臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究將以新古典成長理論的收斂假說為理論基礎，結合 Battese and Rao(2002) 的 Meta-frontier（共同邊界），重新架構 Maniadakis and Thanassoulis (2004) 的 CM 分解法，形成Meta- CM生產力缺口指數（Meta-CM-Productivity Gap index，Meta-CM-PG）分解，以補捉美國、中國、台灣三國銀行業的技術收斂效果。實證結果發現，中國銀行業Meta- CM生產力缺口最小，其次是美國銀行業，最後是台灣銀行業。而生產力收斂效果，以美國銀行業最佳，平均每年以4.3%速度向共同成本邊界收斂。技術效率收斂效果，以台灣銀行業表現最佳，平均每年以7.2%速度向共同成本邊界收斂。而技術變動收斂效果，美中台銀行業均呈退步狀態，而中國退步幅度最小。

Based on the convergence hypothesis in Neoclassical Growth theory, this study applied the concept of Meta-frontier developed by Battese and Rao(2002).The method of the decomposition of cost Malmquist productivity index developed by Maniadakis and Thanassoulis (2004) is reconstructed to establish the Meta-CM-Productivity Gap Index (Meta-CM-PG). The main purpose is to capture the technical convergence effect of the banking industry in the US, China and Taiwan. The empirical results show that the banks in China have the smallest meta-frontier cost gap. The better productivity convergence effect exists in the US banks, and converge on Meta cost frontier 4.3 percent each year. However, the better technical convergence effect exists in the Taiwan’s banks, and converge on Meta cost frontier 7.2 percent each year. Technical convergence effect is decreased in the banking industry in the US, China and Taiwan.

中文摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌謝 III
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究流程 5
第二章 文獻回顧 6
第一節 評估銀行業經營績效方面相關文獻： 6
第二節 結合共同邊界對不同群組銀行業的績效評估方面相關文獻： 9
第三章 研究方法 13
第一節 MALMQUIST PRODUCTIVE GAP指數之建構 13
第二節 COST MALMQUIST PRODUCTIVE GAP指數之建構 15
第三節 MPG指數和CMPG指數的計算 18
第四章 實證結果與分析 20
第一節 資料來源與變數選取 20
第二節 美中台銀行業成本效率值 23
第三節 META-CM生產力缺口指數及其分解 27
第五章 結論與建議 30
第一節 結論 30
第二節 建議 32
參考文獻 33

1.陳富強、方顯光（2007），兩岸銀行業經營績效與生產力之探討，華人前瞻研究，7(1)，15 - 30。

2.黃台心、陳盈秀、陳珮欣 （2007），台灣地區本國銀行業長期效率的動態分析，經濟論文叢刊，35(1)，83 - 114。

3.黃台心、姜麗智、陳冠臻、邱柏豪（2007），應用共同邊界成本函數探討西歐十六國銀行業技術效率和技術缺口比率，管理評論，29(3)，25 - 43。

4.黃台心、張寶光、邱郁芳（2009） 應用共同成本函數探討東亞六國銀行業之生產效率，經濟論文，37(1)，61 - 100。

5.黃台心、張興華、蔡昀恬（2007），東亞六國商業銀行風險偏好與技術效率之探討，台灣金融財務季刊，13(2)，123 - 154。

6.李文福、王媛慧、洪琬婷 （2009），技術變動、產出組合與台灣銀行產業生產力變動，經濟論文叢刊，37(4)，495 - 524。

7.李揚、郭睿淇、李威龍、林孟熙（2009），中國與印度銀行產業之群體績效評估，應用經濟論叢，87(s)，87 - 116。

8.林灼榮、張國雄、徐啟升、邱敬貿 (2007)，金融自由化對臺灣十大行庫營運績效的影響，經濟研究，43，1-33。

9.王綉雯 (2010)，制度變遷與能動性:以台灣金融體制改革為例，第二屆發展研究年會發表論文，台北，台灣。

10.許鈺珮、張錫介 (2005) ，金融控股公司法實施台灣銀行業經營效率影響的分析，金融風險管理季刊，1，33-56。

11.楊永列 (2010)，台灣地區本國銀行成本成長率的估計，經濟與管理論叢，6(1)，79-111。

12.楊永列 、黃鏡如 (2009)，台灣地區本國銀行生產面與成本面Malmquist生產力指數的估計，經濟論文叢刊，37(4)，353-378。

13.詹維玲、劉景中 （2006）, 金融自由化後台灣銀行的效率及生產力, 經濟論文, 34(2)，251 – 300。

14.張子溥、周雨田、孫蕾（2006）, 應用異質性隨機邊界模型探究波動性與效率之研究：以兩岸銀行爲例, 應用經濟論叢, 87 (S)，117 - 144。

15.鄭政秉、梁連文、許智偉（2010）, 差異化管理對台灣與日本銀行業成本效率之影響, 應用經濟論叢, 87(s)，145 - 189。

16.Battese, George E.; Rao, D. S. Prasada. (2002), “Technology Gap, Efficiency, and a Stochastic Metafrontier Function”, International Journal of Business and Economics, 2, 87-93.

17.Berger, A. N., Demsetz, R. S., and Strahan, P. E. (1999), “The consolidation of the financial services industry: Causes, consequences and implications for the future”, Journal of Banking and Finance 23: 135-194.

18.Brown, R., Brown, R., and O’Connor, I. (1999), “Efficiency, bond of association and exit patterns in credit unions: Australian evidence”, Annals of Public Cooperative Economics, 70 (1), 5-23.

19.Cavallo, L. and Rossi, S.P.S. (2002), “Do environmental variables affect the performance and technical efficiency of the European banking systems? A parametric analysis using the stochastic frontier approach”, European Journal of Finance, 8, 123-146.

20.Caves, Douglas W.; Christensen, Laurits R.; Diewert, W. Erwin.(1982), “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity”, Econometrica, 6, 1393-1414.

21.Chen, B.S., and Chen, R.Y. (2002), “The merger and acquisitions of Taiwan’s domestic banking industry: Impacts on efficiency and market power”, paper presented at the Asia Conference on Efficiency and Productivity growth, Taipei, Taiwan.

22.Chen, Ku-Hsieh; Yang, Hao-Yen(2011), “A Cross-Country Comparison of Productivity Growth Using the Generalised Metafrontier Malmquist Productivity Index: With Application to Banking Industries in Taiwan and China”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 35, 197-212.

23.Cummins, J.D., and Xie, X. (2008), “Mergers and acquisitions in the US property-liability insurance industry: Productivity and efficiency effects”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 30-55.

24.Färe, R., (1988), Fundamentals of Production Theory (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical System 311), Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

25.Färe, R., Grosskopk, S., and Lovell, C. (1994), Production Frontiers, Cambridge University Press, London.

26.Farrell, M. J., (1957), “The measurement of productive efficiency,” Journal of the Royal statistical Society. Series A (General), 120, 253-290.

27.Fiordelisi, F., and Molyneux, P. (2010), “Total factor productivity and shareholder returns in banking”, Omega, 38, 241-253.

28.Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. A. and Yaisawarng, S. (1999), “The impact of mergers on credit unions service provision”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 23, 367-386.

29.Goddard, J., Molyneux, P. and Wilson, J. (2001), European Banking: Efficiency, Technology and Growth, Chichester, UK, John Wiley and Sons.

30.Group of Ten. (2001), Report on consolidation in the financial sector. Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland.

31.Hadad, Muliaman D.; Hall, Maximilian J. B.; Kenjegalieva, Karligash A.; Santoso, Wimboh; Simper, Richard. (2011), “Banking Efficiency and Stock Market Performance: An Analysis of Listed Indonesian Banks”, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 37, 1-20.

32.Hahn, F. R. (2007), “Domestic mergers in the Austrian banking sector: a
performance analysis”, Applied Financial Economics, 17, 185-196.

33.Havrylchyk, O. (2004), “Consolidation of the Polish banking sector: consequences for the banking institutions and the public”, Economic System, 28, 125-140.

34.Haynes, M., and Thompson, S. (1999), “The productivity effects of bank mergers: Evidence from the UK building societies”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 23, 825-846.

35.Huang, Mei-Ying; Fu, Tsu-Tan. (1999), “An Examination of the Cost Efficiency of Banks in Taiwan and China Using the Metafrontier Cost Function”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 40, 387-406.

36.Huang, Tai-Hsin; Chiang, Dien-Lin; Tsai, Chao-Min. (2015), “Applying the New Metafrontier Directional Distance Function to Compare Banking Efficiencies in Central and Eastern European Countries”, Economic Modellin, 44, 188-99.

37.Juo, Jia-Ching; Lin, Yu-Hui; Chen, Tsai-Chia. (2015), “Productivity Change of Taiwanese Farmers' Credit Unions: A Nonparametric Metafrontier Malmquist-Luenberger Productivity Indicator”, Central European Journal of Operations Research, 23, 125-47.

38.Koetter, M. (2008), “An assessment of bank merger success in Germany”, German Economic Review, 9, 232-264.

39.Kontolaimou, Alexandra; Tsekouras, Kostas (2010), “Are Cooperatives the Weakest Link in European Banking? A Non-parametric Metafrontier Approach”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 8, 1946-57.

40.Kontolaimou, Alexandra; Kounetas, Konstantinos; Mourtos, Ioannis; Tsekouras, Kostas (2012), “Technology Gaps in European Banking: Put the Blame on Inputs or Outputs?”, Economic Modelling, 5, 1798-1808.

41.Kontolaimou, Alexandra; Kounetas, Konstantinos; Mourtos, Ioannis; Tsekouras, Kostas (2012), “Technology Gaps in European Banking: Put the Blame on Inputs or Outputs?”, Economic Modelling, 5, 1798-1808.

42.Lee, Boon L., Worthington, Andrew C., and Leong, Wai Ho（2010）, “Malmquist Indices of Pre- and Post-deregulation Productivity, Efficiency and Technological Change in the Singaporean Banking Sector”, Singapore Economic Review, 4, 599-618.

43.Lozano-Vivas, Ana; Pastor, Jesus T.; Pastor, Jose M. (2002), “An Efficiency Comparison of European Banking Systems Operating under Different Environmental Conditions”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1, 59-77.

44.Maniadakis, N., and Thanassoulis, E. (2004), “A cost Malmquist productivity index,” European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 396-409.

45.Mei-Ying Huang, Jia-Ching Juo, Tsu-tan Fu. (2015), “Metafrontier cost Malmquist productivity index: an application to Taiwanese and Chinese commercial banks,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 44, 321-335.

46.Mohsen Afsharian and Heinz Ahn. (2015), “The overall Malmquist index: a new approach for measuring productivity changes over time,” Annals of Operations Research, 226, 1-27.

47.Mylonidis, N., and Kelnikola, I. (2005), “Merging activity in the Greek banking system: A financial accounting perspective”, Southern Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, 1, 121-144.

48.Ralston, D., Wright, A., and Garden, K. (2001), “Can mergers ensure the survival of credit unions in the third millennium?” Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, 2277-2304.

49.Ray, S., and Desli, E. (1997), “Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries: comment”, American Economic Review, 87, 1033-1039.

50.Resti, A. (1998), “Regulation can foster mergers; can mergers foster efficiency? The Italian case,” Journal of Economics and Business, 50, 157-169.

51.Silva Portela, Maria Conceicao A.; Thanassoulis, Emmanuel. (2006), “Malmquist Indexes Using a Geometric Distance Function (GDF): Application to a Sample of Portuguese Bank Branches”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1-2, 25-41.

52.Sherman, H. D., and Rupert, T. J. (2006), “Do bank mergers have hidden or foregone value? Realized and unrealized operating synergies in one bank merger,” European Journal of Operational Research, 168, 253-268.

53.Siriopoulos, C., and Tziogkidis, P. (2010), “How do Greek banking institutions react after significant events? A DEA approach”, Omega, 38, 294-308.

54.Vennet, R. V. (1996), “The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the efficiency and profitability of EC credit institutions”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 20, 1531-1558.