本研究探討不同的序列結構在序列學習的學習效果,以及使用群落偵測演算法去檢視在序列網路內意元集組的行為．我們以不同的序列結構，連續與間隔和交錯與重複因素的影響下，是否有在高情境干擾在練習中的表現相較於低情境干擾較差，但在學後保留 有較佳的表現，也就是情境干擾效應的出現．我們分別以技能改善、技能記憶儲存、技能遺忘、技能保留、技能遷移分別去探討學習效果的出現，發現在練習連續交錯型的學習效果是優於其他條件下的序列．我們更以群落偵測演算法來探討集組的出現，以及意元集組行為如何將序列中的元素串聯，來探討在練習兩種不同干擾條件中, 集組行為經由練習後的變化．

The current study investigated the influences of motor sequence structures on motor sequence learning. The motor sequences were arranged in either a repetitive or an interleaved order. It has been shown that the performance of practicing an interleaved sequence (higher contextual interference level) is generally inferior to that of practicing a repetitive sequence (lower contextual interference level), but becomes superior during the retention phase, a phenomenon known as the contextual interference (CI) effect. We assessed the CI effects on different indices of learning, such as improving, saving, forgetting, and transfer. We further used the community-detection algorithm to investigate how the participants applied the chunking techniques during motor sequence learning. We found that the length of sequence chunks tended to decrease after repetitive practice, but increase after interleaved practice. This finding indicates the difference in chunking patterns between sequences of different contextual interference levels.

誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii
英文摘要 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
第一章 前言 1
1-1動作學習(motor learning) 　 1
1-2序列學習(sequence learning) 　 2
1-3情境干擾效應(contextual interference effect) 3
1-4間隔效應(spacing effect) 　 4
1-5意元集組(chunking) 　 5
第二章 實驗材料與方法 6
2-1 序列按鍵實驗 (Serial reaction-time task) 6
2-2 實驗1:序列結構與情境干擾效應的相關性 7
2-3 實驗2:間隔效應與情境干擾效應間相互作用 　 10
2-4 實驗3:意元集組(Chunking) 11
第三章 實驗數據分析 12
3-1學習行為之分析(Behavior data) 12
3-2動作學習效果 13
3-3意元集組分析(Chunking Analysis) 14
第四章 結果 16
4-1實驗一　序列結構與情境干擾效應的相關性 16
4-2實驗二　間隔效應與情境干擾效應間相互作用 18
4-3實驗三 意元集組(Chunking) 25
第五章 討論 28
第六章 結論 29
第七章 參考文獻 30
附錄 33
圖一燈號顯示與相對應按鍵位置
6
圖二實驗一實驗流程
7
圖三按鍵實驗之序列顯示
8
圖四序列實驗使用重複及交錯練習排序
9
圖五實驗三實驗流程
11
圖六交錯型與重複型序列之反應時間
16
圖七情境干擾效應檢定
17
圖八連續與間隔之交錯型與重複型序列的反應時間
18
圖九情境干擾效應SI_SR和CI_CR
19
圖十情境干擾之保留效果檢定
19
圖十一學習改善程度比較
20
圖十二重複型序列之記憶留存效果
21
圖十三交錯型序列之記憶留存效果
21
圖十四序列組合於交錯型序列之記憶留存效果
22
圖十五序列組合對交錯型序列之記憶留存效果
22
圖十六重複型序列之技能遺忘效果
22
圖十七交錯型序列之技能遺忘效果
22
圖十八重複型序列之學習遷移效果
23
圖十九交錯型序列之學習遷移效果
23
圖二十交錯型序列之意元強度
25
圖二十一重複型序列之意元強度
25
圖二十二交錯型與重複型的三種序列之意元數量
27
圖二十三愛丁堡慣用測問卷
33
圖二十四簡短智能測驗
34
圖二十五基本資料表
35
表一學習改善檢定
20
表二重複型序列之記憶留存檢定
21
表三交錯型序列之記憶留存檢定
21
表四重複型序列之技能遺忘檢定
23
表五交錯型序列之技能遺忘檢定
23
表六重複型序列之學習遷移檢定
24
表七交錯型序列之學習遷移檢定
24
表八學習影響因素與效果
24

Adams, Jack A. (1971). A Closed-Loop Theory of Motor Learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3(2), 111-150.
Alamia, A., Solopchuk, O., D'Ausilio, A., Van Bever, V., Fadiga, L., Olivier, E., & Zenon, A. (2016). Disruption of Broca's Area Alters Higher-order Chunking Processing during Perceptual Sequence Learning. J Cogn Neurosci, 28(3), 402-417. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00911
Bassett, Danielle S, Wymbs, Nicholas F, Porter, Mason A, Mucha, Peter J, Carlson, Jean M, & Grafton, Scott T. (2011). Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(18), 7641-7646.
Battig, William F. (1956). Transfer from verbal pretraining to motor performance as a function of motor task complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51(6), 371.
Blondel, Vincent D., Guillaume, Jean-Loup, Renaud, Lambiotte, & Lefebvre, Etienne. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, Issue 10, pp. 10008, 12 pp. (2008).
Bo, Jin, & Seidler, Rachael D. (2009). Visuospatial working memory capacity predicts the organization of acquired explicit motor sequences. Journal of neurophysiology, 101(6), 3116-3125.
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychol Bull, 132(3), 354-380. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
Ebbinghaus, Hermann. (1985). Remembering Ebbinghaus. Contemporary Psychology, 30(7), 519-523.
Folstein, Marshal F., Folstein, Susan E., & McHugh, Paul R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189-198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Gobet, Fernand, Lane, Peter CR, Croker, Steve, Cheng, Peter CH, Jones, Gary, Oliver, Iain, & Pine, Julian M. (2001). Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 5(6), 236-243.
Guadagnoli, Mark A., & Lee, Timothy D. (2004). Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(2), 212-224.
James, William. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt.
Jimenez, L. (2008). Taking patterns for chunks: is there any evidence of chunk learning in continuous serial reaction-time tasks? Psychol Res, 72(4), 387-396. doi: 10.1007/s00426-007-0121-7
Johns, Gary. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of management review, 31(2), 386-408.
Jr., Philip I. Pavlik, & Anderson, John R. (2005). Practice and Forgetting Effects on Vocabulary Memory: An Activation-Based Model of the Spacing Effect. Cognitive Science, 29(4), 559-586.
Keele, Steven W., Ivry, Richard
, Mayr, Ulrich, Hazeltine, Eliot, & Heuer, Herbert. (2003). The Cognitive and Neural Architecture of Sequence Representation. Psychological Review, 110(2), 316-339.
Lashley, Karl Spencer. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior.
Magill, Richard A., & Hall, Kellie G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9(3-5), 241-289. doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(90)90005-x
Miller, George A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63(2), 81.
Mucha, Peter J, Richardson, Thomas, Macon, Kevin, Porter, Mason A, & Onnela, Jukka-Pekka. (2010). Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks. science, 328(5980), 876-878.
Newman, Mark EJ, & Leicht, Elizabeth A. (2007). Mixture models and exploratory analysis in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(23), 9564-9569.
Nissen, Mary Jo, & Bullemer, Peter. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1-32. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97-113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
Perruchet, Pierre, & Pacton, Sebastien. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in cognitive sciences, 10(5), 233-238.
Richard Schmidt, Tim Lee. (1999). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis.: Human Kinetics; 5 edition.
Robertson, E. M. (2007). The serial reaction time task: implicit motor skill learning? J Neurosci, 27(38), 10073-10075. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2747-07.2007
Sakai, K., Kitaguchi, K., & Hikosaka, O. (2003). Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning. Exp Brain Res, 152(2), 229-242. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1548-8
Schmidt, Richard A. (1975). A Schema Theory of Discrete Motor Skill Learning. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 82(4), 225-260.
Shea, Charles H., & Wulf, Gabriele. (2005). Schema Theory: A Critical Appraisal and Reevaluation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37(2), 85-102. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.37.2.85-102
Shea, John B, & Morgan, Robyn L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5(2), 179.
Willingham, Daniel B. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological review, 105(3), 558-584.
Wymbs, N. F., Bassett, D. S., Mucha, P. J., Porter, M. A., & Grafton, S. T. (2012). Differential recruitment of the sensorimotor putamen and frontoparietal cortex during motor chunking in humans. Neuron, 74(5), 936-946. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.038