跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(98.80.143.34) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/04 17:28
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:李立昂
研究生(外文):Li Ang Lee
論文名稱:認知風格與校院醫學教育的e化學習行動科技-耳鼻喉頭頸外科學教學的隨機控制研究
論文名稱(外文):Cognitive Style and Mobile Technology in E-Learning in Undergraduate Medical Education- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
指導教授:莊正鏗莊正鏗引用關係
指導教授(外文):C. K. Chuang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:長庚大學
系所名稱:臨床醫學研究所醫學教育組
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:醫學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:英文
論文頁數:54
中文關鍵詞:認知風格e化學習行動科技隨機控制研究耳鼻喉頭頸外科
外文關鍵詞:cognitive stylee-learningmobile technologyrandomized controlled trialotolaryngology-headneck surgery
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:150
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
[摘要尚未公開]
[摘要尚未公開]
Recommendation Letter from the Thesis Advisor…………………………….…………
Thesis/Dissertation Oral Defense Committee Certification…………………...…………
Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………..…………… iii
Chinese Abstract……………………………………………………………….…………… iv
English Abstract………………………………………………………….………………… vi
Chapter 1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. 1
1.1 Background: Current Progress of Undergraduate Medical Education in Taiwan ………………………. 1
1.2 Mobile Technology in E-Learning…………………………………………………....…………………. 2
1.3 Cognitive Style……………………………………………………………………….………………….. 4
1.4 Aim of the Study…………………………………………………………………………………………. 6
Chapter 2 Materials and Methods………………………………………………………… 7
2.1 Study Design………………………………………………………………………….…………………. 7
2.2 Participants…………………………………………………………………………...…………………. 7
2.3 Study Protocol………………………………………………………………………..…………………. 8
2.4 Establishing the M-TEL System for Emergent ORL-HNS Disorders……………….…………………. 9
2.5 Learning Outcomes…………………………………………………………………..…………………. 11
2.6 Satisfaction Surveys………………………………………………………………….…………………. 12
2.7 Outcome Measures…………………………………………………………………...…………………. 13
2.8 Statistical Analysis………………………………………………………………………………………. 13
Chapter 3 Results…………………………………………………………………………... 15
3.1 Subjects……………………………………………………………………………….…………………. 15
3.2 Outcomes in the Overall Group…………………………………………………………………………. 15
3.3 Differences in Outcomes between the IM and PPS Modules………………………...…………………. 15
3.4 Differences in Outcomes between Original FD and FI Leaners…………………………………………. 16
3.5 Post Hoc Analysis……………………………………………………………………. …………………. 17
Chapter 4 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………. 19
Chapter 5 Discussion……………………………………………………………………….. 20
Reference……………………………………………………………………………………. 24
Appendix…………………………………………………………………………………….. 29
1. Association of American Medical Colleges. Recommendations for Clinical Skills
Curricula for Undergraduate Medical Education. Executive Summary. Washington, DC:
American Association of Medical Colleges; 2008.
2. Glicksman JT, Brandt MG, Parr J, Fung K. Needs assessment of undergraduate education
in otolaryngology among family medicine residents. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2008;37(5):668-675.
3. Wolff M, Wagner MJ, Poznanski S, Schiller J, Santen S. Not another boring lecture:
Engaging learners with active learning techniques. J Emerg Med. 2015;48(1):85-93.
4. Fung K. Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery in undergraduate medical education:
advances and innovations. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(Suppl 2):S1-14.
5. Wilkinson E. The new European Society of Cardiology e-learning platform for cardiology
education. Eur Heart J. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(44):3389.
6. Yavner SD, Pusic MV, Kalet AL, et al. Twelve tips for improving the effectiveness of
web-based multimedia instruction for clinical learners. Med Teach. 2015;37(3):239-244.
7. Alegría DA, Boscardin C, Poncelet A, Mayfield C, Wamsley M. Using tablets to support
self-regulated learning in a longitudinal integrated clerkship. Med Educ Online.
2014;19:23638.
8. Frehywot S, Vovides Y, Talib Z, et al. E-learning in medical education in resource
constrained low- and middle-income countries. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11:4.
9. Hardyman W, Bullock A, Brown A, Carter-Ingram S, Stacey M. Mobile technology
supporting trainee doctors’ workplace learning and patient care: an evaluation. BMC Med
Educ. 2013;13:6.
10. Moffett J, Mill AC. Evaluation of the flipped classroom approach in a veterinary
professional skills course. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014;5:415-425.
11. Alegría DA, Boscardin C, Poncelet A, Mayfield C, Wamsley M. Using tablets to support
self-regulated learning in a longitudinal integrated clerkship. Med Educ Online.
2014;19:23638.
12. Ozdalga E, Ozdalga A, Ahuja N. The smartphone in medicine: a review of current and
potential use among physicians and students. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(5):e128.
13. Lewis TL. A systematic self-certification model for mobile medical apps. J Med Internet
25
Res. 2013;15(4):e89.
14. van Roermund TA, Mokkink HG, Bottema BJ, van Weel C, Scherpbier AJ. Comparison of
expectations and beliefs about good teaching in an academic day release medical
education program: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:211.
15. Nkenke E, Vairaktaris E, Bauersachs A, Eitner S, Budach A, Knipfer S, Stelzle F.
Acceptance of technology-enhanced learning for a theoretical radiological science course:
a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:18.
16. Chapman DM, Calhoun JG. Validation of learning style measures: implications for
medical education practice. Med Educ. 2006(6);40:576-583.
17. Sissine M, Segan R, Taylor M, et al. Cost comparison model: Blended eLearning versus
traditional training of community health workers. Online J Public Health Inform.
2014;6(3):e196.
18. Changiz T, Haghani F, Nowroozi N. Are postgraduate students in distance medical
education program ready for e-learning? A survey in Iran. J Educ Health Promot.
2013;2:61.
19. Curry L. Individual differences in cognitive style, learning style and instructional
preference in medical education. In: Norman CR, Van der Vleuten CPM, Newble DI, eds.
International Handbook of Research in Medical Education, Dordrecht: Springer
Science+Business Media 2002:263-276.
20. Curry L. An organisation of learning style theory and constructs. In: Curry L, ed.
Learning Style in Continuing Medical Education. Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association
1983;115–131.
21. Tinajero C, Paramo MF. Field dependence and academic achievement: A reexamination of
their relationship. Br J Educ Psychol. 1997;67(2):199-212.
22. Graff M. Learning from web-based instructional systems and cognitive style. Br J Educ
Tech. 2003;34(4):407-418.
23. Scott N, Smith DU, Rosenberg IK. Cognitive style and instructional materials for medical
students. J Med Educ. 1981;56(7):565-571.
24. Rasmussen K, Belisario JM, Wark PA, et al. Offline eLearning for undergraduates in
health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and
satisfaction. J Glob Health. 2014;4(1):010405.
25. George PP, Papachristou N, Belisario JM, et al. Online eLearning for undergraduates in
health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and
26
satisfaction. J Glob Health. 2014;4(1):010406.
26. Bediang G, Perrin C, Ruiz de Castañeda R, et al. The RAFT Telemedicine network:
Lessons learnt and perspectives from a decade of educational and clinical services in
Low- and Middle-Incomes Countries. Front Public Health. 2014;2:180.
27. Chen S. A cognitive model for non–linear learning in hypermedia programmes. Br J Educ
Technol. 2002;33(4):449-460.
28. Morrison GR, Ross SM, Kalman HK, Kemp JE. Designing Effective Instruction, 7th
Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Inc.; 2013.
29. Witkin H, Oltman P, Raskin E, Karp S. Embedded Figures Test: Manual for the
Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1971.
30. Chapelle C, Green P. Field independence/dependence in second-language acquisition
research. Lang Learn. 1992;42(1):47-83.
31. Choi KJ, Kahmke RR, Crowson MG, Puscas L, Scher RL, Cohen SM. Trends in
otolaryngology consultation patterns at an academic quaternary care center. JAMA
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;143(5):472-477.
32. Baniqued PL, Allen CM, Kranz MB, et al. Working memory, reasoning, and task
switching training: Transfer effects, limitations, and great expectations? PLoS One.
2015;10(11):e0142169.
33. Mayer RE. Multimedia Learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
34. Hassenzahl M, Burmester M, Koller F: AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung
wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In: Ziegler J, Szwillus G. (eds.)
Mensch & Computer 2003. Interaktion in Bewegung, Stuttgart, Leipzig, German:
Vieweg+Teubner Verlag;2003:187-196.
35. Daniel WW: Friedman two-way analysis of variance by ranks. In: Daniel WW. (eds.)
Applied Nonparametric Statistics (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: PWS-Kent; 1990:262-274.
36. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1:
tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149-1160.
37. El-Banna H. The development of a predictive theory of science education based upon
information processing theory. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Scotland, UK:
University of Glasgow; 1987.
38. Doherty I, Sharma N, Harbutt D. Contemporary and future eLearning trends in medical
education. Med Teach. 2015;37(1):1-3.
39. Rasmussen K, Belisario JM, Wark PA, et al. Offline eLearning for undergraduates in
27
health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and
satisfaction. J Glob Health. 2014;4(1):010405.
40. George PP, Papachristou N, Belisario JM, et al. Online eLearning for undergraduates in
health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and
satisfaction. J Glob Health. 2014;4(1):010406.
41. Worm BS. Learning from simple ebooks, online cases or classroom teaching when
acquiring complex knowledge. A randomized controlled trial in respiratory physiology
and pulmonology. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e73336.
42. Banna J, Grace Lin MF, Stewart M, Fialkowski MK. Interaction matters: Strategies to
promote engaged learning in an online introductory nutrition course. J Online Learn
Teach. 2015;11(2):249-261.
43. Gaupp R, Körner M, Fabry G. Effects of a case-based interactive e-learning course on
knowledge and attitudes about patient safety: a quasi-experimental study with third-year
medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:172.
44. Back DA, von Malotky J, Sostmann K, Hube R, Peters H, Hoff E. Superior gain in
knowledge by podcasts versus text-based learning in teaching orthopedics: A randomized
controlled trial. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(1):154-160.
45. Bredesen IM, Bjøro K, Gunningberg L, Hofoss D. Effect of e-learning program on risk
assessment and pressure ulcer classification - A randomized study. Nurse Educ Today.
2016;40:191-197.
46. Oproiu GC. A study about using e-learning platform (Moodle) in university teaching
process. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;180:426-432.
47. Hoa D, Micheau A, Gahide G. Creating an interactive Web-based e-learning course: a
practical introduction for radiologists. Radiographics. 2006;26(6):e25; quiz e25.
48. Eggermont S, Bloemendaal PM, van Baalen JM. E-learning any time any place anywhere
on mobile devices. Perspect Med Educ. 2013;2(2):95-98.
49. Fung K. Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery in undergraduate medical education:
Advances and innovations. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(Suppl 2):S1-14.
50. Curry L. An organisation of learning style theory and constructs. In: Curry L, ed.
Learning Style in Continuing Medical Education. Ottawa, Canadian: Canadian Medical
Association;1983:115-131.
51. Jonassen DH, Grabowski BL. Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and
Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1993.
28
52. Tinajero C, Paramo MF. Field dependence-independence and academic achievement: a
re-examination of their relationship. Br J Educ Psychol. 1997;67(2):199-212.
53. Ramírez-Correa PE, Arenas-Gaitán J, Rondán-Cataluña FJ. Gender and acceptance of
e-learning: A multi-group analysis based on a structural equation model among college
students in Chile and Spain. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140460.
54. Üstünel H, Uçar E, Civelek T, Umut İ. The relationships between field
dependent/independent cognitive styles and information & communication technologies
based programs in gifted education. Int J Hum Sci 2015;12(2):266-277.
55. Karbownik MS, Wiktorowska-Owczarek A, Kowalczyk E, Kwarta P, Mokros Ł, Pietras T.
Board game versus lecture-based seminar in the teaching of pharmacology of
antimicrobial drugs--a randomized controlled trial. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016;363(7). pii:
fnw045.
56. Bertini M, Pizzamiglio L, Wapner S, eds. Field Dependence in Psychological Theory,
Research, and Application. Hilisdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates; 1986.
57. Riding RJ, Rayner SG, eds, Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies: Understanding
Style Differences in Learning and Behaviour. London: David Fulton Publishers; 1998.
58. Wiecha JM, Gramling R, Joachim P, Vanderschmidt H. Collaborative e-learning using
streaming video and asynchronous discussion boards to teach the cognitive foundation of
medical interviewing: a case study. J Med Internet Res. 2003;5(2):e13.
59. Kim KJ, Frick TW. Changes in student motivation during online learning. J Educ Comput
Res. 2011;44(1):1-23.
60. Alegría DA, Boscardin C, Poncelet A, Mayfield C, Wamsley M. Using tablets to support
self-regulated learning in a longitudinal integrated clerkship. Med Educ Online.
2014;19:23638.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊