行政院國家資訊通信發展推動小組（民95）。日本發佈次世代寬頻戰略2010
全國無寬頻地區降為零。【新聞群組】。取自http://www.find.org.tw/
find/home.aspx?page=news&id=4354
李孟壕、曾淑芬（民94）。數位落差再定義與衡量指標之研究。資訊社會研究，9，89-124。
李孟壕（民95）。數位落差理論、方法與應用相關研究整理。資訊社會研究，
10，1-106。
宋庭揚（民97）。電子化政府的現況與挑戰：以東部地區執行縮減數位落差政
策為例（碩士論文）。取自台灣博碩士論文加值系統。（系統編號096ND
HU5055001）
「吳院長聽取「愛台12 建設—智慧台灣推動成效」報告」（民99 年11 月25
日）。行政院兒童e 樂園：即時新聞。【新聞群組】。取http://www.ey.gov.
tw/kids/News_Content2.aspx?n=75E1D80B953423C6&sms=99606AC2FCD5
3A3A&s=58B6FCCB35CE14E9
典通股份有限公司（民103）。103 年個人/家戶數位機會調查報告。國家發展
委員會委託之專題研究報告。臺北市：行政院。
高浩恩（民97）。台灣縮減數位落差政策-以數位機會中心為例（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
張漢宜（民95）。弭平數位落差全球政府動起來。天下雜誌，351。
項靖（民92）。邁向資訊均富：我國數位落差現況之探討。東吳政治學報，16，125-178。
曾淑芬、吳齊殷（民90）。先進各國對消弭數位落差之政策分析。章英華（主
持人），社會公平與數位落差。資訊社會與數位落差研討會。臺北市中央
研究院。
曾淑芬、吳齊殷（民91）。台灣地區數位落差問題之研究。行政院研究發展考
核委員會委託之專題研究報告。（編號：RDEC-RES-090-006）。臺北市：
行政院。
資策會（民94）。2004 年資訊國力年鑑。臺北市：行政院。
資策會（民95）。新加坡公布下一代國家資通訊基礎建設與人才發展
計畫。【新聞群組】。取自http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?
page=news&id=4200
資策會（民98）。洞悉南韓無所不在政策—u-Korea。【新聞群組】。
取自http://www.nici.nat.gov.tw/content/application/nici/gener
ala/guest-cnt-browse.php?cntgrp_ordinal=1002006100110003&cnt_
id=763
簡文吟、陳玉華（民98）。97 年數位落差調差報告。行政院研究發展考核委
員會委託之專題研究報告。臺北市：行政院。
聯合行銷研究股份有限公司（民98）。98 年數位落差調查報告。行政院研究
發展考核委員會委託之專題研究報告。臺北市：行政院。
聯合行銷研究股份有限公司（民97）。96 年數位落差調查報告。行政院研究
發展考核委員會委託之專題研究報告。臺北市：行政院。
聯合行銷研究股份有限公司（民97）。身心障礙數位落差與數位生活需求調查
報告。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託之專題研究報告。臺北市：行政
院。
Blair, T. (2004, 09, 28). The opportunity society: Speech by Tony Blair, Prime
Minister and Leader of the Labour Party, Labour Party Annual Confe
rence. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/369
7434.stm.
Bruno, G., Esposito, E., Genovese, A., & Gwebu, K. L. (2011). A critical analysis
of current indexes for digital divide measurement. Information Society,
27, 16-28.
Cawkell, Tony. 2001. “Sociotechnology: the Digital Divide.” Journal of
information science 27, 1: 51-53.
Colley, A. & Maltby, J. (2008). Impact of the internet on our lives: Male and
female personal perspectives. Computers in human behavior, 24,2005-
2013.
Dale, L. & Ronald, L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance
pages 213-236.
Dijk, V.J. & Hacker, K.(2000). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic
phenomenon. The 50th annual conference of the international
communication association Acapulco,p.1-5.
Dijk, V.J. (1999). The network society: Social aspects of new media. London,UK:
Sage.
Fortier, F. (2001). Virtuality Check- Power relations and alternative strategies in
the information society. Verso. NY.
Gaved, M.B., & Mulholland, P. (2010). Networking communities from the bottom
up:Grassroots approaches to overcoming the digital divide. AI & Society,
25(3), 345-357.
Gillett, S.E. (2000). Universal service: Defining the policy goal in the age of the
internet. Information Society, 16(2), 147-149.
Gorisk,P. (2005). Education Equality and the Digital Divide. AACE Journal.13(1),
3-45
Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online
Skills. First Monday. 7(4) from://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_4.
Hersberger, J. (2005). The homeless and information needs and services.
Reference and User Services Quarterly, 44(3), 199-202.
I.T.U. & M.I.C., (2005). Measuring Digital Opportunity. Rep. Of Korea, Seoul,
ITU/Korea WSIS Thematic meeting on Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships
for Bridging the Digital Divide.
Katz, E. (1995-2000) The Internet,: Access, Civic Involvement, and Social
Interaction American Behavioral Scientist November 2001 45: 405-419,
Kim, MC & Kim, JK (2001). Digital divide: Conceptual Disscussions and
Prospect. Society @ Internet 2001, LNCS 2105, p. 78-91.
Kuttan, A. & Peters, L. (2003). From digital divide to digital opportunity. Lanham,
Md. Scarecrow Press.
Liff,S. & Shepherd, A. (2004). An evolving gender digital divide? Oxford internet
insistute, internet issue brief(2).
Livingstone, S. (2007). Youthful experts? A critical appraisal of children’s
emerging internet literacy. In Robin M., Chrisarthi A., Danny Q., &
Roger, S. (Eds.), Oxford handbook on ICTs. (p. 494). Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press.
Losh, S.C. (2009). Generation versus aging, and education, occupation, gender and
ethnicity effects in U.S. digital divide. Atlanta Conference on Science
and Innovation Policy, October2-3, Retrieved 25, May, 2010, from
http://mailer.fsu.edu/~slosh/LoshGenerationVsAging.doc
Lynch, C. (1998). “Information Literacy and Information Technology Literacy:
New Components in the Curriculum for a Digital Culture.”
from http://staff.cni.org/~clifford/papers/cni-info-lit.html
Mansell, R., & Steinmueller, W. (2000). Mobilizing the information society:
Strategies for growth and opportunity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University
Press.
Murdock, G. (1999). Rights and representations: Public discourse and cultural
citizenship. Television and Common Knowledge, 7, 7-17.
Norris, P. (2001), “Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and
The Internet Worldwide”, Cambridge University Press.
Parayil, G. (2005). The digital divide and increasing returns: Contradictions of
informational capitalism. Information Society, 21, 41-51.
Rice, R. (2002). Primary issues in Internet use: Access, civic and community
involvement, and social interaction and expression. In L. Lievrouw & S.
Livingstone (Eds.). Handbook of new media:Social shaping and
consequences of ICTs. London, UK:Sage.
Richard, J. et al,.(2005). Gender, internet identification, and internet anxiety:
correlates of internet use. Cyber psychology & behavior, 8(4),
p.371-378.
Servon, L. (2002). Bridging the digital divide: Technology, community and public
policy.London, UK: Blackwell.
Siobhan, S. (2009). Digital divide: A discursive move away from the real
inequities. Information Society, 25, 1-22.
Steyaert, J. (2002). Inequality and the digital divide: Myths and realities. In S.
Hick & J. McNutt (Eds.). Advocacy, activism, and the internet:
Community organization and social policy. Chicago, IL: Lycecum
Books.
Tsatsou, P. (2011). Digital divides revisited: What is new about divides and their
research? Media Culture Society, 33, 317-330.