臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

資源循環企業服務商為因應市場及顧客需求，引進所需的資源循環機器設備，但因為市面上的資源循環設備提供者所提供的機器設備，無法滿足真實需求的使用狀況，故引發資源循環企業服務商想要從使用者的角度，轉而進入設備開發領域，開發符合使用者需求的機器設備，作為自身營運規畫及發展未來核心競爭力；但資源循環企業服務商本身不具有設備開發及研發能力，如何降低跨領域市場的風險與不確定性，以及進入此領域該具備哪些資源與能力，是本研究主要探討的核心問題。
本研究以資源基礎理論為主，探討資源循環企業服務商成為資源循環設備服務提供者，需具備哪些資源與能力並創造市場上的競爭優勢。研究樣本以國內外五家資源循環設備服務提供者為研究對象，透過個案研究分析與結構內容分析法進行探討，並推導出研究發現及命題。
研究結果歸納出相關的命題如下:(1)資源循環設備服務提供者的實體資源對競爭優勢具有顯著影響；(2) 資資源循環設備服務提供者的技術資源對競爭優勢具有顯著影響；(3) 資源循環設備服務提供者的總體功能對競爭優勢具有顯著影響；(4) 資源循環設備服務提供者的研究發展對競爭優勢部分顯著影響；(5) 資源循環設備服務提供者的製造能力對競爭優勢具有顯著影響。此外，本研究提出整合性資源與能力分析表，有效的歸納及整合各個研究個案的整體狀況，更可做為日後企業採取策略行動時參考的優先順序使用，實為另一研究貢獻。

Resource recycle service firm introduce the required resource recycle equipment to cope with the market and customer demand. The equipment which made by resource recycling equipment providers available on the market could not meet the real needs of the situation. This situation caused the resource recycling businesses Service providers turn into equipment development from the users’ view to develop the equipment meet the users' needs, as its own operational planning and future development of core competencies.
There are the major core issues to investigate of this study: If the resource recycling business service provider itself does not have the equipment development and R & D capabilities, how to reduce the cross-industries market risks and uncertainties? What resource and capabilities should they have for entering this field?
In this study, mainly resource-based theory to investigate what resources and capabilities that resource recycling service firm required to become resource recycling equipment service providers and creating the competitive advantage in the market. This study investigates five resource recycling equipment service providers domestic and international. Investigating by using the case studies analysis, content and structural analysis, and derive findings and propositions.
The results induct these propositions: (1) The real resources of resource recycle equipment service provider have significant impact on the competitive advantage. (2) The technical resources of resource recycle equipment service provider have significant impact on the competitive advantage. (3) The overall function of resource recycle equipment service provider have significant impact on the competitive advantage. (4) The research and development of resource recycle equipment service provider have significant impact on the competitive advantage. (5) The manufacturing capability of resource recycle equipment service provider have significant impact on the competitive advantage.found that the resource recycling facilities and services provided by the enterprise resources, real resources and technical resources will have significant impact on the competitive advantage. On business ability, there is a significant impact on the overall function, research and development and manufacturing capabilities. In addition, this study proposes integrated resources and capabilities of the table, effective induction and integration of the overall situation of each case study. More can be used as a reference when companies take strategic action priorities for future use. It is truly another research contribution.

第一章 緒論................................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機.......................................1
第二節 研究問題與目的.......................................2
第三節 研究範圍.............................................2
第二章 理論背景.............................................4
第一節 資源基礎理論 (resource-based theory, RBV)............4
第二節 資源基礎理論與競爭優勢................................6
第三節 資源基礎理論與策略執行................................8
第三章 研究方法............................................12
第一節 研究設計............................................12
第二節 資料來源與蒐集......................................13
第四章 研究結果...........................................17
第一節 個案介紹............................................17
第二節 個案分析與整理......................................32
第三節 個案分析與命題推論..................................51
第四節 討論...............................................62
第五章 研究結論與建議......................................66
第一節 研究結論............................................66
第二節 理論貢獻與實務意涵..................................66
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議...............................68
參考文獻..................................................70
表2-1 資源的種類...........................................5
表2-2 資源屬性與特徵........................................7
表2-3 能力的分類...........................................9
表2-4 資源基礎理論相關研究.................................11
表3-1 整合性資源與能力分析表...............................16
表4-1 PO公司整合性資源與能力分析表..........................18
表4-2 TO公司整合性資源與能力分析表..........................21
表4-3 CW公司整合性資源與能力分析表..........................24
表4-4 GD公司整合性資源與能力分析表..........................27
表4-5 CH公司整合性資源與能力分析表..........................30
表4-6 個案公司基本資料.....................................32
表4-7 個案企業之成功競爭優勢比較表..........................33
表4-8 個案企業成功所採取之策略比較表........................34
表4-9 個案企業資源與能力-財務資源比較表.....................35
表4-10 個案企業資源與能力-實體資源比較表....................36
表4-11 個案企業資源與能力-技術資源比較表....................38
表4-12 個案企業資源與能力-聲譽比較表........................39
表4-13 個案企業資源與能力-人力資源比較表....................40
表4-14 個案企業資源與能力-總體功能比較表....................41
表4-15 個案企業資源與能力-管理資訊比較表....................42
表4-16 個案企業資源與能力-研究發展比較表....................43
表4-17 個案企業資源與能力-製造比較表........................44
表4-18 個案企業資源與能力-產品設計比較表....................46
表4-19 個案企業資源與能力-行銷比較表........................47
表4-20 個案企業資源與能力-銷售與配送比較表..................49
表4-21 個案企業資源總表....................................51
表4-22 個案企業能力總表....................................51
表4-23 個案企業資源命題彙整表..............................59
表4-24 個案企業能力命題彙整表..............................60
表5-1 企業資源投入與競爭優勢對應彙整表......................67
表5-2 企業能力投入與競爭優勢對應彙整表......................68
圖1-1 研究流程圖...........................................3
圖2-1 資源基礎理論的策略分析架構............................10
圖3-1 觀念性架構圖.........................................15
圖4-1 修正後研究架構.......................................65

一、中文部分

吳思華 (2003)，策略九說 (三版)，台北，臉譜文化出版社。
呂穎彬、陳瑄淇、周窈朱、呂秀月 (2006)，「2006環保產業年鑑」，工研院能環所，台北。
二、英文部分
Amit, R. & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993), “Strategic assets and organizational rent,” Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1), pp. 33-46.
Barney, Jay B. (1986), “Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy,” Management Science, 32 (10), pp. 1231-1241.
Barney Jay B. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive adventage,” Journal of Management, 17 (1), pp. 99-120.
Barney Jay B. (1992), “Integrating organizational behavior and strategy formulation research: A resource based view,” Advances in Strategic Management, 8, pp. 39-61.
Barney, Jay B. (1999), “How a firm’s capabilities affect boundary decisions,” Sloan Management Review, 40 (3), pp. 137-145
Becker, G. S. (1964), Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to education, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bettis, Richard Stephen A. Bradley and Gary Hamel (1992), “Outsourcing and industrial decline,” Academy of Management Executive, 6 (1), pp. 7-22.
Cavinato, Joseph L. (1992), “A Total Cost/Value Model for Supply Chain Competitiveness”, Journal of Business Logistics, 13(2), pp. 285.
Chen Ming-Jer (1996), “Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration,” Academy of Management Review, 21 (1), pp. 100-134.
Cheon, Myun J, Varun Grover and James T. C. Teng (1995),“Theoretical perspectives on the outsourcing of information systems,” Journal of Information Technology, 10 (4), pp. 209-220.Collis, D. J. (1994), “Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities?” Strategic Management Journal, 15 (Winter), pp. 143-152.
Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. (1995), “Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s.” Harvard Business School, July-August, pp. 118-128.
Conner, Kathleen R. (1991), “A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm?” Journal of Management, 17 (1), pp. 121-154.
Demsetz, H. (1988), “Theory of the Firm Revisited”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4, pp. 141–162.
Dierickx Ingemar and Karel Cool (1989), “Asset stock cccumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage,” Management Science, 35 (12), pp. 1504-1511.
Dow, G. K., (1987), “The function of authority in transaction cost economics,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 8 (1), pp. 13-38.
Fernández, Z. and Suárez, I. (1996), “La estrategia de la empresa desde una perspectiva basada en los resources, ” Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la empresa, 5, pp. 73-92.
Gnyawali, D. R. & Madhavan, R. (2001), “Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective.” Academy of Management Review, 26 (3), pp. 431-445.
Grant, Robert M. (1991), “The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation,” California Management Review, 33 (3), pp. 114-135.
Grant, Robert M. (1992), Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications, Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
Grant, R. M. (1995), Contemporary Strategy Analysis, Blackwell Publishers Inc., pp. 236-241.
Jauch, Lawrence R., Osborn, Richard N., and Martin, Thomas N. (1980), “Structured Content Analysis of Cases: A Complementary Method for Organizational Research,” The Academy of Management Review, 5 (4), pp. 517-525.
Kotabe, Masaaki (1992), “Global Sourcing Strategy: R&D, Manufacturing, and Marketing Interfaces,” New York: Quorum.
Kotabe Masaaki, Michael J. Mol and Janet Y. Murray (2008), “Outsourcing, performance, and the role of E-commerce: A dynamic perspective.” Industrial Marketing Management, 37 (1), pp. 37-45
Lippman S.A. & Rumelt Richard P. (1982), “Uncertain Imitability: an analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition,” The Bell Journal of Economics, 13 (2), pp. 418-438.
Lyons, Thomas F., Krachenberg, A. Richard, & Henke Jr., John W. (1990), “Mixed motive marriages: what's next for buyer-supplier relations?” Sloan Management Review, 31 (3), pp. 29-36.
Penrose, Edith T. (1959), “Theory of The Growth of The Firm,” Blackwell, Oxford.
Peteraf Margaret A. (1993), “The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view,” Strategic Management Journal, 14 (3), pp.179-191.
Porter Michael. E. (1980), Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors, New york: Free Press.
Porter, Michael. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: Free Press.
Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., & Owen-Smith, J. (2005), “Network dynamics and field evolution: the frowth of international collaboration in life sciences.” American Journal of Sociology, 110 (4), pp. 1132-1205.
Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, Gary (1990), “The core competence of the corporation,” Harvard Business Review, 68 (3), pp. 79-93.
Quinn, James Brian (1992), “Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry,” New York: Free Press.
Quinn, James Brian and Hilmer Frederick G. (1994), “Strategic outsourcing,” Sloan Management Review, Summer, 35 (4), pp. 43-55.
Rumelt, R. (1974) “Strategy, structure, and economic performance,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Rumelt R. P. (1984), “Toward a strategic theory of the firm,” In R. Lamb [Eds.], Competitive Strategic Management, pp. 556-570. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Tomer, J. F. (1987), Organizational Capital: The Path to Higher Productivity and Well-being, New York: Praeger.
Tomás F. Espino-Rodríguze and Víctor Padrón-Robaina. (2006), “A review of outsourcing from the resource-based view of the firm,” International Journal of Management Reviews, 8 (1), pp. 49-70.
Wernerfelt, Birger (1984), “A resource based view of the firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2), pp. 170-180.
Williamson, Oliver E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies, Free Press, New York, NY.
Williamson, Oliver E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets and Relational Contracting, Free Press, New York, NY.