臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在資訊高速爆炸的社會中忙•盲•茫已經成為現代人的心靈寫照，無形中產生許多新的病兆。像憂鬱症、資訊恐懼症等文明病不自覺的越來越多人處於心靈不安的情緒中。如何透過禪繞畫藝術Zentangle®與手作藝術讓參與者能夠產生心靈平穩的效用。此乃本研究動機。
本研究以畫過禪繞畫的社會人士為研究對象，研究方法主要使用問卷法於中華禪繞藝術學會臉書粉絲頁上公開徵求填卷者。回收問卷總計108份，剔除2份缺漏及重複問卷實得有效問卷份數106份。對於禪繞藝術畫者在畫禪繞畫後對其核心自我、情緒調節力及自我創造力的部份進行分析，並就禪繞藝術畫者在畫禪繞畫前的情緒做初步自我評估。研究結論建議如下：
一、 透過畫禪繞畫的過程後有顯著對自我價值的肯定。
二、 禪繞藝術顯著對情緒調節上有正向影響，建議可與學校及醫療單位或家扶中心配合以降低因情緒產生的衝突與傷害。
三、 建議由本研究結果鼓勵相關單位可透過國內外公開活動展覽禪繞藝術作品，鼓勵更多形式的創作及藝術家國際化的推動。

The exponential growth of a high-speed information society increasingly overwhelms people, and it is giving rise to numerous epidemics such as infobesity, depression, anxiety, and even psychosis. Our information civilization surreptitiously makes more and more people feel insecure. The Zentangle ® drawing method Zentangle ® and handmade art can help practitioners relax and feel more at peace.This is the motivation of this study.
This study looked at common practitioners of Zentangle ® drawing. The research method used questionnaires completed by Zentangle ® drawing practitioners contacted through the Zentangle Fan Page on Facebook. 108 questionnaires were returned. After elimination of 2 incomplete and duplicate questionnaires, the number of valid questionnaires was 106. The study examined Zentangle ® drawing practitioners’ self-reported Sense of Core Self, Emotional Regulation, and Creative Self Efficacy after Zentangle ® drawing. The study also measures self-reported initial mood status before Zentangle ® drawing.
Conclusions and recommendations are as follows:
1、 The process of Zentangle ® drawing has a significant impact on practitioners’ sense of self-worth.
2、 Zentangle ® drawing has a positive impact on Emotional Self- Regulation. It is suggested to introduce this method to schools, health organizations, and family support centers to reduce conflict and harm through this method of emotional self-regulation.
3、 It is recommended to use the findings of this study to encourage relevant organizations to hold exhibitions of Zentangle ® drawing works at home and abroad to encourage creativity in all its forms and promote Zentangle ® drawing artists internationally.

摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VII
第一章、 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究問題與目的 5
1.3 研究範圍與流程 5
第二章、 文獻探討 7
2.1 禪繞藝術 7
2.2 核心自我 12
2.3 調節情緒力 13
2.4 自我創造力 16
第三章、 研究方法 18
3.1 研究方法與研究對象 18
3.2 樣本選取及研究對象分類 18
3.3 研究模型量表的說明 19
第四章、 研究結果分析 22
4.1 樣本統計分析 22
4.2 研究假設分析 27
4.3 研究結果分析 28
第五章、 研究結論與建議 34
5.1 研究結論 34
5.2 研究限制與建議 36
參考文獻 38
附錄 43

中文部分
1.台灣9起隨機殺人案兇嫌後來怎麼了。(2015，7月21日) 。蘋果日報http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20150721/652013/ (2015年 11 月 18 日查閱)
2.伊佳奇(2014)。婆婆成為畢卡索。(2014年5月30日)。風傳媒部落格http://blog.stormmediagroup.com/3398 (2016年 4 月 28 日查閱)
3.自殺。維基百科https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%87%AA%E6%AE%BA (2015 年 1 1月 8 日查閱)
4.吳憲璋(2003) 。藝術療法的理論與實踐受刑人心靈重建的新視點。警學叢刊， 34(2)，49-70頁。
5.李明蒨(2009)。用音樂打造學習力。台北：天下文化
6.李維靈、郭世和、張利中 (2004) 。音樂偏好與情緒智力之相關研究-以某大學休閒系一年級學生為例之初探。大業學報， 13(2)，39-47頁。
7.李澄賢（2004）。大學生的情緒調節、調節焦點、樂觀與創造力之關係。未出版碩士論文，國立政治大學教育學系，台北。
8.芮克‧羅伯茲、瑪莉亞‧湯瑪斯、戴安、戴寧與蘿拉 (2015) 。禪繞畫之書。台北市：遠流
9.馬斯洛人類需求五層次理論。MBA 智庫百科http://wiki.mbalib.com/zhtw/%E9%A9%AC%E6%96%AF%E6%B4%9B%E4%BA%BA%E7%B1%BB%E9%9C%80%E6%B1%82%E4%BA%94%E5%B1%82%E6%AC%A1%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA (2016 年 1 月 18 日查閱)
10.張春興(2013)。現在心理學:現在人研究自身問題的科學(重修版) (476-477頁) 。台北市：臺灣東華
11.無聊做做白日夢也可提高創造力？(2016，4月9日) 。記者郭原毓,廣州日報http://big5.chinanews.com/m/shj/2016/04-09/7828536.shtml (2016年 4 月 28 日查閱)
12.楊淑貞(2010)。創傷復原與療癒歷程之探索:以表達性藝術治療爲例。台灣藝術治療學刊，2(1)，73-85。
13.蕭伊芳（2009）。核心自我、工作滿意度與生活滿意度之關係研究。未出版碩士論文，國立新竹教育大學，新竹。
14.龍佛衛(2015) 。台灣自殺防治學會暨全國自殺防治中心新聞稿。http://tspc.tw/tspc/portal/news/content.jsp?type=news&sno=946 (2015 年 11 月 4 日查閱)
15.謝智謀與王怡婷(譯)(2003) 。體驗教育－帶領內省指導手冊。台北市：幼獅文化。
16.藝術治療。維基百科。https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%97%9D%E8%A1%93%E6%B2%BB%E7%99%82 (2016年 4 月 28 日查閱)
英文部分
1.Allport, G. W. (1928C), A test for ascendance-submission. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 23, 118-136. Allport, G. W. (1929).
2.Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (1997), Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS for Windows: A guide for social scientists.77-79. London: Routledge.
3.Cleckley, H. (1976), The mask of sanity (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
4.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990), Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
5.Cuieford, J. P. (1965), Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
6.Goldberg, L. R. (1990), An Alternative “description of personality”: The Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
7.Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.
8.Hagerty, M. R. (1999), Testing Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs: National Quality-of-Life Across Time. Social Indicators Research, 46(3), 249-271.
9.Higgins, E. T. (1997), Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
10.Higgins, E. T. (1998), Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-46.
11.James, Q. W. & George, L. K. (1982), The Police and Neighborhood Safety: Broken Windows, Atlantic Monthly, Mar.29-38
12.Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003), The Core Self-Evaluations Scale (CSES): Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303-331.
13.Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997), The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151-188.
14.Likert, R. (1932), A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.
15.Mann, S., Cadman, R. (2014), Does being bored make us more creative？Creativity Research Journal, 26(2), 165–173.
16.Maslow, A. H. (1943), A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
17.Maslow, A. H. (1962), Lessons from the peak-experiences. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 2, 9-18.
18.McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1991), The full five factor model and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(2), 227-232
19. Nunnally, J.C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.Phillips, D. P. (1974), The influence of suggestion on suicide: Substantive and theoretical implications of the werther effect [J].American Sociological Review, 39(3):340-354
21.Pine, J. and Gilmore, J. (1999), The Experience Economy, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
22.Richard F., Irene T. (2004), Europe In The Creative Age. February, 40-41.
23.Rick R. & Maria T. (2012), The Book Of Zentangle, Massachusetts: Zentangle Inc.
24.Romer, P. M. (1986), Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), October, 1002-1037.
25. Rostow, W. W. (1960), The Stages of Economic Growth — A Non-Communist Manifesto, (Cambridge University Press, 1960).
26.Tierney & Farmer, (2002) Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), December,1137-1148.
27.Timothy, A. J., Amir E., Joyce E. B., Carl J. (2003), The Core Self-Evaluations Scale: Development of a Measure. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), June, 303–331.
28.Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988), Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
29.World Health Organization http://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/suicideprevent/en/ (2015年 9月1日查閱)
30.Zentangle https://www.zentangle.com/ (2015年 9月1日查閱)