(3.236.214.19) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/05/09 22:11
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:白邵逸
研究生(外文):Shau-Yi Bai
論文名稱:以科技接受模式探討互動式電子白板之使用態度—以電腦自我效能為調節變數
論文名稱(外文):Exploring the User Attitude of the Interactive Whiteboard Based on TAM— Computer Self-efficacy as a Moderator
指導教授:曾淑美曾淑美引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shu-Mei Tseng
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:義守大學
系所名稱:資訊管理學系
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:63
中文關鍵詞:互動式電子白板科技接受模式電腦自我效能特殊教育
外文關鍵詞:Interactive WhiteboardTAM ModelComputer Self-efficacySpecial Education
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:264
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
互動式電子白板融入教學已成為新興的教學方式。檢視過去文獻發現,較少文獻探討使用者對互動式電子白板的認知有用性、認知易用性、使用態度與其電腦自我效能之間的互動關係。因此,本研究以電腦自我效能為調節變數,探討其分別對認知有用性與使用態度之間關係以及認知易用性與使用態度之間關係的影響。本研究主要係以問卷調查法與立意抽樣方式進行資料蒐集,總計共回收有效問卷168份。接著,透過統計分析以驗證本研究所提出之研究假說。研究結果顯示,本研究所提出之研究假設僅電腦自我效能對互動式電子白板的認知有用性與使用態度之間的關係未具有調節的影響,其餘研究假設皆獲得支持。
最後,本研究根據分析結果提出建議,教育相關單位能增加互動式電子白板的研習數量、建置互動式電子白板線上交流平台,並推廣相關應用軟體之開發,以期特殊教育教師能提高將互動式電子白板融入教學之正向態度,進而提升教學成效。

Interactive electronic whiteboards have been widely integrated into the new teaching methods. Based on the review of literature, there are fewer studies investigating the relationships between computer self-efficacy and users’ perceived usefulness, perceived ease-of-use, and user attitude. Therefore, this research applied the computer self-efficacy as the moderator to investigate how the relationship between perceived usefulness and user attitude, and the relationship between perceived ease-of-use and user attitude are influenced by it. This research mainly applied questionnaire and purposive sampling methods to conduct data collection. There were 168 valid questionnaires and the statistical analysis were utilized to verify the hypotheses proposed in this research. The results are all have positive influence , only that computer self-efficacy has no moderating effect on the relationship between perceived usefulness and user attitude of the interactive whiteboard.
Finally this research provides concrete suggestions based on the analyzed results in order to enhance the positive attitude towards the integration of interactive whiteboard in teaching and increase teaching effectiveness.

摘 要....................................................I
ABSTRACT.................................................II
目 錄..................................................III
表目錄...................................................IV
圖目錄....................................................V
第一章 緒論...............................................1
第一節 研究背景...........................................1
第二節 研究動機...........................................2
第三節 研究目的...........................................3
第二章 文獻探討...........................................4
第一節 特殊教育...........................................4
第二節 互動式電子白板.....................................8
第三節 科技接受模式......................................11
第四節 電腦自我效能......................................17
第三章 研究方法..........................................21
第一節 研究架構與假設....................................21
第二節 研究變數定義......................................23
第三節 問項設計..........................................24
第四節 研究對象與抽樣....................................25
第五節 資料分析方法......................................26
第四章 資料分析..........................................28
第一節 樣本資料分析......................................28
第二節 敘述性統計分析....................................29
第三節 信度與效度分析....................................31
第四節 相關分析..........................................36
第五節 迴歸分析..........................................37
第五章 結論與建議........................................42
第一節 研究結論..........................................42
第二節 研究貢獻與建議....................................44
參考文獻.................................................47
一、 中文部分............................................47
二、 英文部分............................................49
附錄 研究問卷............................................54

一、中文部分:
1.王天苗、范德鑫 (1998)。智障學生學校適應能力之探討。特殊教育學刊,16,131-150。
2.何華國 (1992)。特殊兒童心理與教育。台北市:五南。
3.何華國 (2004)。特殊兒童心理與教育(第四版)。台北市:五南。
4.吳旻靚 (2008)。電腦自我效能調節知識管理系統使用者滿意度之研究-以Delphi K. Top 網站為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義市。
5.吳統雄 (1985)。態度與行為研究的信度與效度:理論、應用、反省。民意學術專刊,29-53。
6.呂麗儀 (2009)。電腦自我效能與網路自我效能對資管系學生學習成長成效與工作選擇意圖之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。明新科技大學,新竹縣。
7.李進福 (2010)。數學教材設計之研究-以視覺設計理論為基礎(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹市。
8.周文賢 (2002)。多變量統計分析。台北市:智勝出版社。
9.林志隆、王郁文 (2006)。南區國小初級資訊種子教師創新接受度與資訊科技融入教學關注之相關研究。屏東教育大學學報,24,107-146。
10.林美和 (1992)。智能不足研究-學習問題與行為輔導。台北市:師大書苑。
11.邱上真 (2004)。特殊教育導論-帶好班上每位學生。台北市:心理。
12.邱皓政 (2011)。量化研究與統計分析,第五版。台北市:五南圖書。
13.邱貴發 (1990)。電腦整合教學的概念與方法。台灣教育,479,1-8。
14.姚藺方 (2015)。臺南市國中小特教教師實施新修訂特殊教育課程綱要現況與問題之調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台南大學,台南市。
15.洪榮照 (2013)。智能障礙者之教育。載於王文科(主編),特殊教育導論,83-118。台北市:五南。
16.張國恩 (1999)。資訊融入各科教學之內涵與實施。資訊與教育雜誌,72,2-9。
17.教育部 (2009年9月16日)。98年度建置國民中小學「多功能e化專科教室」暨「多功能e化數位教室」實施方式說明。取自:http://plan3.erp.moe.gov.tw/plan_detail.php?sn=1andi=1
18.教育部 (2011)。特殊教育課程發展共同原則及課程大綱總綱及配套措施。取自:http://www.ntnu.edu.tw/spc/drlusp_1/home.html
19.教育部中部辦公室全球資訊網 (2009年11月16日)。教育部電子報。取自:http://www.hka.edu.tw/
20.莊維貞、許金發 (2008)。國小教師電腦自我效能與資訊融入教學效能相關研究。遠東學報,25(3),411-430。
21.許天威 (2006)。學習障礙者之教育。台北市:心理。
22.陳惠邦 (2006年12月)。互動白板導入教室教學的現況與思考。「全球華人資訊教育創新論壇」發表之論文,宜蘭縣。
23.陳順宇 (2002)。實驗設計,台北市:華泰文化。
24.陳麗如、陳盈君、連心瑜 (2011)。特殊教育需求滿足—從調整與修改思考課程學習的需求滿足。臺東特教,33,1-6。
25.鈕文英 (2002)。九年一貫課程與特殊教育課程理念和作法之比較。國小特殊教育,34,47-55。
26.鈕文英 (2008)。擁抱個別差異的新典範—融合教育。台北市:心理。
27.楊世瑩 (2006)。SPSS統計分析實務(第二版)。台北市:旗標出版社。
28.榮泰生 (2000)。網路行銷─電子商務實務篇,台北市:五南圖書。
29.網奕資訊 (2010年4月15日)。Haboard 互動式電子白板。取自:http://www.habook.com.tw/software/Detail_soft.asp?BookNo=IWB02andB_key=互動電子白板andCatalogID=1
30.潘怡臻 (2015)。探討電子書線上實作評量系統對電腦自我效能與使用意願關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
31.鄭惟厚 (2004)。你不能不懂統計常識,台北市:天下文化。
32.蕭英勵 (2007)。資訊教育新趨勢─以互動式電子白板融入教學為例。中等教育,58,118-130。
33.賴暄頤 (2010)。全方位課程設計之初探。特教論壇,8,43-55。
34.謝靜慧 (2001)。國民中小學教師之電腦焦慮、電腦自我效能、電腦因應策略與電腦素養之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
二、英文部分:
1.Adams, D., nelson, R. R., and Todd, P. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use and us-age of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16, 229-248.
2.Ajzen, I., and T. J. Madden (1985). Prediction of Goal-Directed Behavior : Attitudes, Intentions, and Perceived Behavioral Control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474.
3.Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psych. Rev, 84(2), 191-215.
4.Bandura, A. (1978). Reflection on self-efficacy. Adv. in Behavioral Res and therapy, 1(4), 237-269.
5.Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 27, 122-147.
6.Bandura, A. (1984). Recycling misconceptions of perceived self-efficacy. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8(3), 231-255.
7.Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs. NJ.
8.Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50, 248-287.
9.Bandura, A., and Cervone, D. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influence in cognitive motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 38, 92-113.
10.Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
11.Beauchamp, G. (2004). Teacher Use of the Interactive Whiteboard in Primary Schools: towards an effective transition framework. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 327-348.
12.BECTA (2004). Getting the Most from Your Interactive Whiteboard: A Guide for Secondary schools. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/orderingDownload/15091.pdf
13.Belmont, J. M. (1996). Long-term memory in mental retardation. In N. R. Ellis(Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation. 1, 219-255. New York: Academic press.
14.Benbasat, I., and Dexter, A. S. (1986). An investigation of the effectiveness of color and graphical information presentation under varying time constraints. MIS quarterly, 59-83.
15.Broderick, A., Mebta-Parekb, H., and Reid, D. K. (2005). Differentiating instruction for disabled students in inclusive classrooms. Theory into Practice, 44(3), 194-202.
16.Chau, P. Y. K. and Hu, P. J. (2002). Information technology acceptance by individual professional: A model comparison approach. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 699-719.
17.Clarke, C. (2004). Secretary of State for the Education and Skills. Paper presented at BETT Conference, Olympia, 7 January 2004. Retrieved from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/ictinschools/index.cfm.
18.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West S. G. and Aiken L. S. (2003). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences(3rd). Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
20.Compeau, D. R. and Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-Efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-192.
21.Conway, J.M. and Lance, C.E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research, Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 325-334.
22.Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model of empirically testing new End-User Information Systems: theory and results. Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
23.Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340
24.Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of computer technology. A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
25.Delcourt, M. A. B. and Kinzie, M. B. (1993). Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy. Journal of research and development in education, 27(1), 35-41.
26.Delcourt, M. A., and M. B. Kinzie (1993). Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy. Journal of research and Development, 27(1), 35-41.
27.Dhindsa, H. S., and Emran, S. H. (2006). Use of the interactive whiteboard in constructivist teaching for higher student achievement. Retrieved from http://www.teachade.com/resources/support/5035b2500c1cb.pdf
28.Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to theory and Research. Boston, MA: Addition-Wesley.
29.Gist, M. E. and Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of management review, 17(2), 183-211.
30.Glover, D. and Miller, D. (2001). A report to Blackburn and Colne EAZ on new technologies. (Keele, Department of Education, Keele University).
31.Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., and Door, V. (2005). Leadership implications of using interactive whiteboards-linking technology and pedagogy in the management of change. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(5), 27-30.
32.Goodison, T. A. (2002). Learning with ICT at primary level: pupils perceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 282-295.
33.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E. Tatham, R. L, and Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
34.Hartwick, J., and Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40(4), 440-564. doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.4.440
35.Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J. and Arrfelt M. (2007). Strategic Supply Chain Management: Improving Performance through a Culture of Competitiveness and Knowledge Development. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 1035-1052.
36.Igbaria, M., and Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23(6), 587-605.
37.Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A Second Generation Little Jiffy. Psychimetrika, 35(4), 401-404.
38.Lee, E. J. and Jang, J. W. (2010). Profiling good Samaritans in online knowledge forums: Effects of affiliative tendency, self-esteem, and public individuation on knowledge sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1336-1344.
39.Lee, Y. C., (2006). An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an E-learning system. Online Information Review, 30(5), 517-541.
40.Levine, T. (1997). Commitment to learning: effects of computer experience, confidence and attitudes. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 16(1), 83-105.
41.Levine, T. (1997). Commitment to learning: Effects of computer experience. Confidence and attitudes. Journal of research on computing in education, 16(1), 83-105.
42.Mager, R. F. (1992). No self-efficacy, no performance. Training, 32-36.
43.Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting User Intention: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
44.Morgan, A. E., and Kennewell, S. E. (2006). Initial teacher education students'views on play as a medium for learning—a divergence of personal philosophy and practice. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15(3), 307-320.
45.Notani, A. S. (1998). Moderators of Perceived Behavioral Control’s Predictiveness in the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(3), 247-271.
46.Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. (2nd), NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
47.Ong, C. S., and Lai, J. Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816-829.
48.Pai, F.Y. and Huang, K.I. (2011). Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of healthcare information systems, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(4), 650-660.
49.Roberts, L. M. and Wortzel, L. H. (1979). New Life Style Determinants of Women’s Food Shopping Behavior. Journal of Marketing, 43(3), 28-29.
50.Saks, A. M. (1995). Longitudinal field investigation of the moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy on the relationship between training and newcomer adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 211-225.
51.Santhanam, R., Sasidharan, S., and Webster, J. (2008). Using self-regulatory learning to enhance e-learning-based information technology training. Information Systems Re-search, 19(1), 26-47.
52.Silver, W. S. (1995). Responses to successful and unsuccessful performance: the moderating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between performance and attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(3), 286-299.
53.Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., and Milleer, J. (2005). Interactive Whiteboard: Boon or bandwagon A Critical Review of the Literature. Journal 01 Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101.
54.Studenmund, A. H. (2010). Using Econometrics: A Practical Guide(6th). NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
55.Taylor, S., and Todd, P. (1995). An Integrated Model of Waste Management Behavior: A Test of Household Recycling and Composting Intentions. Environment and Behavior, 27, 603-30.
56.Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, W., and Tam, K. Y. (2002). Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: what are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 215-242.
57.Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
58.Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies, Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
59.Venkatesh, V., Morris, G. B., and Davis, F. D. (2002). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關點閱論文
 
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔