臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

台灣電子產業發展至今已將近四十年歷史，無可諱言的，從小型外銷到國際品牌代工製造，台灣電子產業在全球扮演重要角色。
從委託製造加工(OEM)到委託設計製造(ODM)，台灣電子代工廠能受國際大廠青睞的主因，在於掌握了零組件研發設計能力、穩定的代工品質、以及高效率、高彈性的配合與創新生產能力。
實務上，電子代工廠、品牌客戶與零組件供應商之間的關係環環相扣，從三方協同合作過程，學習到的知識及經驗，更是台灣電子代工廠有力的競爭力來源。然而專案配合過程中，常發生為維持雙方良好合作關係，即使客戶提出不合理要求，也只能委曲求全的配合，積重難返之下，最終影響到優良溝通模式的建立，降低了彼此的信任度，使雙方技術知識等無法順暢交流，理所當然的，也影響了新產品完成的效率和精確度。
因此，本研究希望能發掘出電子代工協同合作組織間學習運用的良好模式，探討電子代工廠、品牌客戶與零組件供應商三方間溝通狀況，希望能達成知識交集共融，得到優良的研發成果。

The development of electronics industry in Taiwan has been about 40 years. From small sized export sales to international brands foundry, it is no doubt that electronics industry in Taiwan plays an important role in the world. No matter original equipment manufacturer (OEM) or original design manufacturer (ODM), the main reasons that Taiwan's electronic contract manufacturers could be favored by worldly known corporations are grasping the ability of research and design of components, having steady foundry quality, coordinating with high efficiency and high flexibility, and having innovative producing ability.
In practice, the relationships among electronic contract manufacturers, brand customers and component suppliers are closely linked. The knowledge and experiences learned from tripartite collaboration process are origins of strong competitiveness of Taiwan's electronic contract manufacturers. However, in order to maintain the good cooperating relationship between each other, it happens frequently during the process of project cooperating that factories could only compromise even if costumers offer some unreasonable request. Confirmed habits are hard to get rid of, finally, the good communication pattern will be influenced and hard to establish. The trust between each other is reduced, which causes technologies and knowledge of two sides could not interact smoothly, and of course, the efficiency and accuracy of producing new products are affected as well.
As a result, the aim of this research is hoping to dig out the good model for inter-organizational learning generated in OEM collaboration of electronic manufacturing. And the communication situations among electronic contract manufacturers, brand customers and component suppliers will be discussed, wish knowledge could be shared each other, and finally excellent product created.

目錄
頁次
第 壹 章 緒論 1
第 一 節 研究背景 1
第 二 節 研究動機 3
第 三 節 研究目的 4
第 四 節 研究範圍與流程 5

第 貳 章 文獻探討 6
第 一 節 OEM / ODM / EMS 廠特性 6
第 二 節 新產品開發 8
第 三 節 協同合作 13
第 四 節 知識的定義 16
第 五 節 知識吸收能力 17
第 六 節 代工廠與品牌客戶之間的關係 18

第 參 章 研究方法 22
第 一 節 研究方法選取 22
第 二 節 資料來源 25
第 三 節 個案選擇與背景 26
第 四 節 問題設計與訪談程序 29

第 肆 章 個案訪談 30
第 一 節 研究個案內容彙整 30
第 二 節 訪談比較發現 39

第 伍 章 結論與建議 43
第 一 節 研究結論 43
第 二 節 研究限制與建議 47
參考文獻 48
附錄A 56
附錄B 65
附錄C 70

表 目 錄
頁次
表 1-1-1 2014~2016年全球筆記型電腦出貨排名表 2
表 2-2-1 Song 與 Weiss 新產品開發重要性順序 9
表 3-1-1 使用個案研究法建構理論之程序 24
表 3-3-1 訪談個案A公司彙整資料 26
表 3-3-2 訪談個案B公司彙整資料 27
表 3-3-3 訪談個案C公司彙整資料 28
表 4-1-1 新產品開發三階段整理表 42


圖 目 錄
頁次
圖 1-3-1 電子代工組織間關係圖 4
圖 1-4-1 研究流程圖 5
圖 2-2-1 新產品開發流程 11
圖 2-2-2 Hisrich and Peters 新產品開發五階段 11
圖 2-2-3 新產品開發前端活動模式 12
圖 2-6-1 價值網與競爭關係 20

參考文獻
中文部份
1.王孔政、褚志鵬(2007)。供應鏈管理。台北：華泰文化事業。
2.王慧美(2001)。國際代工夥伴關係下之資產專屬性與能力建構：供應商觀點分析。國立台灣大學國際企業研究所未出版博士論文，台北市。
3.巫宗融譯(2000)。新產品完全開發手冊：如何在新產品戰爭中勝出。台北：遠流。(原著：Cooper, R. G. (1998). Product leadership : creating and launching superior new products. NY: Perseus Books.)
4.邱新球 (1999)。企業相依性, 影響策略, 衝突與績效關係之研究，銘傳大學國際企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文，台北市。
5.洪德芳(1993)。高科技產業技術策略與行銷策略配合對新產品發展績效關係影響之研究，中原大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文，桃園市。
6.胡幼慧 (1996) 。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性主義研究實例，台北市：巨流。
7.張書文、戴華亭譯(2005)。產品設計與開發。台北：麥格羅希爾。(原著：Ulrich, K. T. & Eppinger, S. D.(2003)。Product Design and Development,2e. NY: Tata McGraw-Hill Education)
8.張嘉平(2012)。產品開發之卓越化設計-以筆記型電腦公司為例。萬能科技大學經營管理研究所未出版碩士論文，桃園。
9.許恩得(2004)。競合策略。台北:台灣培生教育出版。(原著：Brandenburger, A.M. & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996)。Co-opetition, New York: Doubleday.)
10.陳梧桐(2012)。需求導向模糊前端新產品開發流程的建構與操作，國立交通大學科技管理研究所未出版博士論文，新竹市。
11.陳振祥(1997) 。ODM 策略之理論架構與實證，國立台灣大學商學系未出版博士論文，台北市。
12.陳曉萍(2002) 。企業電子化下協同發展之研究，國立政治大學商學院經營管理未出版碩士論文，台北市。
13.黃意丹(2003)。台灣OEM供應商能力組合類型對業務型態影響之研究－兼論資源依賴OEM客戶程度之干擾效應, 大葉大學國際企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文，彰化縣。
14.黃銘章(2002)。影響代工供應商與顧客間夥伴關係因素之研究-以台灣電子資訊產業為例. 國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文，台北市。
15.劉佩芳(2006)。協同設計之驅動因素及對新產品開發績效之研究，亞洲大學經營管理研究所未出版碩士論文，台中市。



英文部分
1.Beckman, T. (1997). A Methodology for Knowledge Management. IASTED:AI and Soft Computing.
2.Booz, & Allen & Hamilton. (1982). New products management for the 1980s. New York：Booz, Allen Hamilton Inc.
3.Brandenburger, A. M. & Nalebuff, B. J.(1996). Co-Opetition, New York: Doubleday Press.
4.Chen, S. H., Wen, P., Liu, M. C., & Lin, X. W. (2006). Innovation capability building and technology branding: From OEM/ODM to OBM. Paper prepared for the 2006 International Conference on Industrial Technology Innovation Repositioning for Industrial Growth and Economic Prosperity through Innovation. Taipei: Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
5.Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and learning, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
6.Collis, D. J. & Montgomery, C. A. (1998) Corporate Strategy：A Resource-Based Approach. McGraw-Hill, Irwin.
7.Davenport, T. H., Laurence, P. (1998) Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
8.Dwyer, F. R., & Tanner, J. F. (1999). Business marketing: Connecting strategy, relationships, and learning. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
9.Dyer, J. H. (2000). Collaborative advantage: Winning through extended enterprise supplier networks. NY: Oxford University Press.
10.Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.
11.Frazier, G. & Summers, J. (1986). Perceptions Of InterfirmPower And Its Use Within A Franchise Channel Of Distribution, JournalOf Marketing, 23 (May), 169-176.
12.French, J. R., Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. Classics of organization theory, 311-320.
13.Gherardi, S. & Nicolini, D. (2000) The organizational learning of safety in communities of practice. Journal of Management Inquiry 9(1), 7-18.
14.Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: a review and analysis of the literature. Journal of product innovation management, 13(3), 191-215.
15.Hambrick, D. C. & Finkelstein, S (1987), Managerial Discretion: A Bridge between Polar Views of Organizations Outcomes, Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 369-406.
16.Herstatt, C., Verworn, B. & Nagahira, A. (2004). Reducing project related uncertainty in the fuzzy front end of innovation: a comparison of German and Japanese product innovation projects. International Journal of Product Development, 1(1), 43-65.
17.Hisrich, R. D., & Peters, M. P. (1991). Marketing Decisions for New and Mature Products. NY:Maxwell Macmillan.
18.Hisrich, R. D., & Peters, M. P. (1991). Marketing decisions for new and mature products. New York: Maxwell Macmillan.
19.Hsu, C. W., Chen, H., & Jen, L. (2008). Resource linkages and capability development. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(6), 677-685.
20.Jeffries, F. L., & Reed, R. (2000). Trust and Adaptation in Relational Contracting. Academy of Management Review, 25, 873-882.
21.Jeffries, Frank L. & Richard Reed (2000), Trust and Adaptation in Relational Contracting, Academy of Management Review, 25, 873-882.
22.Kahn, K. B. (1996). Interdepartmental integration: A definition with implications for product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 137-151.
23.Kumar, N., Scheer, L. & Steenkamp, J.B. (1998). Interdependence, Punitive Capability And The Reciprocation Of Punitive Actions In Channel Relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 225-35.
24.Leenders, R. T. A., Van Engelen, J. M., & Kratzer, J. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1), 69-92.
25.Myhr, N., & Spekman, R. E. (2005). Collaborative supply-chain partnerships built upon trust and electronically mediated exchange. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 20 (4), 179-186.
26.Nevis, E.C., DiBella, A.J. & Gould, J.M. (1995). Understanding organizations as learning systems, Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 73-86.
27.Oliver, N., Dostaler, I. & Dewberry, E. (2004). New product development benchmarks: The Japanese, North American, and UK consumer electronics industries, The Journal of High Technology Management, 23(1), 371-388.
28.Peter, D. Hall. (1987). A Historical Overview of the Private Nonprofit Sector.in W. W.Powell .New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
29.Pfeffer, J., & Salancik G.R. (1978), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.
30.Smith, P. G. & Reinertsen, D. G.(1991), Development Products in Half the time, New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold.
31.Song & Weiss(1998),Critical Development Activities for Really New versus Incremental Products., Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 124-135.
32.Spek, R. V. ＆ Spijkervet, A. (1997). Knowledge Management: Dealing Intelligently with Knowledge. Knowledge Management and Its Integrative Elements. Boca Raton: CRC press.
33.Ulrich, K.(1995).The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy,24(3),419-440.
34.Wiig, K.M. (1993) Knowledge Management Foundations: Thinking about Thinking, How People and Organizations Create, Represent and Use Knowledge. Arlington:TX Schema Press.


網路資料
1.周育樂 (2010)。財團法人中衛發展中心， http://www.csd.org.tw/report/preview/70.html (2016/12/16)
2.葉神丑 (2010)。財團法人中衛發展中心， http://www.csd.org.tw/report/preview/70.html (2016/12/16)
3.廣達電腦官網(2007)，廣達電腦股份有限公司，http://www.quantatw.com/Quanta/chinese/about/company.aspx (2017/5/28)。
4.緯創資通官網(2004)，緯創資通股份有限公司，http://www.wistron.com.tw/about/company_profile.htm (2017/5/21) 。