跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.204.48.64) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/30 09:07
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:黃奕婷
研究生(外文):Yi-Ting Huang
論文名稱:同盟的形成與變遷:冷戰後美日同盟與美韓同盟的中國因素比較分析
論文名稱(外文):The Formation and Evolution of Alliance: A Comparative Analysis of the China’s Factor in the US-Japan and the US-ROK Alliances after the Cold War
指導教授:張登及張登及引用關係
指導教授(外文):Teng-Chi Chang
口試委員:邱坤玄王高成
口試日期:2015-01-09
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:政治學研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:政治學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
語文別:中文
論文頁數:192
中文關鍵詞:美日同盟美韓同盟中國崛起同盟理論
外文關鍵詞:US-Japan allianceUS-ROK alliancethe Rise of ChinaAlliance Theory
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:296
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
冷戰結束後,「中國崛起」與「權力移轉」成為國際關係中最受關注的議題,在這個背景下,「中國因素」便成為美日、美韓同盟與東北亞秩序變遷的首要變項。本文希望探討與比較「中國因素」對於美日、美韓同盟發展的影響,同時了解隨著中國的崛起,美日同盟與美韓同盟的合作緊密程度是否會有所變化。
本研究的中國因素,主要是希望從物質因素與非物質因素兩個面向進行討論與分析,其中物質因素包含地緣政治因素、軍事安全與經濟因素,非物質因素則是希望從意識形態與歷史記憶,以及國內民意的變化兩個角度切入。
本研究亦依循過去的同盟理論基礎上,建立一套觀察同盟變遷的指標,從義務承擔、同盟信任度及民意對於同盟的評價三大指標來評估同盟的強化或弱化程度。本研究從冷戰後,並以領導人的任期作為觀察時期的切割,分別觀察中國因素對於同盟變遷的影響。
研究後可以發現,兩個同盟中在冷戰後仍存在著霸權領導,美國給予美日和美韓同盟強而有力的安全承諾以維持同盟關係。美日同盟對於中國的威脅認知較為接近,美日同盟的角色與目標比較傾向共同制衡中國;而美韓同盟則傾向與中國合作解決北韓問題,對於中國的威脅認知並不完全相同的情況下,美韓同盟仍然可以持續存在,但是對於同盟的信任度卻產生影響。然而,從意識形態的團結性來看,因為日本、南韓與美國享有共同的政治體制與價值,使得成員國把同盟視為是一個更大的政治共同體,他們無法想像同盟瓦解的情形。
整體而言,美日與美韓同盟在不同事件或者是中國因素的影響下,同盟的發展與狀態確實會發生改變,但是也因為同盟維繫的因素堅定的存在著,使得美日與美韓同盟短期而言並不會因為冷戰結束或者是中國崛起而瓦解。


After the Cold War, the rise of China and the power transition became the most important issues in the international relations. In this background, China factor thus became the most important variable on the evolution of the U.S. Alliances in the Northeast Asia. Therefore, in this thesis, I want to discuss and compare the influence of China rising on the US-Japan alliance and US-ROK alliance.
I tried to analyze the China factor that influenced the evolution of alliances from the aspect of the geographic politics, military factor, economic factor, ideology and the public opinion.
Based on the alliance theory, I found out some points to observe and evaluate the evolution of alliances. The key points are burden sharing, reliance and trust of the alliances, and the public opinion to the alliances. From those points, we could try to evaluate the strength of the alliances.
After the analysis, we could find out that the U.S. still gave a strong promise to secure the existence of the alliances. The U.S. and Japan shared the closed perception of threat to China, so their goals tend to contain China’s rising. However, the ROK tends to cooperate with China to solve the crisis of North Korea. So we can understand that the US-ROK alliance is not like US-Japan alliance becoming so closing. However, the U.S., Japan and ROK share the same political system and value, so the alliances could keep going. They can’t imagine the collapse of the alliances.
All in all, the US-Japan and US-ROK alliance will be indeed affected by the China Rising, however, the alliances will not collapse in the short run.


目錄
謝辭……………………………………………………………………Ⅰ
中文摘要………………………………………………………………Ⅲ
英文摘要………………………………………………………………Ⅴ
目錄……………………………………………………………………Ⅶ
圖表目次………………………………………………………………Ⅸ
第一章 緒論……………………………………… 1
第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………… 1
第二節 文獻回顧……………………………………… 4
第三節 研究途徑與分析方法……………………………………… 22
第四節 研究範圍與研究限制……………………………………… 24
第五節 研究架構與章節安排……………………………………… 27
第二章 同盟理論的回顧與檢討……………………………………… 31
第一節 同盟形成的邏輯與理論……………………………………… 31
第二節 同盟的維繫與瓦解……………………………………… 42
第三節 同盟發展的歷史案例回顧……………………………………… 55
第四節 同盟強度指標與因素分析……………………………………… 68
第三章 美日同盟的強度變化與中國因素分析……………………………………… 75
第一節 美日同盟的歷史與發展……………………………………… 75
第二節 美日同盟的強度變化……………………………………… 81
第三節 美日同盟中的中國因素……………………………………… 109
第四節 小結……………………………………… 127
第四章 美韓同盟的強度變化與中國因素分析……………………………………… 129
第一節 美韓同盟的歷史與發展……………………………………… 129
第二節 美韓同盟的強度變化……………………………………… 133
第三節 美韓同盟中的中國因素……………………………………… 151
第四節 小結……………………………………… 166
第五章 結論……………………………………… 169
第一節 研究發現……………………………………… 169
第二節 理論意涵與研究展望……………………………………… 174
參考書目……………………………………… 177



壹、中文部分
一、專書
中國軍事科學院戰略研究部,2000。《2000-2001年戰略評估》。北京:軍事科學出版社。
王玉民,1997。《社會科學研究方法原理》。台北:洪葉文化。
宋成有,李寒梅,1995。《戰後日本外交史, 1945-1994》。北京 : 世界知識出版社。
李殿仁編,2005。《2004-2005世界軍事形勢分析》。北京:國防大學出版社。
汪偉民,2007。《聯盟理論與美國的聯盟戰略:以美日、美韓聯盟研究為例》。北京:北京知識出版社。
明居正,2013。《大美霸權的浮現:後冷戰時期大國政治的邏輯》。台北:五南出版社。
胡為真,2001。《美國對華「一個中國」政策之演變 : 從尼克森到柯林頓》。台北:台灣商務。
徐中約著,計秋楓,朱慶葆譯,2001-2002。《中國近代史》。香港:中文大學。
張少文,2009。《韓國外交與對外關係》。台北:台灣商務印書館。
張麟徵,2002。《近代國際關係史》。台北:揚智文化。
陳志奇,1993。《中國近代外交史》。台北:南天出版社。
陶文釗,2006。《冷戰後的美國對華政策》。重慶:重慶出版社。
葉至誠、葉立程著,1999。《研究方法與論文寫作》。台北市:商鼎文化。
劉艷,2009。《冷戰後的日美同盟解讀:兼論其對中日關係的影響》。北京:中國政法大學出版社。
蔡東杰,2001。《李鴻章與清季外交史》。台北:文津出版社。
蔡東杰,2010。《中國外交史新論》。台北:風雲論壇。
蔣廷黻,1980。《中國近代史研究》。台北:九思。
謝益顯,2009。《中國當代外交史(1949-2009)》。北京:中國青年。
二、譯著
Bush, Richard C., 林添貴譯,2012。《一山二虎:中日關係的現狀與亞太局勢的未來》(The Perils of Proximity: China-Japan Security Relations)。臺北:遠流出版公司。
Michael J. Green and Patrick M. Cronin編,國防部史政編譯局譯印,2001。《美日聯盟:過去、現在與未來》(The U.S.-Japan Alliance: Past, Present, and Future)台北:國防部史政編譯局。
Shirk, Susan著,溫洽溢譯,2008。《脆弱的強權:在中國崛起的背後》(Fragile Superpower: How China’s International Politics Could Derail Its Peaceful Rise)。臺北:遠流出版公司。
Zbigniew Brzezinski,林添貴譯,2003。《大棋盤─全球戰略大思考》(The Grand Chessboard)。台北:立緒文化。
三、專書論文
包宗和,2011。〈結構現實主義的論點、辯述與反思〉,包宗和主編,《國際關係理論》。台北:五南圖書出版公司。頁49-68。
葛永光,2003。〈美國的亞太政策和東北亞的戰略安全環境〉,胡春惠,宋成有主編,《東北亞發展的回顧與展望國際學術硏討會論文選集》。台北:正中書局。
四、期刊論文
方子毓,2010。〈第一次世界大戰前德國外交政策與英德關係1888-1914〉,《成大歷史學報》,第38號,頁213-256。
王高成,2011。〈中國發展航空母艦之戰略目標設定〉,《全球政治評論》,第36期,頁1-6。
王崑義,2011。〈中共航空母艦的發展與海權爭奪〉,《戰略與評估期刊》,第2卷第3期,頁1-34。
伊藤幹彥,2014。〈戰區飛彈防禦系統(TMD)與亞太區域安全戰略--美日臺之飛彈防禦鐵三角同盟為中心〉,《遠東學報》,第29卷第1期,頁7-22。
何思慎,2006。〈從2006年防衛白皮書看日本美日同盟政策〉,《戰略安全研析》,第17期,頁10-13。
何思慎,2012。〈日本民主黨政權的中國政策(2009-2011 年)〉,《遠景基金會季刊》,第13卷第1期,頁1-49。
何思慎,2013。〈安倍內閣對美政策研析〉,《戰略安全研析 》,第94期,頁22 – 30。
李少軍,2008。〈論國際關係中的案例研究法〉,《當代亞太》,第3期,頁1-11。
李明峻,2013。〈韓國的中國政策〉,《台灣研究季刊》,第9卷第4期,頁63-85。
沈明室,2010。〈北韓擊沉天安艦戰略企圖、後續行動與影響〉,《戰略安全研析》,第61期,頁12-15。
林賢參,2010。〈沖繩普天間美軍基地問題與日美同盟〉,《探索與展望》,第8卷第7期,頁1-9。
邱坤玄,2004。〈中共對冷戰後美日安全關係的認知與新安全觀的形成〉,《東亞研究》,第35卷第2期,頁1-32。
邱坤玄,2010。〈中國在周邊地區的多邊外交理論與實踐〉,《遠景基金會季刊》,第11卷第4期,頁1-41。
邱凱彬,2006。〈甲午戰後清政府的聯俄外交 〉,《中興史學》,第12期,頁83-108。
紀舜傑,2010。〈韓國民主化與國家認同──美國、核武、與統一〉,《台灣國際研究季刊》,第6卷,第4期,頁93-110。
袁易,1996。〈多邊主義與安全困境下之合作:國際關係理論與「美」中關係〉,《問題與研究》,第35卷第6期,頁1-18。
張凱銘,2012。〈盧武鉉執政時期的美韓聯盟變化:威脅制衡的觀點〉,《東亞研究》,第43卷,第2期,頁145-179。
張登及,2008。〈地緣因素與新現實主義:以冷戰後美中地緣競逐為例〉,《政治學報》,第45期,頁95-138。
陳一新,1991。〈從聯盟理論看亞太新安全體系〉,《美國月刊》,第6卷第6期,頁50-57。
陳永康,瞿文中,1999。〈中共海軍現代化對亞太安全的影響〉,《中國大陸研究》,第42卷,第7期,頁1-25。
陳章媛,2008。〈第一次世界大戰的起源─分析一站前歐洲強國的合縱連橫〉,《牡丹江大學學報》,第17卷第12期,頁82-84。
陳嘉生,2010。〈北韓砲擊延坪島事件的觀察與後續發展〉,《戰略安全研析》,第68期,頁20-24。
陳麒安,2008/7。〈聯盟理論之研究:現實主義的觀點〉,《國際關係學報》第26期,頁133-167。
楊永明,1998/6。〈美日安保與亞太安全〉,《政治科學論叢》第九期,頁275-304。
趙建民,何思慎,2004。〈日本外交中有關中國或美國優先之爭論-兼論日、中、台新安全架構〉,《問題與研究》,第43卷第1期,頁83-104。
劉德海,2004。〈南韓民主化與國家安全〉,《台灣民主季刊》,第1卷第3期,年9月,頁25-47。
樓偉,2010。〈日本民主黨執政與美日同盟變化〉,《東北亞論壇》,第19卷第2期,頁103-109。
蔡明彥,2009。〈當前東亞安全問題中的中國因素分析─以地緣政治、經貿整合與北韓核武問題為例〉,《全球政治評論》,第26期,頁1-20。
蔡增家,2012。〈美國重返亞洲與日本防衛政策的轉變〉,《海峽評論》,第261期,頁27-30。
五、學位論文
宇都宮溪,2010。《東亞整合中的中日關係:兼論中日FTA戰略之比較分析》。臺北:國立台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
李承玹,2007。《中韓雙邊軍事外交:演進及其展望》。北京:外交學院研究所碩士論文。
陳相寶,2008。《從聯盟理論探討東亞飛彈防禦區域聯盟—以美日為例》。臺北:國立國防大學戰略研究所碩士論文。
游明蒼,2008。《冷戰後美韓同盟的演進:威脅平衡理論的檢視》。嘉義:南華大學國際暨大陸事務學系亞太研究所碩士班。
黃詩雯,2006。《1964年東京灣事件與美國對越南政策》。台北:國立政治大學外交研究所碩士論文。
六、網路資料
中華人民共和國外交部,2012/3/12。〈2012年3月12日外交部發言人劉為民舉行例行記者會〉, <http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_chn/wjdt_611265/fyrbt_611275/t913202.shtml>。
中華民國外交部研究設計委員會,2002/3/7。〈外交政策(含施政報告):我國與日本關係之現況及展望〉,<http://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=052449DD01A26E24&sms=DF52F83A5B7D2A47&s=01B0A595403C50C3>。
李世暉,2013/3/20。〈日本的TPP策略與對台灣的啟示〉,《台北論壇》, <http://140.119.184.164/taipeiforum/view/129.php>。
防衛省防衛研究所(編),2012。《中國安全戰略報告2011》。東京:日本防衛省防衛研究所。 <http://www.nids.go.jp/publication/chinareport/index.html>。
林祖嘉 、譚瑾瑜,2012/4/16。〈美韓FTA簽署對台灣經濟的影響〉,《國政研究報告》, < http://www.npf.org.tw/post/2/10614>。
高永光,2004/5/20。〈論日本修憲廢除非戰條款〉,《國政評論》, < http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/CL/093/CL-C-093-080.htm>。
國家發展委員會,2012/11/8。〈國際經濟情勢雙週報第1767期〉,< http://www.ndc.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0017871#.VI_q5SuUeNk >。
郭正亮,2013/9/3。〈安倍凝聚 TPP 共識對台灣的啟示〉,《台北論壇》, <http://140.119.184.164/taipeiforum/view/92.php>。
楊永明,2005/10/3。《行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告:日本有關北韓問題之政策與因應策略》, <http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/13842/1/932414H002009.pdf>。
經濟部國際貿易局,2014/12/6。〈RCEP簡介〉,《經濟部國際貿易局經貿資訊網》, < http://www.trade.gov.tw/Pages/List.aspx?nodeID=1153 >。
蘇顯揚,2012/1/5。〈日本參加TPP評析〉,《經濟前瞻雙月刊》,第139期, <http://www.wtocenter.org.tw/SmartKMS/do/www/readDoc?document_id=120756>。
七、網路資源
《BBC中文網》,http://www.bbc.co.uk/zhongwen/trad。
《人民日報》,http://www.people.com.cn/。
《大公網》,http://www.takungpao.com/。
《大紀元》,http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/ncnews.htm。
《中央日報》,http://www.cdnews.com.tw/cdnews_site/。
《中央社》,http://www.cna.com.tw/。
《中時電子報》,http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/16。
《中國評論新聞網》,http://hk.crntt.com/。
《中廣新聞網》,http://www.bcc.com.tw/news。
《今日新聞網》,http://www.nownews.com/。
《日本經濟新聞中文網》,http://zh.cn.nikkei.com/。
《皮尤研究中心》(Pew Research Center),http://www.pewresearch.org/。
《自由時報電子報》,http://www.ltn.com.tw/。
《旺報》,http://www.want-daily.com/portal.php。
《東方早報》,http://www.dfdaily.com/。
《東森新聞雲》http://www.ettoday.net/。
《美國之音中文網》http://www.voachinese.com/。
《紐約時報》(New York Times),http://www.nytimes.com/。
《朝鮮日報中文網》,http://cnnews.chosun.com/。
《華夏經緯網》,http://www.huaxia.com/。
《經濟日報》,http://edn.udn.com/。
《經濟學人》(The Economist),http://www.economist.com/。
《聯合報新聞網》,http://udn.com/news/index。
《韓國亞山研究中心》(The Asan Institute for Policy Studies),http://en.asaninst.org/。
《蘋果日報》,http://www.appledaily.com.tw/。
《讀賣新聞》(Yomiuri Shimbun),http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/。
貳、外文部分
一、專書
Anthony, DiFilippo, 2002. The Challenges of The U.S.-Japan Military Arrangement: Competing Security Transitions in a Changing International Environment. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Cha, Victor D., 1999. Alignment despite Antagonism: The United States─Korea─Japan Security Triangle. USA: Stanford University Press.
Duiker, William J., 1994. U.S. Containment Policy and the Conflict in Indochina. California: Standford University Press.
Kaplan, Morton A., 1957. System and Process in International Politics. New York: John Wiley.
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Keohane, Robert O., 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
Liska, George, 1962. Nations in Alliance: The Limits of Interdependence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Medeiros, Evan S., 2008. Pacific Currents: The Responses of US Allies and Security Partners in East Asia to China''s Rise. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Morgenthau, Hans J., 1985. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Osgood, Robert E., 1968. Alliances and American Foreign Policy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.
Osius Ted, 2002. The U.S.-Japan Security Alliance: Why It Matters and How to Strengthen It. Washington, DC: Center For Strategic & International Studies.
Rotter, Andrew J., 1987. The path to Vietnam : origins of the American commitment to Southeast Asia. Ithaca : Cornell University Press.
Snyder, Glenn H., 1997. Alliance Politics. Ithaca and London: Cornell University.
Sutter, Robert G., 2003. The United States and East Asia: Dynamics and Implications. USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Taylor, A. J. P., 1954. The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848-1918. London : Oxford University Press.
Walt, Stephen M., 1987. The Origins of Alliance. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth N., 1979. Theory of International Politics. Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub.
Waltz, Kenneth N., 2010. Theory of International Politics. USA: Waveland Press.
二、專書論文
Akio, Takahara, 2004. “Japan’s Political Response to the Rise of China,” in Kokubun Ryosei and Wang Jisi eds., The Rise of China and a Changing East Asian Order. Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange. p.
Armacost, Michael H., 2004. ”The Future of America’s Alliances in Northeast Asia,” in Michael H. Armacost and Daniel I. Okimoto eds., The Future of America’s Alliances in Northeast Asia. Washington, DC: Asia-Pacific Research Center in Stanford University, pp. 11-24.
Cha, Victor D., 2004. “Shaping Change and Cultivating Ideas in the US-ROK Alliance,” in Michael H. Armacost and Daniel I. Okimoto eds., The Future of America’s Alliances in Northeast Asia. Washington, DC: Asia-Pacific Research Center in Stanford University. pp. 121-146.
Cossa, Ralph A., 2004. “US-Japan Defense Cooperation: Can Japan Become the Great Britain of Asia? Shhould It?” in Michael H. Armacost and Daniel I.Okimoto, eds., The Future of America’s Alliances in Northeast Asia. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press. pp. 91-104.
Drennan, William M., 2004. “US-ROK Defense Cooperation,” in Michael H. Armacost and Daniel I.Okimoto, eds., The Future of America’s Alliances in Northeast Asia.Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press. pp. 177-190.
Gregg, Donald P., 2004. “The United States and South Korea: An Alliance Adrift,” in Michael H. Armacost and Daniel I.Okimoto, eds., The Future of America’s Alliances in Northeast Asia (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2004), pp. 147-156.
Huang, Jing. 2004. ”China and America’s Northeast Asian Alliances: Approaches, Politics, and Dilemmas,” in Michael H. Armacost and Daniel I. Okimoto eds., The Future of America’s Alliances in Northeast Asia. Washington, DC: Asia-Pacific Research Center in Stanford University. pp. 237-249.
Inoguchi, Takashi, Ikenberry, G. John and Sato, Yoichiro, 2011. “Alliance Constrained: Japan, the United States, and Regional Security,” in Takashi Inoguchi, G. John Ikenberry and Yoichiro Sato ed(s)., The U.S.-Japan Security Alliance: Regional Multilateralism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 1-12.
Kamiya, Matake, 2013. “The US-Japan Alliance: Where From and Where To? ” in Carl Baker and Brad Glosserman eds., Doing More and Expecting Less: The Future of US Alliances in the Asia Pacific. Washington, DC: Center For Strategic & International Studies. pp. 25-40.
Kang Choi, 2013. “The ROK-US Alliance: Past, Present, and Future,” in Carl Baker and Brad Glosserman eds., Doing More and Expecting Less: The Future of US Alliances in the Asia Pacific. Washington, DC: Center For Strategic & International Studies. pp. 41-54.
lain Johnston, Alastair. 2004. ”China’s International Relations: The Political and Security Dimensions,” in Samuel S. Kim, ed., The International Relations of Northeast Asia .USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 65-100.
Lampton, David M., 2004. “US-China Security Relations and America’s Pacific Alliances in the Post-9/11 Era,” in Michael H. Armacost and Daniel I. Okimoto eds., The Future of America’s Alliances in Northeast Asia. Washington, DC: Asia-Pacific Research Center in Stanford University. pp. 221-236.
Lee, Chung-min, “Domestic Politics and the Changing Contours of the ROK-US Alliance: The End of the Status Quo,” in Michael H. Armacost and Daniel I.Okimoto, eds., The Future of America’s Alliances in Northeast Asia (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2004), pp. 199-220.
Mastanduno, Michael, 2011. “Global Cost and Benefits,” in Takashi Inoguchi, G. John Ikenberry and Yoichiro Sato, eds., The U.S.-Japan Security Alliance: Regional Multilateralism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 75-90.
Morgenthau, Hans J., 1959. “Alliances in Theory and Practice,” in Arnold Wolfers ed., Alliance Policy in the Cold War. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press. pp. 184-212.
Murata, Koji, 2000. “Japan''s Military Cooperation and Alliances in the Asia-Pacific Region: Guidelines for U.S.-Japan Defense Cooperation,” in Hung-mao TIEN and Tun-jen CHENG, eds., The Security Environment in the Asia-Pacific. New York: M.E. Sharp. pp.52-63.
Smith, Sheila A., 2011. “Refining U.S.-Japan Strategic Bargain,” in G. John Ikenberry, Yoichiro Sato and Takashi Inoguchi, eds., The U.S.-Japan Security Alliance: Regional Multilateralism. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 31-52.
Sung-Hee, Jwa and Goon, Yong 2004. “The Rise of China’s Economy: opportunities and Threat to China-Korea Economic Relations,” in Kokubun Ryosei and Wang Jisi eds., The Rise of China and a Changing East Asian Order. Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange. pp. 205-228.
Tucker, Nancy, 2013. “The Evolution of US-China Relations,” in David Shambaugh, ed., Tangled Titans: The United States and China. New York: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 29-52.
三、期刊論文
金光林,2008。〈中韓両国歷史・文化摩擦対文明史的考察〉,《新潟産業大学人文学部紀要》,第20號,頁1-20。
Cha, Victor D. and Katz, Katrin, 2011. “South Korea in 2010,” Asian Survey, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 54-63.
Clinton, Hillary, 2011. “America''s Pacific Century,” Foreign Policy, Vol. 189, No.1, pp. 56-63.
Gaddis, John Lewis, 1981. "Containment: Its past and future," International Security, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 74-102.
Gi-Wook Shin, 2012. “Identity Politics and Policy Disputes in U.S.-Korea Relations,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 127, No. 2, pp. 289-310.
He, Yinan, 2008. “Ripe for Cooperation or Rivalry? Commerce, Realpolitik, and War Memory in Contemporary Sino-Japanese Relations,” Asian Security, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2008, pp. 162-197.
Keohane, Robert O. and Martin, Lisa L., 1995. “The Promise of Institutionalist Thoery,” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 39-51.
Keohane, Robert O., 1998. “Alliances, Threats and the Use of Neorealism,” International Security, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 169-176.
Kim, Jinwung. 1989. “Recent Anti-Americanism in South Korea: The Causes,” Asian Survey, Vol. 29, No. 8, pp. 749-763.
Lee, Changkyu and Lee, Inkoo, 2006. “The Rise of China and its Implications for Korean Economy,” Taiwanese Journal of WTO Studies, Vol. 4, pp. 155-188.
Mearsheimer, John J., 1990. “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War,” International Security, Vol. 15, No.1, pp. 5-56.
Mearsheimer, John J., 1994. "The False Promise of International Institutions." International security, Vol. 19, No.3, pp. 5-49.
O., Tara, 2010. “U.S.-ROK Strategic Alliance 2015,” Center for U.S.-Korea Policy, Vol. 2, No.9, pp. 1-4.
Rachman, Gideon, 1996.“Containing China,” The Washington Quarterly, Vol.19, No.1, pp. 126-139.
Roehrig, Terence, 2010. “ROK-US Maritime Cooperation: A Growing Dimension of the Alliance,” International Journal of Korean Studies, Vol. 14, No.1, pp. 91-124.
Ruggie, John G., 1995. “The False Premise of Realism,” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 62-70.
Schweller, Randall L., 1994. "Bandwagoning for profit: Bringing the revisionist state back in." International Security, Vol.19, No.1, pp. 72-107.
Shambaugh, David, 1996. “Containment or Engagement of China? Calculating Beijing''s Responses,” International Security, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 180-209.
Snyder, Scott, 2000. “New Challenges for U.S.-ROK Relations,” Korea and World Affairs, Vol. 24, pp. 29-45.
Snyder, Scott, 2003. “Sino-Korean Relations and the Future of the U.S.-ROK Alliance,” NBR Analysis, Vol.14, No.1, p. 51-72.
Scott Snyder, 2000. “New Challenges for U.S.-ROK Relations,” Korea and World Affairs, Vol. 24, pp. 29-45.
Walt, Stephen M., 1997. "Why alliances endure or collapse," Survival, Vol.39, No.1, pp. 156-179.
Waltz, Kenneth, 1993.
四、會議論文
Campbell, Kurt M., 2004/1/14-15. “America’s Asia Strategy during the Bush Administration,” prepared for the Workshop on the Future of America’s Alliances in Northeast Asia, Standford University’s Asia-Pacific Research Center.
Kim, Taeho, 2000/3/7.8. “Balancing U.S. Alliance and Chinese Cooperation: Korea’s Emerging Security Challenge,” in paper presented at the Asia-Pacific Symposium. Hawaii: The Institute for National Strategic Studies.
五、官方文件
Department of Defense, 2013/10/13. “FACT SHEET ON THE U.S.-REPUBLIC OF KOREA ALLIANCE”, <http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/KoreaStateVisitFactSheetforNSS(JSJ5input)_F9E9.pdf>.
Foreign relations of the United States, 1948, vol.6, p.1163, < http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUS-idx?type=goto&id=FRUS.FRUS1948v06&isize=M&submit=Go+to+page&page=1148>.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, “Japan-U.S. Security Consultative Committee (2+2)”, < http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/n-america/us/security/scc/>.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 1996/4/17. “U.S.-Japan Joint Declaration on Security: Alliance for the 21st Century,” <http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/n-america/us/security/security.html>.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2012/5/3. “US-Japan Joint Statement: A Shared Vision for the Futrue,” <http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/n-america/us/pmv1204/pdfs/Joint_Statement_en.pdf>.
Office of Historian of U.S. Department of State, “MILESTONES: 1945–1952─Korean War and Japan’s Recovery”, < https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/korean-war >.
The Ministry of Defense of Japan, 2010/12/17. “NATIONAL DEFENSE PROGRAM GUIDELINES for FY 2011 and beyond,” <http://www.mod.go.jp/e/d_act/d_policy/pdf/guidelinesFY2011.pdf>.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 1997/9/23. “The Guidelines for U.S.-Japan Defense Cooperation,” Joint Statement U.S.-Japan Security Consultative Committee.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2000/9/11. “Joint Statement, Security Consultative Committee”.
U.S. Department of Defense, 1995/2/27. “United States Security Strategy for the East Asia-Pacific Region,” < http://www.ioc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~worldjpn/documents/texts/JPUS/19950227.O1E.html>.
U.S. Department of Defense, 2006/10/20. “The 38th Security Consultative Meeting Joint Communique,” < http://www.nukestrat.com/korea/JointCommunique2006.pdf>.
U.S. Department of State, 2010/10/27. “Joint Press Availability with Japanese Foreign Minister Seiji Maehara,” < http://www.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2010/10/150110.htm>.
U.S. Embassy Seoul, Korea, 2007/2/23. “U.S., South Korea To Transfer Wartime Force Command in 2012: Defense ministers say operational control transition to begin in July 2007,” < http://seoul.usembassy.gov/410_022307.html>.
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982. “7 April 1954, Eisenhower Press Conference in Foreign Relations of the United States 1952-54,” Vol.13: Indochina.
U.S. House of Representatives, 2012/7/30. House Resolution 121, the Library of Congress, <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:H.Res121:>.
日本內閣辦公室,〈外交関世論調査〉。
六、網路資料
“Asahi Shimbun March 2010 Regular Public Opinion Poll,” The Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation, <http://mansfieldfdn.org/program/research-education-and-communication/asian-opinion-poll-database/listofpolls/2010-polls/asahi-shimbun-march-2010-regular-public-opinion-poll-10-07/>.
“December 2010 Asahi Shimbun Interview Survey,” The Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation, <http://mansfieldfdn.org/program/research-education-and-communication/asian-opinion-poll-database/listofpolls/2010-polls/december-2010-asahi-shimbun-interview-survey/>.
“December 2010 Asahi Shimbun Interview Survey,” The Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation, < http://mansfieldfdn.org/program/research-education-and-communication/asian-opinion-poll-database/listofpolls/2010-polls/december-2010-asahi-shimbun-interview-survey/>.
“Nikkei Shimbun January 2010 Emergency Telephone Opinion Poll,” The Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation, <http://mansfieldfdn.org/program/research-education-and-communication/asian-opinion-poll-database/listofpolls/2010-polls/nikkei-shimbun-january-2010-emergency-telephone-opinion-poll-10-02/>.
“South Korea in a Changing World: Foreign Affairs- Results of the Asan Institute’s 2012 Annual Survey of South Korean Public Opinion,” The Asan Institute for Policy Studies, < http://mansfieldfdn.org/mfdn2011/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/2012-Asan-Annual-Survey.pdf >.
Abe, Shinzo, 2013/2/22. “Japan is Back”, Giving a Speech at CSIS, < http://csis.org/files/attachments/130222_speech_abe.pdf>.
Acheson, Dean. 1950/1/12. “Excepts From Acheson’s Speech To The National Press Club,” <http://web.viu.ca/davies/H102/Acheson.speech1950.htm>.
Cha, Victor D., 2010. “U.S.-Korea Relations: Smooth Sailing in the Wake of Cheonan” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 12, No. 3, < http://csis.org/files/publication/1003q.pdf>.
Cha, Victor D., 2010. “U.S.-Korea Relations: The Sinking of the Cheonan” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 12, No. 2, < http://csis.org/files/publication/1002q.pdf>.
Cha, Victor D., 2011. “U.S.-Korea Relations: A Tumultuous Ending of Year 2010” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 12, No. 4, < http://csis.org/files/publication/1004q.pdf>.
Glosserman, Brad, 2001. “U.S.-Japan Relations:a False Start,” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 3, No. 1, < http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/0101q.pdf>.
Glosserman, Brad, 2002. “U.S.-Japan Relations: An Oasis of Stability,” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 4, No. 3, < http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/0203q.pdf>.
Glosserman, Brad, 2004. “U.S.-Japan Relations: Calm Amidst a ‘C’ of Troubles,” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 6, No. 3, < http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/0403q.pdf>.
Glosserman, Brad, 2004. “U.S.-Japan Relations: Mr. Koizumi’s Mandate,” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 5, No. 4, < http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/0304q.pdf>.
Glosserman, Brad, 2005. “U.S.-Japan Relations: History Starts Here,” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 7, No. 1, < http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/0501q.pdf >.
Glosserman, Brad, 2005. “U.S.-Japan Relations: The Alliance Transformed? ,” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 7, No. 4, < http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/0504q.pdf>.
Glosserman, Brad, 2006. “U.S.-Japan Relations: A Dream of a Quarter,” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 8, No. 2, < http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/0602q.pdf >.
Green, Michael J., 2010. “U.S.-Japan Relations: Hitting the Reset Button,” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 12, No. 3, < http://csis.org/files/publication/1003q.pdf>.
Green, Michael J., 2011. “U.S.-Japan Relations: Tempering Expectations,” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 12, No. 4, < http://csis.org/files/publication/1004q.pdf>.
Green, Michael J., 2012. “U.S.-Japan Relations: Back to Normal,” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 14, No. 1, < http://csis.org/files/publication/1201q.pdf>.
Green, Michael J., 2012. “U.S.-Japan Relations: Big Points on the Scoreboard But Can Noda Make It,” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 13, No. 3, < http://csis.org/files/publication/1103q.pdf>.
Green, Michael Jonathan, 1999. “U.S.-Japan Relations: Still in the Eye of the Hurricane?” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 1, No.2.< http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/9902q.pdf>.
Green, Michael Jonathan, 2000. “U.S.-Japan Relations: Security and Economic Ties Stabilize before the Okinawa Summit,” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 2, No. 2, < http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/0002q.pdf >.
Green, Michael Jonathan, 2000. “U.S.-Japan Relations: Small but Important Steps,” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol.2, No.3, < http://csis.org/programs/pacific-forum-csis/comparative-connections/vol-2-no-3-oct-2000 >.
Green, Michael Jonathan, 2001. “U.S.-Japan Relations: Not Bad for Auto-Pilot,” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 1, No. 3, < http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/9903q.pdf >.
Green, Michael Jonathan, 2001. “U.S.-Japan Relations: Prepariing for New Teams in Tokyo and Washingtn and a Muddy Field in Both Capitals,” Comparative Connection: A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations, Vol. 2, No. 4, < http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/0004q.pdf >
Japan Bank for International Cooperation, “Survey Report on Overseas Business Operations by Japanese Manufacturing Companies–Results of the JBIC FY2013 Survey: Outlook for Japanese Foreign Direct Investment (25th Annual Survey)”, <http://www.jbic.go.jp/wp-content/uploads/reference_en/2014/03/18519/20140304_joi.pdf>.
Pyle, Kenneth B., 2012/11/13. “The US-Japan Alliance in the 21st Century,” The National Bureau of Asian Research, < http://www.nbr.org/research/activity.aspx?id=296 >.
Yomiuri Shimbun, “Japan-U.S. Joint Opinion Poll December 2007 (07-39),” The Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation, < http://mansfieldfdn.org/program/research-education-and-communication/asian-opinion-poll-database/listofpolls/2007-polls/japan-u-s-joint-opinion-poll-december-2007-07-39/>.
日本貿易振興機構(The Japan External Trade Organization),〈日本貿易相手國TOP10〉。
國際協力銀行,〈日本企業海外展開中國─2012年度海外直接投資─調查結果─〉。

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 方子毓,2010。〈第一次世界大戰前德國外交政策與英德關係1888-1914〉,《成大歷史學報》,第38號,頁213-256。
2. 王高成,2011。〈中國發展航空母艦之戰略目標設定〉,《全球政治評論》,第36期,頁1-6。
3. 伊藤幹彥,2014。〈戰區飛彈防禦系統(TMD)與亞太區域安全戰略--美日臺之飛彈防禦鐵三角同盟為中心〉,《遠東學報》,第29卷第1期,頁7-22。
4. 何思慎,2006。〈從2006年防衛白皮書看日本美日同盟政策〉,《戰略安全研析》,第17期,頁10-13。
5. 何思慎,2012。〈日本民主黨政權的中國政策(2009-2011 年)〉,《遠景基金會季刊》,第13卷第1期,頁1-49。
6. 何思慎,2013。〈安倍內閣對美政策研析〉,《戰略安全研析 》,第94期,頁22 – 30。
7. 邱坤玄,2004。〈中共對冷戰後美日安全關係的認知與新安全觀的形成〉,《東亞研究》,第35卷第2期,頁1-32。
8. 邱坤玄,2010。〈中國在周邊地區的多邊外交理論與實踐〉,《遠景基金會季刊》,第11卷第4期,頁1-41。
9. 邱凱彬,2006。〈甲午戰後清政府的聯俄外交 〉,《中興史學》,第12期,頁83-108。
10. 袁易,1996。〈多邊主義與安全困境下之合作:國際關係理論與「美」中關係〉,《問題與研究》,第35卷第6期,頁1-18。
11. 張凱銘,2012。〈盧武鉉執政時期的美韓聯盟變化:威脅制衡的觀點〉,《東亞研究》,第43卷,第2期,頁145-179。
12. 張登及,2008。〈地緣因素與新現實主義:以冷戰後美中地緣競逐為例〉,《政治學報》,第45期,頁95-138。
13. 陳一新,1991。〈從聯盟理論看亞太新安全體系〉,《美國月刊》,第6卷第6期,頁50-57。
14. 陳嘉生,2010。〈北韓砲擊延坪島事件的觀察與後續發展〉,《戰略安全研析》,第68期,頁20-24。
15. 陳麒安,2008/7。〈聯盟理論之研究:現實主義的觀點〉,《國際關係學報》第26期,頁133-167。
 
無相關點閱論文