本研究以休閒活動參與者為對象，探討休閒涉入與地方依戀間之關係，並檢視環境復癒知覺的中介角色。首先，本研究依據文獻提出研究假設，並以麻豆總爺藝文中心為研究場域，利用問卷方式調查該場域之628位休閒活動參與者進行問卷調查，再運用階層複迴歸分析與結構方程式(SEM)驗證模式之因果關係，探討環境復癒知覺所扮演的中介效果。研究結果發現：休閒涉入特質愈明顯的休閒活動參與者，從活動所獲得的地方依戀相對愈強烈。休閒涉入程度愈明顯的活動參與者，其所從事活動的場所環境對其產生復癒知覺涉入的程度也會愈高。活動參與者環境復癒知覺的程度愈高，從活動場域所獲得的地方依戀感相對愈強烈。環境復癒知覺在休閒涉入與地方依戀間扮演著中介的角色，亦即休閒涉入會透過活動場域的環境產生之復癒知覺，增強休閒參與活動者對場域之地方依戀。本研究最後就結果進行討論，並提出相關之建議，以作為休閒遊憩規劃者及後續研究者之參考。

The purposes of the study emphasize on leisure activities participators, and investigate the relationships among leisure involvement, restorative perception, and place attachment. Besides that, we test the mediate effect of restorative perception. This study builds a model and hypothesis according to literatures, and also collects 628 valid questionnaires from Tsung-Yeh Arts and Cultural Center in Matou. Hierarchical regression analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) are applied to test the cause relations between leisure involvement, restorative perception, and place attachment, and further investigate the mediate effect of restorative perception. The result of research is how leisure involvement has positive relationship with restorative perception. When the leisure activities participators have higher level restorative perception, leisure involvement has positive influence on place attachment. Restorative perception is a mediator between leisure involvement and place attachment. Finally, according to the findings, comprehensive discussion and recommendation are offered to leisure and recreation practitioner and future researchers.

摘 要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌謝辭 III
表 目 錄 VI
圖 目 錄 VII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與問題 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究內容與流程 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 休閒涉入 5
第二節 地方依戀 8
第三節 環境復癒知覺 12
第四節 休閒涉入與地方依戀之關係 19
第五節 休閒涉入、環境復癒知覺與地方依戀之關係 20
第三章 研究方法 22
第一節 研究架構與假設 22
第二節 研究變數之操作型定義 25
第三節 問卷設計 27
第四節 樣本選取與資料蒐集 29
第五節 資料分析方法 30
第六節 量表信、效度分析 33
第七節 小節 38
第四章 實證研究分析與結果 39
第一節 樣本結構分析 39
第二節 休閒活動特性分析 40
第三節 變數之描述性統計分析 41
第四節 休閒涉入與環境復癒知覺之關係 43
第五節 環境復癒知覺與地方依戀之關係 45
第六節 休閒涉入與地方依戀之關係 48
第七節 環境復癒知覺的中介效果分析 51
第八節 結構方程模式分析 54
第九節 小結 57
第五章 結果與討論 58
第一節 休閒涉入與環境復癒知覺的關係 58
第二節 環境復癒知覺與地方依戀的關係 59
第三節 休閒涉入與地方依戀的關係 59
第四節 環境復癒知覺的中介效果分析 60
第五節 小結 61
第六章 結論與建議 62
第一節 結論 62
第二節 管理意涵 63
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 64
參考文獻 66
附錄 正式問卷 76

一、中文部分
1.朱笠瑄(2003)，「東北角海岸攀岩冒險遊憩活動之研究」，朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理研究所碩士論文。
2.呂怡儒(2001)，「臺北近郊森林地方感之研究」，國立臺灣大學森林學研究所碩士論文。
3.吳科驊(2006)，「登山健行者休閒參與動機、持續涉入、休閒效益與幸福感之相關研究」，國立體育學院體育研究所碩士論文。
4.吳靜思(2008)，「都市居民知覺居住環境品質、鄰里依附與知覺恢復性之相關性研究—以台中市為例」，靜宜大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文。
5.吳耿良(2009)，「不同生活型態登山健行者的遊憩涉入與休閒效益之研究」，南台科技大學休閒事業管理研究所碩士論文。
6.吳明隆(2007)，「結構方程模式-Amos的操作與應用」，台北：五南。
7.林慧年(2004)，「義務解說員的活動涉入、地方依附和資源知識之相關性－以中華民國荒野保護協會二格山定點自然觀察小組為例」，國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所碩士論文。
8.卓庭宜(2011)，「遊憩涉入、目的地意象與地方依附關係之研究－以九份老街為例」，國立嘉義大學觀光休閒管理研究所碩士論文。
9.周先捷(2005)，「環境偏好與環境恢復性知覺關係之研究－以山景景觀為例」，靜宜大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文。
10.周孟慈(2005)，「自然旅遊環境之遊憩體驗與生心理效益之研究」，國立中興大學園藝學研究所碩士論文。
11.郭淑菁(2003)，「登山社員休閒涉入、休閒滿意度與幸福感之研究」，大葉大學休閒事業管理學研究所碩士論文。
12.張靜芬(2007)，「遊客屬性、環境認知與場所依戀之關係研究－以八里左岸自行車道為例」，中國文化大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文。
13.張肇翰(2007)，「現地與虛擬國家森林遊樂區之遊憩體驗與知覺復癒關係之比較－以內洞國家森林遊樂區為例」，逢甲大學景觀與遊憩研究所碩士論文。
14.張純婉(2011)，「醫療院所內益康花園的恢復性知覺與生心理效益之研究—以台中榮總為例」，東海大學景觀學研究所碩士論文。
15.張寶分(2014)，「臺東「鐵花村」的旅遊目的地意象與場所依戀之探討」，國立臺東大學休閒事業管理研究所碩士論文。
16.許惠玲(2008)，「參與登山健行之高齡者其休閒涉入、休閒效益及幸福感關係之研究－以高雄縣市郊山為例」，國立嘉義大學休閒事業管理研究所碩士論文。
17.曹躍鎧(2013)，「地方依附與環境態度對生態觀光發展之影響－以馬祖為例」，銘傳大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文。
18.陳心怡(2004)，「自行車騎乘者專業化程度與場所依戀關係之研究－以臺中大度山區騎乘者為例」，逢甲大學建築研究所碩士論文。
19.陳嘉雯(2006)，「登山健行活動之登山客持續涉入、休閒效益與幸褔感關係之研究」，銘傳大學觀光研究所碩士論文。
20.陳慧蓉(2006)，「遊客觀光意象與地方依附感關係之探討－以高雄縣美濃鎮為例」，碩士論文，靜宜大學觀光事業研究所，台中市。
21.陳怡靜(2009)，「苗栗縣南庄鄉商圈遊客旅遊目的地意象與場所依戀之研究」，國立嘉義大學觀光休閒研究所碩士論文。
22.陳郁蓓(2014)，「遊客休閒涉入與目的地意象對地方依附之影響－以梅花湖風景特定區為例」，國立雲林科技大學休閒運動研究所碩士論文。
23.莊世盟(2012)，「學童對休閒農場遊憩體驗、遊憩涉入、場所依戀與重遊意願之研究－以薰之園香草休閒農場為例」，國立屏東科技大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。
24.彭逸芝(2005)，「遊憩自行車使用者之遊憩涉入與地方依附關係之研究」，銘傳大學觀光研究所碩士論文。
25.曾慈慧(2004)，「現地與非現地景觀體驗與健康復癒之探討」，旅遊管理研究，第四卷第二期，頁99-118。
26.曾慈慧、沈進成(2010)，「遊客之休閒涉入、地方感與環境復癒知覺關係之研究：以美國德州大彎國家公園為例」，新竹教育大學人文社會學報，第三卷第二期，頁119-145。
27.賈式琛(2005)，「社區意識與地方依附對生態旅遊發展態度影響之研究」，世新大學觀光研究所碩士論文。
28.楊雅婷(2008)，「大社觀音山風景區步道登山健行者之休閒涉入與地方依戀關係之研究」，國立高雄應用科技大學觀光與餐旅管理研究所碩士論文。
29.劉盈足(2005)，「公務員週末之休閒涉入與其休閒滿意度關係之探討－以彰化地區鄉鎮市公所為例」，大葉大學休閒事業管理學研究所碩士論文，彰化縣。
30.劉嘉豪(2012)，「健行者在自然環境休閒涉入與休閒滿意度對其心理復癒之研究」，國立體育大學休閒產業經營學研究所碩士論文。
31.歐陽慧真(2002)，「賞鳥者專門化程度與場所依戀關係之研究－以七股溼地為例」，東海大學景觀學研究所碩士論文。
32.謝宗恆(2003)，「文化遊憩涉入與場所依戀關係之研究－以北埔地區遊客為例」，東海大學景觀學研究所碩士論文。
33.藺心怡(2007)，「賞鳥者覺察性與遊憩涉入間關係之研究」，靜宜大學觀光事業學系研究所碩士論文。
二、英文部分
1.Altman, I., &; Low, S. (1992), Place Attachment, New York, NY: Plenum Press.
2.Andrews, J. C., Durvasula, S., &; Akhter, S. H. (1990), “A framework for conceptualizing and measuring the involvement construct in advertising research,” Journal of advertising, 19(4), pp.27-40.
3.Bagozzi, R. P., &; Yi, Y. (1988), “On the evaluation of structure equations models,” Academic of Marketing Science, 16(1), pp.76-94.
4.Berto, R. (2005), “Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, pp.249-259.
5.Bloch, P. H. (1982), “Involvement beyond the purchase process. Conceptual issues and empirical investigation,” Advances in Consumer Research, 9, pp.413-417.
6.Bloch, P. H., &; Bruce, G. D. (1984), “The leisure experience and consumer products: an investigation of underlying satisfactions,” Journal of Leisure Research, 16(l), 74-88.
7.Bollen, K. A. (1990), “A comment on model evaluation and modification,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), pp.181-185.
8.Bowlby, J. (1969), Attachment and loss, New York: Basic Books.
9.Bricker, K. S., &; Kerstetter, D. L. (2000), “Level of specialization and place attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists,” Leisure Sciences, 22(4), pp.233-257.
10.Bright, A. D. (2000), “The role of socialmarketing in leisure and recreation management,” Journal of LeisureResearch, 32(1), pp.12-18.
11.Dimanche, F., Havitz, M. E., &; Howard, D. R. (1991), “Testing the involvement profile (IP) scale in the context of selected recreational and tourist activities,” Journal of Leisure Research, 23(1), pp.51-66.
12.Feldman, R. M. (1996), “Constancy and change in attachment to types of settlements,” Environment and Behaviors, 28(4), pp.419-445.
13.Felsten, G. (2009), “Where to take a study break on the college campus: An attention restoration theory perspective,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), pp.160-167.
14.Fornell, C., &; Larcker, D. F. (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), pp.39-50.
15.Galliano, S. J., &; Loeffler, G. M. (1999), Place assessment: How people define ecosystems, Oregon: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
16.Gibbons, S., &; Ruddell, E. J. (1995), “The effect of goal orientation and place dependence on select goal interferences among winter backcountry users,” Leisure Sciences, 17(3), pp.171-183.
17.Guiliani, M. V., &; Feldman, R. (1993), “Place attachment in a developmental and cultural context,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(3), pp.267-274.
18.Johnson, B. T., &; Eagly A. H. (1989), “Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, 106, pp.290-311.
19.Hartig, T. A., Mang, M., &; Evans, G. W. (1991), “Restorative effects of natural environment experiences,” Environment and Behavior, 23, 3-26.
20.Hartig, T. A. (1993), Testing restorative environments theory, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Irvine: University of California.
21.Hartig, T. A., Book, A., Garvill, J., Olsson, T., &; Garling, T. (1996), “Environmental influences on psychological restoration,” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 37, pp.378-393.
22.Hartig, T., Kaiser, F., &; Bowler, P. A. (1997), Further development of a measure of perceived environment restorativeness(Working Paper No.5), Gävel, Sweden: Uppsala University, Institute for Housing Research.
23.Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., &; Garling, T. (2003), “Tracking restoration in nature and urban field settings,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, pp.109-123.
24.Havitz, M. E., &; Dimanche, F. (1990), “Propositions for testing the involvement construct in recreational and tourism contexts,” Leisure Sciences, 12(2), pp.179-195.
25.Havitz, M. E., &; Dimanche, F. (1997), “Leisure involvement revisited: Conceptual conundrums and measurement advance,” Journal of Leisure Research, 29(3), pp.245-278.
26.Herzog, T. R., Black, A. M., Fountaine, K. A., &; Knotts, D. J. (1997), “Reflection and attention recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environment,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, pp.165-170.
27.Hou, J. S., Lin, C. H., &; Morais, D. B. (2005), “Antecedents of attachment to a cultural tourism destination: The case of Hakka and Non-Hakka Taiwanese visitors to Pei-Pu,” Journal of Travel Research, 44(2), pp.221-223.
28.Hummon, D. M. (1992), Community attachment: Local sentiment and sense of place, In I. Altman &; S. M. Low, (Eds.), Place attachment. New York, NY: Plaenum Press.
29.Ivarsson, C. T., &; Hagerhall, C. M. (2008), “The perceived restorativeness of gardens: Assessing the restorativeness of a mixed built and natural scene type,” Urban Forestry &; Urban Greening, 7(2), pp.107-118.
30.James, W. (1892), Psychology: Briefer Course, New York: Henry Holt.
31.Jorgensen, B. S., &; Stedman, R. C. (2001), “Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), pp.233-248.
32.Jöreskog, K. G., &; Sörbom, D. (1996), LISREL 8: User’s reference guide, Chicago: Scientific Software International.
33.Kaltenborn B. P. (1997), “Nature of place attachment: a study among recreation homeowners, Southern Norway,” Leisure Science, 19, pp.175-189.
34.Kaplan, S. (1987), “Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environment preference from an evolutionary perspective,” Environment and Behavior, 19, pp.3-32.
35.Kaplan, R. &; Kaplan, S. (1989), The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. NY, Cambridge University Press. Nearby Nature.
36.Kaplan, S., Bardwell, L. V., &; Slakter, D. B. (1993), “The museum as a restorative environment,” Environment and Behavior, 25(6), pp.725-742.
37.Kaplan, S. (1995), “The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, pp.169-182.
38.Kelly, Johe, R., &; Kelly, Janice, R. (1994), “Multiple dimensions of meaning in the domains of work, family and leisure,” Journal of Leisure Research, 26(3), pp.250-274.
39.Korpela, K., &; Hartig, T. (1996), “Restorative qualities of favorite places,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), pp.221-233.
40.Korpela, K., Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G. &; Fuhrer, U. (2001), “Restorative experience and self-regulation in favorite places,” Environment &; Behavior, 33(4), pp.572-589.
41.Korpela, K., Kyttä, M., &; Hartig, T. (2002), “Restorative experience, self-regulation, and children’s place preferences,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(4), pp.387-398.
42.Krugman, H. E. (1965), “The impact of television advertising learning without involvement,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, pp.349-356.
43.Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., &; Bacon, J. (2003), “An examination of the relationship between leisure activity involvement and place attachment among hikers along the Appalachian trail,” Journal of Leisure Research, 35, pp.249-273.
44.Kyle, G., Bricker, K. Graefe, A., &; Wickham, T. (2004a), “An examination of recreationists relationships with activities and settings,” Leisure Sciences, 26(2), pp.123-142.
45.Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., &; Bacon, J. (2004b), “Effect of activity involvement and place attachment on recreationists’perception of setting density,” Journal of Leisure Research, 36(2), pp.209-231.
46.Kyle, G., Graefe, A., &; Manning, R. (2005), “Test the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational setting,” Environment and Behavior, 37(2), pp.153- 177.
47.Kyle, G., &; Mowen, A. J. (2004), “Linking place preferences with place meaning: An examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, pp.439-454.
48.Kyle, G., &; Mowen, A. J. (2005), “An examination of leisure involvement -agency commitment relationship,” Journal of Leisure Research, 37(3), pp.342-363.
49.Laumann, K., Gärling, T., &; Stormark, K. M. (2001), “Rating scale measures of restorative components of environment, Journal of environment psychology, 21, pp.31-44.
50.Laurent, G., &; Kapferer, J. N. (1985), “Measuring consumer involvement profiles,” Journal of Marketing Research, 22(1), pp.41-53.
51.Lee, C. C. (2001), “Predicting tourist attachment to destinations,” Annals of Tourism Research, 28(1), pp.229-232.
52.Lindstrom, B. (1997), A sense of place: Housing selection on Chicago’s north shore, Sociological Quarterly, 38, pp.19-39.
53.McFarlane, B., Boxall, P., &; Watson, D. (1998), “Past experience and behavioral choice among wilderness users,” Journal of Leisure Research, 30(2), pp.195-213.
54.McIntyre, N., &; Pigram, J. (1992), “Recreational specialization reexamined: The case of vehicle-based campers,” Leisure Sciences, 14(1), pp.3-15.
55.Moore, R. L., &; Graefe, A. R. (1994), “Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail-trail users,” Leisure Sciences, 16(1), pp.17-31.
56.Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., &; Kaminoff, R. (1983), “Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, pp.57-83.
57.Purcell, A. T., Lamb, R. J., Peron, E. M., &; Falchero, S. (1994), “Preference or preferences for landscape?” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(3), 195-209.
58.Relph, E. (1976), Place and Placelessness, London: Pion.
59.Rothschild, M. L. (1984), “Perspectives on involvement: Current problems and future directions,” Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), pp.216-217.
60.Safvenbom, R., &; Samdahl, D. N. (1998), “Involvement in and perception of the free-time context for adolescents in youth protection institutions,” Leisure Sciences, 17(3), pp.207-226.
61.Schreyer, R &; Lime, D. V. (1984), “A novice isn't necessarily a novice—the influence of experience use history on subjective perceptions of recreation participation,” Leisure Sciences, 6(2), pp.131-149.
62.Sherif, M., &; Cantril, H. (1947), The psychology of ego-involvements: Social attitudes and identifications, New York: Wiley.
63.Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., &; Nebergall, R. E. (1965), Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach, Philadelphia: Saunders.
64.Slama, M., &; Tashchian, A. (1985), “Elected socioeconomic and demographic characteristics associated with purchasing involvement,” Journal of Marketing, 49, pp.72-82.
65.Staats, H., Kieviet, A., &; Hartig, T. (2003), “Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, pp.147-157.
66.Selin, S. D. R., Howard, E. U., &; Cable, T. (1988), “An analysis of consumer loyalty to municipal recreation programs,” Leisure Science, 10(3), pp.210-223.
67.Stokols, D., &; Shumaker, S. A. (1981), “People in places: A transactional view of settings,” In J. Harvey(Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment, 441-488. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
68.Tuan, Y. F. (1977), “Space and place: the perspective of experience,” Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
69.Ulrich, R. S., &; Addoms, D. L. (1981), “Psychological and recreational benefits of a residential park,” Journal of Leisure Research, 13, pp.43-65.
70.Ulrich, R. S., Dimberg, U., &; Driver, B. L. (1991), “Psychophysiological Indicators of Leisure Benefits,” In Driver, B. L., Brown, P. L. &; Peterson, C. L. eds., Benefits of Leisure. State College, PA: Ventura.
71.Van den Berg, A. E., Koole, S. L., &; Van der Wulp, N. Y. (2003), “Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related？” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), pp.135-146.
72.Vaske, J. J., &; Kobrin, K. C. (2001), “Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior,” The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), pp.16-21.
73.Vorkinn, M., &; Reise, H. (2001), “Environmental concern in a local content,” Environment and behavior, 33(2), pp.249-263.
74.Wiley, C. G. E., Shaw, S. M., &; Havitz, M. E. (2000), “Men's and women's involvement in sports: An examination of the gendered aspects of leisure involvement,” Leisure Sciences, 22(1), pp.19-31.
75.Williams, D. R., &; Roggenbuck, J. W. (1989), “Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results. Paper presented at Symposium on outdoor recreation planning andmanagement, NRPA symposium on leisure research,” San Antonio, TX.
76.Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J. W., &; Waston, A. E. (1992), “Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place,” Leisure Sciences, 14(1), pp.29-46.
77.Williams, D. R., &; Patterson, M. E. (1999), Environmental psychology: Mapping landscape meanings for ecosystem management, In H. K. Cordell and J. C. Bergstrom(Eds.), Integrating social sciences and ecosystem management: Human dimensions in assessment. policy and management (141-160). Champaign, 2: Sagamore.
78.Williams, D. R., &; Vaske, J. J. (2003), “The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach,” Forest Science, 49(6), pp.830-840.
79.Yang, B. E., &; Brown, T. J. (1992), “A cross-cultural comparison of preference for landscape elements,” Environment and Behavior, 24, pp.471-507.