(3.237.178.91) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/03/07 02:21
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:奈爾巴
研究生(外文):NayelRababah
論文名稱:TMT Personality Compositions and Firm Performance: Examining the Effects of CEO-TMT Exchange,Psychological Empowerment,and Decision Quality
論文名稱(外文):TMT Personality Compositions and Firm Performance: Examining the Effects of CEO-TMT Exchange,Psychological Empowerment,and Decision Quality
指導教授:林豪傑林豪傑引用關係謝惠璟
指導教授(外文):Prof. Hao-Chieh LinProf. Hui-Ching Hsieh
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:國際經營管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
語文別:英文
論文頁數:128
外文關鍵詞:TMTUpper-echelons perspectivePsychological empowermentStrategic decisionCEO-TMT exchangeFirm performance.
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:63
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
This research draws on the upper echelons perspective and strategic decision literature to examine the mechanisms by which TMT personality compositions can create advantage for a firm, through the mediation of psychological empowerment and decision quality. The study also addresses the deficits in the literature by examining the moderating role of CEO-TMT exchange on the links between TMT personality compositions and psychological empowerment. A large-scale sample collected from over 700 executives in 210 firms in a Middle Eastern country (Jordan) was analyzed using structural equation modeling and hierarchal regression approaches. The research results show that TMT personality traits, as measured by the Five Factor model (FFM), have significant effects on psychological empowerment, which in turn produces a positive effect on decision quality and then firm performance. Psychological empowerment and decision quality also sequentially mediate the relationships between TMT personality compositions and firm performance. Moreover, CEO-TMT exchange moderates some of the relationships between TMT personality traits and psychological empowerment.
This study advances the upper echelons perspective through investigation of the “black box” between TMT socio-psychometric characteristics and firm performance. It highlights the significance of the CEO-TMT interface, the psychological strength of TMT members and their socio-cognitive bases in firm decision and financial outcomes. Limitations and implications are discussed.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I
ABSTRACT III
TABLE OF CONTENTS V
LIST OF TABLES VIII
LIST OF FIGURES IX
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background. 1
1.2 Research Motivation. 8
1.3 Research Objectives. 15
1.4 Research Questions. 17
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 18
2.1 Theoretical Background. 18
2.1.1 The Upper-Echelons Perspective. 18
2.1.2 TMT Personality Compositions. 19
2.1.3 Decision Quality. 25
2.1.4 Psychological Empowerment. 27
2.1.5 Firm Performance. 29
2.1.6 CEO-TMT Exchange Quality. 31
2.2 Hypothesis Development. 33
2.2.1 TMT Personality Compositions and Its Influence on Psychological Empowerment. 33
2.2.2 TMT Psychological Empowerment and Decision Quality. 40
2.2.3 Decision Quality and Firm Performance. 42
2.2.4 TMT Psychological Empowerment as a Mediator. 43
2.2.5 Identifying the Black Box between TMT Personality Compositions and Firm Performance. 44
2.2.6 Moderating Effects of CEO-TMT Exchange Quality. 46
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 55
3.1 Research Design and Sample Selection. 55
3.2 Level of Analysis. 60
3.3 Back Translation. 60
3.4 Research Model. 61
3.5 Measurements of Variables. 63
3.5.1 Independent Variables. 63
3.5.2 Dependent Variable. 66
3.5.3 Mediating Variables. 67
3.5.4 Moderating Variable. 69
3.5.5 Control Variables. 70
3.6 Statistical Analysis. 72
3.6.1 Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). 72
3.6.2 Moderating Hierarchical Regression Analysis. 73
3.7 Aggregation of the Data. 74
3.8 Assessing Common Method Variance (CMV). 75
CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH ANALYSIS AND RESULTS 78
4.1 Validity Assessment and Measurement Model. 78
4.2 Nested Structural Models, Hypotheses Testing and Results. 81
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 90
5.1 Research Discussion. 90
5.2 Research Implications. 95
5.3 Research Limitations and Future Directions. 102
REFERENCES 107
APPENDICES 124
Appendix I: Survey Questionnaire. 124
Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945-955.
Alkailani, M., Azzam, I. A., & Athamneh, A. B. (2012). Replicating Hofstede in Jordan: Ungeneralized, reevaluating the Jordanian culture. International Business Research, 5(4), 71-80.
Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123-148.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Aryee, S., & Chen, Z. X. (2006). Leader–member exchange in a Chinese context: Antecedents, the mediating role of psychological empowerment and outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 59(7), 793-801.
Ashforth, B. E. (1989). The experience of powerlessness in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making Processes, 43(2), 207-242.
Avery, D. R. (2003). Personality as a predictor of the value of voice. Journal of Psychology, 137(5), 435-446.
Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 951–968.
Bantel, K., & Jackson, S. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(s1), 107-124.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377-391.
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., & Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 43-51.
Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 62-78.
Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32.
Baum, J. R., & Wally, S. (2003). Strategic decision speed and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11), 1107-1129.
Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 595-615.
Benoliel, P., & Somech, A. (2014). The health and performance effects of participative leadership: Exploring the moderating role of the Big Five personality dimensions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(2), 277-294.
Bernerth, J. B., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., Giles, W. F., & Walker, H. J. (2007). Leader–member social exchange (LMSX): Development and validation of a scale. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(8), 979–1003.
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Boal, K. B., & Hooijberg, R. (2001). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 515-549.
Boies, K., & Howell, J. M. (2006). Leader–member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 246-257.
Bond, M. H., & Ng, I. W. C. (2004). The depth of a group's personality resources: Impacts on group process and group performance. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(3), 285-300.
Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901-910.
Buch, R. (2015). Leader–member exchange as a moderator of the relationship between employee-organization exchange and affective commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(1), 59-79.
Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Team member functional background and involvement in management teams: Direct effects and the moderating role of power centralization. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 458-474.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Butts, M. M., Vandenberg, R. J., DeJoy, D. M., Schaffer, B. S., & Wilson, M. G. (2009). Individual reactions to high involvement work processes: Investigating the role of empowerment and perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(2), 122-136.
Buyl, T., Boone, C., Hendriks, W., & Matthyssens, P. (2011). Top management team functional diversity and firm performance: The moderating role of CEO characteristics. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 151-177.
Cannella, A. A., Park, J.-H., & Lee, H.-U. (2008). Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 768-784.
Carless, S. A. (2004). Does psychological empowerment mediate the relationship between psychological climate and job satisfaction? Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(4), 405-425.
Carmeli, A. (2008). Top management team behavioral integration and the performance of service organizations. Group & Organization Management, 33(6), 712-735.
Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2006). Top management team behavioral integration, decision quality, and organizational decline. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(5), 441-453.
Carmeli, A., Schaubroeck, J., & Tishler, A. (2011). How CEO empowering leadership shapes top management team processes: Implications for firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 399-411.
Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749-778.
Carpenter, M. C., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 533-545.
Castro, C. B., Perinan, M. M. V., & Bueno, J. C. C. (2008). Transformational leadership and followers’ attitudes: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(10), 1842-1863.
Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234-246.
Chen, G., Casper, W. J., & Cortina, J. M. (2001). The roles of self-efficacy and task complexity in the relationships among cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and work-related performance: A meta-analytic examination. Human Performance, 14(3), 209-230.
Chen, G., Kirkman, B. L., Kanfer, R., Allen, D., & Rosen, B. (2007a). A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 331-346.
Chen, M.-J., Farh, J. L., & MacMillan, I. C. (1993). An exploration of the expertness of outside informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1614-1632.
Chen, M.-J., Lin, H. C., & Michel, J. G. (2010). Navigating in a hypercompetitive environment: The roles of action aggressiveness and TMT integration. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), 1410-1430.
Chen, Z., Lam, W., & Zhong, J. A. (2007b). Leader–member exchange and member performance: A new look at individual-level negative feedback-seeking behavior and team-level empowerment climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 202-212.
Child, J. (1972). Organization structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(0), 1-22.
Cho, T. S., & Hambrick, D. C. (2006). Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17(4), 453-469.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3 ed.). Mawhaw, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239-290.
Cohen, S. G., Chang, L., & Ledford, G. E. J. (1997). A hierarchical construct of self-management leadership and its relationship to quality of work life and perceived work group effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 275-308.
Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2003). Strategic human resource practices, top management team social network, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 740-751.
Conger, J., & Kanungo, R. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P. T. J., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P. T. J., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO personality inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(9), 887-898.
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organization information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(4), 554-571.
Datta, D. K., Guthrie, J. P., & Wright, P. M. (2005). Human resource management and labor productivity: Does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 135-145.
Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 857-880.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191-1201.
Dean, J. W., & Sharfman, M. P. (1996). Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 368-396.
Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949-969.
Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52-73.
Doms, M., & Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. Z. (2014). Structure and characteristics of top management teams as antecedents of outside executive appointments: A three-country study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(22), 3060-3085.
Dooley, R. S., & Fryxell, G. E. (1999). Attaining decision quality and commitment from dissent: The moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision-making teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 389-402.
Dust, S. B., Resick, C. J., & Mawritz, M. B. (2014). Transformational leadership, psychological empowerment, and the moderating role of mechanistic–organic contexts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(0), 413-433.
Eby, L. T., Freeman, D. M., Rush, M. C., & Lance, C. E. (1999). Motivational bases of affective organizational commitment: A partial test of an integrative theoretical model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 463-483.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
Edmondson, A. C., Roberto, M. A., & Watkins, M. D. (2003). A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: Managing unstructured task streams. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 297-325.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environment Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543-576.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1999). Strategy as strategic decision making. Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 65-72.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. J. (1988). Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 737-770.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semi-conductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 504-529.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136-150.
Erkutlu, H. (2008). The impact of transformational leadership on organizational and leadership effectiveness. Journal of Management Development, 27(7), 708-726.
Ertürk, A., & Vurgun, L. (2015). Retention of IT professionals: Examining the influence of empowerment, social exchange, and trust. Journal of Business Research, 68(0), 34–46.
Fernández-Mesa, A., Iborra, M., & Safón, V. (2013). CEO-TMT interaction: Do tenure and age affect ambidexterity dynamism? European Journal of International Management, 7(1), 31-55.
Ferrier, W. J. (2001). Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 858-877.
Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505-538.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top Management team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 484-503.
Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2008). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fiske, S. T., Kenny, D. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1982). Structural models for the mediation of salience effects on attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(2), 105-127.
Fredrickson, J. W. (1984). The comprehensiveness of strategic decision processes: Extension, observations, future directions. Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), 445-466.
García-Morales, V. J., Lloréns-Montes, F. J., & Verdú-Jover, A. J. (2008). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. British Journal of Management, 19(4), 299-319.
Gardner, T. M. (2005). Interfirm competition for human resources: Evidence from the software industry. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 237-256.
Garg, V. K., Walters, B. A., & Priem, R. L. (2003). Chief executive scanning emphases, environmental dynamism, and manufacturing firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 725-744.
Glunk, U., Heijltjes, M. G., & Olie, R. (2001). Design characteristics and functioning of top management teams in Europe. European Management Journal, 19(3), 291-300.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality: The big five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216-1229.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26-34.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Merveilde, F. De Fruyt & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7-28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
Grant, A. F., Gino, F. G., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 528-550.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6 ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Hambrick, D. C. (1994). Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the team label. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 16, pp. 171-213). Greenwicb, CT: JAI Press.
Hambrick, D. C. (1995). Fragmentation and the other problems CEOs have with their top management teams. California Management Review, 37(3), 110-127.
Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Upper echelon theory: Origins, twists and turns, and lessons learned. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of management theory: The process of theory development (pp. 109-127). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334-343.
Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M.-J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659-684.
Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2005). Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 472-491.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work team cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96-107.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1029-1045.
Haynie, J. J., Cullen, K. L., Lester, H. F., Winter, J., & Svyantek, D. J. (2014). Differentiated leader–member exchange, justice climate, and performance: Main and interactive effects. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 912-922.
Hiller, N. J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Conceptualizing executive hubris: The role of (Hyper-)core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4), 297-319.
Hitt, M. A., Keats, B. W., & DeMarie, S. M. (1998). Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), 22-42.
Hofmann, D. A., & Jones, L. M. (2005). Leadership, collective personality, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 509-522.
Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations. Software of the mind (2 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. The American Psychologist, 49(6), 493-504.
Hough, J. R., & Ogilvie, d. (2005). An empirical test of cognitive style and strategic decision outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 417-448.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453.
Hyatt, D. E., & Ruddy, T. M. (1997). An examination of the relationship between work group characteristics and performance: Once more into the breech. Personnel Psychology, 50(3), 553-585.
Iaquinto, A. L., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1997). Top management team agreement about the strategic decision process: A test of some of its determinants and consequences. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1), 63-75.
Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29(6), 801-830.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). R(wg): An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 306-309.
Janis, I. L. (1985). Sources of error in strategic decision making. In J. M. Pennings (Ed.), Organizational strategy and change (pp. 157-197). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. (2002). Discriminant and incremental validity of four personality traits: Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 693-710.
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self-evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56(0), 303-331.
Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 621-652.
Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 797-807.
Kearney, E., Gebert, D., & Voelpel, S. C. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 581-598.
Khan, M. S., Breitenecker, R. J., & Schwarz, E. J. (2014). Entrepreneurial team locus of control: Diversity and trust. Management Decision, 52(6), 1057-1081.
Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58-74.
Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 175-192.
Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2001). The impact of team members’ cultural values on productivity, cooperation, and empowerment in self-managing work teams. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 597–617.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein, S. W. J. Kozlowski, (Ed.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 216-239). Boston: HBS Press.
Lawrence, B. S. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8(1), 1-22.
Le Blanc, P. M., & González-Romá, V. (2012). A team level investigation of the relationship between leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation, and commitment and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 534-544.
Leach, D. J., Wall, T. D., & Jackson, P. R. (2003). The effect of empowerment on job knowledge: An empirical test involving operators of complex technology. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(1), 27-52.
Lee, A. N., & Nie, Y. (2014). Understanding teacher empowerment: Teachers’ perceptions of principal’s and immediate supervisor’s empowering behaviours, psychological empowerment and work-related outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41(0), 67-79.
LePine, J. A. (2003). Team adaptation and postchange performance: Effects of team composition in terms of members’ cognitive ability and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 27-39.
LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 326-336.
Liao, H., & Chuang, A. (2004). A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 41-58.
Liao, H., Joshi, A., & Chuang, A. C. (2004). Sticking out like a sore thumb: Employee dissimilarity and deviance at work. Personnel Psychology, 57(4), 969-1000.
Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 407-416.
Lim, B.-C., & Ployhart, R. E. (2004). Transformational leadership: Relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 610-621.
Lin, H.-C., & Shih, C.-T. (2008). How executive SHRM system links to firm performance: The perspectives of upper echelon and competitive dynamics. Journal of Management, 34(5), 853-884.
Lin, H. C., & Rababah, N. (2014). CEO–TMT exchange, TMT personality composition, and decision quality: The mediating role of TMT psychological empowerment. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 943-957.
Linden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 662-674.
Ling, Y., Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). Transformational leadership's role in promoting corporate entrepreneurship: Examining the CEO-TMT interface. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 557-576.
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of TMT behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646-672.
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803-855.
Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52(12), 1865-1883.
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. E. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Journal, 26(3), 356-376.
Mathieu, J. E., Gilson, L. L., & Ruddy, T. M. (2006). Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 97-108.
McAdams, D. P. (1992). The five-factor model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 329-361.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. J. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509-516.
Miller, D., & Chen, M.-J. (1994). Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 1-23.
Miller, D., & Droge, C. (1986). Psychological and traditional determinants of structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4), 549-560.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), 221-235.
Mintzberg, H. (1994). Rethinking strategic planning part 1: Pitfalls and fallacies. Long Range Planning, 27(3), 12-21.
Moberg, P. J. (2001). Linking conflict strategy to the Five-Factor model: Theoretical and empirical foundations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12(1), 47-68.
Mohammed, S., & Angell, L. C. (2003). Personality heterogeneity in teams: Which differences make a difference for team performance? Small Group Research, 34(6), 651-677.
Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1998). Five reasons why the big five article has been frequently cited. Personnel Psychology, 51(4), 849-857.
Moynihan, L. M., & Peterson, R. S. (2001). A contingent configuration approach to understanding the role of personality in organizational groups. In B. Staw & R. I. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 23, pp. 327-378). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Muchinsky, P. M., & Monahan, C. J. (1987). What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary model of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), 268-277.
Murray, A. (1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10(s1), 125-141.
Nadkarni, S., & Herrmann, P. (2010). CEO personality, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The case of the Indian business process outsourcing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1050-1073.
Naranjo-Gil, D., Hartmann, F., & Maas, V. S. (2008). Top management team heterogeneity, strategic change and operational performance. British Journal of Management, 19(3), 222-234.
Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27(7), 941-966.
Neuman, G. A., Wagner, S. H., & Christiansen, N. D. (1999). The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group and Organization Management, 24(1), 28-45.
Neuman, G. A., & Wright, J. (1999). Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 376-389.
Oakes, P. J., & Turner, J. C. (1980). Social categorization and intergroup behavior: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive? European Journal of Social Psychology, 10(3), 295-301.
Papadakis, V. M., & Barwise, P. (2002). How much do CEOs and top managers matter in strategic decision-making? British Journal of Management, 13(0), 83-95.
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1-28.
Peterson, R. D., Smith, D. B., Martorana, P. V., & Owens, P. D. (2003). The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 795-808.
Peterson, R. S. (1997). A directive leadership style in group decision making is both virtue and vice: Evidence from elite and experimental groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1107-1121.
Piccolo, R. F., Bardes, M., Mayer, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (2008). Does high quality leader–member exchange accentuate the effects of organizational justice? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(2), 273-298.
Pillemer, J., Graham, E. R., & Burke, D. M. (2014). The face says it all: CEOs, gender, and predicting corporate performance The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 855-864.
Pitcher, P., & Smith, A. D. (2001). Top management team heterogeneity: Personality, power, and proxies. Organization Science, 12(1), 1-18.
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in organizational research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Priem, R. L., Rasheed, A. M. A., & Kotulic, A. G. (1995). Rationality in strategic decision processes, environmental dynamism and firm performance. Journal of Management, 21(5), 913-929.
Reina, C. S., Zhang, Z., & Peterson, S. J. (2014). CEO grandiose narcissism and firm performance: The role of organizational identification. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(0), 958–971.
Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 61-72.
Schriesheim, C. A. (1979). The similarity of individual-directed and group directed leader behavior descriptions. Academy of Management Journal, 22(2), 345-355.
Seibert, S. E., Silver, S. R., & Randolph, W. A. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 332-349.
Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981-1003.
Shadur, M. A., Kienzle, R., & Rodwell, J. J. (1999). The relationship between organizational climate and employee perceptions of involvement. Group and Organization Management, 24(4), 479-503.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420-428.
Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 662-673.
Simsek, Z. (2007). CEO tenure and organizational performance: An intervening model. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 653-662.
Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., & Veiga, J. F. (2010). The impact of CEO core self-evaluation on the firm’s entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 110-119.
Simsek, Z., Veiga, J. F., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2005). Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 69-84.
Smith, A., Houghton, S. M., Hood, J. N., & Ryman, J. A. (2006). Power relationships among top managers: Does top management team power distribution matter for organizational performance? Journal of Business Research, 59(5), 622-629.
Smith, K. G., Ferrier, W. J., & Ndofor, H. (2001). Competitive dynamics research: Critique and future directions. In M. Hitt, R. E. Freeman & J. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management (pp. 315-361). London: Blackwell Publishers.
Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., Gannon, M. J., & Chen, M. J. (1991). Organizational information processing, competitive responses, and performance in the U.S. domestic airline industry. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 60-85.
Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., O’Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 93(3), 412-438.
Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. Lindzey & A. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 883-947). New York: Random House.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13(0), 290-312.
Sosik, J. J. (1997). Effects of transformational leadership and anonymity on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Group & Organizational Management, 22(4), 460-487.
Souitaris, V., & Maestro, B. M. M. (2010). Polychronicity in top management teams: The impact on strategic decision processes and performance of new technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 31(6), 652-678.
Spark, J. R., & chenk, J., A. (2001). Explaining the effects of transformational leadership: An investigation of the effects of higher-order motives in multilevel marketing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(8), 849-869.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483-504.
Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., & Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23(5), 679-704.
Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32(1), 29-54.
Stock, R. (2004). Drivers of team performance: What do we know and what have we still to learn? Schmalenbach Business Review, 56(3), 274-306.
Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315-330.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and inter group behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1249-1263.
Tan, J., & Tan, D. (2005). Environment-strategy co-evolution and co-alignment: A staged model of Chinese SOEs under transition. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 141-157.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. P., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Thomas, K., & Velthouse, B. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management Review, 15(4), 666-681.
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-30.
Tuuli, M. M., & Rowlinson, S. (2009). Empowerment in project teams: A multilevel examination of the job performance implications. Construction Management and Economics, 27(5), 473-498.
Van Vianen, A. E. M., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2001). Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 97-120.
Venkatraman, N., & Grant, J. H. (1986). Construct measurement in organizational strategy research: A critique and proposal. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 71-87.
Vianen, A. E. M., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2001). Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 97-120.
Wagner, S. M., & Kemmerling, R. (2014). Supply chain management executives in corporate upper echelons. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 20(0), 156–166.
Wall, T. D., Cordery, J. L., & Clegg, C. W. (2002). Empowerment, performance, and operational uncertainty: A theoretical integration. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(1), 146-169.
Wally, S., & Baum, J. R. (1994). Personal and structural determinants of the pace of strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 932-956.
Wang, H., Law, K. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2008). Leader-member exchange, employee performance, and work outcomes: an empirical study in the Chinese context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(10), 1809-1824.
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletins, 98(2), 219-235.
West, C. T., & Schwenk, C. R. (1996). Top management team strategic consensus, demographic homogeneity and firm performance: A report of resounding non-findings. Strategic Management Journal, 17(7), 571-576.
Wiersema, M., & Bantel, K. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91-121.
Wiersema, M. F., & Bird, A. (1993). Organizational demography in Japanese firms: Group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 996-1025.
Wilson, K. S., Sin, H.-P., & Conlon, D. E. (2010). What about the leader in leader-member exchange? The impact of resource exchanges and substitutability on the leader. Academy of Management Review, 27(7), 708-726.
Wright, P. M., & Boswell, W. R. (2002). Desegregating HRM: A review and synthesis of micro and macro human resource management research. Journal of Management, 28(3), 247-276.
Yu, T., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Rivalry between multinational enterprises: An event history approach. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 665-686.
Yukl, G. A., & Becker, W. S. (2006). Effective empowerment in organizations. Organization Management Journal, 3(3), 210-231.
Zaccaro, S. J., Gualtieri, J., & Minionis, D. (1995). Task cohesion as a facilitator of team decision-making under temporal urgency. Military Psychology, 7(2), 77-93.
Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 12(4), 451-483.
Zacharatos, A., Barling, J., & Iverson, R. D. (2005). High-performance work systems and occupational safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 77-93.
Zahra, S. A. (2011). Doing research in the (new) Middle East: Sailing with the west. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(4), 6-21.
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.
Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259-271.
Zott, C. (2003). Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 97-125.
Zubaidi, F. R., Al-Sammerai, N. S. M., & Ahmad, F. (2011). An overview on women’s leadership issues in Jordan. Journal of Politics and Law, 4(2), 67-73.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔