臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本文結果顯示家族企業和非家族企業之投資與融資決策對公司績效之優劣有不同但也非都存在著差異。首先，在整體產業中，家族企業與非家族企業在獲利能力（Pro）上均顯現出與公司績效顯著相關；而家族企業則在資本支出（CE）與資產擔保價值（VAA）二項變數中與公司績效顯著相關。其次，再以電子業為例，家族企業和非家族企業仍然同在獲利能力（Pro）上顯現出與公司績效顯著相關；從十一項自變數來看，家族企業有七項和公司績效達顯著之水準，非家族企業則較多有八項表現與公司績效達顯著水準。最後，以非電子業為例，家族企業和非家族企業仍然在獲利能力（Pro）上為公司績效帶來顯著之影響力。除獲利能力外，家族企業在營業毛利成長率（OMGR）、自由現金流量（FC）、資本支出（CE）、和公司規模（CS）此四項對公司績效均達正向非常顯著之水準，其他達顯著水準之項目和整體產業的家族企業則相當一致。在非家族企業中除了獲利能力（Pro），其他項目對公司績效能達顯著之水準者就顯得較為零星，其相關程度亦較家族企業來得薄弱許多。

The results show different advantages and disadvantages of investment and financing decisions on corporate performance between family firms and non-family firms, but it doesn’t mean all of them have a difference. First of all, family firms and non-family firms present the significant correlation with corporate performance in profitability (Pro) in the overall industry. Family firms present the significant correlation with corporate performance in capital expenditure (CE) and collateral value of assets (VAA). Secondly, based on electronics industry, family firms and non-family firms still present the significant correlation with corporate performance in profitability(Pro). From the perspective 11 independent variables, family firms reach the significant level with corporate performance in 7 items, while non-family firms reach the significant level with corporate performance in 8 items. At last, based on the non-electronics industry, family firms and non-family firms still bring significant influences to the corporate performance in profitability (Pro). In addition to profitability, family firms reach positive high level in operation margin growth rate(OMGR), free cash(FC), capital expenditure(CE) and company scale(CS). Other items and overall industry that reach the significant level are considerably consistent with family firms. In addition to profitability(Pro), other items in non-family firms that reach the high level with corporate performance are scattered. The degree of correlation is also greatly weaker than family firms.

致謝……………………………………………………………………
摘要……………………………………………………………………
Abstract………………………………………………………………
目錄……………………………………………………………………I
表目錄…………………………………………………………………II
圖目錄………………………………………………………………III
第一章緒論 1
第一節台灣家族企業之狀況 1
第二節研究背景與動機 3
第三節 研究目的 5
第四節研究架構 6
第二章文獻探討 7
第一節公司績效衡量之相關文獻 7
第二節投資決策影響公司績效之相關文獻 8
第三節融資決策 12
第三章 研究方法 15
第一節研究方法與變數 15
第二節 資料來源及資料收集方法 20
第四章實證結果分析 21
第一節敘述統計量 21
第二節 投資決策、融資決策對公司績效的影響 26
第三節家族企業與非家族企業對公司績效的影響 33
第五章研究結論 45
參考文獻 47

一、中文部分
方資量（2009）。研發投資對創新與經營績效之影響-吸收能力的角色。碩士論文，東海大學會計學系，台中。
王玉珍（2002）。股權結構、董事會組成、資本結構與企業績效關係之研究。出版碩士論文，中央大學企業管理研究所，桃園。
王雍智，潘家玲(2010)。資本結構與公司績效關聯性之研究－台灣股市新啟示。企業管理學報，85，71-110。
王起鳳（2005）。研發費用與公司績效：考慮公司規模後的實証研究。高雄應用科技大學商務經營系，碩士論文，高雄。
中央銀行經濟研究處（1999~2007）。中華民國公民營企業資金狀況調查結果報告。
朱博湧、吳壽山、邱淑芳（1992）。資本結構決定因素－台灣實證探討。管理科學學報，9(2)，159-177。
沈中華與王建安（2000）。融資限制對公司投資的影響。經濟論文，28（1），67-95。
李存修、葉銀華（2001）。整合公司監理與會計資訊之財務危機預測模型。國科會研究報告。
吳魯恆（2012）。董監事大股東持股比例與機構法人持股比例對金融控股公司經營績效之影響。國立東華大學管理學院高階經營管理碩士在職專班論文。
范揚松（1999）。家族企業的病理分析。現代管理月刊，126 ，18-23。
邱愛婷(1996)。上市公司外部融資前後公司績效變動之實證研究。淡江大學國際貿易研究所未出版之碩士論文，1-95，台北。
徐君毅(2001)。研發與廣告支出與企業價值變動之因果關係研究。東海大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文，1-60，台中。
陳威廷(2001)。研究發展支出與市場價值關聯性之實證研究。中國文化大學會計研究所為出版之碩士論文，1-70，台北。
彭永龍(2011)。投資型子公司、公司治理及成長機會與公司績效關係之研究。交通大學管理學院財務金融所未出版之碩士論文，1-60，新竹。
蔡宛婷（2008）。家族企業短視研發投資行為之探討。東海大學會計系， 碩士論文，台中。
劉韻僖、鍾喜梅、葉匡時(2003)。我國上市公司家族控制力與董事會 運作關係之探討。中山管理評論，11(2)，341-365。
賴俊峯(2009)。公司治理機制對公司績效及公司績效波動程度之影響性研究。彰化師範大學商業教育所謂出版之碩士論文，1-55，彰化。
謝劍平(1995)。以公司托賓 Q 比率預測股價對公司投資變動的反應。管理評論，14（1），33-46。
謝佳樺（2006）。研發和廣告支出與未來經濟效益相關性的實證研究：以台灣公司為例。國立成功大學會計學系，碩士論文，台南。






二、西文部分
Armen, H., Gayane, H., & Hassan, T. (2001). Determinants of target capital structure: The case of dual debt and equity issues. Journal of Financial Economics, 71(3), 517-540.
Anderson, R. C., Duru, A., and Reeb, D. M. （2012）. Investment policy in family controlled firms. Journal of Banking and Finance,36(6): 1744-1758.
Asquith, P., & Mullins, D. W. (1986). Equity issues and offering dilution.Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1-2), 61-29.
Baker, N. and Freeland,J.（1975）. Recent advances in R&D benefitmeasurement and project selection methods. Management Science, 21：1164-1175.
Black, E. L., Legoria, J., & Sellers, K. F. (2000). Capital investment effects of dividend imputation. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 22(2), 40-59.
Booth, L., Aivazian, V., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2001). Capital structure in developing countries. Journal of Finance, 56(1), 87-130.
Brigham, E. F., & Gapenski, L. C. (1997). Financial management theory and practice (8th ed.).
Chan, L. K., Lakonishok, C. J., & Sougiannis, T. (2001). The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. The Journal of Finance, 16(6), 2431-2456.
Chauvin, K. W., & Hirschey, M. (1993). Advertising, R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm. Financial Management, 22(4),128-140.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., and Lang, L. H. P. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporation. Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (1-2): 81-112.
Clinch, G. (1991). Employee compensation and firms' research and development activity. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(1), 59-78.
DeAngelo, H., & Masulis, R. (1980). Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(1), 3-27.
DeAngelo, H., and DeAngelo, L. 1985. Managerial ownership of voting rights: A study of public corporations with dual classes of common stock. Journal of Financial Economics, 14 (1): 33-69.
Demsetz, H., & Villalonga, B. (2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3), 209-233.
Fama, E. F., & Miller, M. H. (1972). The theory of finance. Illinois: Dryden Press.Eklund, J., Palmberg, J., and Wiberg, D. （2011）.Family ownership and returns oninvestment: Founders, heirs, and external managers. Working paper no. 148, Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping, Sweden.
Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, R. G., and Petersen, B. C. （1988）. Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers on Economics Activity, 1: 141-195.
Fischer, E. O., Heinkel, R., & Zechner, J. (1989). Dynamic capital structure choice: Theory and tests. The Journal of Finance, 44(1), 19-40.
Gaver, J. J., & Gaver, K. M. (1993). Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16(1-3), 125-160.
Gliman, J. J. (1978). Stock price and optimum research spending.Research Management, 21(1), 34-36.
Harford, J. 1999. Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 54 (6): 1969-1997.
Hirschey, M., & Weygandt, J. J. (1985). Amortization policy for advertising and research and development expenditures. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(1), 326-335.
Houston, J., & James, C. (1996). Bank information monopolies and the mix of private and public debt claims. Journal of Finance, 51(5),1863-1889.
Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(1), 107-138.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance,and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Finance Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jensen,G.R.,Solberg,D.P.,&Zorn,T.S.(1992).Simultaneousdetermination of insider ownership, debt, anddividend policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(2), 247-263.
James, H. 1999. Owner as a manager, extended horizons and the family firm.International Journal of Economics of Business, 6(1):41-56.
Kang, D. 1999. Ownership structure and corporate dividend policy: How large block family owners increase dividend payout and achieve superior firm performance. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
Kim, E. H. (1978). A mean-variance theory of optimal capital structure and corporate debt capacity. Journal of Finance, 33(1),45-64.
Kim, W. S., & Sorensen, E. H. (1986). Evidence on the impact of theagency cost of debt on corporate debt policy. Journal of Quantitative Analysis, 21(2), 131-144.
Le Breton-Miller, I., and Miller, D. 2006. Why do some family businesses out-compete?Governance, long-term orientation, andsustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30 (6): 731-746.
Lindenberg, E. B., & Ross, S. A. (1981). Tobin's q ratio and industrial qrganization. The Journal of Business, 54(1), 1-32.
Masulis, R., Pham, P. K., and Zein, J. 2011. Family business groups around the world: Financing advantages, control motivations, and organizational choices.Review of Financial Studies, 24 (11): 3556-3600.
Michaely, R., and Roberts, M. R. 2012. Corporate dividend policies: Lessons from private firms. Review of Financial Studies, 25 (3): 711-746.
Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3),261-297.
Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend polocy, growth and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business, 34(4), 411-433.
Miller, M. H., & Rock, K. (1985). Dividend policy under asymmetric information. Journal of Finance, 40(4), 1031-1051.
Myers, S. C., & Majluf, M. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221.
Parasuraman, A., & Zeren, L. M. (1983). R&D's relationship with profitand sales. Research Management, 26(1), 25-28.
Peterson P. P., & Benesh, G. A. (1983). A reexamination of the empirical relationship between investment and financing decisions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 18(4), 439-453.
S.A.Zahra. 2003. International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family businesses: the effect of ownership and involvement,Journal of Business Venturing, 18(July)：495-512.
Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., and Dino, R. N. 2003. Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46 (2): 179-194.
Scherr, F. C., & Hulburt, H. M. (2001). The debt maturity structure of small firms. Financial Managtement, 30(1), 85-111.
Smith, C. W., & Watts, R. L. (1992). The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(3), 263-292.
Sougiannis, T. (1994). The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D. The Accounting Review, 69(1), 44-68.
Strebulaev, I. A. (2007). Do tests of capital structure theory mean what they say? The Journal of Finance, 62(4),1747-1787.
Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structurechoice. Journal of Finance, 43(1),1-19.
Venketraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814.
Warner, J., & Smith, C. W. (1979). On the financial contracting: An analysis of bond covenants. Journal of Financial Economics 7(2), 117-161.
Zantout, Z. (1994). External capital market control, corporate restructuring, and firm performance during the 1980s. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 21(1), 37-64.