhama, K., &Simaraks, S., (2014). Do We Really Understand Problems of Rubber Farmers with Small Areas in the Recent Extension Area in Upper Northeast Thailand?, 35(1), 1. Retrieved May 19, 2015, from http://kasetsartjournal.ku.ac.th/kuj_files/2014/A1403260943505000.pdf [in Thai with English abstract]
Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
Cairns, R. (2013). Examining framings of geoengineering using Q methodology. Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Paper Series: 002. Retrieved December 5, 2014, from http://geoengineering-governance-research.org/perch/resources/workingpaper2cairnsframings-ofge-usingqmethodology.pdf
Carolyn, B., &Palena, N. (2006). Conducting In-Depth Interviews: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews for Evaluation Input. Retrieved April 15, 2015, from http://www.pathfinder.org/publications-tools/Conducting-In-Depth-Interviews-A-Guide- for-Designing-and-Conducting-In-Depth-Inteviews-for-Evaluation-Input.html
Carpenter, D., & McGillivray, M. (2012). A Methodology for Assessing the Poverty-reducing Impacts of Australia''s International Agricultural Research. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
Chalermphol, J., Bastakoti, G. B., & Bastakoti, R. C. (2014). Adoption of Improved Varieties of Vegetable Crops with Pesticide Use in Chiang Mai Province, Northern Thailand. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 418-424.
Community development department of Thailand. (n.d). Operational area at Ban Luang, Nan. Retrieved July 1, 2015 from http://banluang.cdd.go.th/tambon.htm [in Thai]
Community development department of Thailand. (n.d). Profile of Banluang district. Retrieved July 1, 2015 from http://banluang.cdd.go.th/Story.htm [in Thai]
Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research. (n.d.).CGIAR Research Program on Integrated Systems for the Humid Tropics. Retrieved May 17, 2015 from http://www.cgiar.org/our-research/cgiar-research-programs/cgiar-research-program-on-integrated-systems-humid-tropics/
Cropper, M., Griffiths, C. W., & Mani, M. (1997). Roads, population pressures, and deforestation in Thailand, 1976-89. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (1726).
Department of Mineral Resources. (2013). Project for risky areas that prone to landslides at the community level at Phong sub-district, Santisuk district, Nan province.Retrieved June 30, 2015 from http://www.dmr.go.th/download/Landslide/community/ตำบลพงษ์-น่าน.pdf [in thai]
Driscoll, D.L., S.A. Appiah-Yeboah, P.S. Salib, and D.J. Rupert. (2007). “Merging Qualitative and Quantitative Data in Mixed Methods Research: How To and Why Not.” Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 3(1):19-28.
Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105.
Food and agricultural organization. (2006). Thailand Agriculture. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPC/doc/Counprof/PDF%20files/Thailand.pdf
Geoffrey Lacher, R., & Nepal, S. K. (2010). Dependency and development in northern Thailand. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(4), 947–968.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2010.03.005
Glenn, B. (n.d.). Conducting Focus Group. Retrieved April 15, 2015, from http://www.cse.lehigh.edu/~glennb/mm/FocusGroups.htm
Grossman, N. and Faulder, D. (2011). King BhumibolAdulyadej: A Life’s Work. In D. Millet (Eds), Singapore: Tien Wah Press.
Highland Research and Development Institute, (2015). Upland in Thailand. Retrieve June, 12, 2015 from http://www.hrdi.or.th/about_us/page/about [in Thai]
Homann-Kee Tui, S., Adekunle, A., Lundy, M., Tucker, J., Birachi, E., Schut, M., Klerkx, L.Ballantyne, P.G., Duncan, A.J., Cadilhon, J. and Mundy, P. (2013). What are innovation platforms? Innovation Platform Practice Brief 1. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI.
Humidtropics. (2012). Humidtropics: Integrated Systems for the Humid Tropics proposal. Retrieved May 17, 2015 from http://library.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10947/2554/crp_1.2__proposal_jan24_2012.pdf?sequence=1
Humidtropics. (2012). Research Program on integrated systems for the Humid Tropics. Retrieved May 17, 2015, from http://humidtropics.cgiar.org/
Information Center Department of Agricultural Extension. (2014). Nan Information. Retrieved from http://www.agriinfo.doae.go.th/year57/province/region6/nan.pdf
Konig, B., Kuntosch, A., Bokelmann, W., Doernberg, A., Schwerdtner, W., Busse, M., ... & Stahlecker, T. (2012, September). Analysing agricultural innovation systems: a multilevel mixed methods approach. In 131st Seminar, September 18-19, 2012, Prague, Czech Republic (No. 135792). European Association of Agricultural Economists.
Kumnan, S. (2009). Awareness among farmers about the issue that occurred from Maize plantation in Luang sub-district, Santhisuk district, Nan. Chiangmai: Chiangmai University.
Leech, NL &Onwuegbuzie AJ (2006) ‘A typology of mixed methods research designs’, Quality and Quantity, 42(2): 265-275.
Library of Congress, N., Ruhs, M., &Tangjitwisuth, S. (1998). Problems and outlook of agriculture in Thailand. JIRCAS International Symposium Series (Japan), 13(2), 3–14.
Lieber, E. (2009). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Insights into design and analysis issues. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 3, 218-227.
Manandhar, S., Pratoomchai, W., Ono, K., Kazama, S., & Komori, D. (2015). Local people''s perceptions of climate change and related hazards in mountainous areas of northern Thailand. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 11, 47-59.
McNamara, Carter. (1999). General Guidelines for Conducting Interviews, Minnesota.
Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. SAGE Publications.
Meteorological Department of Thailand. (n.d.). Thawangpha Hydrogeology Meteorological Station. Retrieved June 30, 2015 from http://www.cmdata.tmd.go.th/metadata/thawangpa.pdf [in Thai]
Mixed methods research. (n.d.). Retrieved April 11, 2015, from http://resourcecentre.foodrisc.org/mixed-methods-research_185.html
Mongsawad, P. (2010). The philosophy of the sufficiency economy: a contribution to the theory of development. Asia Pacific Development Journal, 17(1), 123.
Moroizumi, T., Hamada, H., Sukchan, S., & Ikemoto, M. (2009). Soil water content and water balance in rainfed fields in Northeast Thailand. Agricultural water management, 96(1), 160-166.
Nan Cultural Office. (2013). General Information of Ban luang district. Retrieved June 30, 2015 from http://province.m-culture.go.th/nan/file/amphur/bal/01bal.html [in Thai]
Nan Cultural Office. (2013). General Information of Muang district. Retrieved June 30, 2015 from http://province.m-culture.go.th/nan/file/amphur/muang/01muang.html [in Thai]
Nan Cultural Office. (2013). General Information of Santisuk district. Retrieved June 30, 2015 from http://province.m-culture.go.th/nan/file/amphur/suk/01suk.html [in Thai]
Nan Cultural Office. (2013). General Information of Thawongpha district .Retrieved June 30, 2015 from http://province.m-culture.go.th/nan/file/amphur/tawung/01tawung.html [in Thai]
Nan Provincial Administrative Organization. (2012). Nan agricultural policy. Retrieved March 17, 2014, from http://www.tei.or.th/publications/2011-download/2011-SGA-Nan-Policy-Brief.pdf [in Thai]
Nan Provincial Governor''s Office. Gross Provincial Product of Nan 2011-2012 Edition.(2012). Retrieved May 22, 2014, from http://www.nan.go.th/cgdnan/doc_eco/609.pdf [in Thai]
Natethip, D. (1997). Pesticide Use of the Small Farm Holding Farmers in Tambon Pua, Amphoe Pua, Changwat Nan. Chiangmai:Chiangmai University. [in Thai]
Nederlof, S., & Wongtschowski, M. (2011). Putting heads together: agricultural innovation platforms in practice. F. van der Lee (Ed.). KIT Publishers, KIT Development, Policy & Practice.
Ngaboyisonga, C., Mutabaz, S., Buruchara, R., Chiuri, W., Pali, P., Rao, K. P. C., …Kashaija, I. M. (2009). Agricultural innovation platform formation: process and lessons from LakeKivu Pilot Learning site. Retrieved from http://outputs.worldagroforestry.org/record/5179
Office of Agricultural Economics. (2011). Table space utilization of agricultural by province year 2011. Retrieved May 22, 2014, from http://www.oae.go.th/download/use_soilNew/soiNew/landused2554.html [inThai]
Office of Small and Medium Enterprises Promotion. (2014). Chiang Rai. Retrieved March 20, 2014, from http://122.155.9.68/identity/index.php/north/n-upper-2/chiangrai [inThai]
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board, (n.d.). Chapter 6: Development of the Southern Border Provinces, Thailand. Retrieved May 21, 2015, from www.nesdb.go.th/portals/0/news/plan/p5/M4_6.doc. [in Thai]
OluwoleFatunbi, A. A. (2010). How to set up an Innovation Platform Sub Saharan Africa Challenge Programme (SSA CP). Sub-Saharan Africa. Retrieved March 20, 2015, from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/263064184_How_to_set_up_an_Innovation_Platform_Sub_Saharan_Africa_Challenge_Programme_(SSA_CP)_What_is_an_Innovation_Platform
Panomtarrinichigul, M. (2006). Research on Sustainable Hill Farming in Northern Thailand. Retrieved May 18, 2015, from http://mis.agri.cmu.ac.th/download/publication/3356_file.pdf
Poapongsakorn, N., Ruhs, M., & Tangjitwisuth, S. (1998). Problems and outlook of agriculture in Thailand. TDRI Quarterly Review, 13(2), 3-14.
Praneetvatakul, S., Janekarnkij, P., Potchanasin, C., &Prayoonwong, K. (2001). Assessing the sustainability of agriculture: a case of Mae Chaem Catchment, northern Thailand. Environment International, 27(2-3), 103–109.
Rajalahti, R., Janssen, W., & Pehu, E. (2008). Agricultural innovation systems: From diagnostics toward operational practices. Agriculture & Rural Development Department, World Bank.
RJ, Prakongkep N, editors. Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of Soil Science; Soil Solutions for a Changing World; ISBN 978-0-646-53783-2; Published on DVD; http://www.iuss.org; Symposium 3.2.1; Highland agriculture and conservation of soil and water; Brisbane, Australia, 1-6 August 2010. IUSS pp. 64-67.
Sang-Arun, J., Mihara, M., Horaguchi, Y., & Yamaji, E. (2006). Soil erosion and participatory remediation strategy for bench terraces in northern Thailand. Catena, 65(3), 258-264.
Sophanodora, P., Kamnalrat, A., & Wannachit, W. (2002). Plant production in Southern Region of Thailand. Department of plant science. Faculty of Natural Resources. Prince of Songkla University. Retrieved May 21, 2015, from http://www.natres.psu.ac.th/Department/PlantScience/510-211/lecturenote/document/cropSouth.pdf. [in Thai]
Stenner, P. H. D., Cooper, D., & Skevington, S. M. (2003). Putting the Q into quality of life; the identification of subjective constructions of health-related quality of life using Q methodology. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 57(11), 2161–2172.
Sub-global Assessment for Nan. (2012). Agricultural imagination of Nan in the future. Retrieved March 29, 2014, from http://www.peithailand.com/th/meeting_material/2012-05-30/nan_seminar.pdf [in Thai]
Teddlie, C., &Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. SAGE Publications Inc.
Tenywa, M. M., Rao, K. P. C., Tukahirwa, J. B., Buruchara, R., Adekunle, A. A., Mugabe, J., ... & Abenakyo, A. (2011). Agricultural innovation platform as a tool for development oriented research: lessons and challenges in the formation and operationalization.
Thai Land Development Department. (2014). Industrial drop of Phayao. Retrieved March 17, 2014, from http://glamdring.baac.or.th/North/North/Phayao/Phayao.htm [in Thai]
Thailand, Bureau Of Agricultural Economic Research, Office Of Agricultural Economics, Ministry Of Agriculture And Cooperatives. (2012). a study of conditional living of poor farmer household in the lower part of Northeast Region, Thailand. Retrieved May 18, 2015, from http://www.oae.go.th/download/resech/2556/2.56researchNortheast05072556.pdf. [in Thai]
Thailand. Department of Agriculture of Thailand. Office of Agricultural Research and Development Region 8, (2015). Improving quality of life to the Southern Region of Thailand through agriculture. Retrieved May 21, 2015, from http://it.doa.go.th/pibai/pibai/n16/v_10-nov/rai.html. [in Thai]
Thailand. Department of National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT). (2010). the draft of research strategy plan (2013-2016): Central Region. Retrieved May 18, 2015, from http://research.eau.ac.th/pdf/Central.PDF [in Thai]
Thailand. Department of National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT). (2010). the draft of research strategy plan (2013-2016): Southern Region. Retrieved May 18, 2015, from http://research.eau.ac.th/pdf/South.PDF [in Thai]
Thailand. Department of National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT). (2010). the draft of research strategy plan (2013-2016): Northeast Region. Retrieved May 18, 2015, from http://research.eau.ac.th/pdf/Northeast.PDF [in Thai]
Thailand. Government Strategic Information Center, National Statistical Office. (2013).www.services.nic.go.th. Table 24: Minimum wage divided into each region of Thailand (1997 – 2013). Retrieved May 19, 2015, from www.services.nic.go.th/gsic/file-policy/policy-7/24.xls [in Thai]
Thailand. Ministry of Information and Communication Technology. National Statistical Office (NSO). (2013). Preliminary Report 2013 Agricultural Census. Retrieved May 18, 2015, from http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/ess/ess_test_folder/World_Census_Agriculture/Country_info_2010/Reports/Reports_5/THA_ENG_THA_PRE_REP_2013.pdf [in Thai]
Thailand. Office of Small and Medium Enterprises Promotion, (2015). Central and east Thailand. Retrieved May 25, 2015, from http://122.155.9.68/identity/index.php/. [in Thai]
Thapinta, A., & Hudak, P. F. (2003). Use of geographic information systems for assessing groundwater pollution potential by pesticides in Central Thailand. Environment International, 29(1), 87-93.
The Agricultural Research Development Agency (Public Organization). (2015). Southern Region of Thailand. Retrieved May 18, 2015, from http://www.arda.or.th/kasetinfo/south/content.php [in Thai]
The Chaipattana Foundation. (2015). Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy Retrieved February 24, 2015, from http://www.chaipat.or.th/chaipat_english/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4103&Itemid=293
The World Vegetable Center. (2014). A Situational Analysis to Support the Development of Integrated Agricultural Systems for Upland Areas in Thailand. Retrieved April 11, 2015, from http://humidtropics.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2014/10/TOR-Consultancy-Agriculture-Nan-Thailand.pdf
The World Vegetable Center. (2014).Thailand R4D platform launched. Retrieved April 11, 2015, from http://avrdc.org/thailand-r4d-platform-launched/
Tmanov, A. (2001). Case Study of the Ukrainian Agricultural Advisory Services (Dotoral Dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
U.S. Library of Congress, (n.d).Thailand Table of Contents. AGRICULTURE. Retrieved March 25, 2015, from http://countrystudies.us/thailand/67.htm
United Nations Development Program Thailand. (2012). Thai province brainstorms about green and inclusive growth. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.th.undp.org/content/thailand/en/home/presscenter/articles/2012/06/01/tha-province-brainstorms-about-green-and-inclusive-growth/
United Nations. (2009). Map of Thailand. Retrieved May 19, 2015 from http://www.un.org/depts/Cartographic/map/profile/thailand.pdf
Water, Land and Ecosystems Mekong, (n.d.). Research-for-Development | WLE Mekong. Retrieved from http://wle-mekong.cgiar.org/about/research-for-development/
Webler, T., Danielson, S., & Tuler, S. (2009). Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research. Greenfield MA: Social and Environmental Research Institute, 54.
Wiangsa district Health Office. (n.d.). Wiangsa district General Information. Retrieved June 30, 2015 from http://sa-eoffice.com/ข้อมูลทั่วไป-อำเภอเวียง/ [in Thai]
Wicharuck, S. (2010). Influence of land use systems on soil resources in northern Thailand. In Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of Soil Science: Soil solutions for a changing world, Brisbane, Australia, 1-6 August 2010. Symposium 3.2. 1 Highland agriculture and conservation of soil and water (pp. 64-67). International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS), c/o Institut für Bodenforschung, Universität für Bodenkultur.
Wisartsakul, W., (2012). Report on Rice mortgage scheme: The insufficient macro-oriented population development. Retrieved May 18, 2015 from https://wwisartsakul.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/e0b888e0b8b3e0b899e0b8b3e0b882e0b989e0b8b2e0b8a7_e0b884e0b8a7e0b8b2e0b8a1e0b8a2e0b8b2e0b881e0b888e0b899.pdf [in Thai]
Workbook E. (n.d.). “Conducting In-Depth Interviews”. Retrieved April 15, 2015, from http://www.nsf.org.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top