(3.220.231.235) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/03/08 05:58
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:徐雅玲
研究生(外文):MANANYA SRIWORRARAT
論文名稱(外文):Key Factors Affecting Thai Passengers to Select Low Cost Airline
指導教授:李智明李智明引用關係
指導教授(外文):LEE,CHIH-MING
口試委員:阮金祥劉基全
口試委員(外文):ROAN,JIN-SHYANGLIOU,JI-CHYUAN
口試日期:2016-06-24
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東吳大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:英文
論文頁數:133
外文關鍵詞:Low Cost AirlineLCALow Cost CarrierLCCBudget AirlineNo-Frill AirlineAnalytical Hierarchy ProcessAHPDecision Making Model
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:103
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:19
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
In the past few years, global airline industry has grown dramatically, and low cost airline obviously become prosperous and gains enormous market shares of the airline travelling. Furthermore, low cost airline in Thailand has increased their competitiveness rapidly and earned significant market share from full service airline. The purpose of this study is to find the key factors affecting Thai passengers to select low cost airlines, and we hope that the results of this study could serve as a guideline for the managers of Thai low cost airline to effectively develop their marketing strategies in order to gain the competitive advantage and meet passenger’s satisfaction. A framework with four dimensions and 19 factors influencing passenger’s selection of low cost airlines were derived by literature review. Then, a questionnaire of AHP was designed and a questionnaire survey of Thai passengers was done. Next, AHP methodology was applied to obtain the priority of importance of these dimensions and factors. We found that the rank of importance of dimensions is: airline corporate, service quality, flight management, and airline aircraft. As for the rank of importance of 19 factors is: price, punctuality, safety record, reliability, responsiveness, flight availability, comfort, cleanliness, brand image, promotion and advertising, empathy, flight announcement, service supply chain, tangible, assurance, facilities, flight compensation, alliance, and entertainment, respectively. Further, we compared our results with those of other papers. Finally, we make suggestions to both Thai low cost airlines and Thai government.
Abstract i
Acknowledgement ii
Table of Contents iv
List of Tables v
List of Figures vi
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Purposes of the Research 6
1.3 Research Process 7
Chapter 2 Literature Review 9
2.1 Papers Related to Airline Service 9
2.2 A Hierarchical Framework of Key Factors 18
2.3 Papers Related to the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) 22
Chapter 3 Methodology of Analytic Hierarchy Process 26
3.1 The Principle of AHP 26
3.2 The Process of AHP 27
3.3 The Advantages of AHP 38
3.4 The Applications of AHP 38
Chapter 4 Results of Survey and Discussion 41
4.1 Personal Information of Thai Passengers 41
4.2 Results of Questionnaire 47
4.3 The Comparisons of Results with Those of Other Papers 72
5.1 The Summary of Results 82
5.2 Suggestions for Related Organizations 83
5.3 Research Limits and Future Development 92
References 94


Alam, M.R. (2012). Demographic influence on brand preference towards budget airline in
UAE. International Journal of Applied Research & Studies, 1(2), 1-8.
Alessio, I.A., & Labib, A. (2009). Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice:
Benefits and limitations. OR Insight, 22(4), 221-220.
Amiruddin, N.H. (2013). Price, service quality and customer loyalty: A case of Air Asia.
South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 2(1), 34-40.
Anuwichanont, J. (2011). The impact of price perception on customer loyalty in the airline
Context. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 9(9), 37-50.
Ariffin, A.A.M., Salleh, A.H.M., Aziz, N.A., & Asbudin, A.A. (2010). Service quality and
satisfaction for low cost carriers. International Review of Business Research
Papers, 6(1), 47-56.
Atalik, O., & Ozdemir, E. (2015). A hybrid method using factor analysis and AHP on
passenger purchase decision: the case of domestic airlines in Turkey. International
Business Research, 8(1), 14-23.
Babic, D., & Kalic, M. (2011). Modeling the estimation of the airline profit in case of
purchasing new slots for increasing flight frequency. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 1069–1079.
Badea, A., Prostean, G., Goncalves, G., & Allaoui, H. (2014). Assessing risk factors in
collaborative supply chain with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Procedia-
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 114 – 123.
Baker, D. (2014). Low-cost airlines management model and customer satisfaction.
International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(9), 1-17.
Banuelas, R., & Antony, J. (2004). Modified analytic hierarchy process to incorporate
uncertainty and managerial aspects. International Journal of Production Research, 42(18), 3851–3872.
Barnhart, C., Fearing, D., & Vaze, V. (2014). Modeling passenger travel and delays in the
national air transportation system. Operation Research, 580-601.
Berrittella, M., Franca, L.L., & Zito, P. (2009). An analytic hierarchy process for ranking
operating costs of low cost and full service airlines. Journal of Air Transport
Management, 15(5), 249-255.
Berry, L.L., & Parasuraman, A. (1992). Marketing services: Competing through quality Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 132-134.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔