跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.222.104.206) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/05/30 00:16
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:蔡念庭
研究生(外文):Nian-Ting Tsai
論文名稱:開放式合作多樣性與組織創新對廠商創新績效之研究
論文名稱(外文):A study on open collaboration diversity and organizational innovation impact on the firm innovation performance
指導教授:王俊賢王俊賢引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chun-Hsien Wang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立嘉義大學
系所名稱:生物事業管理學系研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
畢業學年度:103
中文關鍵詞:開放式創新組織創新開放式合作多樣性創新績效
外文關鍵詞:open innovationorganizational innovationopen collaboration diversityinnovation performance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:196
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:41
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
外部知識來源已經成為企業創新策略重要的一環。為了獲得外部知識,企業與多個夥伴進行合作以獲得多種技術,並導致企業技術的多樣性。此外,組織創新也被認為對於企業競爭力具有高度重要性。本研究目的為基於開放式創新觀點,探討技術多樣性與創新績效之關係與兩者如何推動創新績效。本研究分析樣本根據2012年台灣行政院國家科學委員會所進行之區域創新調查(Community Innovation Survey; CIS)之中2381家進行創新活動之台灣廠商為樣本。本研究利用Tobit 迴歸分析驗證本研究的基本假說與開放式合作多樣性、組織創新與創新績效之間的關係。實證結果發現,開放式合作多樣性與創新績效具有顯著倒U關係,且組織創新對開放式合作多樣性與創新績效間具有顯著干擾效果。
External knowledge sourcing has become a vital part of firm’s innovation strategies. In order to access external knowledge, firms collaborate with multiple partners for multiple technologies that would lead to the diversification of their technological knowledge. Moreover, the organizational innovation is considered to be highly important for a firm's competitiveness. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between the technology diversity and organizational innovation in terms of how to drive the innovation performance based on the open innovation perspective. The analysis is based on a sample of 2381 Taiwanese firms active in innovation activities taken from the Community Innovation Survey (CIS) 2012, survey by the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology. Finally, we use Tobit regression analysis to tests the hypotheses and the relationship among open collaboration diversity, organizational innovation and innovation performance. We found open collaboration has an inverted U-shaped and significant effect on the firm innovation performance, and that this relationship is positively moderated by organizational innovation. In addition, the empirical result also found that the organizational innovation has a positive and significant effect on firm innovation performance.
Chinese abstract I
Abstract II
Table of Contents III
List of figures IV
List of tables V
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research background and motivation 1
1.2 Research purposes 5
1.3 Research process 6
Chapter 2 Literature review 7
2.1 Nature of innovation 7
2.2 Open innovation 10
2.3 Organizational innovation 13
2.4 Open collaboration diversity and innovation performance 16
Chapter 3 Methodologies 21
3.1 Theoretical and hypotheses development 21
3.2 Data collection 35
3.3 Variable measures 37
Chapter 4 Empirical Results 41
4.1 Sample analysis 41
4.2 Descriptive statistic 43
4.3 Test of hypotheses 45
Chapter 5 Discussion and Conclusion 49
5.1 Discussion 49
5.2 Conclusion 52
5.3 Limitations and directions for future research 53
Reference 54

Almeida, P., &; Phene, A. (2004). Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic management journal, 25(8‐9), 847-864.
2. Ang, S.H., 2008. Competitive intensity and collaboration: Impact on firm growth across technological environments. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1057-1075.
3. Argyres, N. (1996). Capabilities, technological diversification and divisionalization. Strategic management journal, 17(5), 395-410.
4. Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel, S., &; Lay, G. (2008). Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys. Technovation, 28(10), 644-657.
5. Arora, A., &; Gambardella, A. (1990). Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 361-379.
6. Baldridge, J. V., &; Burnham, R. A. (1975). Organizational innovation: Individual, organizational, and environmental impacts. Administrative science quarterly, 165-176.
7. Bapuji, H., Loree, D., and Crossan, M., 2011. Connecting external knowledge usage and firm performance: An empirical analysis, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 28, 215-231.
8. Bartlett, C. A., &; Ghoshal, S. (1987). Managing across borders: New organizational responses. Sloan Management Review, 29(1), 43-53.
9. Ballot, G. Fakhfakh, F. Galia, F., and Salter, A., (2015) The fateful triangle: Complementarities in performance betweenproduct, process and organizational innovation in France and the UK. Research Policy, 44, 217–232.
10. Ballot, G., Fakhfakh, F., Galia, F., &; Salter, A. (2015). The fateful triangle: Complementarities in performance between product, process and organizational innovation in France and the UK. Research Policy, 44(1), 217-232.
11. Battisti, G., &; Stoneman, P. (2010). How innovative are UK firms? evidence from the fourth UK community innovation survey on synergies between technological and organizational innovations. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 187-206.
12. Becheikh, N., Landry, R., &; Amara, N. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003. Technovation, 26(5), 644-664.
13. Becker, W., &; Dietz, J. (2004). R&;D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 209-223.
14. Betz, F. (1987). Managing technology: competing through new ventures, innovation, and corporate research: Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
15. Bianchi, M., Cavaliere, A., Chiaroni, D., Frattini, F., &; Chiesa, V. (2011). Organisational modes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis. Technovation, 31(1), 22-33.
16. Biggadike, E. R. (1979). Corporate diversification: Entry, strategy, and performance: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
17. Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., &; Mol, M. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of management Review, 33(4), 825-845.
18. Blundell, R., Griffith, R., &; Van Reenen, J. (1999). Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. The Review of Economic Studies, 66(3), 529-554.
19. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., &; Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1), 69-87. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology: Harvard Business Press.
20. Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., 2006. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&;D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52 (1), 68–82.
21. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
22. Chesbrough, H. W. (2004). Managing open innovation. Research-Technology Management, 47(1), 23-26.
23. Chesbrough, H. W., &; Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&;d Management, 36(3), 229-236.
24. Chesbrough, H.W. and Appleyard, M.M. (2007), "Open Innovation and Strategy." California Management Review 50(1), 57-76.
25. Camisón, C., and Villar-López, A., (2014) Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance, Journal of Business Research, 67, 2891–2902.
26. Chiang, Y. H., &; Hung, K. P. (2010). Exploring open search strategies and perceived innovation performance from the perspective of inter‐organizational knowledge flows. R&;d Management, 40(3), 292-299.
27. Christensen, J. F., Olesen, M. H., &; Kjær, J. S. (2005). The industrial dynamics of Open Innovation—Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics. Research Policy, 34(10), 1533-1549.
28. Cohen, W. M., &; Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128-152.
29. Colarelli, S. M. (1998). Psychological interventions in organizations: An evolutionary perspective. American Psychologist, 53(9), 1044.
30. Combs, J. G., &; Ketchen, D. J. (1999). Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource‐based view and organizational economics. Strategic management journal, 20(9), 867-888.
31. Crossan, M. M., &; Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of management studies, 47(6), 1154-1191.
32. Daft, R. L. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 193-210.
33. Dahlander, L., &; Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699-709.
34. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
35. Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management science, 42(5), 693-716.
36. Damanpour, F., &; Aravind, D. (2012). Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes, and antecedents. Management and Organization Review, 8(2), 423-454.
37. Damanpour, F., &; Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of" organizational lag". Administrative science quarterly, 392-409.
38. Development, O. f. E. C.-o. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data: OECD publishing.
39. Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147-162.
40. Drucker, P. F. (1987). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Newbridge Communications.
41. Duysters, G., &; Lokshin, B. (2011). Determinants of Alliance Portfolio Complexity and Its Effect on Innovative Performance of Companies*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 570-585.
42. Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., &; Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&;D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&;d Management, 39(4), 311-316.
43. Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., &; Tribó, J. A. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research policy, 38(1), 96-105.
44. Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., &; O'keefe, R. D. (1984). Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management science, 30(6), 682-695.
45. Evangelista, R., &; Vezzani, A. (2010). The economic impact of technological and organizational innovations. A firm-level analysis. Research Policy, 39(10), 1253-1263.
46. Feldman, M. S., &; Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative science quarterly, 48(1), 94-118.
47. Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management science, 47(1), 117-132.
48. Freeman, C., &; Soete, L. (2009). Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: What we can learn from the past. Research Policy, 38(4), 583-589.
49. Frenz, M., &; Ietto-Gillies, G. (2009). The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: Evidence from the UK Community Innovation Survey. Research Policy, 38(7), 1125-1135.
50. Gambardella, A., &; Torrisi, S. (1998). Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry. Research Policy, 27(5), 445-463.
51. Ganter, A., &; Hecker, A. (2013). Deciphering antecedents of organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 66(5), 575-584.
52. Garcia-Vega, M. (2006). Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firms. Research Policy, 35(2), 230-246. Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R&;d Management, 36(3), 223-228.
53. Gopalakrishnan, S., &; Bierly, P. E. (2006). The impact of firm size and age on knowledge strategies during product development: A study of the drug delivery industry. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 53(1), 3-16.
54. Granstrand, O. (1998). Towards a theory of the technology-based firm. Research Policy, 27(5), 465-489.
55. Granstrand, O., &; Oskarsson, C. (1994). Technology diversification in “MUL-TECH” corporations. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 41(4), 355-364.
56. Granstrand, O., &; Sjölander, S. (1990). Managing innovation in multi-technology corporations. Research Policy, 19(1), 35-60.
57. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a Knowledge‐Based Theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
58. Grant, R. M., &; Baden‐Fuller, C. (2004). A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of management studies, 41(1), 61-84.
59. Greene WH. (2000). Econometric Analysis (4th edn). Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
60. Grimpe, C., &; Sofka, W. (2009). Search patterns and absorptive capacity: Low-and high-technology sectors in European countries. Research Policy, 38(3), 495-506.
61. Hamel, G. (2009). Moon shots for management. Harvard business review, 87(2), 91-98.
62. Hitt, M. A., Biermant, L., Shimizu, K., &; Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 13-28.
63. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., &; Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767-798.
64. Huang, Y.-F., &; Chen, C.-J. (2010). The impact of technological diversity and organizational slack on innovation. Technovation, 30(7), 420-428.
65. Huergo, E., &; Jaumandreu, J. (2004). Firms' age, process innovation and productivity growth. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(4), 541-559.
66. Inkpen, A. C. (1998). Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic alliances. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), 69-80.
67. Janowicz-Panjaitan, M., &; Noorderhaven, N. G. (2008). Formal and informal interorganizational learning within strategic alliances. Research Policy, 37(8), 1337-1355.
68. Jones, G.R., Hill, C.W.L. (1988). Transaction cost analysis of strategystructure choice. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 159–172.
69. Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., &; Singh, H. (2002). Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function.
70. Katila, R. (2002). New product search over time: past ideas in their prime?. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 995-1010.
71. Katila, R., &; Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of management journal, 45(6), 1183-1194.
72. Kim, D.-J., &; Kogut, B. (1996). Technological platforms and diversification. Organization Science, 7(3), 283-301.
73. Kim, J. W., &; Higgins, M. C. (2007). Where do alliances come from?: The effects of upper echelons on alliance formation. Research Policy, 36(4), 499-514.
74. Kimberly, J. R., &; Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 689-713.
75. Kurokawa, S. (1997). Make-or-buy decisions in R&;D: small technology based firms in the United States and Japan. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 44(2), 124-134.
76. Kogut, B. and Zander, U., (1992), Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology, Organization Science, 3, 383-397.
77. Laursen, K., &; Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic management journal, 27(2), 131-150.
78. Lavie, D., Lechner, C., &; Singh, H. (2007). The performance implications of timing of entry and involvement in multipartner alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 578-604.
79. Lavie, D., Kang, J., and Rosenkopf, L., 2011. Balance Within and Across Domains: The Performance Implications of Exploration and Exploitation in Alliances, Organization Science, 22(6), 517–1538.
80. Leten, B., Belderbos, R., &; Van Looy, B. (2007). Technological diversification, coherence, and performance of firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(6), 567-579.
81. Levinthal, D., &; Posen, H. E. (2007). Myopia of selection: Does organizational adaptation limit the efficacy of population selection?. Administrative science quarterly, 52(4), 586-620.
82. Lin, B.-W., Chen, C.-J., &; Wu, H.-L. (2006). Patent portfolio diversity, technology strategy, and firm value. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 53(1), 17-26.
83. Lin, B. W., &; Chen, J. S. (2005). Corporate technology portfolios and R&;D performance measures: a study of technology intensive firms. R&;d Management, 35(2), 157-170.
84. Lin, C., Wu, Y.-J., Chang, C., Wang, W., &; Lee, C.-Y. (2012). The alliance innovation performance of R&;D alliances—the absorptive capacity perspective. Technovation, 32(5), 282-292.
85. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
86. Miller, D. J., Fern, M. J., &; Cardinal, L. B. (2007). The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 307-325.
87. Mol, M. J., &; Birkinshaw, J. (2009). The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices. Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1269-1280.
88. Nadler, D., &; Tushman, M. (1997). Competing by design: The power of organizational architecture: Oxford University Press.
89. Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67, 297-306.
90. Nelson, R. R., &; Winter, S. G. (2009). An evolutionary theory of economic change: Harvard University Press.
91. Nieto, M. J., &; Santamaría, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6), 367-377.
92. Nord, W. R., &; Tucker, S. (1987). Implementing routine and radical innovations: Lexington Books Lexington, MA.
93. Oke, A., Burke, G., &; Myers, A. (2007). Innovation types and performance in growing UK SMEs. International Journal of Operations &; Production Management, 27(7), 735-753.
94. OECD (2005). The measurement of scientific and technological activities Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). Paris: OECD EUROSTAT.
95. Oerlemans, L. A., Knoben, J., &; Pretorius, M. W. (2013). Alliance portfolio diversity, radical and incremental innovation: The moderating role of technology management. Technovation, 33(6), 234-246.
96. Pisano, G.P. and Verganti, R. (2008), Which Kind of Collaboration Is Right for You?, Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 78-86.
97. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., &; Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative science quarterly, 116-145.
98. Qian, C., Cao, Q., &; Takeuchi, R. (2013). Top management team functional diversity and organizational innovation in China: The moderating effects of environment. Strategic Management Journal, 34(1), 110-120.
99. Rodan, S., &; Galunic, C. (2004). More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic management journal, 25(6), 541-562.
100. Rothwell, R. (1991). External networking and innovation in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms in Europe. Technovation, 11(2), 93-112.
101. Sampson, R. C. (2007). R&;D alliances and firm performance: the impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 364-386.
102. Schilling MA, Phelps C. 2007. Interfi rm collaboration networks: the impact of large-scale network structure on fi rm innovation. Management Science 53(7): 1113–1127.
103. Schumann, P. A., Prestwood, D., Tong, A. H., &; Vanston, J. (1994). Innovate!: straight path to quality, customer delight, and competitive advantage: McGraw-Hill.
104. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55): Transaction Publishers.
105. Sisodiya, S. R., Johnson, J. L., &; Grégoire, Y. (2013). Inbound open innovation for enhanced performance: Enablers and opportunities. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(5), 836-849.
106. Song, X. M., &; Montoya‐Weiss, M. M. (1998). Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2), 124-135.
107. Suzuki, J., &; Kodama, F. (2004). Technological diversity of persistent innovators in Japan: Two case studies of large Japanese firms. Research Policy, 33(3), 531-549.
108. Tether, B. S., &; Tajar, A. (2008). The organisational-cooperation mode of innovation and its prominence amongst European service firms. Research Policy, 37(4), 720-739.
109. Tyre, M. J., &; Hauptman, O. (1992). Effectiveness of organizational responses to technological change in the production process. Organization Science,3(3), 301-320.
110. Trott, P. (2008). Innovation management and new product development: Pearson education.
111. Tsai, K.-H., &; Wang, J.-C. (2009). External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey. Research Policy, 38(3), 518-526.
112. Utterback, J. M., &; Suarez, F. F. (1993). Innovation, competition, and industry structure. Research Policy, 22(1), 1-21.
113. Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., &; Noorderhaven, N. (2002). External technology sourcing through alliances or acquisitions: An analysis of the application-specific integrated circuits industry. Organization Science, 13(6), 714-733.
114. Von Hippel, E. (2007). The sources of innovation: Springer.
115. Von Krogh, G., &; Von Hippel, E. (2006). The promise of research on open source software. Management science, 52(7), 975-983.
116. Wu, J. (2012). Technological collaboration in product innovation: The role of market competition and sectoral technological intensity. Research Policy, 41(2), 489-496.
117. Zahra, S. A., &; Nielsen, A. P. (2002). Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic management journal, 23(5), 377-398.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊