跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.222.134.250) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/13 09:19
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:Hoang Huu Kha
研究生(外文):Hoang Huu Kha
論文名稱:虛擬窗戶為老人
論文名稱(外文):Virtual Windows for The Elderly
指導教授:曾俊儒曾俊儒引用關係
指導教授(外文):K. C. Tseng
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:長庚大學
系所名稱:工業設計學系
學門:設計學門
學類:產品設計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:英文
論文頁數:81
中文關鍵詞:老年人環境幸福恢復虛擬窗口
外文關鍵詞:ElderlyEnvironmentHappinessRestorationVirtual Window
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:122
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:17
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
Urbanization continues to grow faster than ever, and some problems resulting from urban development do not gain much attention from society. The number of people is uncontrollable, requiring reduced individual space, houses are becoming smaller, and humans are forced to live in the tiny houses or apartments. Schorr (2014) argued that in the future many people will have to reside in windowless apartments, and this lack of windows in their living environment could have many negative impacts on their health and emotional state. The purpose of the current study is to identify and understand the requirements for virtual windows in elderly living environments, and test whether virtual windows have implications for elders’ daily life, and physical or mental health. Therefore, we collected data regarding happiness and restorative value in the virtual window and windowless environments.
Data collection included experiments, questionnaires, and official visits as well as interaction with a virtual window in the windowless living space. A group of elderly subjects participated in an experiment that lasted approximately 10–15 min, where each participant followed as specific procedure in both environments and rated the happiness and restorative value.
The results showed that installing virtual windows in the living environment had a positive impact on elder’s health, and suggests the virtual windows were an important factor for overall happiness and influenced restorative outcomes. This highlights the importance of well-designed living environments, particularly window elements, for our elderly.
Recommendation letter from the thesis advisor
Oral defense committee certification
Acknowledgement .....................................................................................iii
Abstract......................................................................................................iv
Table of Contents....................................................................................... vi
Figures .....................................................................................................viii
Tables.........................................................................................................ix
Nomenclature.............................................................................................. x
Chapter 1 Introduction................................................................................ 1
1.1 Urbanization Problems .................................................................. 1
1.2 Cities in Taiwan and Aging Population Problem........................... 2
1.3 Research Rationale ........................................................................ 6
1.4 Research Framework ..................................................................... 7
Chapter 2 Literature Review....................................................................... 9
2.1 Elders’ Residential Environment and Surroundings...................... 9
2.2 Importance of Windows in Elderly Living Environments .......... 11
2.3 Views to Outside.......................................................................... 15
Chapter 3 Methodology ............................................................................ 17
3.1 Participants................................................................................... 17
3.2 Materials ...................................................................................... 17
3.3 Experiment Setting ...................................................................... 18
3.4 Measurements.............................................................................. 19
3.4.1 The Happiness Single-Item Scale ...................................... 19
3.4.2 The Perceived Restorativeness Scale................................. 19
3.4.3 General Demographic Questionnaires............................... 21
3.5 Data Analysis............................................................................... 21
Chapter 4 Virtual Window System ........................................................... 22
4.1 Virtual Window ........................................................................... 22
4.2 Virtual Window Concepts ........................................................... 24
4.3 Proposed Synthesis...................................................................... 25
4.4 System Design ............................................................................. 26
Chapter 5 System Validation .................................................................... 28
5.1 Experiment Conditions................................................................ 28
5.1.1 Windowless Environment.................................................. 28
5.1.2 Virtual Window Environment ........................................... 28
5.2 Procedure ..................................................................................... 30
5.3 General Demographic.................................................................. 32
5.4 The Happiness Single-Item Scale................................................ 34
5.4.1 Descriptive Statistics of the Happiness Single-Item Scale 34
5.4.2 Happiness between Windowless and Virtual Window
Environments.............................................................................. 35
5.5 The Perceived Restorativeness Scale .......................................... 37
5.6 Requirement for Virtual Windows in Elderly Living
Environments..................................................................................... 39
5.7 Impact of Virtual Windows on Elderly Well-being .................... 41
5.7.1 Happiness Level................................................................. 41
5.7.2 Restoration Level............................................................... 43
Chapter 6 Conclusion ............................................................................... 46
References................................................................................................. 49
Appendix A: HCII 2016 Publication ........................................................ 56
Appendix B: General demographic questionnaires.................................. 64
Appendix C: The happiness single-item scale.......................................... 66
Appendix D: The perceived restorativeness scale.................................... 67

Figures
Figure 1- 1. Variable Relationships ............................................................ 7
Figure 1- 2. Research Framework .............................................................. 8
Figure 3- 1 Experiment setting for (a) windowless and (b) virtual window
environments............................................................................................. 18
Figure 4- 1 Some examples of currently available virtual window ......... 24
Figure 4- 2 Example single images from the environmental categories.. 26
Figure 5 - 1 Windowless environment...................................................... 28
Figure 5 - 2 Virtual window environment ................................................ 29
Figure 5 - 3 Experiment Procedure .......................................................... 31


Tables
Table 4- 1 Typical virtual window environments..................................... 25
Table 5- 1 General demographics............................................................. 33
Table 5- 2 Happiness scale (0-10) ............................................................ 35
Table 5- 3 Natural environment scenes compared with windowless
environment (WE) .................................................................................... 36
Table 5- 4 Community spaces scenes compared with windowless
environment (WE) .................................................................................... 36
Table 5- 5 Urban area scenes compared with windowless environment
(WE).......................................................................................................... 37
Table 5- 6 Overall perceived restorativeness scale scores between
windowless (WE) and virtual window (VWE) environments ................. 38
Table 5- 7 Individual perceived restorativeness scale scores between
windowless (WE) and virtual window (VWE) environments ................. 38
1. Alidoust, S., Holden, G., & Bosman, C. (2014). Urban Environment and Social Health of the Elderly: A Critical Discussion on Physical, Social and Policy Environments. Athens J. Health, 1, 169-180.
2. Baroni, M. R., & Getrevi, A. (2002). Psicologia ambientale e invecchiamento: fattori di adattamento e disadattamento. AM Nenci (a cura di), Profili di ricerca e intervento psico-sociale per la gestione ambientale. FrancoAngeli, Milano.
3. Beckwith, M. E., & Gilster, S. D. (1997). The paradise garden: A model garden design for those with Alzheimer's disease. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 22(1-2), 3-16.
4. Berto, R. (2007). Assessing the restorative value of the environment: A study on the elderly in comparison with young adults and adolescents. International Journal of Psychology, 42(5), 331-341.
5. Beckwith, M. E., & Gilster, S. D. (1997). The paradise garden: A model garden design for those with Alzheimer's disease. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 22(1-2), 3-16.
6. Bind, M.-A., Baccarelli, A., Zanobetti, A., Tarantini, L., Suh, H., Vokonas, P., & Schwartz, J. (2012). Air pollution and markers of coagulation, inflammation and endothelial function: Associations and epicene environment interactions in an elderly cohort. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 23(2), 332–340.
http://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e31824523f0
7. Brascamp, W., & Kidd, J. L. (2002). Contribution of plants to the well-being of retirement home residents. In XXVI International Horticultural Congress: Expanding Roles for Horticulture in Improving Human Well-Being and Life Quality, 639, 145-150.
8. Carmody, J., & Sterling, R. (1993). Underground Space Design: A Guide to Subsurface Utilization and Design for People in Underground Spaces. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
9. Chao, A.N., Gau, M.L. & Lin, S.H.(2004). The Relationships between Health Status and Quality of Life among Rural Community Elderly Dwellers. The Journal of Long Term Care, 8(1), 41-55.
10. Clarke, P., & Nieuwenhuijsen, E. R. (2009). Environments for healthy ageing: a critical review. Maturitas, 64(1), 14-19.
11. Cunningham, G. O., & Michael, Y. L. (2004). Concepts guiding the study of the impact of the built environment on physical activity for older adults: a review of the literature. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(6), 435-443.
12. Douglas C. H. & Douglas M. R. (2003). Attitudes to and Perceptions of the Built Environment: Considerations for Better Design Technologies. Retrieved from
https://www.york.ac.uk/res/iht/events/nhsworkshop/Douglas.pdf
13. Frumkin, H. (2003). Healthy places: exploring the evidence. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1451-1456.
14. Golant, S. M. (1984). The effects of residential and activity behaviors on old people’s en-vironmental experiences. In Elderly People and The Environment, 239-278.
15. Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G. W., & Gärling, T. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 14(4), 175-194.
16. Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23(1), 3-26.
17. Heerwagen, J. H., & Orians, G. (1986). Adaptations to windowlessness: A study of the use of visual decor in windowed and windowless offices. Environment and Behavior, 18, 623–639.
18. Hinds, J., & Sparks, P. (2011). The affective quality of human-natural environment relationships. Evolutionary Psychology, 9(3), 147470491100900314.
19. Hsieh, M.O. (2004). Related Factors of Living Arrangements and Quality of Life among Disabled Elderly: A Quantitative Exploration. Social Policy & Social Work, 8(1), 1-49.
20. Hsueh, J. C. T., & Wang, Y. T. (2010). Living Arrangement and the Well-being of the Elderly in Taiwan. International Journal of Welfare for The Aged, 23, 87-107.
21. Hwang, E., & Ziebarth, A. C. (2006). Impacts of residential environments on housing satisfaction among Korean American elders. Housing and Society, 33(2), 1-20.
22. Kaplan, R. (1983). The role of nature in the urban context. Behavior and The Natural Environment, 6, 127-162.
23. Kaplan, R. (2001). The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 507-542.
24. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182.
25. Knopf, R. C. (1987). Human behavior, cognition, and affect in the natural environment. Handbook of Environmental Psychology, 1, 783-825.
26. Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime?. Environment and Behavior, 33(3), 343-367.
27. Lai, C.C. & Chu, C.H. (2002). Nutrition, activities and health-related quality of life among elderly people. The University Physical Education & Sports, 62, 122-128.
28. Lawrence, R. J. (2002). Healthy residential environments.
29. Lyle, J. (1999). Design for Human Ecosystems: Landscape, Land Use, and Natural Resources. Island Press.
30. Macintyre, S., Maciver, S., & Sooman, A. (1993). Area, class and health: should we be focusing on places or people?. Journal of Social Policy, 22(2), 213-234.
31. MacRae, S. K., & Michel, M. J. (1997). Consumer perceptions of the healthcare environment - An investigation to determine what matters. In Journal of Healthcare Design: Proceedings from the... Symposium on Healthcare Design. Symposium on Healthcare Design, December 1997 (pp. 7-10). Boston, MA: The Picker Institute and the Center for Health Design.
32. MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 992-1000.
33. Musil, J. (1993). Changing urban systems in post-communist societies in Central Europe: analysis and prediction. Urban Studies, 30(6), 899-905.
34. Ochodo, C., Ndetei, D. M., Moturi, W. N., & Otieno, J. O. (2014). External built residential environment characteristics that affect mental health of adults. Journal of Urban Health, 91(5), 908-927.
35. Passchier-Vermeer, W., & Passchier, W. F. (2000). Noise exposure and public health. Environmental Health Perspectives, 108(1), 123.
36. Rosso, A. L., Auchincloss, A. H., & Michael, Y. L. (2011). The urban built environment and mobility in older adults: a comprehensive review. Journal of Aging Research.
37. Sato, I., & Conner, T. S. (2013). The quality of time in nature: How fascination explains and enhances the relationship between nature experiences and daily affect. Ecopsychology, 5(3), 197-204.
38. Schorr, B. (2014). Mixed Reality Living Spaces. Retrieved from http://mixedreality.cc
39. Sloane, P. D., Mitchell, C. M., Preisser, J. S., Phillips, C., Commander, C., & Burker, E. (1998). Environmental correlates of resident agitation in Alzheimer's disease special care units. Journal of The American Geriatrics Society, 46(7), 862-869.
40. Talbot, J. F., & Kaplan, R. (1990). The benefits of nearby nature for elderly apartment residents. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 33(2), 119-130.
41. Talbot, J. F., & Kaplan, R. (1991). The benefits of nearby nature for elderly apartment residents. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 33(2), 119-130.
42. Tennessen, C. M., & Cimprich, B. (1995). Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 77-85.
43. Tognoli, J. (1987). Residential environments. Handbook of Environmental Psychology, 1, 655-690.
44. Tse, T. (2005). The environment and falls prevention: Do environmental modifications make a difference?. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52(4), 271-281.
45. Ulrich, R. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery. Science, 224(4647), 224-225.
46. Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13(5), 523-556.
47. Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201-230.
48. Verderber, S. (1986). Dimensions of person-window transactions in the hospital environment. Environment and Behavior, 18(4), 450-466.
49. Wang, Y.T. (2006). 2006 Factors associated with quality of life indicators for the middle aged and elderly people in Taiwan--An example of health capital model. Presented in the Sixth International Campbell Collaboration Colloquium in Los Angeles, California, USA. Feb. 22-24.
50. Wheeler, B. W., White, M., Stahl-Timmins, W., & Depledge, M. H. (2012). Does living by the coast improve health and wellbeing?. Health and Place, 18(5), 1198-1201.
51. White, M. P., Alcock, I., Wheeler, B. W., & Depledge, M. H. (2013). Coastal proximity, health and well-being: Results from a longitudinal panel survey. Health and Place, 23, 97-103.
52. Yung, E. H., Conejos, S., & Chan, E. H. (2016). Social needs of the elderly and active aging in public open spaces in urban renewal. Cities, 52, 114-122.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊