跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(35.173.42.124) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/24 10:18
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:蕭玉欣
研究生(外文):Yu-Hsin Hsiao
論文名稱:當「我們」在一起:都市合作農耕之社會技術配置
論文名稱(外文):Living in Commom :Socio-technical Agencement of Urban Collaborative Farming
指導教授:陳東升陳東升引用關係
口試委員:李丁讚楊弘任
口試日期:2015-07-20
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:社會學研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:社會學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
語文別:中文
論文頁數:106
中文關鍵詞:都市農耕公民農業液態技術社區經濟社會技術配置
外文關鍵詞:urban farmingcivic agriculturefluid techniquescommunity economysocio-technical agencement
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:688
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:128
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本文旨在說明都市合作農耕如何透過人與非人的裝配,促成公民參與社區經濟的結果。本文以行動者網絡理論作為方法上的取徑,追隨行動者的軌跡,勾勒出都市合作農耕從概念到實踐的形成過程。首先,都市合作農耕並不是一個具有固定形體、固定論述、固定操作方式的概念,它的「在」與「不在」必須在形象上、論述上以及實作上等層面被定義。其次,都市合作農耕概念的實踐是流動的,有賴異質行動者不斷地協商、結盟,來形成逐漸穩定的網絡,同時保有網絡的彈性邊界,並允許行動者持續加入或退出的行動者網絡,由此所形成的技術網絡,即為一去中心的配置系統。最後,強調流動技術、彈性網絡的都市合作農耕,使得消費者、生產者以及其他的非人行動者,在社區的範圍內彼此緊密連結。那麼,農園的生產功能不再是為了累積資本,而是以滿足需求為主;農園的剩餘也將更進一步地促成社區的公共財。在這樣的基礎上,社區經濟的雛形可見一斑。

This article aims to elaborate on how urban collaborative farming assembled by human and non-human actors, and leads to citizenship and community economy. By the approach of actor-network theory, I follow the actors to draw the outline of evolution from an abstract concept to a concrete practice of urban collaborative farming. First, urban collaborative farming doesn’t have a fixed figure, discourse and the way of practice. Whether it is “there,” should be defined on multiple aspects. Secondly, urban collaborative farming is fluid. Thus, to realize the concept of urban collaborative farming, it’s important that heterogeneous actors keep negotiate, ally with one another, and form a gradually stabilized network. Also, network with flexible boundary allows actors to join in and drop out is of equal importance and makes sense to citizen participation. Lastly, with the emphasis on fluid techniques and flexible network, urban collaborative farming connects consumers, producers and other non-human actors together within the community. By this token, the function of urban collaborative farms is nothing but meet the needs, and the surplus would not be accumulated as personal capital but serve as public goods. This way, the prototype of community also appears.

緒論........................................................1
第一節 前言.................................................1
第二節 問題意識............................................3
第三節 文獻回顧............................................5
第四節 研究設計與方法.....................................16
第一章、都市合作農耕是什麼.................................23
第一節 形象的:都市合作農園的樣貌..........................23
第二節 論述的:公民農業/都市農業..........................25
第三節 行動的、實作的(practical).........................28
第四節 小結................................................30
第二章、社會技術配置的組裝.................................32
第一節 液態技術的在地網絡..................................33
第二節 從沸騰到凝固:屋頂農園模態的穩定化..................34
第三節 小結................................................52
第四章、位移模式與社區經濟.................................54
第一節 誰是參與的集體?...................................55
第二節 位移模式:去中心的代言人與實作的再現串連...........62
第三節 消費與再生產:社區經濟與公民社會的可能..............83
第四節 小結................................................91
第五章、結論...............................................94
第一節 公民農業與新型態民主................................94
第二節 研究貢獻............................................95
第三節 未盡之言:對都市農耕政策之想法......................96
參考文獻...................................................99
附錄一 訪談大綱...........................................104


參考文獻
白仁德、吳貞儀(2010)永續性農業運動-社區支持型農業與土地倫理的對話。城市學學刊 1(2): 1-35。
李丁讚(2011)公民農業與社會重建。臺灣社會研究 84: 431-464。
林文源(2007)論行動者網絡理論的行動本體論。科技醫療與社會 4: 65-108。
林崇熙(2001)沈默的技術-嘉南平原上的拼裝車。科技醫療與社會 1: 1-42。
邱大昕(2011)為什麼馬殺雞:視障按摩歷歷史的行行動網絡分析。台灣社會研究季刊 83: 5-36。
徐肇尉(2012)後結構地理學取徑下的鄉村空間過程:以「歷坵小農復耕行動」 為例。臺北:臺灣大學地理學系碩士論文。
陳美玲、Dr.Eduardo F. Freyre(2012),《古巴農業的另一種選擇》
陳美芬 (2012) 從日本農產直賣所看生產者,消費者與遊客的地域網絡連結。農業推廣文彙 339-344。
楊弘任(2012)行動中的川流發電:小水力綠能技術創新的行動者網絡分析。台灣社會學 23: 51-99。
楊弘任(2014)社區如何動起來?黑珍珠之鄉的派系、在地師傅與社區總體營造(增訂版)。台北:群學。
楊弘任(2007)社區如何動起來?黑珍珠之鄉的派系、在地師傅與社區總體營造。台北:左岸文化。
賴鳳霙、譚鴻仁(2011)臺中合樸農學市集的形成過程:行動者網絡理論的觀點。地理研究 54: 19-42。
藍佩嘉(2012)質性個案研究:紮根理論與延伸個案法,見蘇國賢等編,社會及行為科學研究法第二版。台灣:東華。
謝嘉心(2014)「做師傅就好」:港都黑手師傅的生命、工作與社會流動。臺北:臺灣大學地理學系碩士論文。
Garrety, Karin,方俊育譯,2004[1997],〈社會世界、行動者網絡與爭議:以膽固醇、飲食中脂肪與心臟病為例〉。頁265-329,收錄於吳嘉苓、傅大為、雷祥麟編,《科技渴望社會》。台北:群學出版社。
Geertz, Clifford著,劉東、黃平譯(1999 [1973])《深層游戰;關於巴里島鬥雞的記述》,頁484-534。南京:譯林。
Latour, B.(2004)給我一個實驗室,我將舉起全世界,見傅大偉等編,《科技渴望社會》,頁219-263。台北:群學。
Latour, B.著,余曉嵐、林文源、許全義譯(2012)《我們從未現代過》。台北:群學。
Sharon Zukin著、王志弘、王玥民、徐苔玲譯(2012)《裸城:純正都市地方的生與死》。台北,群學。
Sismondo, S. 著、林宗德譯(2007)《科學與技術研究導論》。台北,群學。
S. Shapin and S. Schaffer著,蔡佩君譯(2006)《利維坦與空氣泵浦:霍布斯、波以耳與實驗生活》。台北:行人。
Patel, R.著、葉家興、謝伯讓、高薏涵、謝佩妏合譯(2009)《糧食戰爭》。台北:高寶。
Akrick, Madeleine (1992) The De-Scription of Technical Objects, pp. 205-224 in Shaping Technology / Buildng Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by Bijker, Wiebe E. and John Law. The MIT Press.
Brehm, J. M., & Eisenhauer, B. W. (2008) Motivations for Participating in Community-supported Agriculture and Their Relationship with Community Attachment and Social Capital. Southern Rural Sociology 23(1): 94-115.
Burawoy, Michael (1991) Extended Case Method, pp. 271-290 in Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis, edited by Michael Burawoy. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.
Callon, M. (1986) The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle, pp.19-34 in Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World, edited by Callon, Michel, John Law, and Arie Rip. New York: Sheridan House Inc.
Callon, M. (1999) Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay, pp.67-83 in The Science Studies Reader, edited by Mario. New York and London: Routledge.
Callon, M. (2006) What Does It Mean to Say That Economics is Performative? Centre de Sociologie de l''Innovation (CSI)
de Laet, Marianne and Annemarie Mol (2000) The Zimbabwe Bush: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology. Social Studies of Science 30(2): 225-263.
Geertz, Clifford (1973) Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture, pp.3-30 in The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.
Gibson‐Graham, J. K. (2005) Surplus Possibilities: Postdevelopment and Community Economies. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 26(1): 4-26.
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006a). The End of Capitalism. A Feminist Critique of Political Economy. Minneapolis: Minnesota.
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006b). A Postcapitalist Politics. U of Minnesota Press.
Latour, B. (1999) Pandora''s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno (2005) Reassembling the Social-An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.
Latour, B. (2009) Politics of nature. Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno (1991) Technology is Society Made Durable, pp.103-131 in A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, edited by John Law. London and New York: Routledge.
Latour, Bruno (2013) An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. Cambridge & London: Harvard University Press.
Law, J. (2002) Objects and spaces. Theory, Culture & Society 19(5-6): 91-105.
Law, J. (2009) Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics. The new Blackwell companion to social theory 141-158.
Lyson, Thomas A. (2004) Civic agriculture: Reconnecting farm, food, and community. UPNE.
Macias, T. (2008) Working Toward a Just, Equitable, and Local Food System: The Social Impact of Community-Based Agriculture, Social Science Quarterly 89(5): 1086-1101.
Miguel A, Altieri, Nelso Companioni, Kristina Cañizares, Catherine Murphy, Peter Rosset, Martin Bourque and Clara I. Nicholls (1999) The Greening of the “Barrios”: Urban Agriculture for Food Security in Cuba, Agriculture and Human Values 16: 131-140.
Mol, Annemarie (2002) Cutting Surgeons, Walking Patients: Some Complexities Involved in Comparing, pp.218-257 in Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices, edited by John Law and Annemarie Mol. Durham; London: Duke University Pres.
Murdoch, J. (1997). Towards a Geography of Heterogeneous Associations. Progress in Human Geography 21(3): 321-337.
Wittman, H. (2009) Reworking the Metabolic Rift: La Via Campesina, Agrarian Citizenship, and Food Sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36: 805-826.
Shapin, S. (1998) Placing the View from Nowhere: Historical and Sociological Problems in the Location of Science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23(1): 5-12.
Schmelzkopf, K. (2002) Incommensurability, Land Use and The Right to Space: Community Gardens in New York City. Urban geography 23 (4): 323-343.
Smith, C. and H.E. Kurtz (2003) Community Gardens and Politics of Scale in New York City. The Geographical Review 93 (2): 193-212.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989) Institutional Ecology, Translations'' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley''s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387-420.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top