跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.83) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/06 13:00
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林冠瑋
研究生(外文):Kuan-wei Lin
論文名稱:融入英語溝通策略教學對高中生的口語表現之成效
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Integrating Communication Strategies Instruction into EFL Senior High Speaking Class
指導教授:黃聖慧黃聖慧引用關係
指導教授(外文):Huang, Sheng-hui
口試委員:張善貿王清煌
口試委員(外文):Shan-mao ChangChing-huang Wang
口試日期:104-6-15
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:英語學系
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:英文
論文頁數:102
中文關鍵詞:口語溝通策略溝通策略教學口說課程
外文關鍵詞:Communication strategiescommunication strategies instructionspeaking class
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:357
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:18
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究旨在探討融入英語溝通策略教學對高中生英語口語表現之成效。溝通策略教學一直是相當爭議性的議題,雖然部分先前研究支持英語溝通策略教學,然而教學現場的實證研究卻較少見到。因此,本研究採行量性與質性並用之方法,探討英語溝通策略教學對高中生英語口語表現之效益。研究對象來自於中台灣某公立高中學生,分為實驗組與對照組兩組,實驗組除了接受口語課程外,八個口語溝通策略也被融入口語課程教學中,而對照組僅接受口語課程並沒有接受口語溝通策略教學。
本研究為期18週並且蒐集以下三種資料:學生前後測口語表現分數、英語溝通策略使用問卷、學生學習日誌。
研究結果顯示(1) 實驗組在後測的口語表現上有顯著的進步。(2) 實驗組的口語溝通策略使用頻率也有提升。(3) 從學習日誌中顯示學生對口語溝通策略教學持有正向的態度。根據本研究的結果,研究者提供一些教學應用上之建議、研究限制、與可供日後相關研究參考的建議。

It has been a controversial issue whether communication strategies (CSs) instruction could improve learners’ foreign language speaking performance. Although previous studies favored the teaching of communication strategies, few empirical studies were conducted regarding the effects of CSs instruction in foreign language classrooms. This study aims to gauge the effects of integrating CSs instruction into English as a foreign language senior high class. Eight target communication strategies proposed by Lam (2005) were implemented in the instruction. Two classes from a public senior high school in central Taiwan participated in this study. One group received speaking class with CSs instruction while the other received speaking class without CSs instruction. The study lasted for 18 weeks. Three types of data were collected during the process of the study: the scores of participants’ speaking performance, the results of self-report communication strategy questionnaire, and participants’ learning diaries.
The findings reveal that (1) The experimental group significantly improved their speaking performance in the post-test; (2) The experimental group increased their frequency of CSs use; (3) Positive perceptions regarding the CSs instruction were found in the excerpts of learning diaries.

Finally, pedagogical implications, limitations of the study, and suggestions for further research were also reported.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION……………………………………….1
Background and Rationale of the Study………………………………………….1
Purposes of the Study…………………………………………………………….6
Research Questions………………………………………………………………6
Operational Definitions of Terms……………………………………...…….......7
Significance of the Study……………………………………………...………....8

CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW…………………………………9
An Overview of Language Learning Strategies……………………………….....9
An Overview of Learning Strategies Training……………………………….…11
An Overview on Communication Strategies……………………………………12
Types of Perspectives in Communication Strategies…………..…….……14
Interactional Perspective……………………………………………..14
Psycholinguistic Perspective………………………………………....15
Psychological Perspective……………………………………………15
The Development of Communication Strategies……………………….....16
Taxonomy of Communication Strategies…………….….……..….....16
Studies on Effects of Communication Strategies Instruction..……...…..…26
Studies on Communication Strategies in Taiwan………………………….28
Use of Communication Strategies………………………...………….28
Effects of Communication Strategies Instructions……………….…..30
The Definition of Communication Strategies for the Present Study……………30
CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY………….……………………...33
Participants……………………………………………………………………...33
Communication Strategies Teaching Procedures……………………………….34
Instruments…..………………………………………………………………….36
Quantitative Methods for Data Collection
The Oral Communication Tasks……………………………………...37
The Oral Communication Assessment Scale for EFL Students……...37
The Oral Communication Strategies Questionnaire…………………38
Textbook and Strategy Guided Sheet………………………………...39
Qualitative Method for Data Collection
Students’ Learning Diaries…………………………………………...40
The Lesson Plan………………………………………………………………...42
The Lesson Plan for Experimental Group…………………………………42
The Lesson Plan for Control Group……………………………………….42
Data Collection Procedures……………………………………………………..43
Data Analysis……………………………………………………………………45
Pilot Study………………………………………………………………………46
Results of the Pilot Study…………………………………………………47
Reflections and Modifications of Pilot Study…………………………….50

CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS……………………………………………..51
Quantitative Data Analysis…………………………………………….……………..52
The Effects of Communication Strategies Instruction on Students’ Speaking Performance…………………………………………………………………………….52
Descriptive Statistics of Students’ Speaking Performance……………......53
Students’ Speaking Performance between Groups after the Instruction………..54
Students’ Speaking Performance within Groups after the Instruction………….55
Descriptive Statistics of Students’ Overall Use of Communication Strategies…56
Summary of Quantitative Data Results………………………………………………57
Qualitative Data Analysis…………………………………………………………….57
Students’ Perceptions about Communication Strategies Instruction……………57
Usefulness……………………………………………………………58
Improving Understandings……………………………...…………...59
Gaining More Time…………………………..………………………60
Summary of Qualitative Data Results………………………………………………..61
CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION……………………63
Summary and Discussion of the Major Results……………………………………...63
Effects of Communication Strategies Instruction on Students’ Speaking Performance..64
Effects of Communication Strategies Instruction on Students’ Communication Strategies Use...66
Students’ Perceptions about Communication Strategies Instruction……………67
Conclusions of the Study……………………………………………………………..69
Pedagogical Implications…………………………………………………………….70
Limitations of the Study………………………………….…………………………..72
Suggestions for Further Study………………………………………………….…….73
REFERENCES………………………………………………………...……………74
APPENDICES
Appendix A Teaching Procedures…………………………………………...83
Appendix B Oral Communication Tasks for Pretest………………………...84
Appendix C Oral Communication Tasks for Posttest………………………..85
Appendix D Communication Strategies Questionnaire (Chinese Version)….86
Appendix E Communication Strategies Questionnaire (English Version)….89
Appendix F Communication Strategy Guide Sheet………………....………91
Appendix G Sample Learning Diaries……………….……………………...96
Appendix H Sample Lesson Plan for Experimental Group…………………97
Appendix I Sample Lesson Plan for Control Group……………..….….…98 Appendix J Sample of Consent Form (English Version)…………………..99
Appendix K Sample of Consent Form (Chinese Version)…………………101

Abunawas, S. (2012). Communication strategies used by Jordanian EFL learners. Canadian Social Science, 8 (4), 178-193.
Bialystok, E. (1983). Some factors in the selection and implementation of communication strategies. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 110-118). London: Longman.
Bialystok, E. (1990). Communication strategies: A psychological analysis of second language use. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Bialystok, E., & Frohlich, M. (1980). Oral communication strategies for lexical difficulties. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 5, 3-30.
Bongaerts, T., & Poulisse, N. (1989). Communication strategies in L1 and L2: Same or different? Applied Linguistics, 10 (3), 253-268.
Brwon, H. Douglas. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. Longman, pp.127-130.
Carton, A. (1971). Inferencing: A process in using and learning language. In P. Pimsleur & T. Quinn (Eds.), The psychology of second language learning, (Vol. 18, pp. 45-58) Cambridge University Press.
Chamot, A. U. (1998). Teaching learning strategies to language students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED433719)
Chen, H. W. (2009). Oral communication strategies used by English major college students in Taiwan-A case of Chaoyang University of Technology. Unpublished master’s thesis, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chen, I. C. (2002). Language learning strategies used by high and low proficiency students in a teachnology college. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.
Chen, S. (1990). A study of communication strategies in interlanguage production by Chinese EFL learners. Language Learning, 40 (2), 155-187.
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London: Longman.
Corder, S. P. (1978). Language-learner language. In J. C. Richards (Ed.) Understanding second and foreign language learning: Issues and approaches. US: Newbury House.
Derwing, T. M., &Rossiter, M. J. (2002). ESL learners’ perceptions of their pronunciation needs and strategies. System, 30, 155-166.
Dörnyei, Z. (1995). On the teachability of communication strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 29,55-85.
Dörnyei, Z. & Thurrell, S. (1992). Conversation and dialogues in action. London:Prince Hall International.
Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1983). Strategies in interlanguage communication. London: Longman.
Faucette, P. (2001). A pedagogical perspective on communication strategies: Benefits of training and an analysis of English language teaching materials. Second Language Studies, 19(2), 1-40.
Feyten, C. M., Flaitz, J. J., & LaRocca, M. A. (1999). Consciousness raising and strategy use. Applied Language Learning, 10, 15-38.
Fillmore, D. Kempler, & W. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language
ability and language behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 203-228). New York: Academic
Press.
Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 287-307.
Hsieh, C. L. (1998). The relationship between anxiety and the use of communication strategies in L2 context. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsu, Y. W. (2004). An investigation of oral communication strategies: From the perspectives of English majors and professors. Unpublished master’s thesis, Tamkang University, New Taipei, Taiwan.
Huang, A. C. (2007). An investigation of communication strategy use in interculturalvideoconferencing: A case study of Tamkang University English majors.Unpublished master’s thesis, Tamkang University, New Taipei, Taiwan.
Hymes, Dell. (1971).’Comperece and performance in linguistic theory’ in R. Huxley and E. Ingram (Eds.). Language acquisition: Models and methods. London: Academic Press.
Kellerman, E. (1991). Compensatory strategies in second language research: A critique, a revision, and some (non-) implications for the classroom. In R.. Philipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/Second language pedagogy research: A commemorative volume for Claus Faerch (pp.142–161). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Konishi, K., & Tarone, E. (2004). English constructions used in compensatory strategies: Baseline data for communicative EFL instruction. In D. Boxer & A.D. Cohen (Eds.), Studying speaking to inform second language learning (pp. 174–199). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Lam, W.Y. K. (2005). Is strategic competence teachable? The Journal of Asia TEFL, 2, 87–112.
Lam, W. Y. K. (2010). Implementing communication strategy instruction in the ESL oral classroom: What do low-proficiency learners tell us? TESL Canada Journal, 27(2), 11-30.
Lee, J. F. (2007) The effects of teaching oral communication strategies on college students’ learning performance and self-efficacy in an extension program. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
Liu, W. I. (2007). A study of communication strategies of Chinese junior high school EFL Learners. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chungcheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Lo, C. T. (2003). The selection and the teachability of communication strategies in young EFL learners speech production. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei Teacher’s College, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2010). Methods in educational
research: From theory to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lovelock, C. (2002). Instant feedback for learner training: Using individual assessment cards. English Teaching Forum, 40(4), 26-34.
Maleki, A. (2007). Teachability of communication strategies: An Iranian experience.
System, 35(4), 583-594.
Naiman, N., Fronhlich, M., Stern, H. H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Nakatani, Y. (2005). The effect of awareness-raising training on oral communication strategy use. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 76-91.
Nakatani, Y. (2006). Developing an oral communication strategy inventory. The Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 151-168.
Nakatani, Y. (2010).Identifying strategies that facilitate EFL learners’ oral communication: A classroom study using multiple data collection procedures. The Modern Language Journal, 94, 116-136.
Nakatani, Y. (2012). Exploring the implementation of the CEFR in Asian contexts: Focus on Communication Strategies. Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol 46 (1), 771-775.
Naughton, D. (2006). Cooperative strategy training and oral interaction: enhancing small group communication in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 169-184.
Norman, D.A. (1980). Cognitive engineering and education. In D. T. Tuma & F. Reif (Eds.), Problem solving and education (pp. 97-107). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Styles, strategies, and aptitude: Connections for language learning. In T.S. Parry & C. W. Stansfield (Eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 67-125). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Oxford, R. L. (1992). The tapestry of language learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Oxford, R. (1994). Gender differences in L2 styles and strategies: Do they exist? Should we pay attention? In J. Alatis (ed.), Strategies interaction and language acquisition: Theory, practice, research.(pp.541-557). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Rababah, G. A. (2002). Strategic competence and language teaching. Urbana, IL. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 472 697.
Rababah, G. A. (2005). Communication problems facing Arab learners of English.
Journal of Language and Learning, 3(1), 180-197.
Reiss, M. (1983). Helping the unsuccessful language learner. Forum, 21(2), 1-8.
Rossiter, M. J. (2003). “It’s like chicken but bigger”: Effects of communication
strategy in the ESL classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60, 105-121.
Rubin, J. (1975).What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, (pp. 41-51).
Rubin, J. (1987). Leaner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and
typology. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learners strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Salamone, A.M., & Marsal, F. (1997). How to avoid language breakdown?
Circumlocution! Foreign Language Annals, 30, 473–484.
Scullen, M.E., & Jourdain, S. (2000). The effect of explicit training on successful
circumlocution: A classroom study. In J. Lee & A. Valdman (Eds.), Form and
meaning: Multiple perspectives (pp. 231-253). Boston, MA: Heinle.
Selinker, J. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10(3), 209-231.
Tarone, E. (1977). Conscious communication strategies in interlanguage: A progress report. In H. D. Brown, C. A.Yorio, & R. H. Crymes (Eds.), on TESOL ’77 (pp. 194-203). Washington, D.C.
Tarone, E. (1980). Communication strategies, foreigner talks, and repair in interlanguage. Language Learning, 30, 417-431.
Tarone, E. (1981). Some thoughts of the notion of communication strategy. TESOL Quarterly, 15(3), 285-295.
Tarone, E. (1983). Teaching strategic competence in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Language Learning, 4, 121-130.
Tarone, E., & Yule, G. (1989). Focus on the language learner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tarone, E. (1984). Teaching strategic competence in the foreign language classroom. In S. Savignon & M. Berns (Eds.), Initiatives in communicative language teaching (pp. 127-136). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Teng, H. C. (2012) A study on the teachability of EFL communication strategies. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 (pp. 3566 – 3570).
Wilkins, D, A. 1976. Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wong-Fillmore, L. (1979) Individual differences in second language acquisition. In C.
Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.
Weng, F. R. (2008). An investigation of oral communication strategies of college English majors in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Zhang, W. Y. (2005). The selection of communication strategies by Taiwanese EFL elementary school students with different English proficiency levels in information gap activities. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei Teacher’s College, Taipei, Taiwan.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top