跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(3.235.174.99) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/24 20:16
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:Nazarenko Darya
研究生(外文):Nazarenko Darya
論文名稱:供應商評選之決策準則 -分析與系統化回顧
論文名稱(外文):Decision-making criteria for supplier evaluation and selection: an analysis and systematic review
指導教授:林傑毓林傑毓引用關係
口試委員:曾志弘吳淑幸林傑毓
口試日期:2017-06-27
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:長榮大學
系所名稱:經營管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:英文
論文頁數:63
中文關鍵詞:供應商評選
外文關鍵詞:Decision-making
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:62
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
外籍生無中文摘要
ABSTRACT
Supplier selection plays a significant role in business operations. Various factors have influences on the evaluation and decision-making of supplier evaluation and selection. Supplier selection is a highly complicated process. It is one of the most popular discussion points in academic and business societies. A great number of research articles about supplier selection exist in the literature. These studies have examined the influences of different factors on supplier selection decision-making.
This thesis aims to examine the literature in a specified period of time to identify the changes and tendency of the main criteria which mostly influence the supplier selection and evaluation decision-making. To reach the research purpose, this study has reviewed more than 30 articles published in the period between 2000 and 2015 which are drawn from a big research database. Based on the examination of these articles were completed the critical analysis and systematic review.
Research findings reveal that the traditional criteria like cost, quality, delivery, and others are still the most common factors used in the supplier selection process. Two new criteria regarding the corporate social responsibility and environmental issues are added to the already existed factors. The present study also summarized the top ten criteria that were most cited in the literature and discussed the meanings and importance of these ten criteria. According to the research findings, practical and academic suggestions are also addressed in the thesis.
Key Words:bibliometric analysis, criteria for supplier selection, ystematic review, supplier selection.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT....................................................... i
ABSTRACT............................................................. ii
CONTENT............................................................. iii
CONTENT OF TABLES.................................................... iv
CONTENT OF FIGURES.................................................... v
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.2 Research Purposes 4
1.3 Structure of the Thesis 5
CHAPTER TWO THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 7
2.1 The Importance of Supplier Selection 7
2.2 Supplier Selection 9
2.3 Supplier Selection Criteria 12
CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 16
3.1 Bibliometric and Systematic Analysis 16
3.2 Methodological Procedures 18
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 24
4.1 General Observations 24
4.2 Most Cited Criteria 39
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS 45
5.1 Summary 45
5.2 Suggestions 47
5.3 Limitations 48
REFERENCES 49

1.Aghai, S., Mollaverdi N., & Sabbagh, M.S. (2014). A fuzzy multi objective programming model for supplier selection with volume discount and risk criteria. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 71, 1483-1492.
2.Alinezad, A., Seif, A., & Esfandiari, N. (2013). Supplier evaluation and selection with QFD and FAHP in a pharmaceutical company, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68, 355-364.
3.Arabzad, S.M., Ghorbani, M., Razmi, J., & Shirouyehzad, H. (2015). Employing fuzzy TOPSIS and SWOT for supplier selection and order allocation problem, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 76, 803-818.
4.Campbell, D. Picard-Aitken, M., G. Caruso, Valentim, J., Edmonds, S R., Williams, G.T., Macaluso, B., Robitaille, J. Bastien, N., Laframboise. M., Lebeau, L., Mirabel., P., Lariviere, V., & Archambault, E. (2010). Bibliometrics as a performance measurement tool for evaluation: the case of research funded by the national cancer institute of Canada. American Journal of Evaluation, 31 (1), 66-83.
5.Cao, Q.W., Wu, J., & Liang, C.Y. (2015). An intuitionsitic fuzzy judgement matrix and TOPSIS integrated multi-criteria decision making method for green supplier selection. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 28, 117-126.
6.Carter, R. (1995). The Seven C's of Supplier Evaluation. The Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 44-46.
7.Celebi, N., & Selvi, I.H. (2014). An integrated fuzzy-grey based approach to group decision making problem for a wagon company. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 26, 353-365.
8.Chaharsooghi, S. K., & Ashrafi, M. (2014). Sustainable Supplier Performance Evaluation and Selection with Neofuzzy TOPSIS Method. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2014.
9.Chai, J., & Liu, J.N.K. (2012). A new rule-based SIR approach to supplier selection under intuitionistic fuzzy environments. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 20(3), 451-471.
10.Cheraghi, S.H., Dadashzadeh, M., & Subramaniam, M. (2004). Criticalcsuccess factors for supplier selection: an update. Journal of Applied Business Reseach, 20(2), 91–108.
11.Creswel, J.W. (2003). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.
12.Dempsey, W. (1978). Wendor selection and the Buying process. Industrial Marketing Management, 7, 257–267.
13.Dickson, W.G. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing, 2(1), 5–17.
14.Dowlatshahi, S., Karimi-Nasab, M., & Bahrololum, H. (2015). A group decision-making approach for supplier selection in configuration design: A case study, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 81, 1139–1154.
15.Ellram L.M. (1990). The supplier selection decision in strategic partnerships. Journal of Purchasing & Materials Management, 26(4), 8–14.
16.Evans, R. H. (1980). Choice criteria revisited. Journal of Marketing, 44, 55–56.
17.Fazlollahtabar, H., Mahdavi, I., Ashoori, M.T., Kaviani, S., & Mahdavi-Amiri, N. (2011). A multi-objective decision-making process of supplier selection and order allocation for multi-period scheduling in an electronic market, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 52, 1039–1052.
18.Gencer, C., & Gürpinar, D. (2007). Analytic network process in supplier selection: a case study in an electronic firm. Applied Mathematics Model, 31(11), 2475–2486.
19.Ghorabaee, M.K., Amiri, M., Sadaghiani, J.S., & Goodarzi, G.H. (2014). Multiple criteria group decision-making for supplier selection based on COPRAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 75, 1115–1130.
20.Gonzalez, M. E., Quesada, G., & Monge, C. A. M. (2004). Determining the importance of the supplier selection process in manufacturing: a case study. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(6), 492-504.
21.Han, Z.Q., Luo, X.X., Chen, X.H., & Yang, W.E. (2015). Selecting supplier combination based on fuzzy multicriteria analysis, International Journal of General Systems, 44 (5), 572–590.
22.Hashemian, S.M, Behzadian, M., Samizadeh, R., & Ignatius, J. (2014). A fuzzy hybrid group decision support system approach for the supplier evaluation process. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 73, 1105–1117.
23.Kalimuthu Rajoo, S.S.., Kasim, M.M., & Ahmad, N. (2013). Evaluating Supplier Quality Performance Using Analytical Hierarchy Process. International conference on Mathematical science and Statistics, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1557 , 490-494.
24.Karimi, H., & Rezaeinia, A. (2014). Supplier selection using revised multi-segment goal programming model, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 70, 1227–1234.
25.Liao, M.Y., Wu, C.W., & Wu, J.W. (2013). Fuzzy inference to supplier evaluation and selection based on quality index: a flexible approach, Neural Computing & Applications, 23 (Suppl 1), 117–127.
26.Lu, D.W., Ertek, G., & Betts, A. (2014). Modelling the supply chain perception gaps. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 71, 731–751.
27.Mavi, R.K., Kazemi, S., Najafabadi, A.F., & Mousaabadi, H.B. (2013). Identification and Assessment of Logistical Factors to Evaluate a Green Supplier Using the Fuzzy Logic DEMATEL Method. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 22 (2), 445-455.
28.Michael, T., & Leng, T.C. (2001). Empirical analysis of supplier selection and involvement, customer satisfaction, and firm performance. Supply Chain Management International Journal, 6(4), 174–188.
29.Morton, B. (2002). Purchasing and “green” issues. In: Day, M. (Ed.), Gower Handbook of Purchasing Management, 3 ed. Gower Publishing Limited, Aldershot, 207–222.
30.Ozkok, B.A., & Kocken, H.G. (2013). Fuzzy approaches to supplier selection problem. International conference on Mathematical science and Statistics, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1557, 355-360.
31.Pal, Q., Gupta, A.K., & Garg, R.K. (2013). Supplier selection criteria and methods in supply chains: a review. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 7(10).
32.Paul, S.K. (2015). Supplier selection for managing supply risks in supply chain: a fuzzy approach, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 79, 657–664.
33.Pi, W.N., & Low, C.Y. (2005). Supplier evaluation and selection using Taguchi loss functions, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26, 155–160.
34.Pitchipoo, P., Venkumar, P., & Rajakarunakaran, S. (2015). Grey decision model for supplier evaluation and selection in process industry: a comparative perspective, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 76, 2059–2069.
35.Roodhooft, F., & Konings, J. (1996). Vendor selection and evaluation—an activity based costing approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 96, 97–102.
36.Sadigh, A.N., Fallah, H., & Nahavandi, N. (2013). A multi-objective supply chain model integrated with location of distribution centers and supplier selection decisions. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 69, 225–235.
37.Saen, R.F. (2010). Developing a new data envelopment analysis methodology for supplier selection in the presence of both undesirable outputs and imprecise data. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 51, 1243–1250.
38.Seifbarghy, M., & Esfandiari, N. (2013). Modeling and solving a multiobjective supplier quota allocation problem considering transaction costs. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24 (1), 201-209.
39.Sepehriar, A., Eslamipoor, R., & Nobari, A. (2013). A new mixed fuzzy-LP method for selecting the best supplier using fuzzy group decision making. Neural Computing & Application, 23 (Suppl 1), 345–352.
40.Shipley, D.D. (1985). Resellers' supplier selection criteria for different consumer products. European Journal of Marketing, 19(7), 26–36.
41.Songhori, M.J., Tavana, M., Azadeh, A., &, Khakbaz, M.H. (2011). A supplier selection and order allocation model with multiple transportation alternatives. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 52, 365–376.
42.Sonmez, M. (2006). A review and critique of supplier selection process and practices. Loughborough University Business School occasional papers series, 2006 (1).
43.Sultanaa, I., Ahmed, I., & Azeem, A. (2015). An integrated approach for multiple criteria supplier selection combining Fuzzy Delphi,Fuzzy AHP & Fuzzy TOPSIS, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 29, 1273–1287.
44.Tadi´c, D., Stefanovi´c, M., & Aleksi´c, A. (2014). The evaluation and ranking of medical device suppliers by using fuzzy topsis methodology. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 27, 2091–2101.
45.Tahriri, F., Osman, M.R., Ali, A., & Yusuff, R.M. (2008). A review of supplier selection methods in manufacturing industries. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 15(3), 201-208.
46.Tasca, J.E., Ensslin, L., Enslin, S.R., & Alves, M.B.M. (2010). An approach for selecting a theoretical framework for the evaluation of training programs. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34 (7), 631-655.
47.Vahdani, B., Jabbari, A.H.K., Roshanaei, V., & Zandieh, M. (2010). Extension of the ELECTRE method for decision-making problems with interval weights and data. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 50, 793–800.
48.Villanueva-Ponce, R., Garcia-Alcaraz, J.L., Cortes-Robles, G., Romero-Gonzalez, J., Jiménez-Macías, E., & Blanco-Fernández, J. (2015). Impact of suppliers’ green attributes in corporate image and financial profit: case maquiladora industry, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1277–1296.
49.Wang, G., Huang, S. H., & Dismukes, J.P. (2005). Manufacturing supply chain design and evaluation. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25, 93–100.
50.Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., & Benton, W.C. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods, European Journal of Operational Research, 50, 2–18.
51.Wilson, E.J. (1994). The relative importance of supplier selection criteria: a review and update. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 30 (3), 34 – 41.
52.Xu, L., Kumar, D.T., Shankar, K.M., Kannan, D., & Chen, G. (2013). Analyzing criteria and sub-criteria for the corporate social responsibility-based supplier selection process using AHP. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68, 907–916.
53.Završnik, B. (1998). The importance of selection and evaluation of the supplier in purchasing management. Management (Split), 3 (2), 59-74.
電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20221231)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關論文
 
無相關期刊
 
無相關點閱論文