壹、中文部分
王素香（1995）。一位國小自然科教師班級氣氛形成因素之個案研究
（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
王俊明（1980）。國小級任教師之領導行為對班級氣氛之影響（未出
版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。
王為蜻（2014）。學習科技對國小學童自主學習態度與教師專業角色
認知之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄。
行政院（2003）。挑戰2008年計劃。取自：
http://www.ey.gov.tw/Content_List.aspxn=D91B0214E3F6F056
呂美珠（2014）。情境學習與國小五年級學童英語學習興趣及學習成
就之相關研究──以新北市英速魔法學院闊瀨校區為例（未出版
之碩士論文）。臺北市立大學，台北市。
李介耀（2008）。國小校園英語生活環境對英語學習成就的影響：家
庭社經地位、城鄉別、合作學習與自我效能為干擾變項（未出版
之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
林秀芳（2012年6月）。視覺藝術結合英語教學對國小學童學習興趣
之影響。國立新竹教育大學藝術與設計學系2012 研究生論文研討會發表之論文，國立新竹教育大學。
吳武典（1971）。影響學生學習的因素。教育文摘，16(15)，5。
余怡佳（2013）。國中生英語學習動機、自我效能、英語溝通意願及
英語學習成就之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，
彰化縣。
吳明清（2002）。教育研究-基本觀念與方法分析。台北：五南。
吳明隆 （2008）。 SPSS 統計運用學習與實務：問卷分析與應用統
計。台北：五南。
吳明隆、涂金堂（2005）。SPSS 與統計應用分析。台北: 五南圖書出
版股份有限公司。
吳怡親（2013）。運用聽說教學法提升台灣兒童英語溝通意願及口說
能力之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。南台科技大學，台南市。
李桂枝（2013）。多元智能英語教學模組對國小學童學習興趣及學習
成效之影響（未出版之碩士論文）。國立東華大學，花蓮縣。
林毓霜（2011）。行動電話輔助之任務型教學活動對國小學童英語溝
通意願的影響（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，台北
市。
谷祖蕙（2013）。國小中、高年級學生知覺教室環境與快樂學習之關
聯性研究-以桃園縣為例（未出版之碩士論文）。銘傳大學，台北
市。
吳清山（2014年9月）。國際化潮流下的國小外語學習─專訪教育部
國民及學前教育署署長吳清山。語言之道，3，2-6。
吳福源（2000）。國民小學優良教師與一般教師之班級氣氛比較研究。
花蓮師院學報，10，171-195。
施如樺（2006）。國小學童英語學習環境及其學習動機之相關研究（未
出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，台北市。
施佑賢（2014）。彰化縣國中英語科教師班級經營類型語學生學習興
趣之關係（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
徐貞美（1991）。英語課與教室管理。英語教學，16(2)，35-44。項必蒂（1979）。高級中學教材、年級暨學生性別與班級氣氛的關係
（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，台北市。
教育部國民及學前教育署（2008）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要語
文學習領域（英語）。取自：
http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php?header
陳芸珊（2007）。國中小學生自主學習策略之使用及其影響因素之研
究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學，台北市。
陳奎憙（1980）。教育社會學。臺北市：三民。
張美雲、王新燕、趙成亮（2005）。自主學習。福建省：福建教育出
版社。
陳茜茹（1995）。班級氣氛與兒童生活適應和學業成就之關係研究（未
出版之碩士論文）。台北市立師範學院，台北市。
張純瑗（2007）。網路學習環境中自主學習策略與學習成效之相關研
究—以國小三年級自然科為例（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立
教育大學，台北市。
張修榕（2014）。臺灣學生在不同社群媒體中的英語溝通意願（未出
版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。
陳密桃（1993）。班級氣氛之引導與塑造。南投文教，5，29-32。
郭瑞珍（2011）。國中生英語學習動機、英語使用、英語溝通意願及
英語學習成就之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，
彰化縣。
陳嬿伊（2008）。屏東縣國小六年級學童知覺班級氣氛與學習動機關
係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東縣。
黃幼君（2004）。台灣大一學生於大一英文課堂中英語學習動機、溝
通意願、溝通頻率之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。東海大學，台
中市。
邱姵瑜（2011）。國小學童學習環境與數學學業成就之研究（未出版
之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
楊達和（2014）。科技人士英語學習動機、英語使用、英語溝通意願
及英語能力之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，
彰化縣。
楊榮祥（1997）。中小學科學教室環境影響之本質與其影響因素。臺
北市：國家科學委員會微縮小組。
蘇伊鈴（2007）。高雄縣國小學童英語學習環境與學習動機關係之研
究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺東大學，台東縣。
劉坤桐（2009）。宜蘭縣國小高年級導師領導風格、班級氣氛與學生
學習動機之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。佛光大學，宜蘭縣。
蔡怡萱（2015）。運用「國際教育文化學習課程主題」融入國小五年
級英語教學提升學生文化覺識與英語學習興趣之行動研究（未出
版之碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，台中市。
劉唯玉（2004）。多元智慧與原住民教育研究。臺北市：五南。
鄭瑞洲、洪振方、黃台珠（2011）。情境興趣--制式與非正式課程科學
學習的交會點。科學教育，340，2-10。
貳、英文部分
Asher, S. R. (1980). Topic interest and children's reading
comprehension. Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension,
525-534.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Barkley, R. A. (2004). Adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity
disorder: An overview of empirically based treatments. Journal of
Psychiatric Practice,10(1), 39-56.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable
distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic,
and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Bekker, M. H. J., & Assen, M. A. L. M. (2008).
Autonomy-connectedness and gender. Sex Roles, 59(3), 532-544.
Benson, P. (1997). The philosophy and politics of learner
autonomy. Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning, 7,
18-34.
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language
Learning. Harlow, England: Longman/Pearson Education.
Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced
by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and s tudents. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161-186.
Bull, S., Feldman, P., & Solity, J. (2013). Classroom management:
Principles to Practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
Burgoon, J. K. (1976). The unwillingness‐to‐communicate scale:
Development and validation. Communications Monographs, 43(1),
60-69.
Chen, H. I., & Pan, H. H. (2015). Learner Autonomy and the Use of
Language Learning Strategies in a Taiwanese Junior High
School. Journal of Studies in Education, 5(1), 52-64.
Combs, A. W. (1962). Motivation and the growth of self: In perceiving
behaving, and learning. Association for supervision and curriculum
development yearbook. Washington, D.C.: The Association.
Confessore, G. J., & Park, E. (2004). Factor validation of the Learner
Autonomy Profile, version 3.0 and extraction of the short form.
International Journal of Self-directed Learning, 1(1), 39–58.
Cotterall, S. (1995). Readiness for autonomy: Investigating learner
beliefs.System, 23(2), 195-205.
Darom, E. & Rich, Y. (1988). Sex differences in attitudes toward school:
Student self-reports and teacher perceptions. British Journal of
Educational Psychology, 58, 350-355.
Dörnyei, Z. (2002). The motivational basis of language learning tasks. In
P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language
Learning (pp. 137-158). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins
Publishing Company.
Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000). The role of individual and social
variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4
(3), 275-300.
Egel, I. P. (2009). Learner autonomy in the language classroom: From
teacher dependency to learner independency. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2023-2026.
Fell, E. A. P. (1986). The relationship between teachers’ personality
preference types and fifth grade students’ perceptions of the
classroom psychosocial climate (behavior characteristics). The
university of Alabama Degree：EDD.（DAO：AAC 8600755）.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new era
of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34,
906-911.
Fraser, B. J. (1986). Classroom environment. London, England: Croom
Helm.
Fraser, B. J. (1998). Science learning environments: Assessment, effects
and determinants. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International
handbook of science education (pp. 527–564). Dordrecht, The
Netherlands: Kluwer.
Fraser, B.J., Anderson, G.J. &Walberg, H.J. (1982). Assessment of
learning environments: Manual for Learning Environment Inventory (LEI) and My Class Inventory (MCI) (3rd vers.). Perth, Australia: Western Australian Institute of Technology.
Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1986). Using short forms of classroom
climate instruments to assess and improve classroom psychosocial
environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(5),
387-413.
Getzels, J. W., & Thelen, H. A. (1972). A conceptual framework for the
study of the classroom group as a social system. In A. Morrison, &
D. Mcintyre (Eds.), The social psychology of teaching. New York,
NY: Penguin.
Ghonsooly, B., Hosseini Fatemi, A., & Khajavy Fadafen, G. H. (2013).
Examining the relationship between willingness to communicate in English, communication confidence and classroom environment. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 3(1), 63-71
Gökgöz, B. (2008). An Investigation of Learner Autonomy and Strategies
for Coping with Speaking Problems in Relation to Sucess in English
Speaking Classes (Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical
University, Turkish). Retrieved from
https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12609846/index.pdf
Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical
considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 191-209.
Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness-A neglected variable in
discourse processing. Cognitive Science, 10(2), 179-194.
Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (1998). Situational interest and learning. In L.
Hoffman, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest
and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest and
gender (pp.74–90). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically
unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of
Educational Research, 70(2), 151-179.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest
development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford
England: Pergamon.
Ikonen, A. (2013). Promotion of learner autonomy in the EFL classroom:
the students' view. (Matser’s thesis, University of Jyväskylä,
Finland). Retrieved from
http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201312102771
Insel, P. M., & Moos, R. H. (1974). Psychological environments:
Expanding the scope of human ecology. American
Psychologist, 29(3), 179.
Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York, NY: Plenum Press
Izard, C. E., & Ackerman, B. P. (2000). Motivational, organizational, and
regulatory functions of discrete emotions. In M. Lewis & J. M.
Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 253-
264). New York, NY: Guilford.
Khaki, S. (2013). The Relationship between Learner Autonomy and
Willingness to Communicate (WTC) in Iranian EFL
Learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English
Literature, 2(5), 97-109.
Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An
educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of
Psychology in Education, 14, 23-40.
Krapp, A., Hidi, S., and Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning and
development. In Renninger, A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (Eds.), The
Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Hillsdale,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lewin,K.(1936). Principles of Topological Psychology, New York, NY:
McGrawHill.
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems.
Dublin, Ireland: Authentik.
Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental
considerations revisited. International Journal of Innovation in
Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14-29.
Littlewood, W. (1996). “Autonomy”: An anatomy and a
framework. System, 24(4), 427-435.
Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian
contexts. Applied linguistics, 20(1), 71-94.
Long, M., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus
design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 27-56.
Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research,
practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in
classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). New York, NY:
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacIntyre, P. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate –
A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11(2),
135-142.
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001).
Willingness to communicate, social support, and languagelearning
orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 23, 369-388.
MacIntyre, P., Baker, S., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. (2003). Talking in
order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language
programs.Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 589-608.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as
predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language
and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3-26.
MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998).
Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational
model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language
Journal, 82(4), 545-562.
McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to
communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 16-25.
McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985, November). Willingness to
communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented
at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association,
Denver, CO.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1982). Communication
apprehension and shyness: Conceptual and operational
distinctions. Communication Studies, 33(3), 458-468.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to
communicate: A cognitive view. Journal of Social Behavior and
Personality,5(2), 19 - 44.
Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational Interest: Its multifaceted structure in the
secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 85(3) , 424–436.
Moos, R. H. (1973). Conceptualizations of human environments.
American Psychologist, 28(8), 652-665.
Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments. SanFrancisco,
CA: Jossey Bass Publishers.
Mortensen, C. D., Arntson, P. H., & Lustig, M. (1977). The measurement
of verbal predispositions: Scale development and
application. Human Communication Research, 3(2), 146-158.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality: A clinical and
experimental study of fifty men of college age. New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
Nunan, D. (1993). Task-based syllabus design: Selecting, grading and
sequencing of tasks. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in
pedagogical context (pp. 55-68). Clevedon, England: Multilingual
Matters.
Nunan, D. (1995). Closing the gap between learning and
instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 133-158.
Peng, J. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the Chinese EFL
classroom: A cultural perspective. In J. Liu (Ed.), English language
teaching in China: New approaches, perspectives, and standards.
London, England: Continuum.
Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in
English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language
Learning, 60(4), 834-876.
Reinders, H. (2010). Towards a classroom pedagogy for learner
autonomy: A framework of independent language learning skills.
Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 40-55.
Renninger, K. A. (1989). Individual differences in children’s play interest.
In L. T.Winegar (Ed.), Social interaction and the development of
children’s understanding (pp. 147-172). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Renninger, K. A. (1990). Children’s play interests, representation, and
activity. In R. Fivush&K. Hudson (Eds.), Knowing and
remembering in young children (pp. 127-165). New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.
Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for
understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J.M.
Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search
for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 375-407). New York,
NY: Academic.
Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2002). Student interest and achievement:
Developmental issues raised by a case study. In A. Wigfield & J. S.
Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp.
173-195). New York, NY: Academic.
Renninger, K. A., & Shumar, W. (2002). Community building with and
for teachers: The Math Forum as a resource for teacher professional
development. In K. A. Renninger&W. Shumar (Eds.), Building
virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp.
60-95). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Renninger, K. A., Sinclair, N., Hand, V. M., Stohl, H., Alejandre, S., &
Underwood, J. S. (2004, June). Students’ interest for and work with
appletenhanced word problems. In Proceedings of the 6th
international conference on Learning sciences (pp. 629-629).
International Society of the Learning Sciences, Los Angeles, CA.
Sallinen- Kuparinen, A., McCroskey, L. E., & Richmond V. P. (1991).
Willingness to communicate, communication apprehension,
introversion and self-reported communication competence: Finish
and American comparisons. Communication Research Reports, 8,
55-64.
Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational
Psychologist, 26, 299–323.
Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies
Reading, 3, 257–280.
Schiefele, U., & Krapp, A. (1996). Topic interest and free recall of
expository test. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 141-160.
Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1988, April). Conceptualization
and Measurement of Interest. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting
of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans,
USA.
Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the
literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology
Review, 13(1), 23-52.
Simic, M., Tanaka, T., & 田中共子. (2008). Language context in the
willingness to communicate research works: A review. 岡山大学大
学院社会文化科学研究科紀要, 26(1), 71-88.
Smith, R. (2008). Learner autonomy. Elt Journal, 62(4), 395-397.
Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language
learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31,304-318.
Trickett, E. J., & Moos, R. H. (1973). Social environment of junior high
and high school classrooms. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 65(1), 93-102.
Vancouver, J. B. (2005). The depth of history and explanation as benefit
and bane for psychological control theories. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 90(1), 38-52.
Varol, B., & Yilmaz, S. (2010). Similarities and differences between
female and male learners: Inside and outside class autonomous
language learning activities. Procedia Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 3, 237-344.
Walberg, H.J., & Anderson, G.J. (1968). Classroom climate and
individual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59,
414–419.
Weaver, C. (2005). Using the Rasch Model to Develop a Measure of
Second Language Learners’ Willingness to Communicate within a
Language Classroom. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6(4),
396–415.
Weaver, C. (2009). Willingness to Communicate: A Mediating Factor in
the Interaction between Learners and Tasks. In Van den Branden, K.,
Van Gorp, K., & Verhelst, M. (Eds.). Tasks in action: Task-based
language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp.
153-187). Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars
Publishing.
Weaver, S. J., & Cohen, A. D. (1994). Making learning strategy
instruction a reality in the foreign language curriculum. Faces in a
crowd: The individual learner in multisection courses, 285-323.
Welch, W. W., & Walberg, H. J. (1968). A design for curriculum
evaluation. Science Education, 52(1), 10-16.
Wen, W. P., & Clément, R. (2003). A Chinese conceptualisation of
willingness to communicate in ESL. Language Culture and
Curriculum, 16(1), 18-38.
Wenden, A. (1991). Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy. New
York, NY: Prentice Hall.
Wilson, B. G. (1995). Metaphors for instruction: Why we talk about
learning environments. Educational Technology-Saddle Brook
NJ-, 35, 25-25.
Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language:
The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1),
54-66.
Zeng, Y., & Tan, H. (2014, May). A Review of WTC Research in L2 and
its Pedagogical Implications. Paper presented in International
Conference on Education, Language, Art and Intercultural
Communication , Zhengzhou, China.
Zhang, L. X., & Li, X. X. (2004). A comparative study on learner
autonomy between Chinese students and West European students.
Foreign Language World, 4(2), 15-23.