跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(2600:1f28:365:80b0:7358:9a99:61b8:7c06) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/19 08:23
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:邵盟傑
研究生(外文):Meng-Chieh Shao
論文名稱:核心自我評價與工作滿意度之結構關係研究 -- 以內在工作激勵為中介變數
論文名稱(外文):A study of structural relationship between core self-evaluation and job satisfaction--mediating by intrinsic motivation
指導教授:廖紫柔廖紫柔引用關係
指導教授(外文):Tzu-Jou Liao
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:義守大學
系所名稱:工業管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:108
中文關鍵詞:核心自我評價工作滿意度內在工作激勵台灣越南員工比較
外文關鍵詞:core self-evaluationsjob satisfactionintrinsic work motivationa behavioral comparison of employees between Taiwan and Vietnam
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:1037
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
企業員工若能在工作中感受到自身價值及發揮自身最大的優勢,進而對公司有認同、歸屬感,對工作感到滿足,更有意願留在公司繼續服務,因此,對於員工如何在工作得到高度工作滿意便成為研究的焦點。國內現有的研究核心自我評價大多以台灣勞工為主,較缺乏比較台灣與其他國家地區的員工,例如越南勞工,之間的差異性之相關研究。
本研究透過問卷方式,隨機抽樣問卷調查610位台灣勞工及998位越南勞工,並將其收集之問卷資料運用於SPSS及AMOS 21.0套裝軟體進行分析,並以結構模式來驗證兩個地區的核心自我評價、工作滿意、及內在工作激勵三者結構關係是否具有差異。
結果顯示,三變數之結構關係驗證顯示,台越勞工之核心自我評價確實會經由內在工作激勵的中介效果顯著間接影響工作滿意度,但此中介效果對於台灣勞工的影響小於越南勞工。換言之,內在工作激勵對工作滿意度的影響在越南比在台灣強度較大。

If employees can feel their own values and play to their greatest advantages at work, they will be committed to the organizations and satisfied with job, and then have a high willingness to work in the organizations. Thus, job satisfaction is an important research focus. Most research in Taiwan take Taiwanese employees as examples for studies, just few conducted a behavioral comparison of employees between Taiwan and other countries. This study attempted to compare the differences of work behaviors between Taiwan’s and Vietnam’s employees, using a structural modeling to analyze the relationship among three variables: core self-evaluation, job satisfaction and intrinsic motivation.
This study performed a questionnaire survey both in Taiwan and Vietnam, 610 objects were randomly selected in Taiwan and 998 in Vietnam. Such statistical software as SPSS 19.0 and AMOS 21.0 were used to analyze the collected data and to investigate if there are differences between employees of these two countries about the structural relationship among core self-evaluation, job satisfaction and intrinsic motivation.
The research results showed that the structural relationship of the three variables is existed both in Taiwan and Vietnam, yet the mediation effect of intrinsic motivation on the relationship between core self-evaluation and job satisfaction is much lower in Taiwan than in Vietnam. Therefore, the influence of intrinsic motivation towards job satisfaction is higher in Vietnam than in Taiwan.

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與背景 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究流程 3
第四節 研究限制 4
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 核心自我評價 5
第二節 內在工作激勵 10
第三節 工作滿意度 13
第四節 各構面間關係探討 17
第五節 越南勞工簡介 19
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構 20
第二節 研究假設 21
第三節 研究變項之操作性定義 22
第四節 樣本數與共同方法變異 27
第五節 資料分析方法 30
第六節 資料分析流程 33
第四章 研究結果分析
第一節 樣本結構分析 37
第二節 信度分析和因素分析 42
第三節 結構方程模型 62
第四節 假設驗證 77
第五章 結論與建議
第二節 研究結論 79
第二節 建議與後續研究 83
參考文獻 84
附錄 89

中文文獻:
王宜惠(2014),核心自我評價與組織公民行為關係之結構模式研究:以工作滿意度為中介變數,義守大學工業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
吳明隆(2009),結構方程式AMOS的操作與應用(第二版),台北:五南。
吳超榮、甘怡群(2005),核心自我評價:一個驗證性因素分析,北京大學學報(自然科學版),41(4), 622-627
張偉豪&鄭時宜(2012),與結構方程模型共舞曙光出現,新北市:前程文化。
張紹勳(1999),企業員工生涯定位工作滿意與組織效能之研究-以資訊電腦業為參考組,管理評論,18(2),35-58。
許士軍(1977),工作滿意、個人特徵與組織氣候-文獻探討與實證研究,國立政治大學學報,(35),13-56。
陳志偉(1996),工作特性、工作壓力與組織承諾之相關研究-以中部區企業員工為例,東海大學工業工程學系未出版碩士論文。
傳彥凱、張朝欽(2009), 工作壓力、工作滿意與組織承諾之研究-以苗栗縣國小總務主任為例,中華技術學院學報,(40),139-163。
廖佳君(2007),以結構模式驗證組織正義、組織信任與組織承諾相互關係,興國學報,(8),P79-110。
蘇益德(2004),工作特性、工作者特質、人力資源制度認知對工作滿意度之探討 研究-以台南科學工業園區為例,成功大學工業與資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
江孟儒(2009),激勵制度、工作滿意度與離職傾向之關聯性研究─以台灣地區人壽保險機構為例,國立東華大學國際企業學系碩士論文
林妙雀、趙心潔(2000),激勵性報酬、員工屬性與工作滿意度之研究-以台灣高科技產業為實證對象。亞太管理評論,5卷1期,P53-74。
林俊毅、吳美連,2002,人力資源管理理論與實務,臺北:智勝文化。
林姿利(2012),發言一致性、核心自我評價、預期內疚與工作滿足感之關係研究,國立彰化師範大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文
林振樺(2008),核心自我評價、核心他人評價與員工態度的關係,東吳大學心理學系,碩士論文
林錫波(1994),目標難度與獎賞方式對台北體專學生壘球擲準學習表現與內在動機之影響,碩士論文,國立體育學院體育研究所。
馬亞芬(2006),內在及外在激勵因素對於護士工作滿意度的重要性:以台灣及緬甸為例之實證研究,成功大學國際管理碩士碩士論文。
許恒瑞(2005),台灣北部中小型傳統產業員工內外在激勵與創新行為的認知之關聯性探討,開南管理學院企業管理研究所碩士論文
蔡豐任(1993),外在獎勵和內在激勵對運動員的影響,聯合學報,第十一期,481-492。


英文文獻:
Amabile, T. M., 1997, Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy,
Journal of Creative Behavior, 31: 18-31.
Bock, G. W., and Kim Y.G. (2002). Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An
Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing. Information Resources
Management Journal, 15(2), 14-21
Bollen , K.A. (1989),Structural equations with latent variables,New York : Wiley.
Bono,J.E.& Judge,T.A.( 2003 ),Core self-evaluations:A review of trait and its role in
job satisfaction and job performance,European Journal of Personality,
17( 2),5-18.
Brief, A. P., and Aldag, R. J., 1977, The Intrinsic-Extrinsic Dichotomy: Toward Conceptual Clarity, Academy of Management Review, 3: 496-500.
Buitendach ,J.H.&Witte,H.De. (2005),Job insecurity,extrinsic job sat-isfaction and
affective organizational commitment of maintenance workers in a
parastatal,South African Journal Business Communication,42(4),324-348.
Bundy, A. C., Einfeld, S. L, &Joosten, A. V. (2009),Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for stereotypic and repetitive behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 39, 521-531,2009.
Bussing,A.,Bissels,T, Fuchs,V.& Perrar,K.( 1999 ),A dynamic model of work
satisfaction: qualitative approaches, Human Relations, 52,999-1028.
Chang, M. L. (2014). The individual and congruence effects of core self-evaluation on supervisor-subordinate guanxi and job satisfaction. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(5), 624-647.
Chun, J. & Park, M. (2006). A Test of Causal Model for Motivation and job Performance, Job Satisfaction and Psychological Well-being of the Elderly. Journal of the Korea Gerontological Society, 26(3), 521-545.
Conti, R., and Amabile, T. M., 1995, The positive impact of creative activity :Effects of creative task engagement and motivational focus on college students'' learning, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10: 1107-1110.
Davenport, T. H. and L. Prusak (1998), Working knowledge : How Organization Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press. Overstated: The Functional Taxonomy. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 117-123.
Davis, H. 1977. Human Behavior at Work: Organizational Behavior,5th ed. New York: McGrae-Hill.
Deci, E. L. (1975). Some Thoughts on the Internal State Called Intrinsic Motivation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, Illinois.
Deci, E. L., and Ryan R. M., 1985, Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior, New York: Plenum Press.
George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling Good-Doing Good:A Conceptual Analysis of the Mood at Work Organizational Spontaneity Relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 310-329.
Hellregiel, P. R. (1999). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in theworkplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1111-1132.
Herzberg, F. (1968), One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 53-62
Hoppock,R.(1935),Job Satisfaction, New York : Harper&Brother.
Judge ,T. A. , Bono, J. E. , Erez , A. & Locke ,E. A.(2005), Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction : The role of self-concordance and gole attainment., Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2): 257-268.
Judge ,T. A., Erez , A., Bono, J. E.& Thoresen, C. J.(2002),Are measures of self- esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83(3),693 -710.
Judge ,T. A., Bono J.E. ,Locke, E. A.(2002),Personality and job satisfaction: Theme diating role of job characteristics, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2) 237-249.
Judge, T.A. & Bono, J. E.(2001),Relationship of core self-evaluations traits self-esteem
Judge, T. A., Locke ,E.A. & Durham, C.C.(1997),The Dispositional Causes of Job Satisfaction : A Core Evaluations Approach, Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151-188.
Judge, T.A., Locke, E.A., Durham, C. C. & Kluger, A.N.(1998),Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations, Journal of Applied Psychology,83(1): 17–34.
Judge, T.A., Van Vianen, A.E.M.& Pater, I.E.(2004),Emotional stability, core self- evaluations, and job outcomes: A Review of the evidence and an agenda for future research, Human performance,17(3):325-346.
Kowal, J., & Fortier, M.S. (2000). Testing relationships from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation using flow as a motivational consequence. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 171-181.
Loehlin, J.C.( 1987 , 1992 , 2004 ), Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum(2th ed.), 1992 (4t ed.) ,2004.
Lu, L., 1999, Work motivation, job stress and employees’ well-being, Journal of Applied Management Studies, 8(1): 61-72.
Robbins, S. P. (1992).Organization Behavior, Prentice-Hall Inc., 6th,.
Shi, M., Yan, X.F., You, X.Q. & Li ,J.S. (2015). Core Self-evaluations, Emotional Intelligence and Job Satisfaction in Chinese Soldiers. Social Indicators Research, 124(1), 221-229.
Steer, R. M. (1994), Work and stress, introduction to organizational, New York: Addison Wesley.
Tharenou, P.(1979),Employee self-esteem: A review of the literature, Journal of Vocational Behavior,15,316-346.
Williams, L.L.(2005),Impact of nurses'' job satisfaction on organizational trust.,Health Care Management Review, 30(3), 203-211.
Williams, L. J. & Anderson SE.(1991),Job satisfaction and organizational
commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors, Journal of Management, 17(3) 601-617.
Wu, C. H., & Griffin, M. A. (2012). Longitudinal Relationships Between Core Self-Evaluations and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 331-342.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top