跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.192.95.161) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/16 03:41
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:黃達翰
研究生(外文):Huang, Da-han
論文名稱:台灣英語系學生學習風格偏好、英語聽力策略使用與英語聽解力之相關性研究
論文名稱(外文):An Investigation of the Relationships among Learning Style Preferences, Listening Strategy Use and Listening Comprehension of Taiwanese EFL English Major Students
指導教授:趙玉芝趙玉芝引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chao, Yu-gi
口試委員:錢清香張善貿趙玉芝
口試委員(外文):Chang, Ching-ShyangChang, Shan-maoChao, Yu-gi
口試日期:2016-06-17
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:英語學系
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:英文
論文頁數:148
中文關鍵詞:英語聽解力學習風格偏好英語聽力策略使用結構方程式
外文關鍵詞:listening comprehensionlearning style preferenceslistening strategy useStructural Equation Modeling (SEM)
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:436
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:118
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
本研究旨在探討以英語為外語的台灣英語系大學生其學習風格偏好、英語聽力策略使用及英語聽解力之間的關係,其重點主要在於探討學習風格偏好及英語聽力策略使用對英語聽解力的影響。研究對象為472位台灣北、中、南地區的英語系大學生,最後共取得444份有效問卷進行資料分析。參與同學首先進行托福紙筆測驗,以便測量他們的英語聽解力。在考試結束後,參與學生接著填寫學習風格問卷及聽力策略問卷各一份。本研究所得的資料分別使用SPSS 22.0、Amos 20.0及結構方程模式加以分析。
研究結果發現如下:第一,程度較好的學生顯著地偏好使用綜合型學習風格。第二,台灣英語系大學生的學習風格偏好、英語聽力策略使用與英語聽解力三者之間有顯著相關。就學習風格及聽力策略使用兩者關係而言,視覺型、聽覺型和肢感型學生較能在後設認知、認知及社交情感策略上運用自如,分析型學生傾向使用後設認知及認知策略,而綜合型學生則傾向使用後設認知策略。就學習風格及英語聽解力兩者關係而言,綜合型學習風格對英語聽解力有正向的影響,視覺型學習風格則相反。大多數的學習風格再搭配後設認知策略使用後,都能夠增強英語聽解力。再者,就聽力策略使用及英語聽解力兩者的關係而言,後設認知策略對英語聽解力有正向的影響。更確切地來說,下列聽力策略對於英語聽解力有正面的幫助:集中注意力、仔細核對、段落間推測、語言外推測及使用參考資料。相反地,使用翻譯及轉換成中文文法來聽懂英文則是會對英語聽解力造成負面的影響。本論文更進一步提出英語教學的建議。本研究建議英語老師們可以使用聽力策略教學,特別是後設認知策略教學,來幫助學生增進英語聽力。此外,老師們建議也要訓練學生減少使用會降低他們聽力的翻譯及轉換策略。最後,本研究對未來研究提出了些許的建議。

The present study investigated the relationships among learning style preferences, listening strategy use and listening comprehension of Taiwanese EFL English major students. To be specific, the study was purport to find out the influence of learning style preferences and listening strategy use on listening comprehension. Four hundred and seventy-two English major students from northern, central and southern Taiwan participated in the study. Four hundred and forty-four valid questionnaires were analyzed in the present study. Students’ listening comprehension was assessed by TOFEL Institutional Test Program (TOFEL IBT) to assess their listening comprehension. After the completion of the test, a questionnaire for listening strategy use and a questionnaire for learning style preferences were administered to the students. The quantitative data were analyzed by using SPSS Version 22.0 for Windows and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with Amos for windows version 20.0.
The major findings were summarized as follows. First, effective listeners had a significantly stronger preference for synthesizing learning style than less effective listeners. Second, there were significant relationships among learning style preferences, listening strategy use and listening comprehension of Taiwanese EFL English major students. Concerning the relationship between learning style preferences and listening strategy use, visual, auditory and tactile/kinesthetic learners tended to employ metacognitive, cognitive and socio-affective strategies flexibly and frequently. Analytic learners tended to make use of metacognitive and cognitive strategies more frequently. Nevertheless, synthesizing learners tended to apply metacognitive strategies more. Considering the relationship between learning style preferences and listening comprehension, synthesizing learning style was shown to influence listening comprehension positively while visual learning style would cause negative impacts on listening comprehension. Most of the learning styles, through the use of metacognitive strategies, lead to a better performance on listening comprehension. As for the relationship between listening strategy use and listening comprehension, metacognitive strategies influenced listening comprehension positively. More specifically, the use of directed attention, double-check monitoring, between parts inferencing, extralinguistic inferencing and resourcing listening strategies would facilitate listening comprehension. Whereas, the use of translation and transfer listening strategies would impede successful listening comprehension. The present study further provided some pedagogical implications. English teachers and educators were suggested to involve listening strategy instructions, especially instructions on metacognitive strategy use, in the class to help students improve their listening comprehension through the use of listening strategies. Moreover, it was also recommended that teachers train students to avoid using translation and transfer strategies which may influence their listening comprehension negatively. Lastly, the study proposed some suggestions for further studies.

ABSTRACT (English) i
ABSTRACT (Chinese) iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF TABLES x
LIST OF FIGURES xiii

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
Background and Motivation of the Study 1
Purpose of the Study 5
Research Questions 6
Significance of the Study 6
Definition of Terms 7

CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 11
Taxonomies of Learning Style Preferences 11
Learning Style Preference Instruments 26
The Process of Listening Comprehension 32
Studies on Learning Style Preferences, Listening Strategy Use
and Listening Comprehension 47
Research Model and Hypotheses 54

CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 58
Population of the Study 58
Participants of the Study 59
Instrumentation of the Study 60
TOEFL ITP Listening Comprehension Test 60
Listening Strategy Use and Leanring Style Questionnaire 60
Data Collecting Procedures 63
Data Analysis 65
Pilot Study 65
Results of the Pilot Study 65
Reflections on the Pilot Study 86

CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS 89
Quantitative Results of the Questionnaires 89
Results for the First Research Question 91
Results for the Second Research Question 93
Results for the Third Research Question 96
The Initial Model 97
The Final Model 100

CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 111
Summary of the Major Findings 111
Discussion of the Major Findings 115
Pedagogical Implications 122
Limitation of the Study 124
Suggestions for Further Studies 125


REFERENCES 126
APPENDICES 137
Appendix A Background Information Questionnaire 137
Appendix B Listening Strategy Use Questionnaire 139
Appendix C Learning Style Questionnaire 141
Appendix D The English Version of Background Information Questionnaire 143
Appendix E The English Verison of Listening Strategy Use Questionnaire 145
Appendix F The English Version of Learning Style Questionnaire 147

Bicer, D. (2014). The effect of students’ and instructors’ learning styles on achievement of foreign language preparatory school students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 382-386.
Bjork, R., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D. & Pashler, H. (2009). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Association for Psychological Science, 9(3), 105-119.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principle of language learning and teaching. New York: Longman.
Brownell, J. (1996). Listening: Attitudes, principles, and skills. Boston, MA: Allen & Bacon.
Chamot, A. U., (2005). Language listening strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 98-111.
Chao, C. J. (2015). Teaching listening strategies to less proficient EFL college students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan University of science and technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chao, Y. G. (1996). The influence of strategy use on comprehension and recall of authentic English listening texts by Chinese EFL students in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, U.S. A.
Chao, Y. G. (1999). EFL listening strategies by English majors in Taiwan. Proceedings of the sixteen conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp. 465-479). Taipei: Crane.
Chao, Y. G., Liu, L. X., Wang, E. Y., & Wu, C. H. (2003). A survey of EFL university freshmen's listening strategies and difficulties. The Twelfth International Symposium on English Teaching, 2, 26-35.
Chen, C. H. (2013). A study of inferencing strategy instruction on college EFL students’ listening comprehension in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.
Chen, H. C. (2005). Proficiency and gender differences in the listening strategy use of the EFL senior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chuanghua University of Education, Chunghua, Taiwan.
Chen, L. F. (2010) An investigation of the relationships among learning styles, listening comprehension strategies, and English listening comprehension of Taiwanese EFL junior high school students. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Chen, L., Zhang, R., & Liu, C. (2013). Listening strategy use and influential factors in Web-based computer assisted language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 1-13. doi:10.1111/jcal.12041
Chen, L., Zhang, R., & Liu, C. (2013). Listening strategy use and influential factors in Web-based computer assisted language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 1-13. doi:10.1111/jcal.12041
Chen, M. L. (2009). Influence of grade level on perceptual learning style preferences and language learning strategies of Taiwanese English as a foreign language learners. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 304-308. Retrieved from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608009000107
Chen, S. P. (2004). The relationship between English proficiency and learning style/multiple intelligences: A case study of Fu-Hsing school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Cheng, Y. L. (2006). Senior high school students’ perceptual learning style preferences and language learning strategies. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.
Chi, J. C. (2001). The relationship between language learning style preferences and listening strategy use for advanced adult ESL learners. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, the U.S.A.
Chien, L. Y. (2007). A study of college English majors’ EFL listening difficulties and strategies while taking TOEFL. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. London, UK: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
Cohen, A. D. (2003). The learner’s side of foreign language learning: Where do styles, strategies, and tasks meet? International Review of Applied Linguistics Teaching, 41(4), 279-291.
Cohen, A.D., Oxford, R.L., & Chi, J.C. (2001). Learning style survey. Retrieved form http://carla.acad.umn.edu/profiles/Cohen-profile.html
Cohen J. E. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Cross, J. (2009). Effects of listening strategy instruction on news videotext comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 13, 151-176.
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching elementary student through their individual learning styles. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Dun, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. E. (1989). Learning style inventory. Lawrence, KA: Prince Systems, Inc.
Felder, R. M., & Henriques, E. R. (1995). Learning and teaching styles in foreign and second language education. Foreign Language Annals, 28, 21-31.
Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. (1988). Learning styles and teaching styles in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
Given, B. K. (2002). Teaching to the brain’s natural learning system. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Goh, C. C. M (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC Journal, 39(2), 188-211.
Goh, C. C. M. (1998). How ESL learners with different listening abilities use comprehension strategies and tactics. Language Teaching Research, 2(2), 124-147.
Goh, C. C. M. (2002a). Teaching listening in the language classroom. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Goh, C. C. M. (2002b). Learner’s self-reports on comprehension and learning strategies for listening. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12, 46-68.
Gohar, M. J., & Sadeghi, N. (2015). The impact of learning style preferences on foreign language achievement: A case study of Iranian EFL students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 754-764.
Gregorc, A. F. (1985). Inside style: Beyond the basics. Columbia, CT: Gregorc Assoc. Inc.
Harputlu & Ceylan (2014). The effects of motivation and metacognitive strategy use on EFL listening proficiency. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 124-131.
Herrmann, N. (1989). The creative brain. Lake Lure, North Carolina, USA: The Ned Herrmann Group.
Hsu, C. W. (2015). Learning styles on EFL university students’ learning strategies and English proficiency. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin, Taiwan.
Hsu, H. H. (2015). Investigation of relationships among metacognitive awareness, listening strategies, and listening comprehension of EFL senior high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chuanghua University of Education, Chunghua, Taiwan.
Hsu, M. H. (2014). A study of listening comprehension strategies used by EFL students in a technological university. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hsu, Y. H. (2014). A study of the relationship between perceptual learning style preference and English learning strategies among sixth graders in Changhua County. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Kang Ning, Tainan, Taiwan.
Hsu, Y. L. (2007). Elementary school EFL students’ learning style preferences and strategy use and their relationship with the students’ English learning achievement. Unpublished master thesis, Providence University, Taichung, R.O.C.
Huang, K. L. (2013). Effects of listening strategy instruction on rural elementary school students’ listening performance. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Yunlin University of science and technology, Yunlin, Taiwan.
Huang, Y. C. (2008). The effects of explicit teaching of listening strategies on senior high school students’ English listening comprehension. National Chuanghua Univiersity of Education, Chuanghua, Taiwan.
Hung, C. L. (2014). Effects of metacognitive strategy instruction and listening only on listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Kafadar, T., & Tay, B. (2014). Learning strategies and learning styles used by students in social studies. International Journal of Academic Research, 6(2), 259-267. DOI: 10.7813/2075-4124.2014/6-2/B.39
Kantaridou, Z. & Joycey, A. P. (2011). Major, minor, and negative learning style preferences of university students. System, 39, 103-112, Retrieved form http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X11000091
Karthigeyan, K., & Nirmala, K. (2013). Learning style preference of English language learners. Educationia Confab, 2(1), 134-140.
Kinsella, K. (1995). Understanding and empowering diverse learners. In J. M. Reid (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom (pp. 170-194). Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ku, S. C. (2011). A study on English listening difficulty and strategy of junior high school students in Nantou County. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Taiwan.
Lai, Y. C. (2015). An exploratory study of Taiwanese senior high school students’ use of metacognitive listening strategies for the test of English listening comprehension. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Li, H. Y. (2015). A study on the effects of listening strategy instruction on junior high school students’ listening comprehension: An experimental-comparative study of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chuanghua University of Education, Chunghua, Taiwan.
Li, P. C. (2009). Effects of listening strategy instruction on junior high school students’ EFL listening comprehension in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chuanghua University of Education, Chunghua, Taiwan.
Lin, C. H. (2013). An exploration of the learning style preferences and English listening difficulties of senior high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chuanghua University of Education, Chunghua, Taiwan.
Lin, C. Y. (2009). Proficiency and gender differences in the listening strategy use of the EFL junior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Taiwan.
Lin, S. F. (2006). Effects of listening strategy instruction on EFL senior high school students' English listening comprehension in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chuanghua University of Education, Chunghua, Taiwan.
Lin, Y. J. (2014). The efficacy of explicit instruction on enhancing metacognition and listening comprehension of EFL learners. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Liu, H. J. (2008). A study of the interrelationship between listening strategy use, listening proficiency levels, and learning style. RARECLS, 5, 84-104.
Lu, Y. T., (2015). Effects of direct listening strategy instruction on the listening performance of junior high school students: Short dialogue listening comprehension test as an example. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Moradi, K. (2013). The impact of listening strategy instruction on academic lecture comprehension: A case of Iranian EFL learners. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 406-416.
Mortimore, T. (2008). Strategies for wholistic and analytic learners. In T. Mortimore (Ed.), Dyslexia and learning style: A practitioner’s handbook (pp. 125-198). UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer, A. L. (1998). MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Nation, I. S. P. & Newton, J. (2009).Listening. In I.S.P. Nation & J. Newton (Eds), Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking (pp.37-58). UK: Routledge.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. UK: Cambridge University Press.
O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10(4), 418-437.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
Oxford, R. L. (2001). Language learning styles and strategies. In C. M. Marianne (Eds.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (3rd ed., pp. 359-366). Boston: Heinle & Heinle
Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: Concepts and relationship. IRAL, 41, 271-278.
Pittenger, D. J. (1993). The utility of the Myers-Biggs type indicator. Review of Educational Research, 63, 467-488.
Rahimirad, M. (2014). The impact of metacognitive strategy instruction on the listening performance of university students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1485-1491.
Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 87-111.
Reid, J. M. (1995). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive strategies awareness and sucee in learning English as a foreign language: An overview. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 73-81.
Rogowsky, B. A., Calhoun, B. M., & Tallal, P. (2015). Matching learning style to instructional method: Effects on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 64-78.
Sahragard, R., & Mallahi, O. (2014). Relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ language learning styles, writing proficiency and self-assessment, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1611-1620.
Shen, W. H. (2011). A study of the relationships among learning style preferences, listening strategy use, and listening comprehension of EFL college Freshmen. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chuanghua University of Education, Chunghua, Taiwan.
Tang, J. Y. (2015). Enhance junior high school students’ English listening ability through metacognitive listening strategy instructions. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Teng, H. C. (1996). An investigation of EFL listening comprehension strategies used by college freshmen in Taiwan. Research report submitted to National Science Council. (NSC85-2418-H-224-002)
Teng, H. C. (1997). An investigation of EFL listening strategies by Taiwanese college students. The Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 509-520). Taipei: Crane.
Teng, H. C. (1998). A study of EFL listening comprehension strategies. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED 422745)
Tight, D. G. (2010). Perceptual learning style matching and L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 60(4), 792-833. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00572.x
Tsingos, C., & Bosnic-Anticevich, S. B. (2015). Learning styles and approaches: Can reflective strategies encourage deep learning? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7, 492-504.
Underwood, M. (1994). Teaching listening. New York: Longman.
Vandergrift, L. (1996). The listening comprehension strategies of core French high school students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52, 200-223.
Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53(3), 463-496.
Wang, W. Y. (2002). Effects of gender and proficiency on listening comprehension strategy use by Taiwanese EFL senior high school students—A case from Changhua, Taiwan. Unpublished master's thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Taiwan.
Willing, K. (1994). Learning strategies in adult migrant education. Sydney: National Center for English Teaching and Research.
Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins: Field depend and field independence. New York: International University.
Wong, L. L. C., & Nunan, D. (2011). The learning styles and strategies of effective language learners. System, 39, 144-163. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X1100056X
Wu , L. Y. (2007). A study of listening strategies and difficulties of high-proficiency and low-proficiency English majors in Taiwan—A think-aloud study. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chuanghua University of Education, Chunghua, Taiwan.
Wu, Y. T. (2015). The influence of listening strategy instruction on rural junior high school students’ English listening performance. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin, Taiwan.
Yeh, M. C. (2004). The effects of motivation and listening strategies on supplementary materials and their usage in central Taiwan. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, National Kaoshiung Noral University, R.O.C.
Yu, P. J. (2015). The influence of language learning strategies on Taiwanese EFL University students’ listening comprehension. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊