跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.83) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/25 18:31
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:劉家豐
研究生(外文):LIU,CHIA-FENG
論文名稱:隱含波動率價差之訊息內涵及交易策略:台灣市場實證研究
論文名稱(外文):Information content of volatility spread and its trading strategies: Evidence from the Taiwan market
指導教授:陳昭君陳昭君引用關係
指導教授(外文):CHEN,CHAO-CHUN
口試委員:莊凱旭林士貴
口試委員(外文):CHUANG,KAI-SHILIN,SHIH-KUEI
口試日期:2016-06-27
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:財務金融學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:39
中文關鍵詞:隱含波動率價差資訊假說預測能力交易策略
外文關鍵詞:Implied volatility spreadInformation hypothesisPredictabilityTrading strategies
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:233
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:19
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本文使用2007年至2015年之選擇權日內資料,研究旨在觀察台指選擇權之隱含波動率價差對當期台灣加權股價指數的影響,以及其對台灣加權股價指數未來走向是否具有預測能力。實證結果顯示,隱含波動率價差對台灣加權股價指數有顯著正向的影響,支持資訊假說論點,且隱含波動率價差亦有預測台灣加權股價指數的能力。以此研究結果為基礎,本研究進一步以選擇權隱含波動率價差為訊號進行交易操作,操作標的分別為台灣加權股價指數、台指期貨及台灣50指數股票型基金等,以觀察投資人是否能藉由波動率價差策略獲利。結果顯示,在不計交易成本的情況下,以隱含波動度價差為基礎之交易策略,不論採用上述何種商品進行交易操作皆可獲利,其中又以台指期貨的報酬率最高。即使在計入交易成本後,利用此一策略操作台指期貨依舊可以獲利。
Based on the intraday data of Taiwan Stock Exchange Capitalization Weight Stock Index (TAIEX) options ranging from 2007 to 2015, this research investigates the impact of implied volatility spread on the TAIEX index and examines whether volatility spread of TAIEX options possesses predictability. Empirical results suggest that the impact of implied volatility spread on the TAIEX index is positive, supporting the information hypothesis. We also find that implied volatility spread has the ability in predicting subsequently TAIEX returns. Based on these findings, we develop a volatility-spread-based strategy and examine performances of this strategy in trading TAIEX index, TAIEX futures, and the Taiwan 50 ETF, respectively. We find that the volatility-spread-based trading strategy generates a positive profit in the absence of transaction costs. After taking transaction costs into account, traders still profit by applying this strategy in trading TAEIX futures.
第一章、 緒論 1
第二章、 文獻回顧 3
第三章、 研究來源與研究模型 7
第一節 資料來源與處理 7
第二節 隱含波動率之計算 7
第三節 隱含波動率價差之計算 8
第四節 隱含波動率價差對當期價格之影響 10
第五節 隱含波動率價差對未來報酬之預測能力 10
第六節 隱含波動率價差交易策略 11
第四章、 實證結果分析 12
第一節 敘述性統計 12
第二節 實證結果 17
第五章、 隱含波動率價差交易策略之操作績效 23
第六章、 結論 36
參考文獻 37

詹錦宏、施介人(2005),「台股指數現貨, 期貨與選擇權價格發現之研究」,台灣金融財務季刊,第六卷,第一期,頁31-51。
楊東曉、楊聲勇、蔡逸賢(2011),「買賣權期貨訂價誤差與隱含波動度差之應用」,期貨與選擇權學刊,第四卷,第二期,頁75-112。
Black, F. (1975). Fact and fantasy in the use of options. Financial Analysts Journal, 31(4), 36-41.
Battalio, R., & Schultz, P. (2006). Options and the bubble. Journal of Finance, 61(5), 2071-2102.
Bali, T. G., & Hovakimian, A. (2009). Volatility spreads and expected stock returns. Management Science, 55(11), 1797-1812.
Chakravarty, S., Gulen, H., & Mayhew, S. (2004). Informed trading in stock and option markets. Journal of Finance, 59(3), 1235-1257.
Cremers, M., & Weinbaum, D. (2010). Deviations from put-call parity and stock return predictability. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(2), 335.
Chang, C. C., Hsieh, P. F., & Lai, H. N. (2009). Do informed option investors predict stock returns? Evidence from the Taiwan stock exchange. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(4), 757-764.
Chan, K. C., Chang, Y., & Lung, P. P. (2009). Informed trading under different market conditions and moneyness: Evidence from TXO options. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17(2), 189-208.
Draper, P., & Fung, J. K. (2002). A Study of Arbitrage Efficiency Between the FTSE‐100 Index Futures and Options Contracts. Journal of Futures Markets, 22(1), 31-58.
Easley, D., O'hara, M., & Srinivas, P. S. (1998). Option volume and stock prices: Evidence on where informed traders trade. The Journal of Finance, 53(2), 431-465.
Fleming, J., Ostdiek, B., & Whaley, R. E. (1995). Predicting stock market volatility: A new measure. Journal of Futures Markets, 15(3), 265-302.
Figlewski, S., & Wang, X. (2000). Is the'Leverage Effect'a Leverage Effect? Available at SSRN 256109.
Harvey, C. R., & Whaley, R. E. (1992). Market volatility prediction and the efficiency of the S & P 100 index option market. Journal of Financial Economics, 31(1), 43-73.
Jin, W., Livnat, J., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Option Prices Leading Equity Prices: Do Option Traders Have an Information Advantage? Journal of Accounting Research, 50(2), 401-432.
Kaul, G., Nimalendran, M., & Zhang, D. (2004). Informed trading and option spreads. Available at SSRN 547462.
Kang, J., & Park, H. J. (2008). The information content of net buying pressure: Evidence from the KOSPI 200 index option market. Journal of Financial Markets, 11(1), 36-56.
Lamont, O. A., & Thaler, R. H. (2003). Anomalies: The law of one price in financial markets. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), 191-202.
Ofek, E., & Richardson, M. (2003). Dotcom mania: The rise and fall of internet stock prices. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1113-1137.
Ofek, E., Richardson, M., & Whitelaw, R. F. (2004). Limited arbitrage and short sales restrictions: Evidence from the options markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 74(2), 305-342.
Pan, J., & Poteshman, A. M. (2006). The information in option volume for future stock prices. Review of Financial Studies, 19(3), 871-908.
Schlag, C., & Stoll, H. (2005). Price impacts of options volume. Journal of Financial Markets, 8(1), 69-87.
Shiu, Y. M., Pan, G. G., Lin, S. H., & Wu, T. C. (2010). Impact of Net Buying Pressure on Changes in Implied Volatility: Before and After the Onset of the Subprime Crisis. Journal of Derivatives, 17(4), 54-66.
Tavakkol, A. (2000). Positive feedback trading in the options market. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 69-80.
Whaley, R. E. (2000). The investor fear gauge. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 26(3), 12-17.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top