臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

羅傑瘤顎家蟻（Strumigenys rogeri Emery）原產於非洲，現已在南北緯25°內熱帶與亞熱帶的一些陸地區域可發現其野外分佈。鑑於對羅傑瘤顎家蟻的各項基礎研究仍舊缺乏，本篇針對羅傑瘤顎家蟻在不同恆溫下飼養並進行觀察，探討其生長與溫度間的關係。在實驗中，將族群飼養在人工蟻巢中，使用24°C、26°C、28°C進行恆溫飼養，同時記錄其產卵、幼蟲孵化、化蛹及新生工蟻羽化的時間，並計算每個齡期的發育起點溫度（threshold of development temperature）與有效積溫（effective accumulated temperature）。結果發現，羅傑瘤顎家蟻的卵期在不同溫度下的發育並無顯著相關，顯示溫度對其卵的發育速度無影響；幼蟲期與蛹期方面，在28 °C下培養的幼蟲發育速度快於24°C與26°C。而羅傑瘤顎家蟻的幼蟲期與蛹期的發育起點溫度分別為11.2°C、9.5°C，有效積溫分別為213.2日度、222.4日度。由此結果可用於大量飼養羅傑瘤顎家蟻與推算其地理上可能分佈範圍，以在非其原生地進行外來物種的監測。

The dacetine ant, Strumigenys rogeri, native to Africa, was widespread in tropic and subtropic terrestrial region (between 23.5°N and 23.5°S). However, it was poorly studies. The purpose of this paper investigated the life cycle of S. rogeri development at different constant temperatures. The study raised S. rogeri colonies of in artificial nests, placed in three constant temperature (24°C, 26°C and 28°C), and recorded the individual guantity of eggs, larva, pupa and adult (worker) with continuous observation. According to the result, the development of the eggs would not be difference in different temperature (24°C, 26°C and 28°C). On the contrary, the develop rate of larvae and pupae were more faster under 28°C than 24°C. The result showed threshold of development temperature for the larva and pupa were 11.2°C and 9.5°C, and the effective life cycle accumulated temperature were 213.2 and 222.4 day-degree. The result can predict some information for mass production of S. rogeri and to presume the geographic distribution to monitor the dispread of S. rogeri.

致謝 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
表次 v
圖次 vi
壹、前言 1
貳、往昔研究 4
參、材料與方法 16
肆、結果 22
伍、討論 35
陸、結論 38
柒、參考文獻 39
表次
表一、以孤雌產雌進行生殖的螞蟻種類 9
表二、各種溫度對一般昆蟲的影響 13
表三、羅傑瘤顎家蟻原巢編號與分巢後子巢之編號 18
表四、羅傑瘤顎家蟻（S. rogeri）24˚C生活史各階段所需時間（日 25
表五、羅傑瘤顎家蟻（S. rogeri）26˚C生活史各階段所需時間（日 28
表六、羅傑瘤顎家蟻（S. rogeri）28˚C生活史各階段所需時間（日 31
表七、羅傑瘤顎家蟻在不同溫度下的發育齡期與ANOVA分析……….…..….32
表八、羅傑瘤顎家蟻幼蟲期與蛹期的發育起點溫度與有效積溫 33
圖次
圖一、羅傑瘤顎家蟻（Strumigenys rogeri）在世界的散佈紀錄 5
圖二、羅傑瘤顎家蟻（Strumigenys rogeri Emery, 1890 16
圖三、人工蟻巢 17
圖四、溫濕度計（EL-USB-2-RH / Temperature Data Logger 19
圖五、恆溫生長箱 19
圖六、羅傑瘤顎家蟻（S. rogeri）各齡期計算示意圖 20
圖七、羅傑瘤顎家蟻的飼養 22
圖八、羅傑瘤顎家蟻（S. rogeri）r7號蟻巢於24˚C生長狀況 23
圖九、羅傑瘤顎家蟻（S. rogeri）r8號蟻巢於24˚C生長狀況 24
圖十、羅傑瘤顎家蟻（S. rogeri）r9號蟻巢於24˚C生長狀況 24
圖十一、羅傑瘤顎家蟻（S. rogeri）r4號蟻巢於26˚C生長狀況 26
圖十二、羅傑瘤顎家蟻（S. rogeri）r5號蟻巢於26˚C生長狀況 27
圖十三、羅傑瘤顎家蟻（S. rogeri）6r號蟻巢於26˚C生長狀況 27
圖十四、羅傑瘤顎家蟻（S. rogeri）r1號蟻巢於28˚C生長狀況 29
圖十五、羅傑瘤顎家蟻（S. rogeri）r2號蟻巢於28˚C生長狀況 30
圖十六、羅傑瘤顎家蟻（S. rogeri）r3號蟻巢於28˚C生長狀況 30
圖十七、羅傑瘤顎家蟻在不同溫度下發育齡期趨勢圖 32
圖十八、羅傑瘤顎家蟻幼蟲期（左）與蛹期（右）在不同溫度下的發育速率 34
圖十九、羅傑瘤顎家蟻疑似雄蟻之有翅型個體 35

網站
AntCat：http://www.antcat.org/
GISD：http://www.issg.org/database/welcome/
中文
王淑慧。2009。台灣產孤雌產雌螞蟻-畢氏粗角蟻-溫度與生長發育關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學生物學系碩士論文。43頁。
林宗岐。1993。台灣產針刺家蟻類形態學和系統學研究 (膜翅目：蟻科)。台灣大學植物病蟲害學研究所碩士論文。197頁。
林宗岐。1998。台灣產家蟻亞科系統分類學與動物地理學研究 (膜翅目：蟻科)。台灣大學植物病蟲害學研究所博士論文。748頁。
林宗岐、吳文哲。2003。台灣螞蟻相（膜翅目：蟻科）—並附亞科與屬檢索表。國立台灣博物館年刊。46: 5-69。
貢穀紳。1996。昆蟲學﹙下冊﹚。台中：國立中興大學農學院出版委員會。pp: 35-43。
徐淑芬。2012。羅傑瘤顎家蟻（Strumigenys rogeri）孤雌產雌現象研究（膜翅目：蟻科）。彰化︰國立彰化師範大學碩士論文。

英文
Beedman, M., G. Good., M. H. Allsopp, S. Radloff, C. W. Pirk and F. L. Ratnieks. 2002. A non-policing honey bee colony (Apis mellifera capensis). Naturwissenschaften 89: 479-482.
Bull, J. J. 1983. Evolution of sex determining mechanisms. Benjamin Cummings. Menlo Park, Calif. 316pp.
Campbell, A., B. D. Frazer, N. Gilbert, A. P. Gutierrez, and M. Mackauer. 1974. Temperature requirements of some aphids and their parasites. Journal of Applied Ecology. 11: 431-438.
Carruthers, R. I., T. S. Larkin, H. Firstencel, and Z. Feng. 1992. Influence of Thermal Ecology on the Mycosis of a Rangeland Grasshopper. Ecology. 73: 190-204.
CBD Guiding Principles, 2002. Annexed to Decision VI/23 (Alien species that threaten ecosystems, habitats or species) of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.
Gronenberg, W. 1996. The trap-jaw mechanism in the dacetine ants Daceton armigerum and Strumigenys sp. The Journal of Experimental Biology 199: 2021-2033.
Heinrich, B. 1993. The hot-blooded insects: strategies and mechanisms of thermoregulation. Harvard University Press. 601pp.
IUCN. 2000. The IUCN Guidelines for the Prevention of Biodiversity Loss caused by Alien Invasive Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
Kearney, M. 2005. Hybridization, glaciation and geographical parthenogenesis. Trends in Ecology &; Evolution 20: 495-502.
Kevan, P. G. 1975. Sun-tracking solar furnaces in high arctic flowers: significance for pollination and insects. Science. 189: 723-726.
Le Trionnaire, G., F. Francis., S. Jaubert-Possamai., J. Bonhomme., E. De Pauw., J. P. Gauthier., E. Haubruge., F. Legeai., N. Prunier-Leterme., J. C. Simon., S. Tanguy , and D.Tagu. 2009. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of seasonal photoperiodism in the pea aphid. BMC Genomics. 10: 456.
Lindblad M. and R. Sigvald. 1996. A degree-day mode l for regional prediction of first occurrence of fruit flies in oats in Sweden. Crop Prorecrron 15: 59-565.


Lorenzo-Carballa, M. O. and A. Cordero-Rivera. 2009. Thelytokous parthenogenesis in the damselfly Ischnura hastate (Odonata, Coenagrionidae): genetic mechanisms and lack of bacterial infection. Heredity. 103: 377-384.
Normark, B. B. 2003. The evolution of alternative genetic systems in insects. Annual Reviews. 48: 397-423.
Madeleine, B., G. Good, M. H. Allsopp, S. Radloff, C. W. Pirk, and F. L. Ratnieks. 2002. A non-policing honey bee colony (Apis mellifera capensis). Naturwissenschaften. 89: 479-482.
Matsuura, K. 2011. Sexual and asexual reproduction in termites. Biology ofTermites: A Modern Synthesis. pp: 255-277.
Maynard, S. 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Pearcy, M., O. Hardy. and S. Aron. 2006. Thelytokous parthenogenesis and its consequences on inbreeding in an ant. Heredity. 96: 377-382.
Rabeling, C. and D. J.C. Kronauer. 2013. Thelytokous Parthenogenesis in Eusocial Hymenoptera. Annual Review of Entomology. 58: 273-292.
Réaumur, R.A.F.d. 1935. Observation du thérmomére, faites à Paris pedant l‘année1735, compares avec celles qui ont été faites sous la ligne, à l‘Isle de France,à Alger et quelques-unes de nos isles de l‘Amerique. Mémoires de l‘AcadémieRoyal des Sciences. pp: 545–576.
Roland, J., Keyghobadi, and S. Fownes. 2002. Alpine parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology. 81: 1642-53.
Smith, J. Maynard. 1978. The evolution of sex. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978. 222 pp.
Stenberg, P. and A. Saura. 2009. Cytology of Asexual Animals. Lost Sex. pp: 63-74.
Suomalainen, E., Saura, A., and Lokki, J. 1987. Cytology and evolution in parthenogenesis. Medical. 216 pp.
Urquhart, F. A., and N. R. Urquhart. 1978. Autumnal migration routes of the eastern population of the monarch butterfly (Danaus p. plexippus L.; Danaidae; Lepidoptera) in North America to the overwintering site in the Neovolcanic Plateau of Mexico. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 56: 1759-1764.
Webb G. J. W. and H. Cooper-Preston. 1989. Effects of incubation temperature on crocodiles and the evolution of reptilian oviparity. American Zoologist. 29: 953-971.
Wenseleers, T. and A. Van Oystaeyen. 2011. Unusual modes of reproduction in social insects: shedding light on the evolutionary paradox of sex. BioEssays. 33: 927-37.
Wetterer, J. K. 2012. Worldwide spread of Roger‘s dacetine ant, Strumigenys rogeri (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmicological News. 16: 1-6.
White, M. J. D. 1984. Chromosomal Mechanisms in Animal Reproduction. Bolletino di zoologia. 51: 1-23.