跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.210.99.209) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/04/15 15:07
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:莊凱婷
研究生(外文):Kai-Ting Chuang
論文名稱:不同研發抵稅制度下研發支出對美國公司價值的影響
論文名稱(外文):The Effect of R&D Tax Credit Policy on Firm Value:Evidence from The United States
指導教授:高偉娟高偉娟引用關係林世銘林世銘引用關係
口試委員:黃美祝陳坤志
口試日期:2016-05-31
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:會計學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:49
中文關鍵詞:研發抵稅制度OBRAASC公司價值
外文關鍵詞:R&D tax creditOBRAASCfirm value
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:235
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本論文旨在探討在不同研發投資抵稅制度下,美國公開發行公司取得研發抵稅金額之研發支出對其公司價值的影響。1981年,美國發布適用於公開發行公司的研發抵稅制度(於1989 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act曾修正過之傳統研發抵稅制度, 簡稱OBRA或舊制),2007年初,美國政府為鼓勵公司投入研發支出,並期望擴大符合研發抵稅資格的公司數量,發布了另一項簡化版研發抵稅制度(Alternative Simplified Credit, 簡稱ASC或新制)。此新制降低了過去舊制下公司取得抵減金額的門檻,因此在新制的運行下,不僅大幅增加了符合研發抵稅資格的公司數量,且由公司投入研發支出的結果上也看到了更好的正向影響。為了探討公司採用舊制與新制對其公司價值是否有影響,以及公司投資人對其採用的研發抵稅制度的改變會如何反應,本文將2007年視為變動基準年,探討2007年之前後二年及四年,公司在選用不同稅制後對其公司價值的相對影響。本論文研究結果顯示,在2007年以後選用新制的公司相較於持續選用舊制的公司,新制的選用對公司價值具有較正向影響,代表新制比舊制更能激勵公司投入研發支出,並有效提升公司的獲利能力,也代表投資人更喜好選用新制的公司,此實證結果符合本論文之預期。另外,本論文也發現,在2009年國會提高新制適用的稅率後,公司選用新制更會提升公司的價值,此顯現出修正後的新制相較於修正前,能達到更佳的研發支出激勵效果。

We examine the influence on firm value of the different tax credit regimes that select for their R&D expenditure. Specifically, U.S. firms can apply for alternative simplified credit (ASC) provided by the Health Care and Tax Relief Act of 2006 or the OBRA credit, the old R&D tax credits, which were enacted in 1981 and modified by the 1989 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Finley et al. (2015) indicate that ASC relaxed the eligibility threshold, resulting in a large increase of firms enjoying the R&D tax credits eligibility. They also demonstrate that the ASC tax credit policy is effective in spurring additional investments in R&D. To further understand whether firms’ choices between the OBRA and the ASC tax credit policies have different influences on firm values, and how would the investors respond to a firm’s tax credit selection, we investigate the relative difference on firm values of firms choosing different tax credit policy two years and four years before and after the beginning of 2007. The empirical results show that firms that choose the ASC have more positive effect on firm values than those that choose the OBRA, suggesting that the ASC encourages firms conducting more valuable R&D, and that investors may also prefer firms choosing the ASC rather than the OBRA. Furthermore, we document an even better stimulating effect of the ASC on firm values after the ASC tax credit rate was increased from 12% to 14% in 2009.

口試委員會審定書 #
誌謝 I
摘要 II
ABSTRACT III
目錄 IV
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 美國新舊研發抵稅制度簡介 5
第三章 文獻回顧及研究假說 9
第一節 研發支出與公司價值關係之相關文獻回顧 9
第二節 研發抵稅制度能否提升公司研發支出之相關文獻回顧 11
第三節 美國新、舊研發抵稅制度對公司研發費用激勵效果之相關文獻回顧 12
第四節 研究假說 15
第四章 研究設計 18
第一節 變數衡量 18
第二節 實證模型 22
第三節 各項係數代表意義 23
第四節 樣本篩選 25
第五章 實證結果、敏感性分析及額外測試 28
第一節 實證結果 28
第二節 敏感性分析及額外測試 37
第六章 研究結論、限制與建議 43
第一節 研究結論 43
第二節 研究限制與建議 45
附錄 46
參考文獻 48


Baily, M. N., and R. Z. Lawrence. 1992. Tax incentives for R&D: What do the data tell us? Council on Research and Technology, Washington DC.
Ben-Zion, Uri. 1984. The R&D and investment decision and its relationship to the firm''s market value: Some preliminary results. R&D, patents, and productivity. University of Chicago Press, 299-314
Berger, P. G. 1993. Explicit and implicit tax effects of the R&D tax credit. Journal of Accounting Research 31 (2), 131-171.
Billings, B. A., and G. McGill. 1992. The effect of base changes in the incremental research and experimentation tax credit. Tax Notes 54 (1), 1155-1161.
Bloom, N., R. Griffith, and J. Van Reenen. 2002. Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979-1997. Journal of Public Economics 85 (1), 1-31.
Bosworth, D., and M. Rogers. 2001. Market value, R&D and intellectual property: an empirical analysis of large Australian firms. Economic Record 77 (239), 323-337.
Bushee, B. J. 1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Review 73 (3), 305-333.
Carroll, R., G. Prante, and R. Quek. 2011. The R&D credit: An effective policy for promoting research spending, Prepared for the R&D Credit Coalition, September 2011.
Chan, L.K.C., J. Lakonishok, and T. Sougiannis. 2001. The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. Journal of Finance 56 (6), 2431–2457.
Chen, M.-C., and S. Gupta. 2010. The incentive effects of R&D tax credits: An empirical examination in an emerging economy. Working Paper, National Chengchi University and Michigan State University.
Ciftci, Mustafa, and William M. Cready. 2011. Scale effects of R&D as reflected in earnings and returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics 52 (1), 62-80.
Cockburn, I. M., and Z. Griliches. 1987. Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock markets valuation of R&D and patents. The American Economic Review 78 (2), 419-423.
Copeland, T., T. Koller, and J. Marrin. 2002. Valuation: Measuring and managing the value of companies, 3rd ed., N. Y.: Wiley
Eisner, R., S. H. Albert, and M. A. Sullivan. 1984. The new incremental tax credit for R&D: Incentive or disincentive? National Tax Journal 37 (2), 171-183.
Finley, A. R., S. J. Lusch, and K. A. Cook. 2015. The effectiveness of the R&D tax credit: Evidence from the alternative simplified credit. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 37 (1), 157-181.
Grigsby, M., and J. W. Westmoreland. 2001. The research tax credit: A temporary and incremental dinosaur. Tax Notes 93 (12), 1627-1640.
Griliches, Zvi. 1981. Market value, R&D, and patents. Economics Letters 7 (2), 183-187.
Gu, F. 2005. Innovation, future earnings, and market efficiency. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 20 (4), 385–418.
Gupta, S., Y. Hwang, and A. P. Schmidt. 2011. Structural change in the research and experimentation tax credit: Success or failure? National Tax Journal 64 (2, Part I), 285-322.
Hall, B. H. 1993. R&D tax policy during the 1980s: Success or failure? Tax Policy and the Economy 7, 1-36.
Hall, B. H. 1993. The value of intangible corporate assets: an empirical study of the components of Tobin''s Q. Department of Economics, UCB.
Hirschey, M., and D. W. Wichern. 1984. Accounting and market-value measures of profitability: Consistency, determinants, and uses. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 2 (4), 375-383.
Jaffe, A. B. 1986. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms'' patents, profits and market value. The American Economic Review 76 (5), 984-1001
Klassen, K. J., J. A. Pittman, M. P. Reed, and S. Fortin. 2004. A cross-national comparison of R&D expenditure decisions: Tax incentives and financial constraints." Contemporary Accounting Research 21 (3), 639-680.
Miller, M. and F. Modigliani. 1961. Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business 34(3), 411-433.
Swenson, C. W. 1992. Some tests of the incentive effects of the research and experimentation tax credit. Journal of Public Economics 49 (2), 203-218.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. 1989. Tax policy and administration: The research tax credit has stimulated some additional research spending. GAL13; 89-114, Washington DC.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2009. Tax policy: The research tax credit’s design and administration can be improved. GAO-10-136, USGAO, Washington DC.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top