跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.87) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/03 01:18
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:Andri Pratama
研究生(外文):Andri Pratama
論文名稱:A Rule-based Approach with Multi-level Features Taxonomy for Recognition of Machining Features from 3D Solid Models
論文名稱(外文):A Rule-based Approach with Multi-level Features Taxonomy for Recognition of Machining Features from 3D Solid Models
指導教授:林清安林清安引用關係
指導教授(外文):Alan C. Lin
口試委員:林清安
口試委員(外文):Alan C. Lin
口試日期:2016-07-27
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣科技大學
系所名稱:機械工程系
學門:工程學門
學類:機械工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:英文
論文頁數:77
中文關鍵詞:Machiningfeaturerecognitionmulti-leveltaxonomyedgeandloopclassification.
外文關鍵詞:Machining feature recognitionmulti-level taxonomyedge and loop classification.
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:174
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:2
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
A numerous approaches in recognition of intersecting and isolated features have been proposed in the last several decades. However, they are limited to features with topologically fixed shapes since they are dependent on the pre-defined patterns or rules. On the other hand, some works have been addressed to increase the flexibility in accommodating different features with variable topology, but they are often restricted to isolated machining features.
In the present thesis work, a rule based approach is developed to accommodate intersecting features with variable topology shapes. The proposed approach classifies the features according to the multi-level feature taxonomy. In the first level, features are categorized into three groups of primitive features. Loops and edges are used as fundamental entities to determine the primitive feature types. In the second level, pockets and holes are identified from their primitive feature attributes while visibility maps are adopted to recognize slots and steps features. Intersecting features are identified based on adjacency relationships among face members of the features. On the other hand, pre-defined rules are still utilized in restricted application to identify special machining features such as t-slot, v slot and dovetail slot.
In addition to that, the proposed approach has been implemented to recognize machining features in the industrial parts model in the b-rep format. The result shows that both of isolated and intersecting features with different topology shapes are well extracted from the 3D model.
CONTENT

ABSTRACT 1
CONTENT 2
LIST OF FIGURES 4
LIST OF TABLE 6
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 7
1.1 Research Background 7
1.2 Research Objective 13
1.3 Thesis Organization 13
CHAPTER 2 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 15
2.1 Feature 15
2.1.1 Feature classification 16
2.2 Features based design VS features recognition 18
2.3 Solid modelling 19
2.3.1 Boundary representative 20
2.3.2 Constructive solid geometry 22
CHAPTER 3 MULTI-STRUCTURE METHODOLOGY FOR MACHINING FEATURES RECOGNITION 24
3.1 Machining features taxonomy. 24
3.1.1 First level classification 24
3.1.2 Second level classification 26
3.2 Edge and loop classification. 31
3.2.1 Edge 31
3.2.2 Loop 34
3.3 Algorithm for machining features recognition. 36
3.3.1 Face collection. 37
3.3.2 Features concatenation 40
3.3.3 Features recognition 44
CHAPTER 4 SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION 57
4.1 Systems implementation 57
4.2 Implementation result 59
4.2.1 Solid model 1 59
4.2.2 Solid model 2 61
4.2.3 Solid model 3 63
4.2.4 Solid model 4 65
4.2.5 Solid model 5 66
4.3 Contribution 68
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION 71
5.1 Conclusion 71
5.2 Future consideration 72
REFRENCES 73
REFRENCES
1.Khoshnevis, B., D.N. Sormaz, and J.Y. Park, An integrated process planning system using feature reasoning and space search-based optimization. IIE transactions, 1999. 31(7): p. 597-616.
2.Grayer, A.R., A Computer Link Between Design and Manufacture. 1976, University of Cambridge.
3.Kyprianou, L.K., Shape classification in computer-aided design. 1980, University of Cambridge.
4.Joshi, S. and T.-C. Chang, Graph-based heuristics for recognition of machined features from a 3D solid model. Computer-Aided Design, 1988. 20(2): p. 58-66.
5.Marefat, M. and R.L. Kashyap, Geometric reasoning for recognition of three-dimensional object features. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1990. 12(10): p. 949-965.
6.Trika, S.N. and R.L. Kashyap, Geometric reasoning for extraction of manufacturing features in iso-oriented polyhedrons. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1994. 16(11): p. 1087-1100.
7.Vandenbrande, J.H. and A.A. Requicha, Spatial reasoning for the automatic recognition of machinable features in solid models. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 1993. 15(12): p. 1269-1285.
8.Regli, W.C., S.K. Gupta, and D.S. Nau, Extracting alternative machining features: An algorithmic approach. Research in Engineering Design, 1995. 7(3): p. 173-192.
9.Han, J. and A.A. Requicha, Integration of feature based design and feature recognition. Computer-Aided Design, 1997. 29(5): p. 393-403.
10.Gao, S. and J.J. Shah, Automatic recognition of interacting machining features based on minimal condition subgraph. Computer-Aided Design, 1998. 30(9): p. 727-739.
11.Laakko, T. and M. Mäntylä, Feature modelling by incremental feature recognition. Computer-Aided Design, 1993. 25(8): p. 479-492.
12.Fu, M., et al., An approach to identify design and manufacturing features from a data exchanged part model. Computer-Aided Design, 2003. 35(11): p. 979-993.
13.Bhandarkar, M.P. and R. Nagi, STEP-based feature extraction from STEP geometry for agile manufacturing. Computers in Industry, 2000. 41(1): p. 3-24.
14.Nasr, E.S.A. and A.K. Kamrani, A new methodology for extracting manufacturing features from CAD system. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2006. 51(3): p. 389-415.
15.Nagarajan, S. and N.V. Reddy, Step-based automatic system for recognising design and manufacturing features. Molecular Physics, 2010. 48(1): p. 117-144.
16.Woo, T.C. Feature extraction by volume decomposition. in Conference on CAD/CAM technology in mechanical engineering. 1982.
17.Sakurai, H. and C. Chin, Definition and recognition of volume features for process planning. Manufacturing Research and Technology, 1994. 20: p. 65-65.
18.Shen, Y. and J.J. Shah. Feature recognition by volume decomposition using half-space partitioning. in ASME. 1994.
19.Sakurai, H. and P. Dave, Volume decomposition and feature recognition, Part II: curved objects. Computer-Aided Design, 1996. 28(6): p. 519-537.
20.Tseng, Y.-J. and S. Joshi, Recognizing multiple interpretations in 2½D machining of pockets. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1994. 32(5): p. 1063-1086.
21.Bezdek, E.J., et al., Volumetric feature recognition for direct engineering, in Direct Engineering: Toward Intelligent Manufacturing. 1999, Springer. p. 15-69.
22.Shah, J.J., et al., A discourse on geometric feature recognition from CAD models. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2001. 1(1): p. 41-51.
23.Xu, X., Integrating advanced computer-aided design, manufacturing, and numerical control: principles and implementations. 2009: Information Science Reference Hershey.
24.Lin, A., S.-Y. Lin, and S.-B. Cheng, Extraction of manufacturing features from a feature-based design model. International Journal of Production Research, 1997. 35(12): p. 3249-3288.
25.Gindy, N., A hierarchical structure for form features. The International Journal of Production Research, 1989. 27(12): p. 2089-2103.
26.Xu, X. and S. Hinduja, Recognition of rough machining features in 212D components. Computer-Aided Design, 1998. 30(7): p. 503-516.
27.Lee, K., Principles of cad/cam/cae systems. 1999.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top