臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究主要在探討目前社會的時空背景下，有工作之個人對於其組織認同以及工作投入之間的關係，並且就勤勉責任感的特質去檢驗是否會影響兩者之間的關聯，意即，檢驗勤勉責任感是否帶有調節效果。

此研究假設組織認同與工作投入之間正向關聯，也就是假設個人若是有著較高的組織認同，其工作投入也會較高，即表示兩者之間有正向關係；同時，假設個人特質中的勤勉責任感也會對於工作投入有正向影響，表假設五大人格特質中，所測得之勤勉責任感程度越高者，在工作投入的程度會越加投入；最後，假設勤勉責任感對於組織認同與工作投入之間，會存在調節變項。換句說話，本研究認為個人之勤勉責任感程度愈高者，會有助於提高組織認同對於工作投入之水準，達到正面的調節作用。

經由研究所蒐集之數據並分析後發現，上述三個假設在統計意義上都明顯表示顯著，故證實存在有上述假設之正向關係以及調節變數作用確實存在，並針對數據分析提出解釋，以及提出進一步後續實務上之應用意義。

摘要................................................................................................................................3
英文摘要........................................................................................................................4
目錄................................................................................................................................5
第一章 緒論 ...............................................................................................................6
第一節 研究動機................................................................................................................. 6
第二節 研究目的................................................................................................................. 6
第三節 研究流程................................................................................................................. 7
第二章 文獻探討.........................................................................................................8
第一節 組織認同................................................................................................................. 8
第二節 工作投入............................................................................................................... 14
第三節 勤勉責任感........................................................................................................... 17
第四節 假說推導............................................................................................................... 19
第三章 研究方法.......................................................................................................22
第一節 研究架構............................................................................................................... 22
第二節 研究假設............................................................................................................... 22
第三節 研究變項之操作性定義與衡量........................................................................... 23
第四節 資料收集、處理與分析方法............................................................................... 27
第四章 資料分析.......................................................................................................28
第一節 樣本特性分析....................................................................................................... 28
第二節 變項之信度分析與敘述性統計分析................................................................... 32
第三節 相關性分析........................................................................................................... 35
第四節 主效果之檢定....................................................................................................... 38
第五節 調節變數效果之檢定........................................................................................... 39
第六節 假設結果之驗證................................................................................................... 40
第五章 總結與建議...................................................................................................42
第一節 總結....................................................................................................................... 42
第二節 討論與建議........................................................................................................... 43
參考文獻......................................................................................................................46

Allport, G.W., & Odbert, H. S., 1936.Trait-names:A psycho-lexical study,
Psychological Monographs, 47
Barrick, M.R.& Mount, M.K., 1991. The Big Five personality dimensions and job
performance: A Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1): 1-26.
Blau, G. J. (1985). The measurement and prediction of career commitment. Journal of
Occupational Psychology, 58, 277－88.
Bellou, V., & Thanopoulos, J. (2006). Enhancing service quality in a hospital stting.
Review of Business, 27(1), 26－32.
Bernardin,J. H., & Bownas, D. A., 1985. Personality Assessment in Organizations.
NY: Praeger
Blood, M. R., & Hulin, C. L. (1967). Alienation environmental characteristics of
workers responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(3), 284－290.
Cattell, R. B., 1943. The Description of Personality: Basic Trait Resolved into
Clusters, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38: 476-506.
Deschamps, J. C. & Devos, T. (1998), “ Regarding the relationship between social
identity and personal identity”, In S. Worchel, J. F. Morales, & J. C. Deschamps
Social Identity-international.
Dutton J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (1991), “ Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and
identity in organizational adaptation”, Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517-554.
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994), “ Organizational images and
member identification,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.
Dutton J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (1991), “ Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and
identity in organizational adaptation,” Academy of Management Journal, 34,
517–554.

Dubin, R. (1956). Industrial workers’ world: A study of the central life interests of
industrial workers. Social Problem, 3(3), 131－142.
Elloy, D. F., Everett, J. E., & Flynn, W. R. (1988). An examination of the correlates
of job involvement. Group and Organization Studies, 16(2), 160－77.
Forman, P., & Whetten, D. A. (2002). Members’ identification with multiple-identity
organizations. Organization Science, 13(6), 618－635.
Friedman, M. & Rosenman, R.H., 1974. Type A Behavior and Your Heart, Fawcett.
Goldberg, L. R., 1981. Developing taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms, Problems
with language imprecision: New directions for methodology of social and
behavioral science, 9: 43-65.
Guilford, J.P., 1959. Personality, N.Y., &McGraw-Hill
Guion, R.M., 1965. Synthetic validity in a small company: A demonstration,
Personnel Psychology, 18: 49-63
Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 67(3), 341－349.
Lawler, E. E., & Hall, D. T. (1970). Relationship of job characteristics to job
involvement, satisfaction and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology,
54(4), 305－312.
Lodahl, T. M., & Kejner, M. (1965). Motivation and organizational climate. Boston:
Harvard University.
Mael, F. A. and Tetrick, L. E. (1992), “ Identifying organizational identification,”
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 813–824. 44.
Mael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992), “ Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of
the reformulated model of organizational identification”, Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 13, 103–123.

Mael, F. A. and Ashforth, B. E. (1995), “ Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational
identification, and turnover among newcomers,” Personnel Psychology, 48, 309–333.
46.
Mael & Ashforth. (1989), “ Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the
reformulated model of organizational identification”, Journal of organizational
behavior, 13, 103–23.
McCrae R. R. and Costa P. T. Jr., 1992. An Introduction of the Five-Factor Model and
Its Applications, Journal of Personality, 60: 175-215.
Miller, V. D., Allen, M., Casey, M. K., & Johnson, J. R. (2000), “ Recon-sidering the
organizational identification questionnaire”, Manage-ment Communication Quarterly,
13, 626-658.
Norman, W. T. 1963. Toward an Adequate Taxonomy of Personality Attributes.
Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 66: 574-583
Patchen, M. (1970). Participation, achievement, and involvement on the job.
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Pratt, M. B. (1998), “ To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational
identification”, In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey.
Paullay, I. M., Alliger, G. M., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1994). Construct validation of
two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 79(2), 224－228.
Reitz, H. J., & Jewell, L. N. (1979). Sex, Locus of Control, and Job involvement: A
Six-Country Investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 22(1), 72－88.
Riipinen, M. (1997). The Relationship between Job Involvement and Well－Being.
Journal of Psychology, 131(1), 81－89.
Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta－analysis. Journal of
Vocational Behavior, 66, 358－384.

Rotter, J. B., 1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of
reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80.
Robbins, S. P., 1992. Organizational Behavior: concepts, controversies, and
Applications, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
Robbins, S. P. (2002). Organizational behavior (9th Ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall,
Inc.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2007). Essentials of organizational. New Jersey:
Prentice Hall.
Ruh, R. A., White, J. K., & Wood R. R. (1975). Job involvement, values, personal,
background, participation in decision making and job attitude. Academy of
Management Journal, 18(2), 300－312.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and
theirrelationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. Journal of
Organizational, 25, 293－315.
Schmitt, N., Gooding, R., Noe,R. and Kirsch, M., 1984. Meta-analyses of validity
studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study
characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 37(3): 407-422.
Simon, H. A. (1957), “ Administractive behavior”, New York: Free Press.
Smidts, A., Pruyn, A. T. H., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2001). ”The impact of employee
communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification”,
Academy of Management Journal , 44(5), 1051-1062.
Tajfel,H.(1971), “ Social comparison and social change”, Studies in Intergroup
Behavior. London: Academic.
Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N. & Rothstein, M., 1991. Personality Measures as
Predictors of Job Performance: A Meta-analytic Review, Personnel
Psychology, 44: 703-742
Turner, J.C. (1987), “ Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory”,

New York: Blackwell.
Vroom, V. H. (1962). Ego involvement, job satisfaction, and job performance.
Personnel Psychology, 15(6), 159－177.
Wan-Huggins, V. N., Riordan, C. M. & Griffeth, R. W. (1998). The development and
longitudinal test of a model of organizational identification. Journal of Applied Social
Psychology, 28, 724－749.
Whetten D. & P. Godfrey (1998), “ Identify in organizations: Developing theory
through conversations”, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 171-208
黃仁宏，2000，人格五因素與銷售績效之關聯性－以壽險業為例，行政院國家科
學委員會
蔡維奇，2000，招募策略—精挑細選之戰術，人力資源管理的12堂課，李誠主
編，天下遠見出版股份有限公司，62-63
邱台生(Tai-Sheng Chiu);盧美秀(Meei-Shiow Lu);陳品玲(Ping-Ling Chen)，2003，
組織氣候與工作投入關係之研究―以某醫學中心暨委託經營管理醫院爲例，
P184-199
王淑敏，2012，轉換型領導、組織認同與組織公民行為關係之研究，以台灣國際
獅子會300-E1 區為例，P69-73
溫金豐(Jin-Feng Uen);林裘緒(Chiou-Shiu Lin);錢書華(Michael S. Chien)，2011，
轉換型領導與組織認同：領導者組織典範性知覺的干擾效果，P265-285
蔡依倫，2001，宗教醫院志工組織認同與組織承諾之研究-與非宗教醫院志工作
比較，P78-90
廖見文，2012，非營利組織志工的組織認同與工作投入關係之研究，P6-13
姜昭安；陳殷哲，2014，研發人員心理資本與工作投入之關連性研究，P15-25
潘佳嫻，2012，職場友誼對組織認同之影響－以工作投入為干擾變數，P8-22
林國芳，2012，工作壓力與工作投入關聯性之研究—以組織認同為中介變項，P32-37
李孟潮，武漢中德心理醫院，認同的概念——對佛洛德著作的概念研究
蔡維奇，2016，經理人月刊139期，再不滿上司，也千萬別上臉書抱怨！求職、
轉職一定要知道的招聘趨勢
黃國棟，2016，聯合報，玉山金徵才600人，MA招募20人
王長桐，2010，工作投入與職家衝突關聯性之研究—以心理資本為干擾效果
彭蘭惠，2010，教師之組織認同與組織公民行為：審慎勤勉人格特質干擾效果