臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究主要是探討固定規模報酬之二階段系統資料包絡分析法，考慮第一階段為一個投入項產生一中間項，第二階段為一個中間項產生一個產出項，以一個簡單的例子說明之，以系統觀點可得系統效率值及第一階段效率值，第二階段效率值，與獨立觀點所得效率值比較可得系統效率值較大，而階段效率值相同。

This study analyzes the constant returns to scale two-stage system data envelopment analysis. We consider the the simple two-stage system, where the first division consumes the single exogenous input to produce the intermediate product, which in turn is consumed by the second division to produce the final output. An example is presented to calculate the system efficiencies and the first stage efficiencies and second stage efficiencies. The efficiencies are compared with the Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes data envelopment analysis model from the independence viewpoint.

目 錄
中 文 摘 要 ⅰ
英文摘要 ⅱ
誌 謝 ⅳ
目 錄 ⅴ
表 目 錄 ⅶ
圖 目 錄 ⅸ
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 論文架構 1

第二章 文獻探討 1
2.1 績效評估 4
2.2 網路資料包絡法 5

第三章 研究方法 1
3.1 CCR模型 1
3.2 BCC模型 17

第四章 二階段系統 1
4.1 系統效率值 20
4.2 階段效率值 33

第五章 結論 1

參考文獻 1

[1]高強、黃旭男、Toshiyuki Sueyoshi，2011，管理績效評估：資料包絡分析法，華泰文化事業股份有限公司出版，頁55。
[2]Adam Smith, 1776, The Wealth Of Nations , Random House, Inc.
[3]Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. , 1984, “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Management Science, Vol. 30, pp.1078-1092.
[4]Charnes, A, Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E., 1978, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units”, European Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 2, pp.429-444.
[5]Farrell, M.J., 1957, “The Measurement of Productive Effiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Socity, Series A, Generd, Vol. 120, No. 3, pp.253-281.
[6]Shephard, R. W., 1970, Theory of Cost and Production Functions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
[7]Cao, X. & Yang, F. (2011). Measuring the performance of Internet companies using a two-stage data envelopment analysis model. Enterprise Information Systems, 5, 207-217.
[8]Charnes, A. & Cooper, W.W. (1962). Programming with linear fractionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9, 181-186.
[9]Chen, C., Zhu, J., Yu, J.Y., & Noori, H. (2012). A new methodology for evaluating sustainable product design performance with two-stage network data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 221, 348-359.
[10]Chen, Y. & Zhu, J. (2004). Measuring information technology’s indirect impact on firm performance. Information Technology and Management, 5, 9-22.
[11]Chiou, Y.C. & Lan, L.W., Yen, B.T.H. (2010). A joint measurement of efficiency and effectiveness for non-storable commodities: Integrated data envelopment analysis approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 201, 477-489.
[12]Cron, W. & Sobol, M. (1983). The relationship between computerization and performance: A strategy for maximizing economic benefits of computerization. Information and Management, 6, 171-181.
[13]Ho, C.T.B. & Oh, K.B. (2008). Measuring online stockbroking performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108, 988-1004.
[14]Holod, D., Lewis, H.F. (2011). Resolving the deposit dilemma: A new DEA bank efficiency model. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 2801-2810.
[15]Kao, C. & Hwang, S.N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185, 418-429.
[16]Kao, C. & Hwang, S.N. (2011). Decomposition of technical and scale efficiencies in two-stage production systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 211, 515-519.
[17]Kao, C. & Hwang, S.N. (2014). Multi-period efficiency and Malmquist productivity index in two-stage production systems. European Journal of Operational Research 232, 512-521.
[18]Kao, C. & Liu, S.T. (2011). Efficiencies of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 176, 20-35.
[19]Lewis, H.F., Mallikarjun, S., Sexton, T.R. (2013). Unoriented two-stage DEA: The case of the oscillating intermediate products. European Journal of Operational Research, 229, 529-539.
[20]Lim, S. & Zhu, J. (2013). Integrated data envelopment analysis: Global vs. local optimum. European Journal of Operational Research, 229, 276-278.
[21]Liu, S.T. (2011). A note on efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 212, 606-608.
[22]Liu, S.T. & Wang, R.T. (2009). Efficiency measures of PCB manufacturing firms using relational two-stage data envelopment analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 4935- 4939.
[23]Lu, W.C. (2009). The evolution of R&D efficiency and marketability: Evidence from Taiwan's ICdesign,Industry. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 17, 1-26.
[24]Lu, W.M., Wang, W.K., Hung, S.W., & Lu, E.T. (2012). The effects of corporate governance on airline performance: Production and marketing efficiency perspectives. Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review 48, 529-544.
[25]Rho, S. & An, J. (2007). Evaluating the efficiency of a two-stage production process using data envelopment analysis. International Transactions in Operational Research, 14, 395-410.
[26]Seiford, L.M. & Zhu, J., (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management Science 45, 1270-1288.
[27]Tone, K. & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 243-252.
[28]Tsai, H.Y. & Wang, A.S. (2010). The efficiency analysis of life insurance company in Taiwan: Two-stage data envelopment analysis. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 38, 283-290.
[29]Wang, C.H., Gopal, S., & Zionts (1997). Use of data envelopment analysis in assessing information technology impact on firm performance. Annals of Operations Research, 73, 191-213.
[30]Wang, K., Huang, W., & Wu, J., (2014). Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA. Omega, 44, 5-20.
[31]Yang, C. & Liu, H.M. (2012). Managerial efficiency in Taiwan bank branches: A network DEA. Economic Modelling, 29, 450-461.
[32]Yang, F., Wu, D., Liang, L., Bi, G., & Wu, D.D. (2011). Supply chain DEA: Production possibility set and performance evaluation model. Annals of Operations Research, 185, 195-211.