跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.221.70.232) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/05/30 21:31
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:羅世強
研究生(外文):Shih-Chiang Lo
論文名稱:縮小教師與學生期望落差之研究-以鷹鴿賽局為基礎
論文名稱(外文):A Hawk-Dove Game Based approach to Narrowing the Expectation Gap among the Teacher and Students
指導教授:王福星
指導教授(外文):Fu-Hsing Wang
口試委員:杜淑芬黃謙順陶淑瑗
口試委員(外文):Shu-Fen TuChein-Shung HwangShu-Yuan Tao
口試日期:2015-05-27
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中國文化大學
系所名稱:資訊管理學系
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
語文別:中文
論文頁數:59
中文關鍵詞:鷹鴿賽局學生期望教師期望學習滿意度
外文關鍵詞:game theoryhawk-dove gamelearning satisfactionteacher expectationstudent expectation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:646
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:37
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
博弈論涵蓋生物學、經濟學、政治學、鷹鴿賽局等等領域的應用,而其中鷹鴿賽局適用於策略分析。鷹鴿賽局適用於解決雙方參賽者對於共同資源的競爭,而對於商業之獨占市場的寡頭經濟部分,學者Hsieh, Yuan, and Liu (2012)提出一個專為寡頭服務提供商所設計的鷹鴿賽局,能注重顧客期望並提高顧客滿意度。
本研究以博弈理論中的鷹鴿賽局理論為基礎,以問卷調查法作為基礎,利用問卷來進行教師期望與學生期望的賽局。賽局採用課外輔導時間、回覆網路訊息速度、發還作業速度等三個向度進行多個回合課堂對答方式進行實驗假設的驗證。三個向度中以發還作業速度之向度最快達到穩定,而課外輔導時間和回覆網路訊息速度等向度也在多個回合後達到演化穩定狀態。
研究結果得知課外輔導時間、回覆網路訊息速度、發還作業速度等三個向度可縮小學生期望和教師期望的落差,兼提升學習滿意度。
本研究考慮教師期望與學生期望所設計的鷹鴿賽局縮小學習期望與現實的落差,也讓教師期望更符合實際教學情形,以供教學者參考使用。

Applications of game theory includes biology, economics, and political science. Hawk-dove games are applicable to resolve their contestants compete for a common resource. Hsieh et al. (2012) designed a hawk-dove game for oligopoly service providers to managing customer expectations.
Based on the hawk-dove game theory, this study defines a game on the interactions of a teacher and his/her college students. The game is supposed to narrow the learning gap between the teacher expectations and student’s expectations.
This study used classroom repartee way to verify the experimental hypothesis. The results show that the expectations gap can be narrowed in three dimensions. Besides, dimensions of the tutoring-time, the speed of replying messages and time of getting back homework enhance the learning satisfaction.
This study focused on teacher expectations, student expectations, and expectation gap among a teacher and students. And also this study could be support teacher expectation that more in line with actual teaching situation.

中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
致謝辭 v
內容目錄 vi
表目錄 viii
圖目錄 xi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 2
第三節 研究目的 3
第四節 研究流程 3
第五節 研究限制 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 學生期望 5
第二節 教師期望 10
第三節 學習滿意度 11
第四節 鷹鴿賽局 13
第三章 研究方法 20
第一節 鷹鴿賽局的設計與應用 20
第二節 學生期望之設計 27
第三節 教師期望之設計 28
第四節 學習滿意度之設計 30
第四章 實驗結果 32
第一節 學生期望決定因素之問卷統計 32
第二節 學生期望決定因素之學習滿意度 38
第三節 學生期望決定因素之額外損失統計 41
第四節 教師期望與教師耗費心力之統計 44
第五節 實驗結果討論 45
第五章 結論 47
參考文獻 48

一、中文部分

王素君,陳偉瑀,陳安妮(2014),學生評鑑體育教師教
學滿意度之研究-以亞太創意技術學院為例,國
立中興大學體育學刊,(13),21-33。

李建霖(2010),學習滿意度之定義及相關理論研究,國
立屏東教育大學期刊,(13),101-107。

茹紅忠,武龍寶(2010),關於學生期望與學業成敗相關
問題的研究,教育與教學研究,24(7),40-46。

陳煜璋,吳佳純,黃菱鈺(2013),社群網站之認知關鍵
多數與資訊豐富度於學習滿意度之影響-以fac-
ebook為例,電子商務研究,11(3),269-288。

孫中偉,尤麗敏,賀軍亮(2009),高校地理類專業就業
需求、學生期望與課程設置的錯位差研究,石家
莊學院學報,11(3),113-118。

張其純,高碧連,陳淑慧(2013),運用Moodle數位學習
平台提昇學習滿意度-某區域教學醫院為例,管
理資訊計算,2(1),233-244。

張傑(2012),中央警察大學學生柔道教學評鑑與學習滿
意度之研究,台北市立教育大學體育學系碩士在
職專班未出版之碩士論文,1-79。

龐麗娟,洪秀敏(2005),教師自我效能感:教師自主發
展的重要內在動力機制,教師教育研究,17(4),
43-46。

二、英文部分

Appleton-Knapp, S. L., & Krentler, K. A. (2006). Measuring student expectations and their effects on satisfaction: The importance of managing student expectations. Journal of Marketing Education, 28(3), 254-265.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1974). Teacher-student rela-tionships: Causes and consequences. Holt: Rinehart & Winston.

Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., Sun, S. Y., Lin, T. C., & Sun, P. C. (2005). Usability, quality, value and e-learning con-tinuance decisions. Computers & Education, 45(4), 399–416.

de Jong, R. J., van Tartwijk, J., Verloop, N., Veldman, I., & Wubbels, T. (2012). Teachers’ expectations of teach-er-student interaction: complementary and distinctive expectancy patterns. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(7), 948-956.

Domer, D. E. (1983). Understanding educational satisfaction (pp. 22), The University of Kansas School of architec-ture and urban design, The Association for Institutional Research.

Feltovich, D., & Iwasaki A. (2012). Payoff levels, loss avoidance, and equilibrium selection in games with multiple equilibria: an experimental study. Economic Inquiry, 50(4), 932-952.

Fowler, J., & Şaraplı, O. (2010). Classroom management: what ELT students expect. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 94-97.

González-Gómez, F., Guardiola, J., Rodríguez, Ó. M., Alonso, M. Á. (2011). Gender differences in e-learning satis-faction. Computers & Education, 58(1), 283-290.

Harris, C., & Kloubec, J. (2014). Assessment of student expe-rience in a problem-based learning course using the course experience questionnaire. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 46(4), 315-319.

Hilary, D., & Catherine, R. (2007). Student expectations of teaching and learning. 2007 Conference of the Aus-tralasian Universities Building Education Association (pp. 115-125), Australia: University of Australasian.

Hislop, G. W., & Ellis, H. J.C. (2004). A study of faculty effort in online teaching. Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 15-31.

Hsieh, Y. H., Yuan, S. T., & Liu, H. C. (2012). Service inter-action design: a hawk-dove game based approach to managing customer expectations for oligopoly service providers. Information Systems Frontiers, 16(4), 697-713.

Jaasma, M. A., & Koper, R. J. (1999). The relationship of student‐faculty out‐of‐class communication to instruc-tor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48(1), 41-47.

Jun, S. K. (2013). Characteristics of the flunking occurrence and comparison of the opinion on flunking system be-tween faculty and students at a medical school in Korea. The 2013 International Conference on Advanced In-formation and Communication Technology for Educa-tion, Advances in Intelligent Systems Research (pp. 676-680), China: International Association for Cyber Science and Engineering.

Jones A. C. (2008). The effects of out-of-class support on student satisfaction and motivation to learn. Commu-nication Education, 57(3), 373-388.

Jones, K. T., & Chen, C. C. (2008). Blended learning in a graduate accounting course: student satisfaction and course design issues. The Accounting Educators’ Jour-nal, 18, 15-28.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.

Kokko, H., Jennions, M., & Brooks, R. (2006). Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 37, 43-66.

Lee, Y. J. (2008). A study of the influence of instructional innovation on learning satisfaction and study achieve-ment. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 4(2), 43-54.

Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student per-ception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158-163.

Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education, 48(2), 185-204.

McKelvie, S. J. (1978). Graphic rating scales-how many cat-egories. British Journal of Psychology, 69(2), 185-202.

Moga, H., Antonya, C., Sandu, F., Cocorada, S. (2012). Using game theory for modeling the student-professor inter-action. Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (pp. 1286-1294), Romania: Transilvania University.

Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013). Student percep-tions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. Internet and Higher Education, 18, 38-46.

Paechter, M., Maier, B., Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expec-tations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54(1), 222-229.

Ross, J. A., Cousins, J. B., & Gadalla, T. (1996). With-in-teacher predictors of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(4), 385-400.

Rubie-Davies C., Hattie, J., Townsend, M., Hamilton, R. (2004, Septempber 16-18). Expectations and beliefs about teaching: is there a relationship. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, New Zealand: University of Auckland.

Rubie-Davies, C. M., Flint, A., & McDonald, L. G. (2012). Teacher beliefs, teacher characteristics, and school contextual factors: What are the relationships. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 270-288.

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Jour-nal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 611-625.

Simonsohn, U. (2010). Weather to go to college. The Economic Journal, 120(543), 270-280.

Singh, R., Saleem1, M., Pradhan, P., Heffernan, C., Heffernan, N. T., Razzaq, L., Dailey, M. D., O’Connor, C., & Mul-cahy C. (2011). Feedback during web-based homework: The role of hints. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6738, 328-336.

Smith, J. M., & Price G. R. (1973). The logic of animal con-flict. Nature, 246, 15-18.

Smith, J. M., & Parker, G. A. (1976). The logic of asymmetric contests. Animal Behaviour, 24(1), 159-175.

Tough, A. (1982). Intentional changes: a fresh approach to helping people change. Chicago: Follett.

Tricker, T. (2003). Student expectations: How do we measure up [online]. Available: http://inter-discipli
nary.net/ati/education/ioe/ioe2/tricker%20paper.pdf
[2003].

Tschannen-Morana, M., & Hoyb, A. W. (2001). Teacher effi-cacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and teacher education, 17(7), 783-805.

Zeithaml, V. A., Berry L. L., & Parasuramen, A. (1993). The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(1), 1-12.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top