臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究主要目的在於了解高中職生知覺自主支持與學習投入之間的關係，並探究學業成就目標在變項間是否具有中介的作用。
本研究以台灣中部三縣市（台中、彰化、南投）高中職生為研究對象，共643份有效問卷，以描述性統計分析進行資料處理與分析，以結構方程模式驗證模式適配度。本研究結果如下：
1.知覺自主支持對學習投入有正向相關；
2.知覺自主支持對學業成就目標有正向相關；
3.學業成就目標對學習投入有正向相關；
4.學業成就目標對於知覺自主支持與學習投入有部份中介效果。
因此，本研究發現高中職生之學業成就目標在知覺自主支持對於學習投入的預測力中產生中介效果。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship among high school students’ perceived autonomy support, learning engagement and academic achievement goal played a mediation role.
Participants were high school students from central Taiwan. 643 valid questionnaires were obtained. The collected data were analyzed and structural equation modeling was used to validate the model fit of hypothesized model. The results are shown followings:
1.Perceived autonomy support had a positive effect on learning engagement;
2.Perceived autonomy support had a positive effect on academic achievement goal;
3.Academic achievement goal had a positive effect on learning engagement;
4.Academic achievement goal had a partial effect between perceived autonomy support and learning engagement;
As a result, this study found that high school students’ academic achievement goal has mediating effect on perceived autonomy support and learning engagement.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i
ABSTRACT(ENGLISH) ii
ABSTRACT(CHINESE) iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iv
List of Figures vi
List of Tables vii
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
Background of the Study 1
Motivation of the Study 2
Purpose of the Study 4
Research Questions 4
Definition of Terms 5
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 7
Academic Achievement Goal 7
Perceived Autonomy Support 10
Learning Engagement 18
CHAPTER THREE METHOD 25
Research Design 25
Research Hypotheses 26
Participants 29
Instruments 30
Data Collection Procedure 32
Data Analysis Procedure 32
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS 50
Background Analysis of Participants 50
Analysis of Perceived Autonomy Support, Academic Achievement Goal and Learning Engagement 52
Correlations between Academic Achievement Goal, Perceived Autonomy Support and Learning Engagement 58
Structural Equation Model of High School Students’ Academic Achievement Goal, Perceived Autonomy Support and Learning Engagement. 61
The Hypothesized Model of High School Students’ Academic Achievement Goal, Perceived Autonomy Support and Learning Engagement. 61
Path Analysis of the Academic Achievement Goal, Perceived Autonomy Support and Learning Engagement 62
The Final Model of High School Students’ Academic Achievement Goal, Perceived Autonomy Support and Learning Engagement 67

Differential Analysis of Academic Achievement Goal, Perceived Autonomy Support and Learning Engagement. 72
The Mediating Effect of Academic Achievement Goal on the Relationship between Perceived Autonomy Support and Learning Engagement 79
CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 83
Discussion 83
The Current Situation of Academic Achievement Goals, Perceived Autonomy Support and Learning Engagement 83
The Differences of different background on Academic Achievement Goals, Perceived Autonomy Support and Learning Engagement 83
The Measure Model of Academic Achievement Goals, Perceived Autonomy Support and Learning Engagement 84
The Mediating Effect of Academic Achievement Goal on the Relationship between Perceived Autonomy Support and Learning Engagement 85
Conclusions 86
Limitation of the Study 87
Suggestions for Future Studies 88
REFERENCES 89
APPENDICES 97
APPENDIX A Expert Validity of the Questionnaires 97
APPENDIX B Pretest Questionnaire 104
APPENDIX C Formal Questionnaire 107

Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective, Science Education, 84(6), 740-756. doi: 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Hagger, M. S., & Smith, B. (2007). Influences of perceived autonomy support on physical activity within the theory of planned behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(5), 934-954. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.407
Chen, H. J. (2010). The Relationships of Junior High School Students’ Perceptions of Teachers’ Autonomy Support, Autonomous Motivation, and Learning Engagement.(Unpublished master’s thesis).National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, R.O.C.
Chen, L. C. (2011). A Study of the Relationship among Perceived English Teachers’ Teaching Styles, Learning Motivation and Academic Engagement of Junior High School Students in Central Taiwan. (Unpublished master’s thesis).National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, R.O.C.
Chien, C. L. (2009). The Analysis of Self-determined Motivation and Academic Emotions Model. (Unpublished master’s thesis).National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, R.O.C.
Connell, J.P., & Wellborn, J.G. (1991). Competence autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In R. Gunnar & L.A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self-processes in development: Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, Vol 23 (pp. 43-77). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Coral Lim, B. S., & John Wang, C. K. (2009). Perceived autonomy support, behavioral regulations in physical education and physical activity intention. Psychology of sport and exercise, 10(1), 52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.06.003
Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 19-36. Doi: 10.1111/j.0026-7902.2005.00263.x
De Naeghel, J., Valcke, M., De Meyer, I., Warlop, N., van Braak, J., & Van Keer, H. (2014). The role of teacher behavior in adolescents’ intrinsic reading motivation. Reading and Writing, 27(9), 1547-1565. doi: 10.1007/s11145-014-9506-3
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985a). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109-134. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985b). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Publishing Co.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.41.10.1040
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461-475. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.461
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 x 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632-648. doi: 10.1037/a0023952
Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059
Fredericks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2005). School engagement. In K.A. Moore & L. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish?: Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development. New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media.
Gillison, F. B., Standage, M., & Skevington, S. M. (2013). The effects of manipulating goal content and autonomy support climate on outcomes of a PE fitness class. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(3), 342–352.doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.11.011
Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987), Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 890-898.doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.5.890
Grolnick, W. S. (2003). The psychology of parental control: How well-meant parenting backfires. Choice Reviews Online, 40(5), 40-3087. doi: 10.5860/CHOICE.40-3087
Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 233-240. doi: 10.1037/a0012758
Guay, F., Ratelle, C., Larose, S., Vallerand, R. J., & Vitaro, F. (2013). The number of autonomy-supportive relationships: Are more relationships better for motivation, perceived competence, and achievement? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 375–382. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.07.005
Hafen, C. A., Allen, J. P., Mikami, A. Y., Gregory, A., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). The pivotal role of adolescent autonomy in secondary school classrooms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(3), 245-255. doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9739-2
Hagger, M. S., Sultan, S., Hardcastle, S. J., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2015). Perceived autonomy support and autonomous motivation toward mathematics activities in educational and out-of-school contexts is related to mathematics homework behavior and attainment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 111–123. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.12.002
Hagger, M. S., Hardcastle, S. J., Chater, A., Mallett, C., Pal, S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2014). Autonomous and controlled motivational regulations for multiple health-related behaviors: between- and within-participants analyses. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 2(1), 565-601. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2014.912945
Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L., Hein, V., Pihu, M., Soós, I., & Karsai, I. (2007). The Perceived Autonomy Support Scale for Exercise Settings (PASSES): Development, validity, and crosscultural invariance in young people. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(5), 632-653. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.09.001
Hein, V., & Caune, A. (2014). Relationships between perceived teachers’ autonomy support, effort and physical self-esteem. Kinesiology, 46, 44–52
Hein, V., Koka, A., & Hagger, M. S. (2015).Relationships between perceived teachers' controlling behavior, psychological need thwarting, anger and bullying behavior in high-school students. Journal of Adolescence, 42, 103-114. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.04.003
Kinzie, J., Gonyea, R., Kuh, G. D., Umbach, P., Blaich, C., & Korkmaz, A. (2007). The relationship between gender and student engagement in college. Paper presented at the 32nd annual conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Louisville, KY
Koka, A. (2013). The relationships between perceived teaching behaviors and motivation in physical education: A one-year longitudinal study. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(1), 33-53. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2011.621213
Lee, W., & Reeve, J. (2012). Teachers’ estimates of their students’ motivation and engagement: being in synch with students. Educational Psychology, 32(6), 727-747.doi: 10.1080/01443410.2012.732385
Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-196. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184
Levy, A.R., Polman, R.C.J., & Borkoles, E. (2008). Examining the relationship between perceived autonomy support and age in the context of rehabilitation adherence in sport. Rehabilitation Psychology, 53(2), 224-230. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.53.2.224
Li, Y. H. (2015) 。3C, To Help Students Take Back Their Right of Learning. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1PXonb4
Li, Y. M. & Sun, S. H. (2010). The Relationship between Autonomous Motivation of Course-Taking and Learning Engagement on College Students. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(1), 155-182.
Lin, C. C. (2012). Examining the Relationships among Vocational High School Students’ Perceived Classroom Autonomy Support, Motivational Regulation, and Avoidance Strategies. NTTU Educational Research Journal, 23(1), 59-90.
Lin, C.C. (2011). An Examination of the Path Models for the Factors Related to Vocational High School Students’ Report of Academic Engagement. Journal of Research on Measurement and Statistics, 19, 31-53.
Lin, Y. Y. & Cheng, B. L. (2007). The Latent Change Analysis among Individual Goal Orientations, Classroom Goal Structures and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 39(2), 173-194. doi: 10.6251/BEP.20070423
Lin, Y. Y. & Cheng, B. L. (2014). Beyond 4 Dimensions: The Verification and Analysis of the 6-Dimensional Goal Orientation Model. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 117-140. doi: 10.6251/BEP.20140120
Nicholls, J. G., (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328-346. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.91.3.328
Núñez, J. L., Fernández, C., León, J., & Grijalvo, F. (2015).The relationship between teacher’s autonomy support and students’ autonomy and vitality. Teachers and Teaching, 21(2), 191-202. doi:10.1080/13540602.2014.928127
Ou, P. C. (2013). The Relationship among Individual Goal Orientations, Learning Interests, and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies: An Examination of the Moderate Effect of Classroom Goal Structure. (Unpublished master’s thesis).National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, R.O.C.
Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R.J., & Brière, N. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: a prospective study. Motivation and Emotion; 25(4), 279–306. doi: 10.1023/A:1014805132406
Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
Pomerantz, E. M, Grolnick, W. S., & Price, C. E. (2005). The role of parents in how children approach achievement: A dynamic process perspective. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation. (pp. 229–278). New York: Guilford.
Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., & Senecal, C. (2007), Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis, Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 734-746. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.734
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267.doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding socio-cultural influences on student motivation. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 31-60). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students' engagement by increasing teachers' autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147-169.doi: 10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000c). When rewards compete with nature: The undermining of intrinsic motivation and self-regulation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 13-54). New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-012619070-0/50024-6
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Ryan, R. M., & La Guardia, J. G. (1999). Achievement motivation within a pressured society: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations to learn and the politics of school reform. In T. Urdan (Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 11 (pp. 45–85). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement Goal Theory at the Crossroads: Old Controversies, Current Challenges, and New Directions. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 26-47. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.538646
Sheldon, K. M., & Krieger, L. S. (2007). Understanding the negative effects of legal education on law students: A longitudinal test of self-determination theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(6), 883-897. doi: 10.1177/0146167207301014
Sheldon, K. M., Houser-Marko, L., & Kasser, T. (2006). Does autonomy increase with age? Comparing the goal motivations of college students and their parents. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(2), 168-178. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2004.10.004
Sheldon, K.M. & Kasser, T. (1998). Pursuing personal goals: Skills enable progress, but not all progress is beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1319-1331. doi: 10.1177/01461672982412006
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158-176. doi: 10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860
Shih, S. S. (2008). An Examination of the Relations of Junior High School Students’ Perceived Autonomy Support to Their Achievement-Relevant Processes. Journal of Education & Psychology, 31(2), 1-26.
Shih, S. S. (2010). An Examination of the Relations among Parental Attitudes, Teacher Autonomy Support along with Psychological Control, and Junior High Students' Perfectionistic Tendencies. Journal of Education National Changhua University of Education, 17, 1-16.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.85.4.571
Taylor, I., Ntoumanis, N., & Standage, M. (2008). A self-determination theory approach to understanding antecedents of teachers’ motivational strategies in physical education. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30(1), 75-94.
Um, E. K., Corter, J., & Tatsuoka, K. (2005), Motivation, autonomy support, and mathematics performance: A structural equation analysis. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1Q7vkGl
Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263-280. doi: 10.1037/a0032359
Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 468-483. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.468
Wang, C. C. (2011). A Study of Relationship between Learning Engagement and Learning Confidence of Tamkang University Students. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Tamkang University, New Taipei, R.O.C.
Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Adolescent Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive Engagement Trajectories in School and Their Differential Relations to Educational Success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 31-39. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00753.x
Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 767-779. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767