跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(98.80.143.34) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/10 15:48
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:尹宏源
研究生(外文):Hong-yuan Yin
論文名稱:大陸大學生人格特質與組織文化偏好之研究
論文名稱(外文):The Study of Undergraduates' Personality Traits and Organizational Culture Preferences in Mainland China
指導教授:鄭晉昌鄭晉昌引用關係
指導教授(外文):Jihn-Chang Jehng
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中央大學
系所名稱:人力資源管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:61
中文關鍵詞:組織文化價值觀五大人格特質個人與組織適配
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:404
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:163
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
近年來,隨著大陸大學畢業生人數的逐年增加,企業在招募應屆畢業生時有了更廣泛的選擇,但越來越多的企業發現招募來的大學畢業生並不是與組織文化相契合的人才。如何使企業在招募時能吸引與企業需求相契合的應徵者,成為了人力資源部門的重要任務。同樣對於求職者而言,如何尋得與個人特質相匹配的企業也會對未來的職涯發展起到重要的影響。
本研究以問卷調查的方式,以762位大陸大三、大四及碩士二年級、三年級等即將求職之職場新鮮人為研究對象,分析五大人格特質之求職者的組織文化價值觀偏好。
研究結果發現,五大人格特質中「外向性」、「宜人性」與「開放性」對組織文化價值觀之「外部適應價值觀」有顯著正向影響;五大人格特質中「宜人性」與「開放性」對組織文化價值觀之「內部整合價值觀」有顯著正向影響。

In these past few years, the increasing number of graduated students in China had given a wider range of options for enterprise to choose their best candidates out from this large pool of workforce. But it sprouts out some obstacle that many enterprise facing today, they cannot find their best match of college graduated towards their organizational culture. It is up to the human resource department becoming a skillful recruiter to tackle this problem we face today; one main task is to appeal towards a best candidate along finding the best match with the enterprises’ demand. As for applicants, sorting out all these enterprise and finding where they belong in the workforce can create an important impact towards the company itself in the future.
This research under the form of questionnaire survey, it collects 762 mainland university seniors as participants to analyze the big-five personality of the applicants’ preference organizational culture values.
From the result of this research, it proves that big-five personality “extraversion, agreeableness, and openness to experience” are key factors to “external adaptation values” in values in organizational culture; big-five personality “agreeableness, and openness to experience” are key factors to “internal integration values” in values in organizational culture.

目錄
第一章 緒論....................................................................................1
第一節 研究動機.............................................................................1
第二節 研究目的.............................................................................3
第二章 文獻探討.............................................................................4
第一節 組織文化.............................................................................4
第二節 人格特質.............................................................................13
第三節 人格特質與組織文化偏好之研究 19
第三章 研究方法.............................................................................21
第一節 研究架構與假設 21
第二節 研究對象.............................................................................23
第三節 研究工具.............................................................................24
第四節 資料分析與統計方法...........................................................27
第四章 研究結果.............................................................................28
第一節 樣本回收與敘述性統計分析.................................................28
第二節 因素分析.............................................................................29
第三節 信度分析.............................................................................34
第四節 相關分析.............................................................................35
第五節 迴歸分析.............................................................................36
第五章 研究結論與建議..................................................................39
第一節 研究結論.............................................................................39
第二節 對實務界的建議...................................................................42
第三節 研究限制及後續研究建議.....................................................43
参考文献.........................................................................................44
附錄一 人格特质与组织文化倾向问卷..............................................50


圖目錄
圖3-1研究架構圖............................................................................21


表目錄
表3-1 組織文化價值觀量表題項與對應構面....................................26
表4-1 樣本特性表...........................................................................28
表4-2-1 外向性構面因素分析表......................................................29
表4-2-2 宜人性構面因素分析表......................................................30
表4-2-3 責任心構面因素分析表......................................................30
表4-2-4 神經質構面因素分析表......................................................31
表4-2-5 開放性構面因素分析表......................................................31
表4-2-6 外部適應價值構面因素分析表...........................................32
表4-2-7 內部整合價值構面因素分析表...........................................32
表4-3 信度分析表...........................................................................34
表4-4 相關分析表...........................................................................35
表4-5-1 五大人格特質與外部適應價值之迴歸分析結果..................36
表4-5-2 五大人格特質與內部整合價值之迴歸分析結果..................37
表5-1 研究假設驗證結果................................................................39
一、中文文獻
1. 教育部:2015全國高校畢業生人數將達749萬。2014年12月5日,http://career.eol.cn/kuai_xun_4343/20141205/t20141205_1209689.shtml
2. 王方華,現代企業管理,復旦大學出版社,上海,2001。
3. 王吉鵬,李明,企業文化診斷評估理論與實務,中國發展出版社,北京,2005。
4. 朱小佳,「大五人格量表(BFI)的初步修訂」,揚州大學,碩士論文,2012。
5. 郭永玉,人格心理學導論,武漢大學出版社,武漢,2007。
6. 孫宇,「中外合資企業領導者人格特質、領導行為與企業文化特徵關係研究」,東北財經大學,博士论文,2012。
7. 晁粉芳,「大學生心理韌性與人格、社會支持的關係」,東北師範大學,碩士論文,2010。
8. 張德,企業文化建設,清華大學出版社,北京,2009。
9. 馮艷丹,張利燕,「大學生人格特質與職業興趣的關係研究」,中國健康心理學雜誌,15(2),126-129頁,2007。
10. 黃希庭,人格心理學,浙江教育出版社,杭州,1998。
11. 黃希庭,人格手冊:理論與研究,第二版,華東師範大學出版社,上海,2003。
12. 楊麗恒,李佳,「大學生職業傾向與大五人格特質的關係研究」,教育理論與實踐,31(10),34-36頁,2011。
13. 鄭伯壎,「組織文化價值觀的數量衡鑑」,中華心理學刊,第三十二期,31-49頁,1990。
14. 鄭伯壎,「組織價值觀與組織承諾、組織公民行為、工作績效的關係:不同加權模式、距模式之比較」,中華心理學刊,35(1),43-58頁,1993。
15. 趙俊峰,「從職業錨看大學畢業生的職業生涯規劃」,中國大學生就業,08期,10-12頁,2005。
16. 劉明明,「企業戰略變革的企業文化要素影響研究」,大連理工大學,博士論文,2012。
17. 錢國倫,「工作與組織特性與五大人格特質之交互作用對組織人才吸引力的影響」,台灣師範大學,碩士論文,2011。
18. 魏傑,企業文化塑造,中國發展出版社,北京,2002。
19. 羅永立,牛廣星,「以績效為導向的企業文化創新」,中國人力資源開發,(2),26-29頁,2005。
20. 羅長海,企業文化學,中國人民大學出版社,北京,1999。
21. Morita A., Reingold E.M. & Shimomura, M. (1986). Made in Japan-Akio Morita and Sony. 天下譯(1987)。《新力與我》。台北:經濟與生活出版公司。
22. Ouchi William, (1981). Theory Z:How American business can meet the Japanese challenge.黃明堅譯(1981)。《Z理論:美國企業如何迎接日本的挑戰》。台北:長河出版公司。
23. Rogers, E. M. & Larsen, J. K. (1984). Silcon Valley fever. 朱家一,陳怡蓁譯(1987)。《矽谷熱》。台北:經濟與生活出版公司。


二、英文文獻
1. Aiman Smith L., Bauer T. N., & Cable D. M., “Are you attracted? Do you intend to pursue? A recruiting policy-capturing study”, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol 16(2), pp. 219-237, 2001.
2. Allport Gordon (Eds.), Attitudes in A Handbook of Social Psychology, MA: Clark University Press, Worchester, 1937.
3. Amy L. Kristof Brown, & Jon Billsberry (Eds.), Organizational Fit: Key Issues and New Directions, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, 2013.
4. Auster Ellen, & Freeman R., “Values and poetic organizations: Beyond value fit toward values through conversation”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 113(1), pp. 39-49, 2013.
5. Barrick M. R., & Mount M. K., “The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis”, Personnel psychology, Vol. 44(1), pp. 1-26, 1991.
6. Barrick M. R., Stewart G. L., & Piotrowski M., “Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87(1), pp. 43-51, 2002.
7. Bipp T., “What do People Want from their Jobs? The Big Five, core self-evaluations and work motivation”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 18(1), pp. 28-39, 2010.
8. Borman W. C., Penner L. A., Allen T. D. et al., “Personality predictors of citizenship performance”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 9(1-2), pp. 52-69, 2001.
9. Costa P.T., & McCrae R. R. (Eds.), NEO-PIR: Professional manual, FL.: Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, 1992.
10. Costa P.T., Terracciano A., & McCrae R. R., “Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 81(2), pp. 322-331, 2001.
11. De Jong R. D., Van der Velde M. E. G., & Jansen P. G. W., “Openness to experience and growth need strength as moderators between job characteristics and satisfaction”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 9(3), pp. 350-356, 2001.
12. Deal Terrence E, & Kennedy Allan A., Corporate cultures: the rites and rituals of corporate life, Mass: Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1982.
13. Denison Daniel R, & Mishra Aneil K., “Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness”, Organization Science, Vol. 6(2), pp. 204-223, 1995.
14. Diener E., Larsen R.J., & Emmons R.A., “Person X situation interactions: choice of situations and congruence response models”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 47(3), pp. 80-92, 1984.
15. Emmons R. A., Diener E., & Larsen R. J., “Choice and avoidance of everyday situations and affect congruence: Two models of reciprocal interactionism”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51(4), pp. 815-826, 1986.
16. Furnham A., Petrides K. V., Tsaousis I. et al., “A cross-cultural investigation into the relationships between personality traits and work values”, The Journal of Psychology, Vol. 139(1), pp. 5-32, 2005.
17. Gellatly I. R., “Conscientiousness and task performance: Test of a cognitive process model”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 81(5), pp. 474-482, 1996.
18. Goldberg L.R., “Analyses of Digman’s child-personality data: Derivation of Big-Five factor scores from each of six samples”, Journal of Personality, Vol. 69(5), pp. 709-743, 2001.
19. Hofstede Geert, Cultures and organizations: software of the mind, McGraw-Hill, London, 1991.
20. Hogan J., & Holland B., “Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88(1), pp. 100-112, 2003.
21. Hough LM, Eaton NK, Dunnette MD, et al., “Criterion related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities”, Joumal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 75(5), pp. 581-595, 1990.
22. John O. P., Donahue E. M., & Kentle R. L., “The big five intentory-versions 4a and 5b”, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research, Berkeley, 1991.
23. John O. P., Naumann L. P., & Soto C. J., “Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues”, In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (114-158), Guilford Press, New York, 2008.
24. John P. Kotter, & James L. Heskett, Corporate culture and performance, Maxwell Macmillan International, New York, 1992.
25. Kausel Edgar E., & Slaughter Jerel E., “Narrow personality traits and organizational attraction: Evidence for the complementary hypothesis”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 114(1), pp.3-14, 2011.
26. Kristorf-Brown A L, Jansen K J, & Colbert A E., “A policy-capturing Study of the simultaneous effects of fit with jobs, groups, and organizations”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87 (5), pp. 985-993, 2002.
27. McCrae RR & Costa PT Jr., “An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications”, Joural of Personality, Vol. 60(2), pp. 175-215, 1992.
28. O’Reilly C. A, Chatman J, & Caldwell J., “People and Organizational Culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34(3), pp. 487-516, 1991.
29. Peng Shuyang, Pandey Sheela, & Pandey Sanjay K., “Is there a nonprofit advantage? Examining the impact of institutional context on individual-organizational value congruence”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 75(4), pp. 585-596, 2015.
30. Pervin L. A., Personality: Theory and Research, Wiley, New York, 1993.
31. Pervin L. A., “Persons, situations, interactions: the history of a controversy and a discussion of theoretical models”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14(3), pp. 350-360, 1989.
32. Rice Gillian, “Individual values, Organizational Context, and self-perceptions of employee creativity: Evidence from Egyptian organizations”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59(2), pp.233-241, 2006.
33. Salgado JF., “The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European community”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82(1), pp. 30-43, 1997.
34. Schein E. H., Organizational culture and leadership, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1985.
35. Schneider B., “The People Make the Place”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 40(3), pp. 437-453, 1987.
36. Schneider B., Goldstein H. W., & Smith D. B., “The ASA framework: An update”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 48(4), pp. 747-773, 1995.
37. Spender J. C., “Organizational knowledge, collective practice and Penrose rents”, International Business Review, Vol. 3(4), pp. 353-367, 1994.
38. Tett RP, Jackson DN, Rothstein M, et al., “Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 44(4), pp. 703-742, 1991.
39. Thomas J. Peter & Robert H. Waterman, In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies, Harper & Row, New York, 1982.
40. Turban D. B., Campion J. E., & Eyring A. R., “Factors related to job acceptance decisions of college recuits”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 47(2), pp. 193-213, 1995.
41. Turban D. B., & Keon T. L., “Organization attractiveness: An interactionist perspective”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 78(2), pp. 184-193, 1993.
42. Wiggins J. S., & Trapnell P. D., “A dyadic-interactional perspective on the Five-Factor model” In J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), The Five-Factor model of personality. Theoretical perspectives (pp. 88-162), Guilford, New York, 1996.
43. Zalman Gerald, & Bonoma Thomas V., “Organizational buying behavior: Hypotheses and directions”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 6(1), pp. 53-60, 1977.
44. Zimbardo G. P., Psychology and Life, Tenth Edition, Scott, Foresman and Company, USA, 1979.
45. Zuckerman M., Kuhlman D. M., Joireman J., Teta P., & Kraft, M., “A comparison of three structural models for personality: the big three, the big five, and the alternative five”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 65(4), pp. 757-768, 1993.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top