一、中文部分：
1.于卓民與廖采如(2005)。影響子公司控制機制選擇之研究-以台灣企業為例。交大管理學報，25(2)，27-56。
2.古永嘉與孫明德(2011)。外人直接投資偏誤之衡量與決定因素-行為財務觀點。商管科技季刊，12(2)，113-144。
3.池祥萱、繆文娟與莊瀅臻(2014)。企業社會責任對於公司財務績效之影響是雙面刃嗎？來自全球500大公司的證據。管理學報，31(1)，1-19。4.李文瑞(2000)。廠商海外投資股權模式關鍵影響因素之研究-台商赴東南亞投資之實證分析。管理評論，19(3)，25-49。5.吳思華(2000)。策略九說。台北市：臉譜出版。
6.高長與陳威如(1998)。台商赴大陸投資所有權進入模式決定因素分析。管理學報，15(3)，393-418。
7.許主峯(2012)。台灣科技產業企業社會責任的鑲嵌策略：一個嘗試性的分析模式。中華行政學報，10，23-40。
8.陳律睿、王俊如與鄭怡如(2011)。社會關係、資源投入與進入模式之研究-以進入中國大陸之台灣中小企業為例。中原管理評論，9(1)，75-96。
9.陳律睿、蔡顯童與劉峰旭(2012)。子公司外部網絡鑲嵌之決定因素與影響效果。管理評論，31(1)，21-44。
10.張君立、蔡莉與朱秀梅(2008)。社會網絡、資源獲取與新創企業績效關係研究。工業技術經濟，27(5)，87-90。
11.張義杰、高銘淞與邱志芳(2012)。文化距離之雙重立論與地主國制度環境之調節效果。中山管理評論，20(3)，731-773。
12.程恩富與彭文兵(2002)。社會關係網絡：企業新的資源配置形式。上海行政學院學報，2，79-90。
13.廖明坤、于卓民與司徒達賢(2006)。台商大陸子公司決策自主權影響因素之研究。中山管理評論，14(2)，397-427。二、英文部分：
1.Alford, R. R., & Friedland, R. (1985). Powers of theory: Capitalism, the state, and democracy. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.Altuntas, C., & Turker, D. (2015). Local or global: Analyzing the internationalization of social responsibility of corporate foundations. International Marketing Review, 32(5), 540-575.
3.Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17, 1-26.
4.Aswicahyono, H., & Hill, H. (1995). Determinants of foreign ownership in LDC manufacturing: An Indonesia case study. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(1), 139-158.
5.Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
6.Barney, J. (1997). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
7.Beamish, P. (1985). The characteristics of joint ventures in developed and developing countries. Columbia Journal of World Business, 13-19.
8.Blumentritt, T. P., & Nigh, D. (2002). The integration of subsidiary political activities in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 57-77.
9.Brainard, S. L. (1997). An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade. American Economic Review, 87(4), 520-544.
10.Brouthers, K. D. (2002). Institutional cultural and transaction cost influences in entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 203-221.
11.Brouthers, L. E., & Hennart, J. F. (2007). Boundaries of the firm: Insight from international entry mode research. Journal of Management, 33, 395-425.
12.Campbell, J. T., Eden, L., & Miller, S. R. (2012). Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), 84-106.
13.Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
14.Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2007). CSR agendas for Asia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(4), 183-188.
15.Chen, H. Y., & Hu, M. Y. (2002). An analysis of determinants of entry mode and its impact on performance. International Business Review, 11(2), 193-210.
16.Cheung, Y. L., Tan, W., Ahn, H. J., & Zhang, Z. (2009). Does corporate social responsibility matter in Asian emerging markets. Journal of Business Ethics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0164-3
17.CLSA CG Watch: 2001, 2002, 2004, Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets (Credit Lyonnais).
18.Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 386-405.
19.Contractor, F. J. (1990). Ownership patterns of U.S. joint ventures abroad and the liberalization in the 1980s: Evidence from the benchmark surveys. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(1), 55-73.
20.Cruz, L., & Boehe,, D. M. (2010). How do leading retail MNCs leverage CSR globally? Insight from Brazil. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 243-263.
21.Daft, R. L. (1998). Essentials of organizational theory and design. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
22.Davidson, W.H. (1980). The location of foreign direct investment activity: Country characteristics and experience effect. Journal of International Business Studies, 9-22.
23.DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
24.DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1-38.
25.Dunning, J. H. (1980). Toward an eclectic theory of international production-some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9-31.
26.Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production- A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1-31.
27.Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing Inc.
28.Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.
29.Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Penguin.
30.Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137–147.
31.Grosse, R., & Trevino, L. J. (1996). Foreign direct investment in the united states: An analysis by country of origin. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(1), 139-155.
32.Habib, M., & Zurawicki, L. (2002). Corruption and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 291-307.
33.Hah, K., & Freeman, S. (2014). Multinational enterprise subsidiaries and their CSR: a conceptual framework of the management of CSR in smaller emerging economies. Journal of Business Ethics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1753-8
34.Hill, C., Hwang, P., & Kim, W. C. (1990). An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategy Management Journal, 11, 117-128.
35.Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36.Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 838-849.
37.Ikechi, E., & Sivakumar, K. (2004). International market entry mode strategies of manufacturing firms and service firms: A resource-based perspective. International Marketing Review, 21(1), 68-101.
38.Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 213-231.
39.Jamali, D. (2010). The CSR of MNC subsidiaries in developing countries: Global, local substantive or diluted? Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 181-200.
40.Kobrin, S. J. (1976). The environmental determinants of foreign direct manufacturing investment: An ex post empirical analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 7, 29-42.
41.Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A conceptual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 308-324.
42.Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64-81.
43.Kumar, V., & Subramaniam, V. (1997). A Contingency Framework for the Mode of Entry Decision. Journal of World Business, 32(1), pp.53-72.
44.Li, S., & Filer, L. (2007). The effect of the governance environment on the choice of investment mode and the strategic implications. Journal of World Business, 42(1), 80-98.
45.Lopez-Duarte, C., ＆Vidal-Suarez, M. M. (2010). External uncertainty and entry mode choice: Cultural distance, political risk and language diversity. International Business Review, 19(6), 575-588.
46.Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404-424.
47.Muller, A. (2006). Global versus local CSR strategies. European Management Journal, 24, 189-198.
48.Najah, A., & Jarboui, A. (2013). The social disclosure impact on corporate financial performance: Case of big French companies. International Journal of Business Management and Research, 3(4), 337-351.
49.Newman, K. L., & Nollen, S. D. (1996). Culture and congruence: The fit between management practices and national culture. Journal of International Business Management Studies, 27(4), 753-779.
50.North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24 (3), 403-441.
52.Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. (2001). Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational network in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
53.Peng, M. W., &Pleggenkuhle-Miles, E. G. (2009). Current debates in global strategy. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 51-68.
54.Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley.
55.Prahalad, C. K., & Doz, Y. L. (1987). The multinational mission: Balancing local demands and global vision. New York: Free Press.
56.Rodriguez, P., Siegel, D. S., Hillman, A., & Eden, L. (2006). Three lenses on the multinational enterprise: Politics, corruption, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 733-746.
57.Root, F. (1987). Entry strategies for international markets, Washington: D.C., Health and Company.
58.Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource based perspective on corporate environment performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 534-559.
59.Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.Slangen, A. H. L., & Beugelsdijk, S. (2010). The impact of institutional hazards on foreign multinational activity: A contingency perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(6), 980-995.
61.Slangen, A. H. L., & Van Tulder, R. J. M. (2009). Cultural distance, political risk, or governance quality? Towards a more accurate conceptualization and measurement of external uncertainty in foreign entry mode research. International Business Review, 18(3), 276-291.
62.Tan, J., & Wang, L. (2011). MNC strategic responses to ethical pressure: An institutional logic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 373-390.
63.Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implication for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-352.
64.UNCTAD (2015). World Investment Report 2015: Reforming International Investment Governance, United Nations, New York and Geneva.
65.Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
66.Werther, W. B., & Chandler, D. (2006). Toward a responsible society, Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment (pp. 1-24). London: Sage.
67.Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-trust Implications, New York: Free Press.
68.Williamson, O. E. (1981). The modern corporation: Origins, evolution, attributes. Journal of Economic Literature, 19, 1537-1568.
69.Yang, X., & Rivers, C. (2009). Antecedents of CSR practices in MNC’s subsidiaries: A stakeholder and institutional perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(SUPPL.2), 155-169.
70.Yiu, D., & Makino, S. (2002). The choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary: An institutional perspective. Organizational Science, 13, 667-683.
71.Young, S., & Marais, M. (2012). A multi-level perspective of CSR reporting: The implications of national institutions and industry risk characteristics. Corporate Governance: An International Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00926.x